BarrettH.C. 2005a. Adaptations to predators and prey. In The handbook of evolutionary psychology, ed. BussD.M.. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
2.
BarrettH.C. 2005b. Enzymatic computation and cognitive modularity.Mind & Language20(3): 259–87.
3.
BarrettJ.L. 1998. Cognitive constraints on Hindu concepts of the divine. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion37: 608–19.
4.
BarrettJ.L. 2000. Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences4(1): 29–34.
5.
BarrettJ.L., and KeilF.C.. 1996. Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology31(3): 219–47.
6.
BoyerP. In press. InCreating consilience: Issues and case studies in the integration of the sciences and the humanities, ed. SlingerlandE.G. and CollardM..
7.
BoyerP., and BarrettH.C.. 2005. Domain specificity and intuitive ontology. InThe handbook of evolutionary psychology, ed. BussD.M., 96–118. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley& Sons Inc.
8.
CaramazzaA., and SheltonJ.R.. 1998. Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience10(1): 1–34.
9.
DalyM., and WilsonM.. 1988. Homicide. New York: Aldine.
10.
DalyM., and WilsonM.. 2001. Risk-taking, intrasexual competition, and homicide. InEvolutionary psychology and motivation, ed. FrenchJ.A. and KamilA.C., 1–36. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
11.
DescolaP. 2009. Human natures. Social Anthropology17: 145–57.
12.
EngelC., and SingerW.. 2008. Better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
GazzanigaM.S. 1998. The mind's past. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14.
GelmanS.A., ColeyJ.D., and GottfriedG.M.. 1994. Essentialist beliefs in children: The acquisition of concepts and theories. InMapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture, ed. HirschfeldL.A. and GelmanS.A., 341–65. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
GreeneJ. 2005. Cognitive neuroscience and the structure of the moral mind. InThe innate mind: Structure and contents, ed. CarruthersPeter, 338–52. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
GreeneJ., and HaidtJ.. 2002. How (and where) does moral judgment work?Trends in Cognitive Sciences6(12): 517–23.
17.
HaidtJ. 2007. The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science316(5827): 998–1002.
18.
HaidtJ., KesebirS., PlessnerH., BetschC., and BetschT.. 2008. In the forest of value: Why moral intuitions are different from other kinds.InIntuition in judgment and decision making, 209–29. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
19.
HirschfeldL.A., and GelmanS.A., eds. 1994. Mapping the mind: Domain-specificity in culture and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
KurzbanR., ToobyJ., and CosmidesL.. 2001. Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America98(26): 15387–92.
23.
LienardP., and BoyerP.. 2006. Whence collective rituals? A cultural selection model of ritualized behavior. American Anthropologist108(4): 814–27.
24.
LloydG.E.R. 2007. Cognitive variations: Reflections on the unity and diversity of the human mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
25.
MillerJ.G., and BersoffD.M.. 1994. Cultural influences on the moral status of reciprocity and the discounting of endogenous motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin20(5): 592–602.
26.
NavarreteC.D., KurzbanR., FesslerD.M.T., and KirkpatrickL.A.. 2004. Anxiety and intergroup bias: Terror management or coalitional psychology?Group Processes & Intergroup Relations7(4): 370–97.
27.
NewJ., CosmidesL., and ToobyJ.. 2007. Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America104(42): 16598–603.
28.
NisbettR.E., and CohenD.. 1996. Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
29.
PayneB.K. 2001. Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81(2): 181–92.
30.
QuinlanR.J. 2003. Father absence, parental care, and female reproductive development.Evolution & Human Behavior24(6): 376–90.
31.
RichersonP.J., and BoydR.. 2006. Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
SellA., ToobyJ., and CosmidesL.. 2009. Formidability and the logic of human anger. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America106(35): 15073–8.
33.
SlingerlandE.G. 2008. What science offers the humanities: Integrating body and culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
SloneD.J. 2004. Theological incorrectness: why religious people believe what they shouldn't. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
SnowC.P. 1959. The two cultures and the scientific revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
SpelkeE.S., PhillipsA., and WoodwardA.L.. 1995. Infants’ knowledge of object motion and human action. In Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate, ed. SperberD., PremackD. and James-PremackA.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
37.
TomaselloM. 2000. The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
ToobyJ., and DeVoreI.. 1987. The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. InPrimate models of hominid behavior, ed. KinzeyW., 183–237. New York: SUNY Press.
39.
TurielE. 1998. The development of morality. InHandbook of child psychology, 5th ed., vol. 3, ed. DamonW., 863–932. New York: Wiley.
40.
Viveiros de CastroE.1998. Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism.Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute4: 469–88.
41.
YauJ., and SmetanaJ.G.. 2003. Conceptions of moral, social-conventional, and personal events among Chinese preschoolers in Hong Kong. Child Development74(3): 647–58.
42.
ZunshineL. 2006. Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.