There is an unnoticed step that occurs before a person becomes a patient, that is, every prospective patient must first express his or her need for care to a health professional who responds by describing how the patient might access that care. When the health professional accepts the patient as someone to talk with at the outset, this is termed “acceptance.” Acceptance has been defined as the hidden ethic and core value underlying the applied ethical tool of universal patient acceptance (UPA). Acceptance impacts access to care. Published reactions to acceptance and UPA have so far ranged from thoughtful and constructive, to emotionalized and reactive. As the practical applications of acceptance and UPA are discussed in national forums on access to care, some general trends have emerged. This paper is a status update on UPA and speaks to those proposals and recommendations. The ethical basis of UPA is expanded upon, and the attempt is made to more effectively operationalize the concept and further justify its relevance to the allied-health professions. A clearly articulated notion of acceptance is needed to protect professional conscience from secular interests of patients. It is only after broader multi-disciplinary review and debate, however, that UPA can become less hidden or presupposed, and actually find expression in the ethics codes and training curricula of all the health professions. Once expressed within these professional forums, it will likely gain more relevance in the critical evaluations of acceptance as it is more broadly used in the conversations of economics, politics, and secular (non-professional) society.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PatthoffD.E., and CorsinoB.V.“Universal Patient Acceptance: Ethics Pipe Dream or Key to Improved Access in Dentistry?”Journal of the American College of Dentists68.4 (2001): 39–43; and B.V. Corsino and D.E. Patthoff, “Practical and Ethical Aspects of Acceptance and Universal Patient Acceptance,” Journal of Dental Education 70 (2006): 1198-1201.
2.
LargentB.A.“Reaction to Universal Patient Acceptance: The Perspective of a Private Practice Dentist,”Journal of Dental Education70 (2006): 1202–1207.; and B. Peltier, “Codes and Colleagues: Is There Support for Universal Patient Acceptance?” Journal of Dental Education 70 (2006): 1221-1225.
3.
JonesK.“Mea-Culpa-Not,”.ODA Today (Ohio Dental Association Newsletter) (August 2005): 12.
4.
American Dental Education Association, “Professional Promises: Hopes and Gaps in Access to Oral Health Care: Conference Proceedings”Journal of Dental Education70 (2006): 1117–1247.
5.
Marketing/popular need is distinct from professional need. What is considered a professional need amongst many desires is determined by the conscience of the professional, what is considered a marketing/popular need is determined by the patient. Deciding if a need is adequately met is also distinct—professionals determine professional need, and patients only determine marketing/popular need. “Need” is a fundamental notion in health care, law, economics, philosophy, and theology. It has many definitions and interpretations; most involve some reference to the notion of “desire.” The specific notion of how “need” is used in this article was articulated by David Ozar in “Ethics, Access, and Care,” Journal of Dental Education 70 (2006): 1139-1145, http://www.jdentaled.org/cgi/content/full/70/11/1139. David Ozar and Don Patthoff expanded on this notion in “Esthetics and Ethical Care,” AGD Impact 35.7 (July 2007): 40, http://www.agd.org/publications/articles/?ArtID=1905; and idem, “Need vs. Desire,” AGD Impact 35.8 (August 2007): 32, http://www.agd.org/publications/articles/?ArtID=19813. The topic of needs and desires deserves the volumes that others have written about it. Two particular points, however, are worth noting here: 1) Two very different ways of understanding access and care are at work in contemporary American society. The first is that of our society's health professions as they consider their ethical commitment to respond to patients’ health needs. The second is that of America's public culture where needs—including health-care needs—are no different in kind or ethical significance from unmet desires of any sort. Within American culture, a need is almost nothing more than simply a strong desire. The importance of this point is critical to understanding how basic health needs—that can only be determined by a profession and that are essential for society's survival—are differentiated from enhancements or elective health desires (marketing/popular needs), such as cosmetics, birth control, abortion, and surgical or pharmacological enhancements. Such marketing/popular needs can be accepted as health needs by the profession, especially when influenced by the growing impact of commercialism that segments, targets, promotes, and promises fulfillment of elective health-care desires. 2) For purposes of clarifying the notion of acceptance, then, it is helpful to start with the most fundamental concept of need by building first on the patient's sense of need. This marketing/popular sense of need may or may not play out to be a professionally determined need. A patient becomes a patient when he thinks he is a patient. A patient is no longer a patient when a professionally determined need is satisfied, or when a patient's sense of a particular “health” need is determined to be only a personal desire.
6.
Largent, “Reaction to Universal Patient Acceptance”; and Peltier, “Codes and Colleagues.”
7.
FieserJ. ed., Metaethics, Normative Ethics, and Applied Ethics: Historical and Contemporary Readings (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 2000).
8.
SpencerE.M.Organization Ethics in Health Care (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 13–14.
9.
MacIntyreA.After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 3rd ed. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007); idem, Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1990), 133-137.
10.
ZaltaE.N. ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Palo Alto, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, 2007).
11.
LévinasE.Totalité et infini (Kluwer: Den Haag, 1961).
12.
RendtorffJ.D.“Basic Principles in Bioethics and Biolaw” (paper presented at the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, Boston, MA, August 10-15, 1998), http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Bioe/BioeRend.htm.
13.
VetlesenJ.A.“Worlds Apart? Habermas and Lévinas,”Philosophy and Social Criticism23.1 (January 1997): 1.
14.
WeilS.Gravity and Grace (London: Routledge, 1952).
15.
CigmanR.“Moral Education and the Concept of a Person,” in Proceedings, Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain (London: University of London Institute of Education, 2005).
16.
RogersC.R.On Becoming a Person: A Therapist's View of Psychotherapy (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1989).
17.
DanielsN.“Justice, Health, and Healthcare,”American Journal of Bioethics1.2 (Spring 2001): 2–16.
18.
CahillL.S.Theological Bioethics: Participation, Justice, and Change (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2005).
19.
MacIntyreA.Edith Stein: A Philosophical Prologue, 1913-1922 (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005).
20.
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Securing Access to Health Care. The Ethical Implications of Differences in the Availability of Health Services (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983).
21.
GundersonL.“Number of Uninsured Continues to Rise,”Annals of Internal Medicine129 (1998): 513–515; and C.A. Evans and D.V. Kleinman, “The Surgeon General's Report on America's Oral Health: Opportunities for the Dental Profession,” Journal of the American Dental Association 131 (2000): 1721-1728.
22.
Campo-FloresA.“Code Blue for the ER: How to Stop the Bleeding,”Newsweek Health, MSNBC.com, May 8, 2007, http://www.newsweek.com/id/34803.
23.
OkieS.“More HMOs Quit Medicare Plan: About 536,000 Elderly Will Lose Coverage Next Year,”The Washington Post, September 22, 2001, A25.
24.
MofidiM., RozierR.E., and KingR.S.“Problems with Access to Dental Care for Children: What Caregivers Think,”American Journal of Public Health92 (2002): 53–58.
25.
YaldenC.A.Medical Billing: The Bottom Line: An Entrepreneur's Guide, rev. ed. (Kearney, NE: Morris Publishing, 1999).
MithersC.L.“The ER Crisis,”Ladies Home Journal (July 2001): 70–79.
28.
American Medical Association, Principles of Medical Ethics (Chicago: AMA, 2001), preamble; and American Dental Association, Principles of Ethics and Code of Professional Conduct (Chicago: ADA, 2005), 5-6.
29.
BeauchampT.L., and McCulloughL.B.Medical Ethics: The Moral Responsibilities of Physicians (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984); and D.R. Ozar and D.J. Sokol, Dental Ethics at the Chairside: Professional Principles and Practical Applications, 2nd ed. (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2002), 36-58.
30.
KuhnT.S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).
American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, “Caring for the Poor,”Journal of the American Medical Association269 (1993): 2533–2537.
33.
LewinM.E., and AltmanS., eds., America's Health Care Safety Net: Intact But Endangered (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2000).
LeBowR.H.Health Care Meltdown: Confronting the Myths and Fixing Our Failing System (Chambersburg, PA: A.C. Hood, 2003).
36.
Members of the Medical Professionalism Project/ABIM, “Medical Professionalism in the New Millennium: A Physician Charter,” Annals of Internal Medicine 136 (2002): 243-246; and RhodesR.“Two Concepts of Medical Ethics and Their Implications for Medical Ethics Education,”Journal of Medicine and Philosophy27 (2002): 495–508.
37.
American Medical Association, Principles of Medical Ethics; American Dental Association, Principles of Ethics and Code of Professional Conduct.
38.
BeauchampT.L., and ChildressJ.F.Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).
39.
DunneT.“Group-Level Ethics in Managed Care,”Medical Group Management Journal44 (1997): 28–34; and R. Smith, H. Hiatt, and D. Berwick, “A Shared Statement of Ethical Principles for Those Who Shape and Give Health Care: A Working Draft from the Tavistock Group,” Annals of Internal Medicine 130 (1999): 143-147; A. MacIntyre, Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1990), 133-137.
40.
BertholdM.“Eye on Access: Association Takes Action to Aid Dentists, Patients,”ADA News (May 2, 2001): 22–23.
41.
JettS.“A New Look at Dentistry's First Ethical Question, Journal of the American College of Dentists67.2 (2000): 47–48.
42.
Rhodes“Two Concepts of Medical Ethics.”
43.
MeyerJ.A., and Silow-CarrollS.Increasing Access: Building Working Solutions (Washington, D.C.: Economic and Social Research Institute, 2000).
44.
California Legislative Analyst's Office, “Analysis of the 2007-08 Budget Bill: Potential Fiscal Risks to the State in the Governor's Health Care Coverage Plan,” Sacramento, CA, February 21, 2007, http://www.lao.ca.gov/analysis_2007/2007_pandi/pi_07_anl07.aspx.
