Large-scale projects often involve hundreds or even thousands of businesses. There are opportunities for these firms to produce innovations to solve problems and improve the project’s outcomes, but the time-bounded nature of the project and technical interdependencies also constrains innovation. Using quantitative analysis of data from firms in large oil and gas projects, we show that Teece’s sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring model of dynamic capabilities theorizes innovation in this interfirm project context. We also identify connections between these microfoundations that are not captured in Teece’s linear model, where sensing activities moderate the relationship between seizing activities and innovation.
AchaV.GannD. M.SalterA. J. (2005). Episodic innovation: R&D strategies for project-based environments. Industry and Innovation, 12(2), 255–281.
2.
AhernT.LeavyB.ByrneP. J. (2014). Complex project management as complex problem solving: A distributed knowledge management perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1371–1381.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.06.007
3.
AholaT.DaviesA. (2012). Insights to the governance of large projects: Analysis of organization theory and project management: Administering uncertainty in Norwegian offshore oil by Stinchcombe and Heimer. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 661–679.
4.
AlexyO.Bascavusoglu-MoreauE.SalterA. J. (2016). Toward an aspiration-level theory of open innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(2), 289–306.doi:10.1093/icc/dtw003
5.
AlexyO.GeorgeG.SalterA. J. (2013). Cui bono? The selective revealing of knowledge and its implications for innovative activity. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 270–291.doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0193
ArmstrongJ. S.OvertonT. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.doi:10.1177/002224377701400320
8.
AtkinsonR.CrawfordL.WardS. (2006). Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 687–698.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.011
9.
BaccariniD. (1996). The concept of project complexity—A review. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4), 201–204.doi:10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3
10.
BarlowJ. (2000). Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects. Research Policy, 29(7–8), 973–989.doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00115-3
11.
BarretoI. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280.doi:10.1177/0149206309350776
12.
BaruchY. (1999). Response rate in academic studies—A comparative analysis. Human Relations, 52(4), 421–438.doi:10.1177/001872679905200401
BiedenbachT.MüllerR. (2012). Absorptive, innovative and adaptive capabilities and their impact on project and project portfolio performance. International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 621–635.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.01.016
15.
BradyT.DaviesA. (2004). Building project capabilities: From exploratory to exploitative learning. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1601–1621.doi:10.1177/0170840604048002
16.
BraunT.SydowJ. (2019). Selecting organizational partners for interorganizational projects: The dual but limited role of digital capabilities in the construction industry. Project Management Journal, 50(4), 398–408.doi:10.1177/8756972819857477
17.
BrusoniS. (2005). The limits to specialization: Problem solving and coordination in “modular networks”. Organization Studies, 26(12), 1885–1907.doi:10.1177/0170840605059161
18.
BrusoniS.PrencipeA.PavittK. (2001). Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make?Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 597–621.doi:10.2307/3094825
19.
CachiaM.MillwardL. (2011). The telephone medium and semi-structured interviews: A complementary fit. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 6(3), 265–277.doi:10.1108/17465641111188420
20.
CaniëlsM. C. J.BakensR. J. J. M. (2012). The effects of project management information systems on decision making in a multi project environment. International Journal of Project Management, 30(2), 162–175.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.05.005
21.
CoshA.FuX.HughesA. (2012). Organisation structure and innovation performance in different environments. Small Business Economics, 39(2), 301–317.doi:10.1007/s11187-010-9304-5
22.
CoshA.HughesA. (2000). British enterprise in transition: Growth, innovation and public policy in the small and medium sized enterprise sector 1994–1999. University of Cambridge, ESRC Centre for Business Research (CBR).
23.
CoshA.HughesA. (2003). Enterprise challenged: Policy and performance in the British SME sector, 1999–2002. University of Cambridge, ESRC Centre for Business Research (CBR).
24.
CoshA.HughesA. (2007). British enterprise: Thriving or surviving? SME growth, innovation and public policy 2001–2004. University of Cambridge, ESRC Centre for Business Research.
25.
CrabtreeE.Jane BowerD.KeoghW. (1997). Conflict or collaboration: The changing nature of inter-firm relationships in the UK oil and gas industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 9(2), 179–192.doi:10.1080/09537329708524278
DaviesA. (2013). Innovation and project management. InDodgsonM.GannD.PhillipsN. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (p.36). Oxford University Press.
28.
DaviesA.BradyT. (2000). Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: Towards repeatable solutions. Research Policy, 29(7–8), 931–953.doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00113-X
29.
DaviesA.BradyT. (2016). Explicating the dynamics of project capabilities. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 314–327.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.04.006
30.
DaviesA.DodgsonM.GannD.MacAulayS. (2017). Five rules for managing large, complex projects. MIT Sloan Management Review, 59(1), 73–78.
31.
DaviesA.GannD.DouglasT. (2009). Innovation in megaprojects: Systems integration at London Heathrow Terminal 5. California Management Review, 51(2), 101–125.doi:10.2307/41166482
32.
DaviesA.HobdayM. (2005). The business of projects: Managing innovation in complex products and systems. Cambridge University Press.
33.
DaviesA.MacAulayS.DeBarroT.ThurstonM. (2014). Making innovation happen in a megaproject: London’s Crossrail Suburban Railway System. Project Management Journal, 45(6), 25–37.doi:10.1002/pmj.21461
34.
de OliveiraR.VerreynneM.-L.SteenJ.IndulskaM. (2021). Creating value by giving away: A typology of different innovation revealing strategies. Journal of Business Research, 127(1), 137–150.doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.038
35.
de VilliersC.van StadenC. J. (2010). Shareholders’ requirements for corporate environmental disclosures: A cross-country comparison. The British Accounting Review, 42(4), 227–240.doi:10.1016/j.bar.2010.08.002
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
38.
FordJ. A.SteenJ.VerreynneM.-L. (2014). How environmental regulations affect innovation in the Australian oil and gas industry: Going beyond the porter hypothesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 204–213.doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.062
39.
FordJ. A.VerreynneM.-L.SteenJ. (2018). Limits to networking capabilities: Relationship trade-offs and innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 74(1–2), 50–64.doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.022
40.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388.doi:10.1177/002224378101800313
41.
FreytagP.YoungL. (2014). Introduction to special issue on innovations and networks: Innovation of, within, through and by networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 361–364.doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.004
42.
GannD. M.SalterA. J. (2000). Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: The construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29(7–8), 955–972.doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00114-1
43.
GarrigaH.von KroghG.SpaethS. (2013). Research notes and commentaries: How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1134–1144.
44.
GilN.MiozzoM.MassiniS. (2012). The innovation potential of new infrastructure development: An empirical study of Heathrow Airport’s T5 project. Research Policy, 41(2), 452–466.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.011
45.
GronumS.VerreynneM.-L.KastelleT. (2012). The role of networks in small and medium-sized enterprise innovation and firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 257–282.doi:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00353.x
46.
HairJ. F. J.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
47.
Haus-ReveS.FitjarR. D.Rodríguez-PoseA. (2019). Does combining different types of collaboration always benefit firms? Collaboration, complementarity and product innovation in Norway. Research Policy, 48(6), 1476–1486.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.008
48.
HelfatC. E.PeterafM. A. (2009). Understanding dynamic capabilities: Progress along a developmental path. Strategic Organization, 7(1), 91–102.doi:10.1177/1476127008100133
49.
HenkelJ.MaurerS. M. (2009). Parts, property and sharing. Nature Biotechnology, 27(12), 1095–1098.doi:10.1038/nbt1209-109520010583
50.
HobdayM.DaviesA.PrencipeA. (2005). Systems integration: A core capability of the modern corporation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(6), 1109–1143.doi:10.1093/icc/dth080
51.
JaafariA. (2001). Management of risks, uncertainties and opportunities on projects: Time for a fundamental shift. International Journal of Project Management, 19(2), 89–101.doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00047-2
52.
JonesC.LichtensteinB. B. (2008). Temporary inter-organizational projects. InCropperS.HuxhamC.EbersM.RingP. S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (p.41). Oxford University Press.
KardesI.OzturkA.CavusgilS. T.CavusgilE. (2013). Managing global megaprojects: Complexity and risk management. International Business Review, 22(6), 905–917.doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.01.003
55.
KeinzP.HienerthC.GemündenH. G.KillenC. P.SicotteH. (2021). Special issue: Managing open and user innovation by projects: Sensing, seizing and transforming. International Journal of Project Management, 39(2), 97–101.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.02.001
56.
KöhlerC.SofkaW.GrimpeC. (2012). Selective search, sectoral patterns, and the impact on product innovation performance. Research Policy, 41(8), 1344–1356.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.020
57.
LaursenK.SalterA. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.doi:10.1002/smj.507
58.
LaursenK.SalterA. J. (2014). The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy, 43(5), 867–878.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004
59.
LehtinenJ.PeltokorpiA.ArttoK. (2019). Megaprojects as organizational platforms and technology platforms for value creation. International Journal of Project Management, 37(1), 43–58.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.10.001
60.
LeiponenA.HelfatC. E. (2010). Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 224–236.doi:10.1002/smj.807
61.
LoboS.WhyteJ. (2017). Aligning and reconciling: Building project capabilities for digital delivery. Research Policy, 46(1), 93–107.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.005
62.
MackinnonD. P.CoxM. C. (2012). Commentary on “Mediation analysis and categorical variables: The final frontier” by Dawn Iacobucci. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(4), 600–602.doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2012.03.00923180961
63.
ManleyK. (2008). Against the odds: Small firms in Australia successfully introducing new technology on construction projects. Research Policy, 37(10), 1751–1764.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.013
64.
MartinsuoM.AholaT. (2010). Supplier integration in complex delivery projects: Comparison between different buyer–supplier relationships. International Journal of Project Management, 28(2), 107–116.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.09.004
65.
MentionA.-L. (2011). Co-operation and co-opetition as open innovation practices in the service sector: Which influence on innovation novelty?Technovation, 31(1), 44–53.doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2010.08.002
66.
MillerR.LessardD. (2000). Strategic management of large engineering projects—Shaping institutions, risks, and governance. MIT Press.
67.
MinaA.Bascavusoglu-MoreauE.HughesA. (2014). Open service innovation and the firm’s search for external knowledge. Research Policy, 43(5), 853–866.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.004
68.
MitregaM.ForkmannS.RamosC.HennebergS. C. (2012). Networking capability in business relationships—Concept and scale development. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(5), 739–751.doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.06.002
69.
MoilanenM.ØstbyeS.WollK. (2014). Non-R&D SMEs: External knowledge, absorptive capacity and product innovation. Small Business Economics, 43, 447–462.
70.
NachbagauerA. G. M.Schirl-BoeckI. (2019). Managing the unexpected in megaprojects: Riding the waves of resilience. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12(3), 694–715.doi:10.1108/IJMPB-08-2018-0169
71.
NightingaleP. (2000). The product–process–organisation relationship in complex development projects. Research Policy, 29(7–8), 913–930.doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00112-8
72.
NightingaleP.BradyT. (2011). Projects, paradigms and predictability. InCattaniG.FerrianiS.FrederiksenL.TäubeF. (Eds.), Project-based organizing and strategic management (Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 28, pp.83–112). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
73.
NokeH.PerronsR. K.HughesM. (2008). Strategic dalliances as an enabler for discontinuous innovation in slow clockspeed industries: Evidence from the oil and gas industry. R&D Management, 38(2), 129–139.
74.
OkazakiS.TaylorC. R. (2008). What is SMS advertising and why do multinationals adopt it? Answers from an empirical study in European markets. Journal of Business Research, 61(1), 4–12.doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.05.003
75.
OlaniranO. J.LoveP. E. D.EdwardsD.OlatunjiO. A.MatthewsJ. (2015). Cost overruns in hydrocarbon megaprojects: A critical review and implications for research. Project Management Journal, 46(6), 126–138.doi:10.1002/pmj.21556
76.
OliveiraN.LumineauF. (2017). How coordination trajectories influence the performance of interorganizational project networks. Organization Science, 28(6), 1029–1060.doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1151
77.
PerminovaO.GustafssonM.WikströmK. (2008). Defining uncertainty in projects—A new perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 26(1), 73–79.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.005
78.
PerronsR. K.DonnellyJ. (2012). Who drives E&P innovation?Journal of Petroleum Technology, 64(12), 62–72.
79.
PersaudA. J.KumarU.KumarV. (2003). Innovation in the upstream oil and gas sector: A strategic sector of Canada’s economy. InShavininaL. V. (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp.1000–1017). Pergamon.
80.
PeterafM.Di StefanoG.VeronaG. (2013). The elephant in the room of dynamic capabilities: Bringing two diverging conversations together. Strategic Management Journal, 34(12), 1389–1410.doi:10.1002/smj.2078
81.
PetitY. (2012). Project portfolios in dynamic environments: Organizing for uncertainty. International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 539–553.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.11.007
82.
PetitY.HobbsB. (2010). Project portfolios in dynamic environments: Sources of uncertainty and sensing mechanisms. Project Management Journal, 41(4), 46–58.doi:10.1002/pmj.20201
83.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.87914516251
84.
PodsakoffP. M.OrganD. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.doi:10.1177/014920638601200408
85.
RahimiM.KenworthyT. P.BalakrishnanJ. (2018). An analysis of innovation in oil and gas projects. Project Management Journal, 49(5), 64–84.doi:10.1177/8756972818788773
86.
RitterT.GemündenH. G. (2003). Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. Journal of Business Research, 56(9), 745–755.
87.
RitterT.WilkinsonI. F.JohnstonW. J. (2002). Measuring network competence: Some international evidence. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(2-3), 119–138.doi:10.1108/08858620210419763
88.
SalunkeS.WeerawardenaJ.McColl-KennedyJ. R. (2011). Towards a model of dynamic capabilities in innovation-based competitive strategy: Insights from project-oriented service firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1251–1263.doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.10.009
89.
ShenharA. J.DvirD. (1996). Toward a typological theory of project management. Research Policy, 25(4), 607–632.doi:10.1016/0048-7333(95)00877-2
90.
ShenharA. J.DvirD. (2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Harvard Business Press.
91.
SöderlundJ. (2002). Managing complex development projects: Arenas, knowledge processes and time. R&D Management, 32, 419–430.
92.
SöderlundJ.TellF. (2011). Strategy and capabilities in the P-form corporation: Linking strategic direction with organizational capabilities. InCattaniG.FerrianiS.FrederiksenL. (Eds.), Project-based organizing and strategic management (Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 28, pp.235–262). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
93.
SteenJ. (2021). Childhood experiences and personality meet opportunity: The formative development of a megaproject innovator. InDrouinN.SankaranS.Van MarrewijkA.MüllerR. (Eds.), Megaproject leaders: Reflections on personal life stories (pp.150–165). Edward Elgar.
94.
SteenJ.De FillippiR.SydowJ.PrykeS.MichelfelderI. (2018). Projects and networks: Understanding resource flows and governance of temporary organizations with quantitative and qualitative research methods. Project Management Journal, 49(2), 3–17.doi:10.1177/875697281804900201
95.
SteenJ.FordJ. A.VerreynneM.-L. (2017). Symbols, sublimes, solutions, and problems: A garbage can model of megaprojects. Project Management Journal, 48(6), 117–131.doi:10.1177/875697281704800609
96.
StinchcombeA. L.HeimerC. A. (1985). Organization theory and project management: Administering uncertainty in Norwegian offshore oil. Norwegian University Press.
97.
StjerneI. S.SöderlundJ.MinbaevaD. (2019). Crossing times: Temporal boundary-spanning practices in interorganizational projects. International Journal of Project Management, 37(2), 347–365.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.09.004
98.
SwanJ.GoussevskaiaA.NewellS.RobertsonM.BresnenM.ObembeA. (2007). Modes of organizing biomedical innovation in the UK and US and the role of integrative and relational capabilities. Research Policy, 36(4), 529–547.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.014
99.
TaylorJ. E.LevittR. (2007). Innovation alignment and project network dynamics: An integrative model for change. Project Management Journal, 38(3), 22–35.doi:10.1002/pmj.20003
100.
TaylorJ. E.LevittR. E.FellowL. G. (2006). Understanding and managing systemic innovation in project-based industries. InClelandD. I.SlevinD. P.PintoJ. K. (Eds.), Innovations: Project management research 2004. Project Management Institute.
101.
TeeceD. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.doi:10.1002/smj.640
102.
TeeceD. J. (2017). Towards a capability theory of (innovating) firms: Implications for management and policy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(3), 693–720.doi:10.1093/cje/bew063
van MarrewijkA.CleggS. R.PitsisT. S.VeenswijkM. (2008). Managing public–private megaprojects: Paradoxes, complexity, and project design. International Journal of Project Management, 26(6), 591–600.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.09.007
105.
VerreynneM.-L.MeyerD.LieschP. (2016). Beyond the formal-informal dichotomy of small firm strategy-making in stable and dynamic environments. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(2), 420–444.doi:10.1111/jsbm.12143
106.
VerreynneM.-L.Torres de OliveiraR.SteenJ.IndulskaM.FordJ. A. (2020). What motivates ‘free’ revealing? Measuring outbound non-pecuniary openness, innovation types and expectations of future profit growth. Scientometrics, 124(1), 271–301.doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03434-4
107.
von DanwitzS. (2018). Managing inter-firm projects: A systematic review and directions for future research. International Journal of Project Management, 36(3), 525–541.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.11.004
108.
WhyteJ.NussbaumT. (2020). Transition and temporalities: Spanning temporal boundaries as projects end and operations begin. Project Management Journal, 51(5), 505–521.doi:10.1177/8756972820919002
109.
WikströmK.ArttoK.KujalaJ.SöderlundJ. (2010). Business models in project business. International Journal of Project Management, 28(8), 832–841.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.001
110.
WinchG.LeiringerR. (2016). Owner project capabilities for infrastructure development: A review and development of the “strong owner” concept. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 271–281.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.02.002
111.
WohlgemuthV.WenzelM. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and routinization. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1944–1948.doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.085
112.
ZaitA.BerteaP. E. (2011). Methods for testing discriminant validity. Management and Marketing, 9(2), 217–224.
113.
ZerjavV.EdkinsA.DaviesA. (2018). Project capabilities for operational outcomes in inter-organisational settings: The case of London Heathrow Terminal 2. International Journal of Project Management, 36(3), 444–459.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.01.004
