Retrospective Cost Analysis of Ultrasound Versus Computed Tomography Guided Nonvascular Invasive Radiologic Procedures at a Community-Based Hospital

Abstract

The study compares the cost analysis of ultrasound versus computed tomography guidance for nonvascular invasive procedures. Ultrasound and computed tomography-guided invasive procedures are performed routinely in all radiology departments. However, in many departments computed tomography guidance is preferred to ultrasound, sometimes without valid medical indication, aside from personal preference or training. In the authors' department, all requests for imaging-guided nonvascular procedures initially are evaluated for the possibility of ultrasound guidance. This retrospective study included 2971 patients who underwent invasive procedures with ultrasound and computed tomography guidance during a 4-year period (1994-1997). Outcomes were compared to those of another community-based hospital in the same area. The cost analysis was made based on Health Care Financing Administration/ Medicare reimbursements. The results show that approximately 10% of patients can be redirected from computed tomography-guided procedures to ultrasound guidance.

Keywords

ultrasound guidance computed tomrography guidance biopsy aspiration cost community based

References

1. American Medical Association (AMA) : Physicians' Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) '98 professional editioni. Chicago, AMA, 1998.

2. Nelson RC , Sheafor DH , Paulson EK , et al: Percutaneous biopsy of the liver and pancreas: Comprehensive comparison of the cost of using CT or ultrasound-guidance, abstracted. 1997 Scientific Program, RSNA, Gastrointestinal (intervention: abdomen and pancreas), Supplement 1997;205:146.

3. Charboneau JW , Reading CC , Welch TJ : CT and sonographically guided needle biopsy: Current techniques and new innovations. AJR 1990;154:1-10.

4. Matalon TAS , Silver B : US guidance of interventional procedures. Radiology 1990;174:43-47.

5. Reading CC , Charboneau JW , James EM , et al: Sonographically guided percutaneous biopsy of small (3 cm or less) masses. AJR 1988;151:189-192.

6. Gazelle GS , Haaga JR : Guided percutaneous biopsy of intraabdominal lesions. AjR 1989; 153:929-935.

7. Brandt KR , Charboneau JW , Stephens DV , et al: CT and US-guidedbiopsy of the pancreas. Radiology 1993;187:99-104.

8. Sanchez G MC , Perez SJ , Bernal BA , et al: Ultrasoundguided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Study of the cost per patient and comparison with computed tomographyguided biopsy. Rev Esp Enferm Apar Dig 1997;89(4): 301-304.

9. Memel DS , Dodd GD III , Esola CC : Efficacy of sonography as a guidance technique for biopsy of abdominal, pelvic, and retroperitoneal lymph nodes. AJR 1996; 167:957-962.