Abstract
Objective:
To compare the safety and efficacy of cefoperazone plus sulbactam (CPZ + SB) (3 g [2:1] every 8 h) and ceftazidime (CTZ) (2 g every 8 h) as monotherapy in the empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients with cancer.
Patients:
One hundred eighteen cancer patients with chemotherapy-associated neutropenia and fever. Most patients (82) received norfloxacin and fluconazole as prophylaxis.
Results:
Fifty-nine patients were enrolled in the CPZ + SB group, and 59 were enrolled in the CTZ group. The mean duration of antibiotic therapy was less than 10 days in both groups. Forty-three patients (19 in the CPZ + SB group and 24 in the CTZ group) were bacteremic, and 7 others had cellulitis. Of the 56 microorganisms producing bacteremia, 51 were gram-positive bacteria, mostly staphylococci (28 isolates) and streptococci (22 isolates). Gram-positive cocci were more frequently resistant to CTZ than to CPZ + SB (77% vs. 40%, respectively; p < 0.002). However, the clinical response rate at 72 hours of therapy was 53% in the CPZ + SB group and 52% in the CTZ group (p = 1.0). At the end of therapy, clinical responses were similar in the two groups (p = 0.19). Clinical success with antibiotic modification was seen in 42% of the CPZ + SB recipients and in 58% of CTZ recipients (p = 0.10). Bacteriologic eradication among bacteremic patients appeared to be slightly better in the CPZ + SB group (79% vs. 54%; p = 0.09). Except for rashes in 3 patients (1 in the CPZ + SB group and 2 in the CTZ group), both drugs were well tolerated. Adverse events included superinfections, transient elevation of serum transaminase concentrations, diarrhea, and chills.
Conclusions:
CPZ + SB was superior to CTZ in its in vitro activity against aerobic gram-positive cocci encountered in the study; however, the clinical efficacy and safety of the two drug treatments were similar in the empiric therapy for febrile neutropenia.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.