In this program description, we examined the impact of East Carolina University’s educator preparation program on beginning special educators’ preparedness and confidence to meet professional standards and fulfill their job responsibilities using Q methodology. For this work, undergraduate interns who were enrolled in a rural-focused teacher preparation program that is also located rurally completed a Q sort of national standards for special education teachers and a written questionnaire. Data were analyzed using factor analysis and thematic analysis to draw conclusions about the interns’ perceptions of self-efficacy within the context of their programmatic experiences. Findings indicated interns felt prepared to encourage diversity and address individual students’ needs; however, they need more support engaging in professional practice and assuming the role of a collaborative leader. In addition, targeted coursework, such as developing Individualized Education Programs, supported their learning.
AzanoA. P.StewardT. T. (2016). Confronting challenges at the intersection of rurality, place, and teacher preparation: Improving efforts in teacher education to staff rural schools. Global Education Review, 3(1), 108–128.
BerryA. B.PetrinR. A.GravelleM. L.FarmerT. W. (2011). Issues in special education teacher recruitment, retention, and professional development: Considerations in supporting rural teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30(4), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051103000402
4.
BillingsleyB.BettiniE. (2019). Special education teacher attrition and retention: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 89(5), 697–744. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319862495
5.
BrownS. R. (1993). A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16(3/4), 91–138.
6.
CancioE. J.AlbrechtS. F.JohnsB. H. (2013). Defining administrative support and its relationship to the attrition of teachers of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(4), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2013.0035
7.
CanigiliaC. M. (2016). Special education teachers: Reported preparedness and confidence to implement the 2012 CEC initial level special educator preparation standards (Publication No. 10139774) [Doctoral dissertation, Washington State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
CondermanG.Johnston-RodriguezS.HartmanP.WalkerD. (2012). Honoring voices from beginning special educators for making changes in teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406412473311
10.
ConleyS.YouS. (2017). Key influences on special education teachers’ intentions to leave: The effects of administrative support and teacher team efficacy in a mediational model. Educational Management, Administration, & Leadership, 45(3), 521–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215608859
11.
CooganJ.HerringtonN. (2011). Q methodology: An overview. Research in Secondary Teacher Education, 1(2), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.8604v
12.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2015). What every special educator must know: Professional ethics and standards, 2012 (7th ed.).
13.
CreswellJ.ClarkV. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
14.
GrazianoK. J.NavarreteL. A. (2012). Co-teaching in a teacher education classroom: Collaboration, compromise, and creativity. Issues in Teacher Education, 21(1), 109–126.
15.
HagamanJ. L.CaseyK. J. (2018). Teacher attrition in special education: Perspectives from the field. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(4), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417725797
16.
Hamilton-JonesB. M.VailC. O. (2014). Preparing special educators for collaboration in the classroom: Pre-service teachers’ beliefs and perspectives. International Journal of Special Education, 29(1), 76–86.
17.
HillR. (2005). Reflection as a professional development strategy during organizational change. Reflective Practice, 6(2), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940500106013
18.
HongJ. Y. (2012). Why do some beginning teachers leave the school, and others stay? Understanding teacher resilience through psychological lenses. Teachers and Teaching, 18(4), 417–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.696044
19.
HowleyA.WoodL.HoughB. (2011). Rural elementary school teachers’ technology integration. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26(9), 1–13. http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/26-9.pdf
20.
KrugerJ.DunningD. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
21.
LeeY.PattersonP. P.VegaL. A. (2011). Perils to self-efficacy perceptions and teacher-preparation quality among special education intern teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(2), 61–76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23479693
22.
Mason-WilliamsL.BettiniE.PeytonD.HarveyA.RosenbergM.SindelarP. T. (2020). Rethinking shortages in special education: Making good on the promise of an equal opportunity for students with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0888406419880352
23.
McClureC.ReevesC. (2004). Rural teacher recruitment and retention: Review of the research and practice literature. Appalachian Educational Laboratory. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED484967.pdf
MehrenbergR. L. (2013). Red tape and green teachers: The impact of paperwork on novice special education teachers. International Journal of Special Education, 28(1), 80–87.
26.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
27.
MilitelloM.FusarelliB.MattinglyA.WarrenT. (2015). “We do what we’re told”: How current assistant principals practice leadership and how they wish they could. Journal of School Leadership, 25(2), 194–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461502500201
28.
MilitelloM.JansonC.TonissenD. (2016). InQuiry: A participatory approach for understanding stakeholder perceptions. The Foundation Review, 8(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1286
29.
MoffaE. D.McHentry-SorberE. (2018). Learning to be rural: Lessons about being rural in teacher education programs. The Rural Educator, 39(1), 26–40.
30.
O’ConnorC.JoffeH. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
31.
OthmanL. B.KieranL.AndersonC. J. (2015). Educators’ perspectives: Survey on the 2009 CEC advanced content standards. The Learning Assistance Review, 20(1), 31–46.
32.
ReidJ.GreeneB.CooperM.HastingsW.LockG.WhiteS. (2010). Regenerating rural social space? Teacher education for rural-regional sustainability. Australian Journal of Education, 54(3), 262–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494411005400304
33.
RenbargerR.DavisB. K. (2019). Mentors, self-efficacy, or professional development: Which mediate job satisfaction for new teachers? A regression examination. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 8(1), 21–34.
34.
RodlJ. E.CruzR. A.KnollmanG. A. (2020). Applying Q methodology to teacher evaluation research. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65, Article 100844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100844
35.
RonfeldtM.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212463813
36.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
ShinebourneP.AdamsM. (2007). Q-methodology as a phenomenological research method. Existential Analysis, 18(1), 103–115.
39.
SindelarP. T.PuaD. J.FisherT.PaytonD. J.BrownellM. R.Mason-WilliamsL. (2018). The demand for special education teachers in rural schools revisited: An update on progress. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517749247
40.
StennerP.Stainton RogersR. (2004). Q methodology and qualiquantology: The example of discriminating between emotions. In ToddZ.NerlichB.McKeownS.ClarkeD. D. (Eds.), Mixing methods in psychology: The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice (pp. 166–201). Psychology Press.
41.
StephensonW. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. University of Chicago Press.
42.
SuterJ.GiangrecoM. (2009). Numbers that count: Exploring special education and paraprofessional service delivery in inclusion-oriented schools. Journal of Special Education, 43(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10/.1177/0022466907313353
43.
SutherlandL.HowardS.MarkauskaiteL. (2010). Professional identity creation: Examining the development of beginning preservice teachers’ understanding of their work as teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 455–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.006
44.
WattsS.StennerP. (2005). Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088705qp022oa
45.
WeblerT.DanielsonS.TulerS. (2009). Using Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research. Social and Environmental Research Institute. www.seri-us.org/pubs/Qprimer.pdf
