This study performs a nationwide expert-opinion survey in Mainland China to establish component restoration models of highway bridges toward high-fidelity resilience assessment. To this end, a questionnaire based on component damage states is designed to collect expert opinions on key variables of the restoration models, including loss of functionality, traffic decision, idle time, repair strategy, and recovery time. More importantly, this study introduces the concept of repair-induced loss of functionality into the component restoration models, in addition to the traditional earthquake-induced loss of functionality. According to the survey results, both deterministic and probabilistic restoration models are developed, where the former is for practical application while the latter characterizes epistemic uncertainties in the key variables. Finally, a case study on a highway bridge with multiple types of vulnerable components is carried out to illustrate the application of the component restoration models for full bridge resilience assessment.
AgrawalAKGhosnMAlampalliS, et al. (2012) Seismic fragility of retrofitted multispan continuous steel bridges in New York. Journal of Bridge Engineering17(4), 562–575.
2.
AlmeidaJPTarquiniDBeyerK (2016) Modelling approaches for inelastic behaviour of RC walls: Multi-level assessment and dependability of results. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering23(1), 69–100.
3.
AnchetaTDDarraghRBStewartJP, et al. (2014) NGA-West2 database. Earthquake Spectra30(3), 989–1005.
4.
AndriotisCPPapakonstantinouKGKoumousisVK (2018) Nonlinear programming hybrid beam-column element formulation for large-displacement elastic and inelastic analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics144(10), 04018096.
5.
ATC (1985) Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council, ATC-13.
6.
BadroddinMMuntasir BillahA (2023) Multi-state functionality restoration of highway bridges using stochastic process. Engineering Structures293, 116623.
7.
BaltzopoulosGBaraschinoRIervolinoI (2019) On the number of records for structural risk estimation in PBEE. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics48(5), 489–506.
8.
BillahAHMAlamMS (2015) Seismic fragility assessment of highway bridges: a state-of-the-art review. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering11(6), 804–832.
9.
BocchiniPDecòAFrangopolDM (2012) Probabilistic functionality recovery model for resilience analysis. In BiondiniFFrangopolDM (Eds.) 6th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management (pp. 1920–1927). Stresa, Italy.
10.
BozorgzadehAMegallySRestrepoJI, et al. (2006) Capacity evaluation of exterior sacrificial shear keys of bridge abutments. Journal of Bridge Engineering11(5), 555–565.
11.
BozorgzadehA (2007) Effect of structure backfill on stiffness and capacity of bridge abutments. PhD Dissertation, San Diego, CA: University of California, San Diego.
12.
BruneauMChangSEEguchiRT, et al. (2003) A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra19(4), 733–752.
13.
BruneauMReinhornA (2007) Exploring the concept of seismic resilience for acute care facilities. Earthquake Spectra23(1), 41–62.
14.
Caltrans (2019) Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria Version 2.0. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Transportation.
15.
CapacciLBiondiniFFrangopolDM (2022) Resilience of aging structures and infrastructure systems with emphasis on seismic resilience of bridges and road networks: Review. Resilient Cities and Structures1(2), 23–41.
16.
CimellaroGPReinhornAMBruneauM (2010) Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience. Engineering Structures32(11), 3639–3649.
17.
DongYFrangopolDM (2015) Risk and resilience assessment of bridges under mainshock and aftershocks incorporating uncertainties. Engineering Structures83, 198–208.
18.
DuAWangXXieY, et al. (2023) Regional seismic risk and resilience assessment: Methodological development, applicability, and future research needs - An earthquake engineering perspective. Reliability Engineering & System Safety233, 109104.
19.
FEMA (2013) HAZUS-MH 2.1 Earthquake Model Technical Manual. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
20.
GhoshJPadgettJE (2011) Probabilistic seismic loss assessment of aging bridges using a component-level cost estimation approach. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics40(15), 1743–1761.
21.
HanQDuXLiuJ, et al. (2009) Seismic damage of highway bridges during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration8(2), 263–273.
22.
KafaliCGrigoriuM (2005) Rehabilitation decision analysis. In AugustiGSchuëllerGICiampoliM (Eds.) Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR05).Rome, Italy: Rotterdam: Millpress.
23.
KameshwarSMisraSPadgettJE (2020) Decision tree based bridge restoration models for extreme event performance assessment of regional road networks. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering16(3), 431–451. Taylor & Francis.
24.
KaramlouABocchiniP (2017) From component damage to system-level probabilistic restoration functions for a damaged bridge. Journal of Infrastructure Systems23(3), 04016042.
25.
KosticSMFilippouFC (2012) Section discretization of fiber beam-column elements for cyclic inelastic response. Journal of Structural Engineering138(5), 592–601.
26.
LiLChang-RichardsABostonM, et al. (2023) Post-disaster functional recovery of the built environment: A systematic review and directions for future research. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction95, 103899.
27.
LiuKZhaiCDongY (2021) Optimal restoration schedules of transportation network considering resilience. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering17(8), 1141–1154.
28.
MasoomiHVan De LindtJW (2019) Community-resilience-based design of the built environment. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering5(1), 04018044.
29.
McKennaFScottMHFenvesGL (2010) Nonlinear finite-element analysis software architecture using object composition. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering24(1), 95–107.
30.
MisraSPadgettJEBarbosaAR, et al. (2020) An expert opinion survey on post-hazard restoration of roadways and bridges: Data and key insights. Earthquake Spectra36(2), 983–1004.
31.
MitoulisSAArgyroudisSA (2021) Restoration models of flood resilient bridges: Survey data. Data in Brief36: 107088.
32.
MitoulisSAArgyroudisSALoliM, et al. (2021) Restoration models for quantifying flood resilience of bridges. Engineering Structures238, 112180.
33.
MOTPRC (Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China) (2011) Lead rubber bearing isolator for highway bridge. JTT 822–2011. Beijing, China.
34.
MOTPRC (Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China) (2012) High damping seismic isolation rubber bearings for highway bridges. JTT 842-2012. Beijing, China.
35.
MuthukumarSDesRochesR (2006) A Hertz contact model with non-linear damping for pounding simulation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics35(7), 811–828.
36.
NielsonBGDesRochesR (2007) Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics36(6), 823–839.
37.
PadgettJEDesRochesR (2007) Bridge functionality relationships for improved seismic risk assessment of transportation networks. Earthquake Spectra23(1), 115–130.
38.
PadgettJEDesRochesR (2008) Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics37(8), 1157–1174.
39.
PangYWangX (2021) Cloud-IDA-MSA conversion of fragility curves for efficient and high-fidelity resilience assessment. Journal of Structural Engineering147(5), 04021049.
40.
PorterKA (2004) A survey of bridge practitioners to relate damage to closure. Pasadena, CA: Rep. EERL 2004-07, California Institute of Technology.
41.
ReedDAKapurKCChristieRD (2009) Methodology for assessing the resilience of networked infrastructure. IEEE Systems Journal3(2), 174–180.
42.
SchanackFValdebenitoGAlvialJ (2012) Seismic damage to bridges during the 27 February 2010 magnitude 8.8 Chile earthquake. Earthquake Spectra28(1), 301–315.
43.
ShamsabadiAKhalili-TehraniPStewartJP, et al. (2010) Validated simulation models for lateral response of bridge abutments with typical backfills. Journal of Bridge Engineering15(3), 302–311.
44.
ShaoYXieYRobleeCJ, et al. (2022) Seismic fragility of approach backfill differential settlement for statewide bridges in California. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering153, 107049.
45.
SharmaNTabandehAGardoniP (2018) Resilience analysis: a mathematical formulation to model resilience of engineering systems. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure3(2), 49–67.
46.
ShinozukaMMurachiYDongX, et al. (2003) Effect of seismic retrofit of bridges on transportation networks. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration2(2), 169–179.
47.
SilvaPFMegallySSeibleF (2009) Seismic performance of sacrificial exterior shear keys in bridge abutments. Earthquake Spectra25(3), 643–664.
48.
SunWBocchiniPDavisonBD (2020) Resilience metrics and measurement methods for transportation infrastructure: the state of the art. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure5(3), 168–199.
49.
TangH (2014) Experimental and theoretical research on transverse seismic design of small and medium span bridges on elastomeric pad bearings. PhD Dissertation, Shanghai, China: Tongji University.
50.
VishwanathBSBanerjeeS (2019) Life-cycle resilience of aging bridges under earthquakes. Journal of Bridge Engineering24(11), 04019106.
51.
VosooghiASaiidiMS (2010) Seismic damage states and response parameters for bridge columns. American Concrete Institute, ACI Special Publication (pp. 27–44).
52.
WangXMazumderRKSalariehB, et al. (2022) Machine learning for risk and resilience assessment in structural engineering: Progress and future trends. Journal of Structural Engineering148(8), 03122003.
53.
WangXShafieezadehAYeA (2019) Optimal EDPs for post-earthquake damage assessment of extended pile-shaft–supported bridges subjected to transverse spreading. Earthquake Spectra35(3), 1367–1396.
54.
WangXYeAHeZ, et al. (2016) Quasi-static cyclic testing of elevated RC pile-cap foundation for bridge structures. Journal of Bridge Engineering21(2), 04015042.
55.
WilsonJC (2003) Repair of new long-span bridges damaged by the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities17(4), 196–205.
56.
ZhangJHuoY (2009) Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method. Engineering Structures31(8), 1648–1660.
57.
ZhangWDongHWenJ, et al. (2023) A resilience-based decision framework for post-earthquake restoration of bridge networks under uncertainty. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering0(0), 1–16.
58.
ZhengQYangCWXieY, et al. (2021) Influence of abutment straight backwall fracture on the seismic response of bridges. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics50(7), 1824–1844.
59.
ZhouCYeAWangX, et al. (2023) Abutment longitudinal failure mechanism analysis of Yematan bridge in m7.4 Maduo earthquake. China Civil Engineering Journal.
60.
ZhouLBarbatoMYeA (2021) Experimental investigation of postearthquake vertical load-carrying capacity of scoured reinforced concrete pile group bridge foundations. Journal of Bridge Engineering26(12), 040210.
61.
ZhouLShahriaAMSongA, et al. (2022) Probability-based residual displacement estimation of unbonded laminated rubber bearing supported highway bridges retrofitted with Transverse Steel Damper. Engineering Structures272, 115053.
62.
ZuLHuangYLiW, et al. (2022) Seismic damage analysis of Yematan Bridge under near-fault earthquakes. Structures41(29), 586–601.
