As teaching and learning experiences broaden to include more technological innovations, methods of instruction and resource flexibility are becoming increasingly important for educators and students. Open educational resources (OER) have gained international appeal for such flexibility, and post-secondary institutions are at the forefront of creating access to them. Although research related to OER has increased, few researchers have focused on OER in music instruction. In my cross-sectional survey of music faculty in the United States (N = 409), I found that music faculty were generally unaware of OER although most participants would consider adopting an open textbook for a course. Motivating factors for adoption included ease of use and decreased costs for students, whereas time and financial support would be necessary for adoption to be feasible.
AnnandD.JensenT. (2017). Incentivizing the production and use of open educational resources in higher education institutions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3009
BaasM.AdmiraalW.van den BergE. (2019). Teachers’ adoption of open educational resources in higher education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.510
5.
BansalT.JoshiD. (2015). OER & teacher educators: Awareness and barriers. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 24(1), 59–68. Indira Gandhi National Open University. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/187828/
6.
BlissT. J.RobinsonT. J.HiltonJ.WileyD. A. (2013). An OER COUP: College teacher and student perceptions of open educational resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013(1), Article 4. http://doi.org/10.5334/2013-04
7.
BlissT. J.SmithM. (2017). A brief history of open educational resources. In JhangianiR.Biswas-DienerR. (Eds.), Open. Ubiquity Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.5334/bbc.b
8.
BlomgrenC. (2018). OER awareness and use: The affinity between higher education and K-12. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3431
9.
BrymanA. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
CoxG.TrotterH. (2017). An OER framework, heuristic and lens: Tools for understanding lecturers’ adoption of OER. Open Praxis, 9(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.2.571
12.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
13.
FischerL.ErnstD.MasonS. (2017). Rating the quality of open textbooks: How reviewer and text characteristics predict ratings. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.2985
HiltonJ. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9
JungE.BauerC.HeapsA. (2017). Higher education faculty perceptions of open textbook adoption. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3120
OzdemirO.HendricksC. (2017). Instructor and student experiences with open textbooks, from the California open online library for education (Cool4Ed). Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(1), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9138-0
24.
PetridesL.JimesC.Middleton-DetznerC.WallingJ.WeissS. (2011). Open textbook adoption and use: Implications for teachers and learners. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 26(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2011.538563
25.
PittR. (2015). Mainstreaming open textbooks: Educator perspectives on the impact of OpenStax college open textbooks. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(4), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i4.2381
26.
PrasadD.UsagawaT. (2014). Towards development of OER derived custom-built open textbooks: A baseline survey of university teachers at the university of the South Pacific. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(4), 226–247. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i4.1873
27.
RolfeV. (2012). Open educational resources: Staff attitudes and awareness. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.14395
28.
Schmidt-JonesC. (2012). An open education resource supports a diversity of inquiry-based learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1141
29.
Schmidt-JonesC. (2017). Offering authentic learning activities in the context of open resources and real-world goals: A study of self-motivated online music learning. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 20(1), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2017-0007
