The P-wave seismogram method is utilized to estimate the VS30 at 194 ground motion recording stations in California. Comparison with the measured VS30 at these sites shows an average overestimation of 9%, which is similar to values reported by other studies for the P-wave seismogram method. The estimated VS30 are within ±50% of the measured VS30 for 85% of the sites. The VS30 residuals are interpreted with respect to the peak frequency obtained from horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) measurements, and the results indicate that stations with estimated VS30 greater than 500 m/s may be systematically overestimated by the P-wave seismogram method when a distinct peak is identified in the HVSR. Thus, the peak frequency from HVSR can be used to identify sites with potential bias and also to correct this bias. The P-wave seismogram VS30 estimates from this study are compared to estimates from a geology/slope proxy, and the results suggest that the P-wave seismogram method achieves similar accuracy and less variability relative to the measured VS30 compared with the geology/slope proxy-based method.
AbrahamsonNASilvaWJKamaiR (2014) Summary of the Abrahamson, Silva, and Kamai NGA-West 2 ground-motion relations for active crustal regions. Earthquake Spectra30: 1025–1055.
2.
AhdiSKStewartJPAnchetaTDKwakDYMitraD (2017) Development of Vs profile database and proxy-based models for Vs30 prediction in the Pacific Northwest region of North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America107(4): 1781–1801.
AllenTIWaldDJ (2009) On the use of high-resolution topographic data as a proxy for seismic site conditions ( Vs30). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America99: 935–943.
5.
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2016) ASCE/SEI 7-16: Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.
BooreDMStewartJPSeyhanEAtkinsonGM (2014) NGA-West2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra30: 1057–1085.
8.
BooreDMThompsonEMCadetH (2011) Regional correlations of Vs30 and velocities averaged over depths less than and greater than 30 meters. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America101(6): 3046–3059.
9.
California Institute of Technology and United States Geological Survey Pasadena (1926) Southern California Seismic Network (Dataset). International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks. https://doi.org/10.7914/SN/CI
10.
ChiouBS-JYoungsRR (2014) Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 1117–1153.
11.
CoxBRBeekmanAN (2011) Intramethod variability in ReMi dispersion measurements and Vs estimates at shallow bedrock sites. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering137: 354–362.
12.
European Committee for Standardization (CEN) (2013) EN 1998-1: Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.
13.
IdrissIM (2014) An NGA-West2 empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 1155–1177.
14.
IwahashiJPikeRJ (2007) Automated classifications of topography from DEMs by an unsupervised nested-means algorithm and a three part geometric signature. Geomorphology86(3/4): 409–440.
15.
JonesJKalkanEStephensC (2017) Processing and Review Interface for Strong Motion Data (PRISM)—methodology and automated processing (Version 1.0.0). U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 2017-1008. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.
16.
KamaiRAbrahamsonNASilvaWJ (2016) VS30 in the NGA GMPEs: Regional Differences and Suggested Practice. Earthquake Spectra, 32(4), 2083–2108.
17.
KangSKimBParkHLeeJ (2020) Automated procedure for estimating Vs30 utilizing P-wave seismograms and its application to Japan. Engineering Geology264: 1–16.
18.
KimBHashashYMARathjeEMStewartJPNiSSomervillePGKottkeARSilvaWJCampbellKW (2016) Subsurface shear-wave velocity characterization using P-wave seismograms in Central, and Eastern North America. Earthquake Spectra32(1): 143–169.
19.
KottkeARHashashYMAStewartJPMossCJNikolaouSRathjeEMSilvaWJCampbellKW (2012) Development of geologic site classes for seismic site amplification for central, and eastern North America. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon, 24–28 September 2012, Paper No. 4557.
20.
KwakDBrandenbergSJMikamiAStewartJP (2015) Prediction equations for estimating shear-wave velocity from combined geotechnical and geomorphic indexes based on Japanese dataset. BSSA105(4): 1919–1930.
21.
McPhillipsDFHerrickJAAhdiSYongAKHaefnerS (2020) Updated compilation of Vs30 data for the United States: U.S. Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P9H5QEAC
22.
MiaoYShiYWangS-Y (2018) Estimating near-surface shear wave velocity using the P-wave seismograms method in Japan. Earthquake Spectra34(4): 1955–1971.
23.
NiSLiZSomervilleP (2014) Estimating subsurface shear velocity with radial to vertical ratio of local P waves. Seismological Research Letters85(1): 82–89.
24.
Northern California Earthquake Data Center (2014) Northern California Earthquake Data Center (Dataset). Northern California Earthquake Data Center. https://doi.org/10.7932/NCEDC
25.
OwensTJCrotwellHPGrovesCOliver-PaulP (2004) SOD: Standing order for data. Seismological Research Letters75: 515–520.
26.
ParkSIshiiM (2018) Near-surface compressional and shear wave speeds constrained by body-wave polarization analysis, Geophysical Journal International213 (3): 1559–1571.
27.
ParkerGAHarmonJAStewartJPHashashYMAKottkeARRathjeEMSilvaWCampbellKW (2017) Proxy-based Vs30 estimation in central, and eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America107(1): 117–131.
28.
PinheiroJCBatesDM (2000). Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. New York. Springer-Verlag, p. 528.
TuanTTScherbaumFMalischewskyPG (2011) On the relationship of peaks and troughs of the ellipticity (H/V) of Rayleigh waves and the transmission response of single layer over halfspace models. Geophysical Journal International184: 793–800.
33.
U.S. Geological Survey (1931) United States National Strong-Motion Network (Dataset). International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks. https://doi.org/10.7914/SN/NP
34.
USGS Menlo Park (1967) USGS Northern California Network (Dataset). International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks. https://doi.org/10.7914/SN/NC
35.
WaldDJAllenTI (2007) Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site conditions and amplification. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America97: 1379–1395.
36.
WaldLAHuttonLKGivenDD (1995) The Southern California network bulletin: 1990–1993 summary. Seismological Research Letters66(1): 9–19.
37.
WangPZimmaroPGospeTAhdiSKYongAStewartJP (2021) Horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios from California sites: Open-source database and data interpretation to establish site parameters, California Geological Survey Report. https://doi.org/10.34948/N3KW20
38.
WillsCJClahanKB (2006) Developing a map of geologically defined site-condition categories for California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America96: 1483–1501.
39.
WillsCJGutierrezCIPerezFGBranumDM (2015) A next generation Vs30 map for California based on geology and topography. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America105(6): 3083–3091.
40.
YongA (2016) Comparison of measured and proxy-based Vs30 values in California. Earthquake Spectra32(1): 171–192.
41.
YongAMartinAStokoeKDiehlJ (2013) ARRA-funded Vs30 measurements using multi-technique approach at strong-motion stations in California and central-eastern United States: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013–1102, data files. Available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2013/1102/
42.
ZalachorisGRathjeEMPaineJG (2017) Vs30 characterization of Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas using the P-wave seismogram method. Earthquake Spectra33(3): 943–961.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
