The results of in vitro experiments and animal studies using a wide range of ultrasound intensity levels are reviewed. Somatic, genetic, and teratogenic effects of ultrasound exposure in mammals are examined. The weaknesses of the studies and their clinical applications are discussed.
1. Coakley WT, Dunn F. Interaction of megahertz ultrasound and biological polymers, in Reid JM, Sikov MR (eds.). Interaction of ultrasound and biological tissues. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Publications Office; 1972. U. S. Department of Heath, Education, and Welfare Publication (FDA) 73-8008, pp 43-45.
2.
2. Coakley WT, Dunn F. Degradation of DNA in highintensity focused ultrasonic fields at 1 MHz. J Acoust Soc Am1971;50:1539-1545.
3.
3. Hawley SA, Macleod RM, Dunn F. Degradation of DNA by intense, noncavitating ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am1963;35:1285-1287.
4.
4. Hill CR. Ultrasonic exposure thresholds for changes in cells and tissues. J Acoust Soc Am1972;52:667-672.
5.
5. Peacocke AR, Pritchard NJ. Some biophysical aspects of ultrasound. Progr Biophys1968;18:185-208.
6.
6. Galperin-Lemaitre H, Kirsch-Volders M, Levi S. Fragmentation of purified mammalian DNA molecules by ultrasound below human therapeutic doses. Hum Genet1975;29:61-66.
7.
7. Thacker J. Ultrasound and mammalian DNA. Lancet1975;2: 770-770.
8.
8. Fu YK, Miller MW, Lange CS, et al. Ultrasound lethality to synchronous and asynchronous chinese hamster V-79 cells. Ultrasound Med Biol1980;6:39-46.
9.
9. Fry FJ, Kossoff G, Eggleton RC, Dunn F. Threshold ultrasonic dosages for structural changes in mammalian brain. J Acoust Soc Am1970;48(suppl):1413-1413.
10.
10. Dunn F, Fry FJ. Ultrasonic threshold dosage for the mammalian central nervous system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng1971;BME-18:253-256.
11.
11. Dyson M, Pond JB, Joseph J, Warwick R. The simulation of tissue regeneration by means of ultrasound. Clin Sci1968;35:273-285.
12.
12 Kremkau FW. Cancer therapy with ultrasound: A historical review. JCU1979;7:287-300.
13.
13. Martin AO. Can ultrasound cause genetic damage?JCU1984;12:11-20.
14.
14. MacIntosh IJC, Davey DA. Chromosome aberrations induced by an ultrasonic fetal pulse detector. Br Med J1970;4:92-93.
15.
15. MacIntosh IJC, Davey DA. Relationship between intensity of ultrasound and induction of chromosome aberrations. Br J Radiol1972;45:320-327.
16.
16. Macintosh IJC, Brown RC, Coakley WT. Ultrasound and in vitro chromosome abberrations. Br J Radiol1975;48:230-232.
17.
17. Abdulla U, Dewhurst CJ, Campbell C, et al. Effects of diagnostic ultrasound on maternal and fetal chromosomes. Lancet1971;2:829-831.
18.
18. Ikeuchi T, Sasaki M, Oshimura M, et al. Ultrasound and embryonic chromosomes. Br Med J1973;1:112-112.
19.
19. Serr DM, Padeh B, Zabat H, et al. Studies on the effect of ultrasonic waves on the fetus, in Huntington PJ, Beard RW, Hutten EE, Seapes JW (eds.). Proceedings of the Secona European Congress on Perinatal Medicine. London, 1971;302-307.
20.
20. Cataldo FL, Miller MW, Gergory WD, Carstensen EL. A description of ultrasonically induced chromosomal anomalies in Vicia faba. Radiation Botany1973;13:211-213.
21.
21. Lyon MF, Simpson GM. An Investigation into the possible genetic hazards of ultrasound. Br J Radiol1974;47:712-722.
22.
22. Liebeskind D, Bases R, Mendez F, et al. Sister chromatid exchanges in human lymphocytes after exposure to diagnostic ultrasound. Science1979;205:1273-1275.
23.
23. Liebeskind D, Bases R, Elequin F, et al. Diagnostic ultrasound Effects on the DNA and growth patterns of animal cells. Radiology1979;131:177-184.
24.
24. Biological effects of ultrasound: Mechanisms and clinical implications (NCRP Report No. 74). Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 1983.
25.
25. O'Brien WD Jr. Safety of ultrasound with selective emphasis for obstetrics. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MR1984;5:105-120.
26.
26. Sikov MR. Effects of ultrasound on development, Part II: Studies in mammalian species: an overview. J Ultrasound Med1986;5:651-661.
27.
27. Akamatsu N. Ultrasound irradiation effects on preimplantation embryos. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi1981;33:969-978.
28.
28. Pizzarello DJ, Vivino A, Madden B, et al. The effect of pulsed low power ultrasound on growing tissues, Part I: Developing mammalian and insect tissue. Exp Cell Biol1978;46:179-191.
29.
29. Child SZ, Carstensen EL, David H. A test for the effects of low-temporal-average intensity, pulsed ultrasound on the rat fetus. Exp Cell Biol1984;52: 207-210.
30.
30. Warwick R, Pond JB, Woodward B, Connolly C. Hazards of diagnostic ultrasonography: A study with mice. IEEE Trans Sonics Ultrasound1970;SU-17:158-164.
31.
31. Shoji R, Momma R, Shimizu T, Matsuda S. An experimental study on the effects of low-intensity ultrasound on developing mouse embryos. Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi1971;18:51-56.
32.
32. Shoji R, Momma R, Shimizu T, Matsuda S. Experimental studies on the effect of ultrasound on mouse embryos. Teratology1972;6:119-119.
33.
33. Takabayashi YA, Sato S, Sato A, Suzuki M. Effects of pulse-wave ultrasonic irradiation on mouse embryo. Cho-Onpa Igaku (Supersonic Medicinei)1981;8:286-288.
34.
34. Child SZ, Carstensen EL, Gates AH, Hall WJ. Testing for the teratogenicity of pulsed ultrasound in mice. Ultrasound Med Biol1988;14:493-498.
