Conducting survey research in rural educational contexts presents unique challenges and requires specific methodological considerations. This article provides an overview of potential adaptations that may help support effective, valid, and impactful rural survey research and a brief review of survey research published in Rural Special Education Quarterly (RSEQ) over the last 10 years. Rural areas often pose distinct challenges, such as geographical dispersion, limited access to technology, and sociocultural differences, which can impact the reliability and validity of survey results. This article discusses methodological considerations in survey design, such as simplifying language, employing multimethod data-collection strategies, and ensuring cultural responsivity in planning, implementation, and interpretation of results. The authors emphasize the importance of contextually grounded research approaches that can inform rural education policy and practice, ensuring policies and interventions are feasible and valid in the realities of rural contexts. This article will contribute to the ongoing discussion on best practices in rural educational research and promoting equitable and inclusive educational opportunities for students with disabilities in rural areas.
*AlmeidaC. M.JamesonJ. M.RiesenT.McDonnellJ. (2016). Urban and rural preservice special education teachers’ computer use and perceptions of self-efficacy. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 35(3), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051603500303
2.
ArnoldM. L.NewmanJ. H.GaddyB. B.DeanC. B. (2005). A look at the condition of rural education research: Setting a direction for future research. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(6), 1–25. https://jrre.psu.edu/sites/default/files/2019-08/20-6.pdf
3.
*AultM. J.SpriggsA. D.BauschM. E.CourtadeG. R. (2019). Evaluation of remote versus face-to-face observation of teacher candidates in an alternative certification program. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 38(3), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870519861030
4.
*Barnard-BrakL.Fearon-DrakeD.MutuaK. (2023). Rurality and the provision of extended school year services. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 42(2), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705221136110
5.
*Barnard-BrakL.StevensT.ValenzuelaE. (2018). Barriers to providing extended school year services to students with disabilities: An exploratory study of special education directors. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37(4), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870518772308
6.
*BarrioB. L.HollingsheadA. (2017). Reaching out to paraprofessionals: Engaging professional development aligned with universal design for learning framework in rural communities. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 36(3), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517721693
7.
*BartzJ. M.ApplequistK.ArugueteJ. (2022). Reducing isolation in an online teacher preparation program: Reflections from STRIDE scholars. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 42(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705221135813
8.
BeckerK. L. (2015). Conducting community health needs assessments in rural communities: Lessons learned. Health Promotion Practice, 16(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839914555887
9.
*BerryA. B. (2021). Understanding shared responsibility between special and general education teachers in the rural classroom. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 40(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705211015681
10.
BlumlingA. A.ThomasT. L.StephensD. P. (2014). Researching and respecting the intricacies of isolated communities. Online Journal of Rural Nursing and Health Care, 13(2), 122–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.14574/ojrnhc.v13i2.275
11.
*BundockK.RolfK.HornbergerA.HallidayC. (2023). Improving access to general education via co-teaching in secondary mathematics classrooms: An evaluation of Utah’s professional development initiative. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 42(2), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705231167340
12.
ChristopherS.WattsV.McCormickA. K. H. G.YoungS. (2008). Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership. American Journal of Public Health, 98(8), 1398–1406. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.125757
13.
Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure, U. S. House of Representatives. (n.d.). Eliminating Barriers to Rural Internet Development Grant Eligibility Act (E-BRIDGE). https://transportation.house.gov/e-bridge-act/
14.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
15.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
16.
*DeardorffM. E.PeltierC.Choiseul-PraslinB.Williams-DiehmK.WickerM. (2021). Teacher knowledge in transition planning: Does locale matter?Rural Special Education Quarterly, 40(3), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705211027982
17.
*DeSutterK. L.LemireS. D. (2016). Exploring the special education versus regular education decisions of future teachers in the rural Midwest. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 35(4), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051603500402
18.
DillmanD. A.SmythJ. D.ChristianL. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons.
19.
DongJ.BrowningM. H.ReubenA.McAnirlinO.YuanS.StephensC.MaisonetM.ZhangK.HartJ. E.JamesP.YeagerR. (2024). The paradox of high greenness and poor health in rural Central Appalachia. Environmental Research, 248, 118400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118400
20.
Ellard-GrayA.JeffreyN. K.ChoubakM.CrannS. E. (2015). Finding the hidden participant: Solutions for recruiting hidden, hard-to-reach, and vulnerable populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621420
21.
*ElliottM.LongA. M.PollardJ. M.FitchettC. M.CourtadeG. (2024). Bridging the rural special educator gap: Mentoring to support alternative teacher preparation candidates. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 43(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705241234686
22.
FirchowP.Mac GintyR. (2020). Including hard-to-access populations using mobile phone surveys and participatory indicators. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(1), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729702
23.
*FloydK. K.HornA.SherfinskiM. (2024). Compassion fatigue, resilience, and endurance of special educators in rural P-12 and higher education. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 43(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705241244576
24.
FormeaC. M.MohamedA. A.HassanA.OsmanA.WeisJ. A.SiaI. G.WielandM. L. (2014). Lessons learned: Cultural and linguistic enhancement of surveys through community-based participatory research. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 8(3), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2014.0037
25.
FowlerF. J. (2014). Survey research methods (5th ed.). Sage.
26.
*GarwoodJ. D.WertsM. G.VargheseC.GoseyL. (2018). Mixed-methods analysis of rural special educators’ role stressors, behavior management, and burnout. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517745270
27.
GoodmanL. A. (2011). Comment: On respondent-driven sampling and snowball sampling in hard-to-reach populations and snowball sampling not in hard-to-reach populations. Sociological Methodology, 41(1), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01242.x
28.
HalfacreeK. (2007). Trial by space for a ‘radical rural’: Introducing alternative localities, representations and lives. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.10.002
29.
HarariG. M.LaneN. D.WangR.CrosierB. S.CampbellA. T.GoslingS. D. (2016). Using smartphones to collect behavioral data in psychological science: Opportunities, practical considerations, and challenges. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(6), 838–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616650285
30.
*HardestyC.MoodyE. J.KernS.WarrenW.Cooley HideckerM. J.WagnerS.AroraS.Root-ElledgeS. (2020). Enhancing professional development for educators: Adapting project ECHO from health care to education. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 40(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870520960448
31.
HarzingA. W.ReicheB. S.PudelkoM. (2013). Challenges in international survey research: A review with illustrations and suggested solutions for best practice. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(5), 591–628. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2013.052090
32.
HeckstedenA.KellnerR.DonathL. (2022). Dealing with small samples in football research. Science and Medicine in Football, 6(3), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2021.1978106
33.
HollmanA. K.ObermierT. R.BurgerP. R. (2021). Rural measures: A quantitative study of the rural digital divide. Journal of Information Policy, 1(11), 176–201. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.11.2021.0176
34.
*HornA. L.FloydK. K.DouglasK. H.KaradimouO.BobzienJ. L.LaydenS. J. (2024). What do rural special education teachers say? Examining the reported needs and recommendations for retention. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 43(3), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705241254863
HuhnS.MatzkeI.KochM.GungaH. C.MaggioniM. A.SiéA.BuodoV.OuedraogoW. A.CompaoreG.BunkerA.SauerbornR.BarnighausenT.BarteitS. (2022). Using wearable devices to generate real-world, individual-level data in rural, low-resource contexts in Burkina Faso, Africa: A case study. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, Article 972177. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.972177
KrosnickJ. A.PresserS. (2010). Questionnaire design. In WrightJ. D.MarsdenP. V. (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (2nd ed., pp. 263–313). Emerald Group Publishing.
40.
LavalleyM. (2018). Out of the loop: Rural schools are largely left out of research and policy discussions, exacerbating poverty, inequity, and isolation. Center for Public Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED608842.pdf
41.
LavrakasP. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Sage.
42.
LeeV. R.DrakeJ.WilliamsonK. (2015). Let’s get physical: K-12 students using wearable devices to obtain and learn about data from physical activities. TechTrends, 59(4), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0870-x
43.
LobeB.MorganD. L.HoffmanK. (2022). A systematic comparison of in-person and video-based online interviewing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221127068
44.
*LohmannM. J.WhiteB.JohnsonK. A. (2019). Increasing the rural special education teacher pipeline through asynchronous online instruction: A program description of the Colorado Christian University alternative certification program. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 38(3), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870519860065
45.
*MamlinN.DilibertoJ. A. (2020). There’s no place like home: Finding teachers in your backyard. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 39(2), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870520912465
46.
MartinezD.WayK.MoonZ.KillianT.GarrisonB. (2020). Does a web-first Tailored Design Method work with rural populations?Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 35(2), 1–18. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/jrss/vol35/iss2/5
47.
*McFarland-WhismanJ.WhismanS.LockwoodD. (2022). A preliminary look at reasons for attrition among special educators teaching students with autism spectrum disorder. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 42(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705221136115
48.
MillarM. M.DillmanD. A. (2011). Improving response to web and mixed-mode surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(2), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr003
49.
MurphyK. S. (2024, February5). Still love your landline? Phone service providers are getting closer to phasing it out. CNN. https://www.cnn.com
50.
*OrtogeroS. P.BarcarseT. O.RayA. B. (2022). Developing the knowledge and mentoring skills of future special education leaders. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 41(4), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705221092765
51.
PearsonA. L.RzotkiewiczA.ZwickleA. (2015). Using remote, spatial techniques to select a random household sample in a dispersed, semi-nomadic pastoral community: Utility for a longitudinal health and demographic surveillance system. International Journal of Health Geographics, 14, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-015-0026-4
52.
*PeltierC.PeltierT. K.HottB. L.HeuerA.WerthenT. (2021). “Trends come and go”: Early childhood rural special education teachers’ use of reported practices during mathematics instruction. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 40(4), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705211027981
53.
RobinsonS. B.LeonardK. F. (2024). Designing quality survey questions. Sage.
54.
Rooks-EllisD. L.RyanJ.FloydK.SundeenT. (2024). Assistive technology and rural settings: A scoping review of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 40(2), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434241289955
55.
*RubleL.McGrewJ.FischerM.FindleyJ.StaytonR. (2023). School and intrapersonal predictors and stability of rural special education teacher burnout. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 42(3), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705231180885
56.
RudeH.MillerK. J. (2018). Policy challenges and opportunities for rural special education. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517748662
57.
*SchultzJ. E.SavaianoM. E. (2023). Perspectives of teachers of students with visual impairments and orientation and mobility specialists during COVID-19. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 42(4), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705231213320
58.
ShermanA.SageR. (2011). Sending off your good treasures: Rural schools, brain drain, and community survival in the wake of economic collapse. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26(11). https://jrre.psu.edu/sites/default/files/2019-08/26-11.pdf
SingerE.YeC. (2013). The use and effects of incentives in surveys. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 645(1), 112–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212458082
61.
SmythJ. D.DillmanD. A.ChristianL. M.O’NeillA. C. (2010). Using the internet to survey small towns and communities: Limitations and possibilities in the early 21st century. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(9), 1423–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764210361695
62.
StedmanR. C.ConnellyN. A.HeberleinT. A.DeckerD. J.AllredS. B. (2019). The end of the (research) world as we know it? Understanding and coping with declining response rates to mail surveys. Society & Natural Resources, 32(5), 581–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1587127
63.
StengerR.OlsonK.SmythJ. D. (2023). Comparing readability measures and computer-assisted question evaluation tools for self-administered survey questions. Field Methods, 35(4), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X221124469
64.
*SundeenT. H. (2022). Preparing for increasing inclusion in rural schools: A university and rural educational service agency collaboration. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 41(4), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705221132557
65.
*SwindlehurstK. A.BerryA. B. (2021). Developing pre-service teachers’ skills in post-secondary transition through applied practice. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 40(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870520982300
66.
*TomanG.MaagJ. W. (2024). A survey of rural special education teachers’ professional development experiences. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 43(3), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705241258737
67.
TourangeauR. (2019). Surveying hard-to-survey populations despite the unfavorable environment. American Journal of Public Health, 109(10), 1326–1327. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305300
68.
TourangeauR.RipsL. J.RasinskiK. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press.
VaughnL. M.JacquezF. (2020). Characteristics of community science partnerships: Engagement, communication, and shared decision-making. Collaborations: A Journal of Community-Based Research and Practice, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.13244
71.
WelshR. O. (2024). Does rural mean not urban? Reconsidering the conceptualization and operationalization of rural school districts. Urban Education, 60(6), 1530–1565. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859241227929
72.
*WertsM. G.CarpenterE. S.FewellC. (2014). Barriers and benefits to response to intervention: Perceptions of special education teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 33(2), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051403300202
73.
ZahndW. E.BellN.LarsonA. E. (2022). Geographic, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic inequities in broadband access. Journal of Rural Health, 38(3), 519–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12635
74.
*ZhangE.BellingerS.SwailsL.PuntS.TepperK.NelsonE. L. (2023). Connecting behavioral health specialists with schools: Adapting a telementoring series during COVID-19. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 42(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705231152
