On 6 February 2023, Southern Türkiye was hit by devastating earthquakes, directly affecting over 14 million people in 11 cities, causing more than 50,000 deaths and the destruction of more than 800,000 buildings. This article goes beyond the physical damage imposed by the catastrophe to discuss the effects of the earthquakes on the operations of women-owned businesses. The mixed-method study with entrepreneurs belonging to a women’s business association operating in a moderately disrupted part of the region explores their struggles and recovery expectations. Thirty-five questionnaires were analyzed to identify the reasons for business closure, challenges, and needs faced in the post-disaster period and their recovery strategies. In addition, 23 entrepreneurs participated in roundtable discussions to provide a broader context to their responses to survey topics as well as lessons learned. Across both the survey and roundtables, while many respondents reported minor physical damage to their building, they also experienced financial and personal challenges from disruption to equipment, infrastructure, services, supply chains, institutional decisions, employee well-being, and customer base. Many used their business resources and personal savings to assist employees and others in the community. The women entrepreneurs often felt their recovery needs were ignored by government and private relief organizations and encountered barriers to receiving assistance from public and private institutions. Organizing together as women in business, even informally, provided mutual support during the crisis and recovery periods and catalyzed their role in support of their communities. The results illuminate functional community recovery as a balance of recovery of built infrastructure functionality and recovery of the broader social and economic fabric of the community.
AlmuftiIKrollCMielerMTremayneHWeinAXiaoY (2017) Measuring the resilience of businesses following the 2014 South Napa earthquake in California. In: 16th world conference on earthquake engineering, Santiago, Chile, 9–13 January. Available at: https://www.wcee.nicee.org/wcee/article/16WCEE/WCEE2017-2359.pdf (accessed 7 June 2024).
AsgaryAAnjumMIAzimiN (2012) Disaster recovery and business continuity after the 2010 flood in Pakistan: Case of small businesses. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction2: 46–56.
4.
BrooksNAdgerWNKellyPM (2005) The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Global Environmental Change15: 151–163.
5.
ChangSEFalit-BaiamonteA (2002) Disaster vulnerability of businesses in the 2001 Nisqually earthquake. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards4: 59–71.
6.
ChangSETaylorJEElwoodKJSevilleEBrunsdonDGartnerM (2014) Urban disaster recovery in Christchurch: The central business district cordon and other critical decisions. Earthquake Spectra30(1): 513–532.
7.
CollierBLHaughwoutAFKunreutherHCMichel-KerjanEOStewartMA (2016) Firm age and size and the financial management of infrequent shocks. National Bureau of Economic Research Technical Report. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8.
CorreaVSBritoFde LimaRMQueirozMM (2021) Female entrepreneurship in emerging and developing countries: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship14(3): 300–322.
DahlhamerJMTierneyKJ (1998) Rebounding from disruptive events—Business recovery following the Northridge earthquake. Sociological Spectrum18(2): 121–141.
11.
DenzinNKRyanKE (2007) Qualitative methods. In: OuthwaiteWTurnerSP (eds) The Sage Handbook of Social Science Methodology. London: Sage, pp. 578–594.
12.
DietchEACoreyM (2011) Predicting long-term business recovery four years after Hurricane Katrina. Management Research Review34(3): 311–324.
13.
DoerfelMLChewningLVLaiCH (2013) The evolution of networks and the resilience of interorganizational relationships after disaster. Communication Monographs80(4): 533–559.
14.
FilimonauVMatyakubovUMatniyozovMShakenAMikaM (2024) Women entrepreneurs in tourism in a time of a life event crisis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism32(3): 457–479.
15.
FothergillA (1996) Gender, risk, and disaster. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters14: 33–56.
16.
GrubeLEStorrVH (2018) Embedded entrepreneurs and post-disaster community recovery. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development30(7–8): 800–821.
17.
GunasekeraRIshizawa EscuderoODaniellJEPomonisAMacabuagJLDCBrandJSchaeferARomero HernandezRAEsperSOtáloraSGBijanKCoxKD (2023) Global Rapid Post—Disaster Damage Estimation (GRADE) Report: February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes—Türkiye Report (English). Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099022723021250141/P1788430aeb62f08009b2302bd4074030fb (accessed 27 November 2024).
18.
HelgesonJFungJRoa HenriquezAZhangYZychermanANierenbergCButryDRamkissoonD (2020) Complex Event resilience of small- and medium-sized enterprises: Natural disaster planning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Special Publication (NIST SP). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
19.
HelgesonJFungJRoa HenriquezAZychermanANierenbergCButryDRamkissoonDZhangY (2021) Longitudinal study of complex event resilience of small- and medium-sized enterprises: Natural disaster planning and recovery during the COVID-19 pandemic (Wave 2). Special Publication (NIST SP), Gaithersburg, MD, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Available at: https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=932310 (accessed 9 November 2024).
20.
JosephsonASchrankHMarshallM (2017) Assessing preparedness of small businesses for hurricane disasters: Analysis of pre-disaster owner, business and location characteristics. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction23: 25–35.
21.
KevaneMRatanALDharD (2024) Women-led small-and medium-sized enterprises during COVID-19: Examining barriers and opportunities. Feminist Economics30(1): 244–277.
22.
KoliouMVan de LindtJWMcAllisterTPEllingwoodBRDillardMCutlerH (2020) State of the research in community resilience: Progress and challenges. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure5(3): 131–151.
23.
KrollCALandisJDShenQStrykerS (1990) Economic impacts of the Loma Prieta earthquake: A focus on small businesses. Berkeley Planning Journal, 5(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.5070/BP35113132 Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6s67g8mh
24.
LamNSNArenasHPaceKLeSageJCampanellaR (2012) Predictors of business return in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. PLoS ONE7(10): e47935.
25.
LeeJ (2019) Business recovery from Hurricane Harvey. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction34: 305–315.
26.
LiFWangLJinZHuangLXiaB (2020) Key factors affecting sustained business operations after an earthquake: A case study from New Beichuan, China, 2013–2017. Natural Hazards104(Suppl. 1): 101–121.
27.
LilleyMSlonimR (2016) Gender differences in Altruism: Responses to a natural disaster. IZA Discussion paper no. 9657. Bonn: IZA. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2716598 (accessed 18 November 2024)
28.
LoscoccoKARobinsonJ (1991) Barriers to women’s small-business success in the United States. Gender & Society5(4): 511–532.
29.
MacDonaldR (2005) How women were affected by the Tsunami: A perspective from Oxfam. PLoS Medicine2(6): e178.
30.
MarquisFKimJJElwoodKJChangSE (2015) Understanding post-earthquake decisions on multi-storey concrete buildings in Christchurch, New Zealand. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering15(2): 731–758.
31.
MarshallMINiehmLSSydnorSBSchrankHL (2015) Predicting small business demise after a natural disaster; An analysis of pre-existing conditions. Natural Hazards79(1): 331–354.
32.
MeschDJPactorA (2015) Women and philanthropy. In: JungTPhillipsSDHarrowJ (eds) The Routledge Companion to Philanthropy. 1st ed. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–14.
33.
MilesSBChangSE (2006) Modeling community recovery from earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra22(2): 439–458.
34.
MorenoJShawD (2018) Women’s empowerment following disaster: A longitudinal study of social change. Natural Hazards92: 205–224.
35.
MorrowBHEnarsonE (1996) Hurricane Andrew through women’s eyes: Issues and recommendations. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters14: 5–22.
36.
OrhanE (2016a) Lessons learned from businesses to ensure community level recovery in a Post-disaster period: Case from Adapazari, Turkey. Natural Hazards Review17(1): 05015002.
37.
OrhanE (2016b) Building community resilience: Business preparedness lessons in the case of Adapazarı, Turkiye. Disasters40(1): 45–64.
38.
OrhanE (2017) Factors affecting post-disaster location choices of businesses: An analysis of the 1999 earthquake. Environmental Hazards16(4): 363–382.
39.
OrtizDReinosoEVillalobosJA (2021) Assessment of business interruption time due to direct and indirect effects of the Chiapas earthquake on September 7th 2017. Natural Hazards108: 2813–2833.
40.
PathakSEmahIE (2017) Gendered approach towards disaster recovery: Experiences from 2011 floods in Pathumthani province, Thailand. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction24: 129–134.
41.
PierelEHelgesonJDowK (2023a) Intersections of small business mobility, adaptive capacity, and resilience during crises. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters41(1): 47–65.
42.
PierelEDHelgesonJDowK (2023b) Deciphering small business community disaster support using machine learning. PLoS Climate2(3): e0000155.
Presidential Decree No 125 (2023) Presidential decree on “measures taken in the field of labor and social security under the state of emergency.” Presidential Decree No 125. Ankara, Turkey: The Official Gazette of Türkiye.
45.
Ray-BennettNS (2010) The role of microcredit in reducing women’s vulnerabilities to multiple disasters. Disasters34(1): 240–260.
SagbasGSheikhi GarjanRSarikayaKDenizD (2024) Field reconnaissance on seismic performance and functionality of Turkish industrial facilities affected by the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering22: 227–254.
48.
ScarinciC (2016) A post-Superstorm Sandy study of small business disaster preparedness and perspective on planning for future incidents. Journal of International and Interdisciplinary Business Research3: 61–74. Available at: http://scholars.fhsu.edu/jiibr/vol3/iss1/7 (accessed 7 June 2024).
49.
SevilleEStevensonJBrownCGiovinazziSVargoJ (2014) Disruption and resilience: How organisations coped with the Canterbury earthquakes. Economics of Resilient Infrastructure Research Report 2014/002, p. 44. Available at: https://resorgs.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/disruption_and_resilience.pdf (accessed 26 December 2019).
50.
StantonR (2005) Beyond disaster recovery: The benefits of business continuity. Computer Fraud & Security2005: 18–19.
51.
StorrVHHaeffele-BalchSGrubeLE (2018) Entrepreneurs drive community revival in the wake of disaster. The Review of Austrian Economics31: 479–484.
52.
SydnorSNiehmLLeeYMarshallMSchrankH (2017) Analysis of post-disaster damage and disruptive impacts on the operating status of small businesses after Hurricane Katrina. Natural Hazards85: 1637–1663.
53.
TorresAPMarshallMISydnorS (2019) Does social capital pay off? The case of small business resilience after Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management27: 168–181.
54.
TorresJMadukoFGaddisIIacovoneLBeegleK (2023) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women-led businesses. The World Bank Research Observer38(1): 36–72.
TURKSTAT (2023) Address- based population registration system of Turkiye 2023. Turkish Statistical Institute Web Page. Available at: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/ (accessed 15 November 2024).
WalcottRSchmidtCKaminskyMSinghRJAndersonLDesaiSde HoopT (2023) Women’s groups, covariate shocks, and resilience: An evidence synthesis of past shocks to inform a response to COVID-19. Gates Open Research7: 111.
59.
WasileskiGRodriguesHWalterD (2011) Business closure and relocation: A comparative analysis of the Loma Prieta earthquake and Hurricane Andrew. Disasters35(1): 102–129.
60.
WatsonMXiaoYHelgesonJDillardM (2020) The importance of households in business disaster recovery. Natural Hazard Review21(4): 05020008.
61.
WebbGRTierneyKJDahlhamerJM (2002) Predicting long-term business recovery from disaster—A comparison of the Loma Prieta earthquake and Hurricane Andrew. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards4: 45–58.
62.
WeinARoseA (2011) Economic resilience lessons from the ShakeOut earthquake scenario. Earthquake Spectra27: 559–573.
XiaoYWuKFinnDChandrasekharD (2022) Community businesses as social units in post-disaster recovery. Journal of Planning Education and Research42(1): 76–89.
66.
YoungKGreenbaumRTDormadyNC (2017) Sex, gender, and disasters: Experimental evidence on the decision to invest in resilience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction24: 439–450.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
