This article challenges the dominant assumption of goal rationality behind temporary organizations’ design in project-based organizations (PBOs). While extant literature posits that organizations strive to select the most appropriate project arrangements to fit particular task requirements at hand, findings from an in-depth ethnography-inspired case study suggest that projects in PBOs tend to imitate each other's structures, strategies, and practices with little consideration of the potential performance effects. Building upon the new institutionalism, this article conceptualizes the PBO as an organizational field of temporary and permanent organizations embedded in wider organizational and institutional fields and explicates isomorphic processes among temporary organizations in PBOs.
BakkerR. M. (2010). Taking stock of temporary organizational forms: A systematic review and research agenda.International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 466–486. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00281.x
2.
BattilanaJ., LecaB., & BoxenbaumE. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship.The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107. doi.org/10.1080/19416520903053598
3.
BergmanI., GunnarsonS., & RäisänenC. (2013). Decoupling and standardization in the projectification of a company.International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6(1), 106–128. doi.org/10.1108/17538371311291053
4.
Blindenbach-DriessenF., & Van den EndeJ. (2006). Innovation in project-based firms: The context dependency of success factors.Research Policy, 35(4), 545–561. doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.005
5.
BradyT., & DaviesA. (2004). Building project capabilities: From exploratory to exploitative learning.Organization Studies, 25(9), 1601–1621. doi.org/10.1177/0170840604048002
6.
BradyT., & MaylorH. (2010). The improvement paradox in project contexts: A clue to the way forward?International Journal of Project Management, 28(8), 787–795. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.08.001
7.
BresnenM., GoussevskaiaA., & SwanJ. (2004). Embedding new management knowledge in project-based organizations.Organization Studies, 25(9), 1535–1555. doi.org/10.1177/0170840604047999
8.
BrymanA., & BellE. (2007). Business research methods: Social research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
BuckertM., OechsslerJ., & SchwierenC. (2017). Imitation under stress.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 139(December), 252–266. doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.04.014
10.
BurgersJ. H., Van Den BoschF. A. J., & VolberdaH. W. (2008). Why new business development projects fail: Coping with the differences of technological versus market knowledge.Long Range Planning, 41(1), 55–73. doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2007.10.003
11.
CattaniG., FerrianiS., FrederiksenL., & TäubeF. (2011). Project-based organizing and strategic management: A long-term research agenda on temporary organizational forms (Editorial).Project-Based Organizing and Strategic Management, 28, xv–xxxix.
12.
CyertR. M., & MarchJ. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
DaviesA., & BradyT. (2000). Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: Towards repeatable solutions.Research Policy, 29(7-8), 931–953. doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00113-X
14.
DaviesA., & BradyT. (2016). Explicating the dynamics of project capabilities.International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 314–327. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.04.006
15.
DiMaggioP. J., & PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
16.
DörrenbächerC., & GeppertM. (2017). Multinational corporations and organization theory: Post millennium perspectives.Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
17.
DvirD., LipovetskyS., ShenharA. J., & TishlerA. (1998). In search of project classification: A non-universal approach to project success factors.Research Policy, 27(9), 915–935. doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00085-7
18.
EdmondsonA. C., & McManusS. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research.Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1155–1179. doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26586086
19.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research.Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385
20.
EisenhardtK. M., & GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges.Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
21.
EkstedtE., LundinR. A., & WirdeniusH. (1992). Conceptions and renewal in Swedish construction companies.European Management Journal, 10(2), 202–209. doi.org/10.1016/0263-2373(92)90070-K
22.
EngwallM. (2003). No project is an island: Linking projects to history and context.Research Policy, 32(5), 789–808. doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00088-4
23.
EngwallM., & JerbrantA. (2003). The resource allocation syndrome: The prime challenge of multi-project management?International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 403–409. doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00113-8
24.
EngwallM., & WestlingG. (2004). Peripety in an R&D drama: Capturing a turnaround in project dynamics.Organization Studies, 25(9), 1557–1578. doi.org/10.1177/0170840604048000
25.
ErikssonT., & KadeforsA. (2017). Organisational design and development in a large rail tunnel project—Influence of heuristics and mantras.International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 492–503. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.12.006
GalbraithJ. R. (1977). Organization design.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
28.
GalbraithJ. R. (2014). Designing organizations: Strategy, process and structure at the business unit and enterprise level (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29.
GannD. M., & SalterA. J. (2000). Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: The construction of complex products and systems.Research Policy, 29(7-8), 955–972. doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00114-1
30.
GhoshalS., & BartlettC. A. (1990). The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network.Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 603–626. doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1990.4310825
31.
GibbertM., RuigrokW., & WickiB. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study?Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1465–1474. doi.org/10.1002/smj.722
32.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.London, England: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson.
33.
GrabherG. (2004). Temporary architectures of learning: Knowledge governance in project ecologies.Organization Studies, 25(9), 1491–1514. doi.org/10.1177/0170840604047996
34.
HanischB., & WaldA. (2011). A project management research framework integrating multiple theoretical perspectives and influencing factors.Project Management Journal, 42(3), 4–22. doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20241
35.
HanischB., & WaldA. (2012). A bibliometric view on the use of contingency theory in project management research.Project Management Journal, 43(3), 4–23. doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21267
36.
HeniszW. J., LevittR. E., & ScottW. R. (2012). Toward a unified theory of project governance: Economic, sociological and psychological supports for relational contracting.Engineering Project Organization Journal, 2(1-2), 37–55. doi.org/10.1080/21573727.2011.637552
37.
HobdayM. (2000). The project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems?Research Policy, 29(7-8), 871–893. doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00110-4
38.
HodgsonD. (2002). Disciplining the professional: The case of project management.Journal of Management Studies, 39(6), 803–821. doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00312
39.
KadeforsA. (1995). Institutions in building projects: Implications for flexibility and change.Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 395–408. doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00017-P
40.
KeeganA., & TurnerJ. R. (2002). The management of innovation in project-based firms.Long Range Planning, 35(4), 367–388. doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(02)00069-9
41.
KockA., HeisingW., & GemündenH. G. (2016). A contingency approach on the impact of front-end success on project portfolio success.Project Management Journal, 47(2), 115–129. doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21575
42.
KostovaT., RothK., & DacinM. T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions.Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 994–1006. doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.34422026
43.
LampelJ. (2011). Institutional dynamics of project-based creative organizations: Irving Thalberg and the Hollywood studio system. In Project-Based Organizing and Strategic Management (Vol. 28, pp. 445–466). doi.org/10.1108/S0742-3322(2011)0000028020
44.
LeavittH. J. (1965). Applied organizational change in industry: Structural, technological, and humanistic approaches. In MarchJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of Organizations (pp. 1144–1170). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
45.
LechlerT. G., & DvirD. (2010). An alternative taxonomy of project management structures: Linking project management structures and project success.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(2), 198–210. doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2010.2044441
46.
LevittR. E. (2012). The virtual design team: Designing project organizations as engineers design bridges.Journal of Organization Design, 1(2), 14–41. doi.org/10.7146/jod.1.2.6345
47.
LindkvistL. (2004). Governing project-based firms: Promoting market-like processes within hierarchies.Journal of Management and Governance, 8(1), 3–25. doi.org/10.1023/B:MAGO.0000015392.75507.ad
48.
Loufrani-FedidaS., & SagliettoL. (2016). Mechanisms for managing competencies in project-based organizations: An integrative multilevel analysis.Long Range Planning, 49(1), 72–89. doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2014.09.001
49.
LundinR. A., ArvidssonN., BradyT., EkstedtE., MidlerC., & SydowJ. (2015). Managing and working in project society: Institutional challenges of temporary organizations.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.doi.org/10.1007/9781139939454
50.
LundinR. A., & SöderholmA. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization.Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 437–455. doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U
51.
ManningS. (2008). Embedding projects in multiple contexts—A structuration perspective.International Journal of Project Management, 26(1), 30–37. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.012
52.
MartinsuoM., HensmanN., ArttoK., KujalaJ., & JaafariA. (2006). Project-based management as an organizational innovation: Drivers, changes, and benefits of adopting project-based management.Project Management Journal, 36(3), 87–97.
53.
MeyerJ. W., & RowanB. (1977). Institutionalised organisations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
54.
MiddletonC. J. (1967). How to set up a project organization.Harvard Business Review, (March/April), 73–82.
MiterevM. (2017). Organizing project-based operations: The interplay of content, context and social processes.Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
57.
MiterevM., EngwallM., & JerbrantA. (2016). Exploring program management competences for various program types.International Journal of Project Management, 34(3), 545–557. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.07.006
58.
MiterevM., ManciniM., & TurnerR. (2017). Towards a design for the project-based organization.International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 479–491. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.12.007
59.
MiterevM., TurnerJ. R., & ManciniM. (2017). The organization design perspective on the project-based organization: A structured review.International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(3), 527–549. doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-06-2016-0048
60.
MorrisP. W. G., & GeraldiJ. G. (2011). Managing the institutional context for projects.Project Management Journal, 42(6), 20–32. doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20271
NightingaleP., Baden-FullerC., & HopkinsM. M. (2011). Projects, project capabilities and project organisations. In CattaniG., FerrianiS., FrederiksenL., & TäubeF. (Eds.), Project-based organizing and strategic management (Vol. 28, pp. 215–234). doi.org/10.1108/S0742-3322(2011)0000028012
63.
PackendorffJ. (1995). Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research.Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 319–333. doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00018-Q
64.
PascaleR. T., & AthosA. G. (1981). The art of Japanese management.New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
65.
PemselS., MüllerR., & SöderlundJ. (2016). Knowledge governance strategies in project-based organizations.Long Range Planning, 49(6), 648–660. doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.01.001
66.
PetersT. J., & WatermanR. H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best-run companies.New York, NY: Harper and Row.
67.
PrencipeA., & TellF. (2001). Inter-project learning: Processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms.Research Policy, 30(9), 1373–1394. doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00157-3
68.
RichB., & JanosL. (1994). Skunk works: A personal memoir of my years at Lockheed.Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co.
69.
SchoonhovenC. B. (1981). Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency “theory.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3), 349–377. doi.org/10.2307/2392512
70.
ScottW. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations.London, England: SAGE Publications, Inc.
71.
ShenharA. J. (2001). One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains.Management Science, 47(3), 394–414. doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.3.394.9772
72.
ShenharA. J., & DvirD. (1996). Toward a typological theory of project management.Research Policy, 25(4), 607–632. doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00877-2
73.
SöderlundJ. (2005). Developing project competence: Empirical regularities in competitive project operations.International Journal of Innovation Management, 9(4), 451–480. doi.org/10.1142/S1363919605001344
74.
SöderlundJ. (2008). Competence dynamics and learning processes in project-based firms: Shifting, adapting and leveraging.International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(1), 41–67. doi.org/10.1142/S1363919608001911
75.
SuchmanM. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches.Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
SydowJ., LindkvistL., & DeFillippiR. (2004). Project-based organizations, embeddedness and repositories of knowledge: Editorial.Organization Studies, 25(9), 1475–1489. doi.org/10.1177/0170840604048162
78.
SydowJ., & StaberU. (2002). The institutional embeddedness of project networks: The case of content production in German television.Regional Studies, 36(3), 215–227. doi.org/10.1080/00343400220122034
79.
TellerJ., KockA., & GemündenH. G. (2014). Risk management in project portfolios is more than managing project risks: A contingency perspective on risk management.Project Management Journal, 45(4), 67–80. doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21431
80.
Van de VenA. H., GancoM., & HiningsC. R. (2013). Returning to the frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional designs.The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 393–440. doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.774981
81.
WeberM. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretative sociology.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
82.
WhitleyR. (2006). Project-based firms: New organizational form or variations on a theme?Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(1), 77–99. doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtj003
83.
WhittingtonR., PettigrewA., PeckS., FentonE., & ConyonM. (1999). Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: A European panel study, 1992–1996.Organization Science, 10(5), 583–600.
84.
WindelerA., & SydowJ. (2001). Project networks and changing industry practices — Collaborative content production in the German television industry.Organization Studies, 22(6), 1035–1060. doi.org/10.1177/0170840601226006
85.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
86.
Zika-ViktorssonA., SundströmP., & EngwallM. (2006). Project overload: An exploratory study of work and management in multi-project settings.International Journal of Project Management, 24(5), 385–394. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.02.010
