Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A preclinical study of 15 Macaca fascicularis monkeys was conducted to determine (1) the ability of detecting median mononeuropathy (MMN) within the median nerve after a work intervention and (2) the relationship between the layers of the median nerve during an acute inflammatory process by using sonography in conjunction with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Cross-sectional areas (CSAs) were imaged using MRI and sonography proximal to the carpal tunnel inlet (defined by the most distal portion of the radius) and further distal into the carpal tunnel (defined by the most proximal portion of the pisiform) at the prework exposure stage. CSAs measured on the outer edge of the median nerve were obtained from both modalities, at both anatomical locations. An intermodality t test demonstrated no statistical differences between the two sets of measurements (radius, P ≤ .15; pisiform, P ≤ .46). At the postwork exposure stage, sonographic measurements were obtained on the outer and inner borders of the median nerve at both anatomical levels. A two-tailed t test showed statistically significant differences within the carpal tunnel comparing pre- and postwork CSA measurements (radius, P ≤ .01; pisiform, P ≤ .297). The epineurial layer area was then determined as the difference between outer-border and inner-border CSAs. Pearson correlations between the epineurial layer and overall median nerve CSA within the carpal tunnel demonstrated a strong positive correlation that was statistically significant (r = 0.97; P ≤ .01) after postwork exposure. Possible factors contributing to this acute phase of MMN could be hyperemia within the layers of the nerve and the development of Renault bodies. This work would need to be translated to human studies for further confirmation of the anatomic and clinical significance of this effect.

Keywords

median mononeuropathy MRI sonography wrist median nerve

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), also known as median mononeuropathy (MMN), is a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by the compression of the median nerve as it passes through the carpal tunnel and under the transverse carpal ligament. This is the most common nerve entrapment syndrome of the upper limbs, with approximately 849,000 new cases reported each year in the United States.¹ Nerve conduction studies are presently considered the gold standard in the diagnosis of CTS; however, imaging studies have shown a positive correlation between increasing cross-sectional nerve area measurements obtained using musculoskeletal sonography and a decrease in nerve conduction velocities.^2–6

Sonography has also been demonstrated effective in evaluating other pathologies in the wrist such as masses or fluid collections, as well as the size and echotexture of the median nerve at distinct anatomical landmarks.⁷ The National Guidelines Clearinghouse provides an evidence-based guideline for CTS diagnosed with sonography. This set of guidelines was the direct result of a meta-analysis published in 2011, which reported the diagnostic sensitivity of sonography to evaluate the median nerve at 77.6% and a specificity of 86.8%.⁸ This indicates a role for high-resolution sonography, which can capture median nerve enlargement and increased hypoechogencity.⁹ Recent studies have taken a different approach to improve the diagnostic accuracy of sonography of the median nerve. During the acute phase of CTS, the median nerve becomes enlarged and constricted by the transverse carpal ligament as it passes distally through the carpal tunnel inlet. Proximal to the inlet, a hyperemic response develops coupled with intraneural edema, causing an inflamed nerve. Swelling constricts the nerve as it passes through the inlet on its course to innervate the hand. By combining sonographic measures, including cross-sectional area, hypoechogenicity, and hypervascularity of the median nerve, the additive effect of these measures raised the probability of a correct CTS diagnosis to 87% to 99%.^10,11

Preliminary studies have suggested that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the carpal tunnel is more sensitive than sonography for detecting compression of the median nerve by surrounding anatomy or pathology.¹² The American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria rank MRI as the imaging gold standard for CTS and is the recommended radiologic procedure with the clinical condition of chronic wrist pain with or without prior injury and normal or nondiagnostic radiographs.¹³

The objective of the current study was to investigate the use of cross-sectional area measurements of the median nerve to determine whether longitudinal sonography measures could be used to detect physiologic change. By investigating the size of the median nerve measured using sonography and compared with MRI, a preclinical investigation might discern whether this imaging modality can detect physiologic change in the median nerve.

Methods and Materials

A study approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) board of review was completed using 15 Macaca fascicularis monkeys as participants in MMN research. During a 20-week working phase, the 15 M fascicularis performed a repetitive pinching task affecting the left wrist, with the intention of inducing MMN.¹⁴ A baseline MRI scan and two baseline sonograms were taken prior to work exposure. Ten additional sonograms were performed throughout the pre- and postwork exposure. The baseline MRI examinations were then retrospectively matched with sonograms that were completed closest to the same date.

MRI Examination

A modified musculoskeletal MRI protocol was completed on a BioSpec 94/30 MRI System equipped with a 9.4T horizontal bore magnet (Bruker BioSpin, Billerica, Massachusetts). The magnet operated at 400 MHz, running ParaVision 4.0 software platform adapted from the TopSpin 1.5 (Bruker BioSpin). Each subject was positioned in a warm plastic cylinder with a 3.5-mm quadrature coil placed anterior to the wrist. A 20-cm spatial gradient was used for signal acquisition. The subjects were also monitored throughout the scan with a Model 1025 small animal monitoring system (Small Animals Instruments, Stony Brook, New York). T1- and T2-weighted MRI scans were performed in the axial plane, obtaining 32 images of the median nerve as the scans progressed distally down the arm.

Sonography Examination

A musculoskeletal sonography protocol was refined and replicated to evaluate the size and shape of the median nerve quantitatively and qualitatively.^15,16 Three sonographers used a GE Logiq i hand-carried unit (HCU) (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) to scan the subjects, using a 12.0-MHz linear probe with a bandwidth of 7 to 12 MHz. A 12.0-MHz imaging frequency was selected; the time gain compensation controls were aligned vertically and centered with Harmonics and CrossBeam also being used. Each wrist was scanned in both the axial and longitudinal planes to obtain multiple views of the median nerve. In the axial plane, dynamic clips were stored as the scan progressed distally. Weekly quality control measurements were performed with the transducer and a tissue-mimicking phantom throughout the study to monitor and document reliable equipment performance.

Analysis

Cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements were obtained from both imaging modalities in the axial plane, at the levels of the distal radius (proximal to the carpal tunnel) and the proximal pisiform (within the carpal tunnel). In previous studies, there has been some discrepancy in the manner with which sonographic CSA measurements were acquired. Several studies have used the outer edge of the median nerve epineurium to evaluate the CSA of the nerve,^17,18 whereas others have advocated measuring inside the epineurium by tracking around the hypoechoic inner border.^7,19–22 For this study, both measurements were obtained on the sonograms by tracing around the outer edge of the epineurium as well as inside the epineurium (Figure 1A,B). To address measurement error that could be attributed to the researcher, a direct trace of the CSA was completed five times at each anatomical location. The highest and lowest values were eliminated and the middle three data points were averaged.

Figure 1.

(A) Sonogram of the median nerve imaged in the axial plane. Note the echogenic outer edge (white arrow), known as the epineurium, which surrounds the nerve, and the hypoechoic inner edge (red arrow), which surrounds the perineurium and endoneurium. (B) Axial magnetic resonance image of the left working wrist of a subject that provides a high-resolution image of the outer border of the median nerve, at the level of the radius, proximal to the carpal tunnel inlet.

MRI Analysis

The appropriate T1-weighted MRI examination was selected and analyzed using the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Center for Information Technology medical imaging analysis computer software package, Medical Image Processing, Analysis, and Visualization (MIPAV; NIH, Bethesda, Maryland). A credentialed MRI technologist selected images of the median nerve in the axial plane at the anatomical landmarks of the distal radius (Figure 2) and the proximal pisiform (Figure 3). Proximal to the carpal tunnel inlet was identified in the axial plane as the slice at the most distal level of the radius, and within the carpal tunnel was identified by the most proximal portion of the pisiform. CSA measurements of the median nerve were then performed by using the direct trace function on the MIPAV software. The researcher carefully traced around the outer edges of the nerve epineurium at these two locations. Once the traces were completed, the computer software automatically calculated the CSA. The image number within the imaging sequence for both MRI and sonography was recorded on a customized worksheet to ensure reproducibility for further data analysis.

Figure 2.

Anatomical structures that make up a typical peripheral nerve. Do You Really Need Back Surgery? A Surgeon’s Guide to Neck and Back Pain and How to Choose Your Treatment. http://www.backpainguide.com/Chapter_Fig_folders/Ch10_Recover_Folder/Ch10-1_NerveStruct.html. Reprinted with permission by Oxford University Press.

Figure 3.

(A) Cross-sectional representative diagram of a normal peripheral nerve and the associated vascularity, without compression of the nerve. (B) A hypothesized cross-sectional representative diagram of an acute mononeuropathy of a peripheral nerve with associated hyperemia. The solid blue arrow depicts the compression on the nerve and the small open blue arrow demonstrates the swelling directed outward on the epineurium.

Sonogram Analysis

The individual cases were analyzed by a credentialed sonographer on the same GE Logiq i HCU that was used to perform the original musculoskeletal sonogram. Using the analytical software found on the HCU, measurements at the corresponding locations to MRI were taken. The dynamic clip of the axial median nerve was selected and matched by date to the corresponding MRI. Using the run/stop function, images were selected that captured an image at the distal radius and at the proximal pisiform. Using the direct trace function on the HCU, the outer edges of the median nerve were carefully traced, making sure to include all of the epineurium. On the same image, the nerve trace was repeated for the inner hyperechoic border. In a similar manner as with the MRI, the direct trace of the CSA was completed five times, and the high and low measures were eliminated from the average.

Once both an outer CSA and an inner CSA were recorded, the inner CSA was subtracted from the outer CSA to obtain a residual area that represented the epineurial tissue.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were generated using Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, Washington) so that a mean CSA measurement could be objectively compared between both imaging modalities. This analysis also allowed for the detection of measurement changes involving the nerve that could be attributed to work exposure. Mean CSAs were organized and grouped by method of analysis (inner border, outer border, and residual), anatomical location (proximal to the carpal tunnel inlet and within the carpal tunnel), and the time point within the study the measurements were collected (prework vs postwork exposure).

Two-tailed t tests were used to compare the subject measurements made by MRI and sonography at the baseline time point at both anatomical locations. In addition, a Pearson correlation was used to test for a linear relationship between work exposure and ultrasound CSA measurements made at the same anatomical locations. A P value ≤.05 was set a priori for statistical significance.

Results

Fifteen M fascicularis monkeys completed the 20 weeks of work exposure and were analyzed retrospectively to determine the potential effects on the left hand and the resulting CSA measurement changes that may have taken place in the median nerve proximal to the carpal tunnel inlet and distal within the carpal tunnel. Mean CSA measurements of the median nerve taken both at baseline and postwork exposure are included in Table 1 for the subjects of the study. The mean days and hours worked for both groups were compared to imaging measurements taken at the distal radius, and proximal pisiform, with MRI and sonography.

Table 1.

Mean Direct Trace CSAs for the Subjects’ Left Hand Preintervention and Postintervention by Group

	US Pisiform OCSA	US Pisiform ICSA	US Radius OCSA	US Radius ICSA	MRI Pisiform OCSA	MRI Radius OCSA
Preintervention
Year 1 (n = 8)	2.76	0.97	2.21	0.70	2.09	1.91
Year 2 (n = 7)	2.54	1.10	1.85	0.66	2.87	3.46
Postintervention
Year 1 (n = 8)	2.59	0.91	1.94	0.65
Year 2 (n = 7)	2.79	0.83	1.68	0.49

Proximal to the carpal tunnel inlet was indicated by the most distal portion of the radius, and within the carpal tunnel was indicated by the most proximal portion of the pisiform. ICSA, inner cross-sectional area; OCSA, outer cross-sectional area; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; US, ultrasonography.

At the baseline stage, a t test comparison between outer direct trace CSAs at the pisiform for MRI and sonography yielded a P value ≤.46, indicating no significant differences in the measurements (and retaining the null hypothesis). The t test was repeated in a similar fashion at the same time point and at the distal radius, with a P value ≤.15, indicating that the hypothesis concerning statistical equality of the direct trace CSAs made including the median nerve epineurium using either MRI or sonography could be retained. The inner sonographic CSA measurements could not be compared with a corresponding MRI image because the inner border of the epineurium was not consistently resolved on the MRI, such that only an outer CSA could be compared at the baseline time point.

A t test was also used to compare ultrasound CSA measurements, including the epineurium, obtained proximal to the carpal tunnel inlet and further distal into the carpal tunnel prior to and at the conclusion of the working phase. Proximal to the carpal tunnel inlet, a P value ≤.297 was found, indicating that the CSAs measured using sonography at this level were similar, and no significant change was observed after the work intervention. However, further distal into the carpal tunnel, a P value ≤.01 was noted, concluding that the direct-trace CSAs obtained from sonography were significantly different following the work interval.

The designed intervention was an opportunity for the subjects to perform a repetitive pinching task that could affect the left wrist. Given the statistical differences in CSA from the baseline examination and the conclusion of the working phase at the level of the pisiform, a Pearson correlation was done to determine if changes in CSA measurements were associated with the work exposure and if it would be possible to gauge the changes that might occur in the CSA of the epineurial layer occurring at the level of the pisiform (Figure 1A).

After work exposure, a residual area, or area of the epineurium, at the postwork stage was calculated by subtracting the postwork inner CSA measurements from the postwork outer CSA measurements. This residual area was then correlated with both the postwork outer CSA and postwork inner CSA measurements. The results of a Pearson correlation demonstrated a statistically significant low-level strength of association (r = .22, P ≤ .01) between the residual area and inner CSA measurements. However, a statistically significant high level of association (r = .95, P ≤ .01) was noted for a correlation between the residual area and outer CSA measurements (Table 2).

Table 2.

Correlations Between CSAs of Sonographic Residual Area (Epineurial Layer) Outer and Inner CSA by Anatomical Location of the Pisiform, Postwork Exposure

	r Value	P Value
Inner CSA	.22	.01
Outer CSA	.95	.01

Within the carpal tunnel is identified by the most proximal portion of the pisiform. CSA, cross-sectional area.

Further analysis was done to determine if the work exposure intervention presented a correlation between mean work exposure and the residual area (epineurial layer) of the median nerve at the level of the pisiform in the postwork stage. Again, a Pearson correlation was used and determined that a slightly positive correlation (r = .30, P ≤ .01) was present.

Discussion

A mononeuropathy is a disorder that involves a single peripheral nerve and is caused by an injury that can result in short- or long-term debilitation. Unlike the central nervous system, peripheral nerves are stronger and much more resilent.²³ This resilience to injury in a peripheral nerve has been attributed to a series of connective tissue sheaths that help to insulate and enclose the delicate sensory and motor fibers.²³ This preclinical study was designed to investigate the use of cross-sectional area measurements across imaging modalities in order to provide diagnostic information on physiologic change and the stage of injury to the median nerve in a controlled cohort of M fascicularis. Using MRI and sonography to image the median nerve required a diagnostic ability to distinguish between the normal appearance of the nerve and the various changes resulting from repetitive injury.

This cohort of subjects began with prework measurements that were compared statistically using a t test. Reviewing the outcomes during the prework phase of the study, the results demonstrated no statistical differences between MRI and sonography in the measurements proximal to the carpal tunnel or further distal in the carpal tunnel. This lack of statistical difference demonstrated the ability of MRI and sonography to provide very similar measurements of the median nerve when the outer border of the epineurium was included in the CSA. Because MRI is considered the gold standard for obtaining median nerve dimensions, these data provide validity for the measurements made using sonography.

The choice to suspend further analysis of CSAs measured on the outer rim of the epineurium was the controversy and the need to standardize the measurement being explored in this experiment. The analysis of the CSAs measured inside of the epineurium with sonography is highly advocated; however, this could not be compared with MRI since this modality cannot accurately resolve the inner border of the epineurium. Therefore, by subtracting the sonographic outer-border CSA measurements, which included the epineurium, from the inner sonographic CSA measured along the inner border of the epineurium, a residual area representing epineurial layer thickness can be obtained. Outer sonographic measurements were used throughout this experiment due to the statistical similarity when compared with the gold-standard MRI measurements.

The next step was to try to understand the relationship of the inner-border sonographic CSA measurement with the outer CSA (outer-border epineurium) measurements. The connective tissue making up the epineurium, which serves to protect the nerve fibers, is known as epineurial connective tissue. Because sonography is able to accurately determine the CSA of the median nerve while excluding the epineurium,⁷ it was possible to derive the interfascicular epineurial connective tissue area measurement, which surrounds the fascicles inside the nerve, by subtracting this from the sonographic measurements, which included the epineurium. This residual area or epineurium measurement would then allow for an analysis of the interaction between the outer and inner CSA measurements and the epineurial connective tissue area, all obtained through sonography. While examining the area of the nerve at the inlet to the carpal tunnel (distal point of the radius), a t test between these residual area measurements before and after work exposure demonstrated no statistical differences. Therefore, further measurement analysis was deemed unnecessary.

Moving to the area of the nerve further distal within the carpal tunnel, identified by the most proximal portion of the pisiform, significant differences were seen comparing the pre- and postwork intervention. Using the calculated epineurial layer, defined as the difference between outer and inner median nerve CSA measurements, correlations could be made to allow for a better understanding of the relationship between the layers of the median nerve involved in the inflammatory process. A comparison of the outer CSA measurements, which included the epineurium, to the epineurial layer area itself demonstrated a strong positive correlation, suggesting that any increase in outer CSA could result in an increase of the epineurium layer area regardless of physiologic change. A second correlation between CSA measurements made along the inner border, which excludes the epineurial layer, and the same epineurial layer area as used in the previous correlation demonstrated a weak positive correlation, suggesting that as the epineurial layer area increased, the inner CSA measurements remained somewhat constant. These findings suggest that as inflammation of the median nerve occurs, it is the enlargement of the epineurial layer causing the overall increase in size, as opposed to the inner area of the nerve, which includes the fascicles and perineurium (Figure 3A,B). Continued study into alternative physiologic factors that could have influenced these results is important to explore, with the cautionary note that a strong statistical correlation does not necessarily represent causation.²⁴

Previous studies have reported the acute constriction of the median nerve at the site of entrapment resulting in swelling.²⁵ In the current study, measurements were repeated after work exposure to detect acute measurement changes within the nerve that may be attributed to inflammation. Inflammatory changes in the nerve have been described as eliciting a hypoechoic appearance with sonography and enlargement of the nerve due to endoneural edema.^18,26 To determine the optimal diagnostic technique, it was necessary to repeat the statistical comparisons postwork exposure at both locations, proximal to the carpal tunnel inlet and further distal within the carpal tunnel. Repeating the t test demonstrated a significant P value at the location of the proximal pisiform, or distal inside the carpal tunnel, which indicated a significant difference in the CSA measurements obtained. Because differing time points in the study were being explored, it became important to isolate the single intervention, which was the only factor that had been altered between the pre- and postwork measurements.

Because work exposure was the single intervention made between pre- and postmeasurements, the analysis of work exposure should be important to postulating what could be contributing to differences in the imaging measurements. Work exposure was the opportunity to complete the repetitive squeeze task, but it is not a direct measure of the actual force exerted by the subjects. This would be a more direct measure of the impact of the repetitive movements on the median nerve.

The work exposure proved to be influential in the difference between measurements taken before and after work at the anatomical level inside the carpal tunnel. Although the mean hours worked are a relatively “soft” measure of the intervention, this begins to describe the possible physiologic changes that may have been taking place within the median nerve. Increased CSA measurements traced outside the epineurium with concomitant residual CSA enlargement could be a contributor to impingement of the fascicules within the median nerve. Work exposure would be hypothesized to have more impact over a sustained time period, so the fact that this level of association was even demonstrated speaks to the influence of the repetitive pinch-pinch task.

These findings suggest a potential relationship between the physiologic response of the inflammation of the entire median nerve and that of just the epineurium, which is worth further investigation. The lack of entire nerve inflammation suggests that, as epineurial swelling compresses the interfascicular connective tissue area, this swelling in turn compresses the fascicles and affects electrical signaling. This ultimate compressive impact on the electrical signals is the underlying cause of the painful and symptomatic hands that are associated with CTS.²⁷ This would also explain the lack of sensitivity reported in a previous study in which CSA measurements were obtained excluding the epineurium.²⁸ Although the entire epineurial area of the nerve is accurately visualized through sonography, it is not the portion of the nerve where swelling is attributed. These data suggest that not only is the epineurium of the median nerve expanding and causing difficulty in moving through the carpal tunnel, but also the expansion internally within the nerve causes a decrease in electrical signals being transmitted distally to the hand and fingers.

An additional factor that can be attributed to intrafascicular compression is Renaut bodies. Renaut bodies are fibroblasts that are believed to be derived from endoneurial connective tissue and are often noted to be deposited around the median nerve as a response to repeated mechanical stress.^29,30 In a cadaver study, Renaut bodies were found on all five females, and the deposition consistently surrounded the fascicles of the median nerve segments removed for microscopic investigation.³¹ The presence of Renaut bodies is another potential cause for an increase in the epineurium and constriction of the perinerium from the connective tissue. Renaut bodies’ deposition has been linked with the development of MMN.²⁵

When examining the layers of a median nerve that has incurred a microinjury, the endonerium would react acutely under hyperemic conditions²⁶ and then progress to tissue repair once the trauma is relieved or, if the trauma is not relieved, become ischemic. An injury longitudinally can result in regeneration of nerve fibers depending on the distance that regrowth must take place.³² Continued study is needed to address the reaction of the nerve tissue surrounding the individual fascicles, as physiologic changes may be varied.

Limitations

This study is limited foremost by the level of evidence, which is correlative but not necessarily causative, and should be considered preclinical. In addition, a direct measure of the force during the repetitive squeeze task was not reported and would have made this a more robust analysis. Last, the positioning of the subjects for MRI in the warm plastic cylinder was difficult and could be the source of problems with consistent imaging of the wrist.

Conclusions

While comparing MRI CSA measurements and sonography CSA measurements, it was determined that without any manipulation of the nerve, these two measurements suggest no statistical difference and can be accurately compared. Because MRI is defaulted to as the optimal diagnostic tool for scanning the wrist, it was possible to continue with the experiment using sonography as an optimal imaging technique.

Because of the statistical difference inside the carpal tunnel following work exposure, the next step taken was to correlate both inner and outer CSA sonographic measurements with the epineurial layer area. Given the strong positive correlation between outer CSAs and the epineurial layer, combined with the weak positive correlation between inner CSAs and the epineurial layer area, it can be suggested that an increased size in the epineurium may be the cause of many CTS symptoms. This relationship is critical in demonstrating the pathophysiologic change of the nerve. Possibilities suggested for this physiologic result were intraneural edema, which could be adding to the inflammation of the median nerve and increasing the compression,⁷ and Renaut bodies.^{25,29-30,32-34} Inflammation of the nerve was best displayed using a T2 MRI, which would be the next subsequent step in this research. Another important step would be to compare the blood flow in the perineural plexus using Doppler of the CSA areas to document any increased vascularity that could be linked to an increase in CSA.³³

Future Directions

Although this study was able to report statistically significant findings that somewhat contradict previous studies, further research is needed at the level of the intraneural vessels and surrounding tissue. The results of this pilot study should be considered preclinical evidence and as such cannot be generalized. Our team is committed to further investigation and replication of this study to advance the future of median nerve imaging and CTS diagnosis.

To move this line of research forward and determine whether musculoskeletal sonography can indeed be accurately compared with MRI measurements of proximal and distal segments of the wrist area, this study needs to be replicated with more participants and also translated to a human study. This current study involved only 15 animal subjects, yielding 30 scans at 60 locations to correlate, and more clinical data are needed if conclusions are to be drawn. Translating this work to humans is the next logical step in the progression of the research.

Another suggested direction that this research could undertake would be to compare these two imaging modalities using a direct overlay method. By manipulating images and matching anatomical landmarks, there would be less discrepancy in the measurements obtained because this would further facilitate a direct comparison. This would also remove the derived measurement of the connective tissue area and provide a more direct measurement of the area and shape during all time points throughout the study.

An intermediate step in the current study would be to obtain histological samples of the median nerve through dissection. This gold standard of measurement would provide an even higher level of comparison between the two imaging modalities. It would also allow for a search for the deposition of Renaut bodies. Fueling further research based on these preliminary data may affect the current ACR Appropriateness Criteria and influence an updated version that would reflect a more effective use of musculoskeletal sonography in evaluating the painful wrist for patients. This would advance the diagnosis capabilities of musculoskeletal sonography.

Musculoskeletal sonography also offers additional techniques for the detection of acute nerve trauma such as spectral Doppler. In an acute traumatic stage, the nerve will become hyperemic, therefore causing increased vascularity.³⁵ This physiological response can be detected and visually sampled at any portion of the nerve.36 The use of real-time scanning and the ability to see the live movement of the nerve and the way it interacts with surrounding tissues generates additional ways to monitor the physiologic process of nerve repair.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The research team would like to thank our veterinary technicians, Stephanie Moran and Rebecca Slattery, for their invaluable support and hard work.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was made possible by a grant from the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health R21 OH009907-02 and the ASRT Foundation.

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Report of incidence for CTS in the US per year. http://www.cdc.gov/search.do?q=incidence+of+carpal+tunnel+in+the+US+per+year&oe=UTF-8&ie=UTF-8&sort=date%3AD%3AL%3Ad1&ud=1&site=default_collection&btnG.x=18&btnG.y=7 Accessed September 22, 2010.

Nakamichi

Tachibana

: Ultrasonographic measurement of median nerve cross-sectional area in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic accuracy. Muscle Nerve 2002;26:798–803.

Wiesler

Chloros

Cartwright

Smith

Rushing

Walker

: The use of diagnostic ultrasound in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 2006;31:726–732.

Kwon

Jung

Baek

: Comparison of sonography and electrodiagnostic testing in the diagnosis of CTS. J Hand Surg 2008;33A:65–71.

Visser

Smidt

Lee

: High-resolution sonography versus EMG in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:63–67.

Kaymak

Ozcakar

Cetin

Akinci

Hascelik

: A comparison of the benefits of sonography and electrophysiologic measurements as predictors of symptom severity and functional status in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:743–748.

Bianchi

Martinoli

: Wrist, in Bianchi

Martinoli

(eds): Ultrasound of the Musculoskeletal System. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 2007, pp 425–494.

Fowler

Gaughan

Hyas

: The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of CTS. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:1089–1094.

US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: National Guideline Clearinghouse. http://www.guideline.gov/. Accessed May 31, 2011.

10.

Rahmani

Ghasemi-Esfe

Bozorg

Mazloumi

Khalilzadeh

Kahnouji

: The ultrasonographic correlates of CTS in patients with normal electro diagnostic tests. Acta Radiol 2010;52:191–197.

11.

Ghasemi-Esfe

Khalilzakeh

Mazioumi

Vaziri-Bozorg

Kahnouji

Rahmani

: Combination of high-resolution and color Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Acta Radiol 2011;52:191–197.

12.

Buchberger

: Radiologic imaging of the carpal tunnel. Eur J Radiol 1997;25:112–117.

13.

American College of Radiology: ACR Appropriateness Criteria. http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/app_criteria/pdf/ExpertPanelonMusculoskeletalImaging/ChronicWristPainDoc10.aspx. Accessed December 1, 2011.

14.

Sommerich

Lavender

Buford

Banks

Korkmaz

Pease

: Toward development of a nonhuman primate model of carpal tunnel syndrome: performance of a voluntary repetitive pinching task induces median mononeuropathy in Macaca fascicularis. J Ortho Res 2007;25:713–724.

15.

American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM): AIUM Practice Guideline for the Performance of the Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Examination. Laurel, MD, AIUM, 2007, pp 3–4.

16.

Roll

Evans

: Feasibility of using a hand-carried sonographic unit for investigating median nerve pathology. J Diagn Med Sonography 2009;25:241–249.

17.

Wong

Griffith

Hul

ACF

Wong

: Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic usefulness of sonography. Radiology 2004;232:93–99.

18.

Beekman

Visser

: High resolution sonography of the peripheral nervous system: a review of the literature. Eur J Neurol 2004;11:305–314.

19.

Altinok

Baysal

Karakas

: Ultrasonographic assessment of mild and moderate idiopathic CTS. Clin Radiol 2004;59:916–925.

20.

Roll

Evans

Freimer

Sommerich

: Screening for carpal tunnel syndrome using sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2011;30:1657–1667.

21.

Valle

Zamorani

: Nerve and blood vessels, in Bianchi

Martinoli

(eds): Ultrasound of the Musculoskeletal System. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 2007, pp 97–136.

22.

Roll

Case-Smith

Evans

: Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography vs. electromyography in CTS: a systematic review. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011;37:1539–1553.

23.

Porth

: Disorders of neuromuscular function, in Porth

(ed): Essentials of Pathophysiology: Concepts of Altered Health States. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007, pp 787–821.

24.

Duncan

Sullivan

Lomas

: Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Radiol 1999;173:681–684.

25.

Beekman

Visser

: Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a critical review of the literature. Muscle Nerve 2003;27:26–30.

26.

Jacobson

: Basic pathology concepts, in Jacobson

(ed): Musculoskeletal Ultrasound. Philadelphia, PA, Elsevier, 2007, pp 15–38.

27.

Klauser

Halpern

De Zordo

: Carpal tunnel syndrome assessment with US: value of additional cross-sectional area measurements of the median nerve in patients versus healthy volunteers. Radiology 2009;250:171–177.

28.

Rahmani

Ghasemi Esfe

Bozorg

Mazloumi

Khalilzadeh

Kahnouji

: The ultrasonographic correlates of carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with normal electrodiagnostic tests. Musculoskelet Radiol 2011;116: 489–496.

29.

Hopkins

Glass

: Correlation: concept and computation/relationships between two variables, in Hopkins

Hopkins

Glass

(eds): Basic Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 3rd ed. Boston, Allyn & Bacon, 1996, pp 88–106.

30.

Moran

Perez

Esteban

Bellon

Arranz

del Cerro

: Sonographic measurement of cross-sectional area of the median nerve in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: correlation with nerve conduction studies. J Clin Ultrasound 2009;37:125–131.

31.

Karadag

Kalyoncu

Akdogan

: Sonographic assessment of CTS in rheumatoid arthritis: prevalence and correlation with disease activity. Rheumatol Int 2012;32:2313–2319.

32.

Jefferson

Neary

Eames

: Renault body distribution at sites of human peripheral nerve entrapment. J Neurol Sci 1981;49:19–29.

33.

Ortman

Sahenk

Mendell

: The experimental production of Renaut bodies. J Neurol Sci 1983;62:233–241.

34.

Hill

Hall

: Microscopic anatomy of the posterior interosseous and median nerves at sites of potential entrapment in the forearm. J Hand Surg Br 1999;24:170–176.

35.

Braun

Anderson

: Alterations in neuronal transmission, in Braun

Anderson

(eds): Pathophysiology: Functional Alternations in Human Health. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007, pp 216–252.

36.

Evans

Volz

Hutmire

Roll

: Morphologic characterization of intraneural flow associated with median nerve pathology. J Diagn Med Sonography 2012;28: 11–19.

Utilization of Sonography Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Determining the Cross-Sectional Area of the Median Nerve in a Sample of Working Macaca fascicularis

Abstract

Keywords

Methods and Materials

MRI Examination

Sonography Examination

Analysis

MRI Analysis

Sonogram Analysis

Statistical Analysis

Results

Discussion

Limitations

Conclusions

Future Directions

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

References