This article investigates organizational design choices and their antecedents for the design of project-based organizations. Extant literature acknowledges the diversity of project-based organizational forms, but neither the particular configurations of organizational design dimensions nor the reasons behind their differences are widely addressed. Based on interviews in 12 project-based organizations in various sectors, this study identifies three common organizational design configurations of project-based organizations. It further discusses a range of internal and external factors, which can influence the choice of configuration. The findings are summarized in five overriding conclusions.
ArchibaldR. D. (1992). Managing high-technology programs and projects – Second edition. New York, NY: Wiley.
2.
ArvidssonN. (2009). Exploring tensions in projectified matrix organisations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 97–107. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2008.09.002
3.
AubryM.Lavoie-TremblayM. (2018). Rethinking organizational design for managing multiple projects. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 12–26. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.05.012
4.
AubryM.MüllerR.GlücklerJ. (2011). Exploring PMOs through community of practice theory. Project Management Journal, 42(5), 42–56. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20259
5.
BattilanaJ.LecaB.BoxenbaumE. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1080/19416520903053598
6.
BergmanI.GunnarsonS.RäisänenC. (2013). Decoupling and standardization in the projectification of a company. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6(1), 106–128. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1108/17538371311291053
7.
BlichfeldtB. S.EskerodP. (2008). Project portfolio management—There’s more to it than what management enacts. International Journal of Project Management, 26(4), 357–365. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.06.004
8.
BradyT.MaylorH. (2010). The improvement paradox in project contexts: A clue to the way forward?International Journal of Project Management, 28(8), 787–795. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.08.001
9.
CattaniG.FerrianiS.LanzaA. (2017). Deconstructing the outside puzzle: The legitimation journey of novelty. Organization Science, 28(6), 965–992. Retrieved from doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1161
10.
CrawfordL. H.HobbsJ. B.TurnerJ. R. (2005). Project categorization systems: Aligning capability with strategy for better results. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute (Vol. 37). Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1145/363332.363339
11.
DuboisA.GaddeL.-E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553–560. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8
12.
EdkinsA.SmithA. (2012). Designing the project. In WilliamsT. M.SamsetK. (Eds.), Project governance (pp. 135–174). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137274618.0009
13.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
14.
EkstedtE.LundinR. A.WirdeniusH. (1992). Conceptions and renewal in Swedish construction companies. European Management Journal, 10(2), 202–209. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0263-2373(92)90070-K
ErikssonT.KadeforsA. (2017). Organisational design and development in a large rail tunnel project: Influence of heuristics and mantras. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 492–503. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.12.006
17.
FreilichJ. (2015). When innovation is not enough: The managerial challenges of technology change in pharmaceutical R&D. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
18.
GalbraithJ. R. (1977). Organization design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19.
GareisR. (1991). Management by projects: The management strategy of the “new” project-oriented company. International Journal of Project Management, 9(2), 71–76. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(91)90062-Z
20.
GareisR.HuemannM. (2007). Maturity models for the project-oriented company. In TurnerJ. R. (Ed.), The Gower handbook of project management – Fourth edition (pp. 183–208). Aldershot, UK: Gower.
21.
GemündenH. G.AubryM. (2017). Isomorphism: A challenge for the project-based organization. Project Management Journal, 48(5), 3–8.
22.
GemündenH. G.LehnerP.KockA. (2018). The project-oriented organization and its contribution to innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 147–160. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.009
23.
GeraldiJ. G. (2008). The balance between order and chaos in multi-project firms: A conceptual model. International Journal of Project Management, 26(4), 348–356. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.013
24.
GeraldiJ. G.AdlbrechtG. (2007). On faith, fact and interaction in projects. Project Management Journal, 38(1), 32–43.
25.
GeraldiJ. G.MaylorH.WilliamsT. (2011). Now, let’s make it really complex (complicated). International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(9), 966–990. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111165848
26.
GreenwoodR.MillerD. (2010). Tackling design anew: Getting back to the heart of organizational theory. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(4), 78–88. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2010.55206386
27.
HanischB.WaldA. (2012). A bibliometric view on the use of contingency theory in project management research. Project Management Journal, 43(3), 4–23. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21267
28.
HobdayM. (2000). The project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems?Research Policy, 29(7–8), 871–893. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00110-4
29.
HuemannM. (2010). Considering human resource management when developing a project-oriented company: Case study of a telecommunication company. International Journal of Project Management, 28(4), 361–369. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.02.008
30.
HuemannM.KeeganA.TurnerJ. R. (2007). Human resource management in the project-oriented company: A review. International Journal of Project Management, 25(3), 315–323. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.10.001
KockA.HeisingW.GemündenH. G. (2016). A contingency approach on the impact of front-end success on project portfolio success. Project Management Journal, 47(2), 115–129. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21575
33.
LechlerT. G.DvirD. (2010). An alternative taxonomy of project management structures: Linking project management structures and project success. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(2), 198–210. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2010.2044441
34.
LindkvistL. (2004). Governing project-based firms: Promoting market-like processes within hierarchies. Journal of Management and Governance, 8(1), 3–25. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1023/B:MAGO.0000015392.75507.ad
35.
LundinR. A.ArvidssonN.BradyT.EkstedtE.MidlerC.SydowJ. (2015). Managing and working in project society: Institutional challenges of temporary organizations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1007/9781139939454
36.
MartinsuoM.HensmanN.ArttoK.KujalaJ.JaafariA. (2006). Project-based management as an organizational innovation: Drivers, changes, and benefits and adopting project based management. Project Management Journal, 36(3), 87–97. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1177/875697280603700309
37.
MartinsuoM.HoverfältP. (2018). Change program management: Toward a capability for managing value-oriented, integrated multi-project change in its context. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 134–146. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.018
38.
MaylorH.BradyT.Cooke-DaviesT.HodgsonD. (2006). From projectification to programmification. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 663–674. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.014
39.
MaylorH.TurnerN.Murray-WebsterR. (2015). ”It worked for manufacturing…!” Operations strategy in project-based operations. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 103–115. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.03.009
40.
MidlerC. (1995). “Projectification” of the firm: The Renault case. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 363–375. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00035-T
41.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook – Third edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
42.
MiterevM. (2017). Organizing project-based operations: The interplay of content, context and social processes. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. Retrieved fromhttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-206670
43.
MiterevM.EngwallM.JerbrantA. (2017). Mechanisms of isomorphism in project-based organizations. Project Management Journal, 48(5), 9–24.
44.
MiterevM.ManciniM.TurnerJ. R. (2017). Towards a design for the project-based organization. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 479–491. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.12.007
45.
MiterevM.TurnerJ. R.ManciniM. (2017). The organization design perspective on the project-based organization: A structured review. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(3), 527–549. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-06-2016-0048
46.
MorrisP. W. G.GeraldiJ. G. (2011). Managing the institutional context for projects. Project Management Journal, 42(6), 20–32. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20271
MüllerR.PemselS.ShaoJ. (2014). Organizational enablers for governance and governmentality of projects: A literature review. International Journal of Project Management, 32, 1309–1320. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.03.007
49.
NäsholmM. H.BlomquistT. (2015). Co-creation as a strategy for program management. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 8(1), 58–73. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2013-0063
50.
PartingtonD.PellegrinelliS.YoungM. (2005). Attributes and levels of programme management competence: An interpretive study. International Journal of Project Management, 23, 87–95. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.06.004
51.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods – Third edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
52.
PrencipeA.TellF. (2001). Inter-project learning: Processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms. Research Policy, 30(9), 1373–1394. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00157-3
53.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) – Sixth edition. Newtown Square, PA: Author.
54.
PuranamP.AlexyO.ReitzigM. (2014). What’s “new” about new forms of organizing?Academy of Management Review, 39(2), 162–180. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0436
55.
SchoperY. G.WaldA.IngasonH. T.FridgeirssonT. V. (2018). Projectification in Western economies: A comparative study of Germany, Norway and Iceland. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 71–82. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.008
56.
ShaoJ.MüllerR. (2011). The development of constructs of program context and program success: A qualitative study. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 947–959. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.02.003
57.
ShenharA. J. (2001). One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science, 47(3), 394–414. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.3.394.9772
SimardM.AubryM.LabergeD. (2018). The utopia of order versus chaos: A conceptual framework for governance, organizational design and governmentality in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 36(3), 460–473. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.01.003
60.
SöderlundJ. (2011). Pluralism in project management: Navigating the crossroads of specialization and fragmentation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(2), 153–176. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00290.x
61.
SöderlundJ.BredinK. (2006). HRM in project-intensive firms: Changes and challenges. Human Resource Management. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20107
62.
TellerJ.KockA.GemündenH. G. (2014). Risk management in project portfolios is more than managing project risks: A contingency perspective on risk management. Project Management Journal, 45(4), 67–80. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21431
63.
TurnerJ. R. (2014). The handbook of project-based management – Fourth edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
64.
TurnerJ. R.CochraneR. A. (1993). Goals-and-methods matrix: Coping with projects with ill defined goals and /or methods of achieving them. International Journal of Project Management, 11(2), 93–102.
65.
TurnerJ. R.HuemannM.KeeganA. (2008). Human resource management in the project-oriented organization: Employee well-being and ethical treatment. International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 577–585. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.005
66.
TurnerJ. R.KeeganA. (1999). The versatile project-based organization: Governance and operational control. European Management Journal, 17(3), 296–309. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00009-2
67.
TurnerJ. R.KeeganA. (2000). The management of operations in the project-based organisation. Journal of Change Management, 1(2), 131–148. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1080/714042464
68.
TurnerJ. R.KeeganA. (2001). Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization: Roles of the broker and steward. European Management Journal, 19(3), 254–267. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(01)00022-6
69.
TurnerJ. R.LedwithA.KellyJ. (2009). Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2(2), 282–296. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1108/17538370910949301
70.
TurnerJ. R.LedwithA.KellyJ. (2010). Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises: Matching processes to the nature of the firm. International Journal of Project Management, 28(8), 744–755. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.06.005
71.
TurnerJ. R.LedwithA.KellyJ. (2012). Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises: Tailoring the practices to the size of company. Management Decision, 50(5), 942–957. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211227627
72.
TurnerJ. R.MüllerR. (2003). On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 1–8. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00020-0c
73.
TurnerJ. R.MüllerR. (2017). The governance of organizational project management. In SankaranS.MüllerR.DrouinN. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of organizational project management (pp. 75–91). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org10.1017/9781316662243.010
74.
TurnerR.LedwithA. (2018). Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises: Fitting the practices to the needs of the firm to deliver benefit. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(3), 475–493. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12265
75.
Van de VenA. H.GancoM.HiningsC. R. (2013). The Academy of Management Annals returning to the frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional designs. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 393–440. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.774981
76.
WhitleyR. (2006). Project-based firms: New organizational form or variations on a theme?Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(1), 77–99. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtj003
77.
WhittingtonR.PettigrewA.PeckS.FentonE.ConyonM. (1999). Change and complementarities in the new landscape: Study, European Panel Competitive 1992–1996. Organization Science, 10(5), 583–600.
78.
WilliamsonO. E. (1983). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and anti-trust implications. New York, NY: Macmillan.
