Outcomes of a Comprehensive,Pharmacist-Managed Injectable Anticoagulation Discharge Program for the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism

Abstract

Background:

Safe and effective transition of patients receiving injectable anticoagulation, from an inpatient to an outpatient setting, requires patient education, prescription coordination, and appropriate follow-up.

Objective:

To evaluate a long-standing, hospital-wide, pharmacist-managed injectable anticoagulation discharge program at an urban academic medical center.

Methods:

This observational study included adults discharged on an injectable anticoagulant between December 1, 2008, and February 28, 2009. The primary endpoint was program adherence, defined as percent of discharged patients whose anticoagulation therapy was coordinated by a pharmacist. Secondary endpoints included duration of patient counseling and medication procurement (including confirmation of current home supply or need for complete procurement of a full/new prescription); length of hospital stay for patients with a primary diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE); and VTE recurrence and bleeding rates at 3 months. Descriptive statistics were used and are presented as proportions and mean (SD).

Results:

A total of 207 patients discharged on an injectable anticoagulant (3.2 discharges/day) were included. Pharmacist coordination was documented for 180 (87%) patients. Overall, pharmacists spent 37.6 (25.5) minutes per patient, including 19.4 (9.6) minutes for counseling and 19.7 (19.7) minutes for medication procurement; 150 (83%) patients required complete medication procurement lasting 21.4 (19.6) minutes. The length of hospital stay for patients with a primary diagnosis of VTE was 3.2 (2.4) days. At 3 months, 5.3% and 1.4% of assessable patients had recurrent VTE or major bleeding events, respectively. Patients with major bleeding experienced intracranial hemorrhage (n = 2) and gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 1), all beyond the first 2 weeks after discharge.

Conclusions:

The pharmacist-managed injectable anticoagulation discharge program was completed in a large proportion of patients. Patient education and medication procurement require the majority of time-related resources. Continual process improvement is crucial for hospitals to ensure that all patients discharged with injectable anticoagulation are assessed and receive anticoagulation education.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Heit

. Venous thromboembolism: Disease burden, outcomes and risk factors. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3: 1611–7. DOI 10.1111/j.1538–7836.2005.01415.x

Heit

Cohen

Anderson

Jr . Estimated annual number of incident and recurrent, non-fatal and fatal venous thromboembolism (VTE) events in the US (abstract 910). Blood 2005; 106: 267a.

Spyropoulos

Hurley

Ciesla

. Management of acute proximal deep vein thrombosis: Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of outpatient treatment with enoxaparin vs inpatient treatment with unfractionated heparin. Chest 2002; 122: 108–14. DOI 10.1378/chest.122.1.108

Kearon

Kahn

Agnelli

. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. 8th ed. Chest 2008; 133: 454–45. DOI 10.1378/chest.08–0658

Hirsh

Bauer

Donati

. Parenteral anticoagulants: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. 8th ed. Chest 2008; 133: 141–59. DOI 10.1378/chest.08–0689

American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. ASHP therapeutic position statement on the use of low molecular weight heparins for adult outpatient treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2004; 61: 1950–5. [Erratum, Am J Health Syst Pharm 2004; 61:2243.]

Zed

Filiatrault

. Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction of a pharmacist-managed, emergency department based outpatient treatment program for venous thromboembolic disease. CJEM 2008; 10: 10–7.

Groce

. Initial management of deep vein thrombosis in the outpatient setting. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008; 65: 866–74. DOI 10.2146/ajhp070408

Yurkowski

. Issues in developing an outpatient deep vein thrombosis treatment program: University Hospital experience. Pharmacotherapy 1998; 18: 165S–9S.

10.

Snow

Qaseem

Barry

. Management of venous thromboembolism: A clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians. Ann Fam Med 2007; 5: 74–80. [Erratum, Ann Fam Med 2007l 5:179.] DOI 10.1370/afm.668

11.

Joint Commission. National Patient Safety Goals 2010. www.jointcommission.org/NR/rdonlyres/868C9E07–037F-433D-8858-0D5FAA4322F2/0/RevisedChapter_HAP_NPSG_20090924.pdf. (accessed 2010 Aug 20).

12.

Meyer

Marjanovic

Valcke

. Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: A randomized controlled study. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 1729–35. DOI 10.1001/archinte.162.15.1729

13.

Merli

Ferrufino

Lin

. Hospital-based costs associated with venous thromboembolism treatment regimens. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 1077–86. DOI 10.1111/j.1538–7836.2008.02997.x

14.

Ramacciotti

Araujo

Lastoria

. An open-label, comparative study of the efficacy and safety of once-daily dose of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in the treatment of proximal lower limb deep-vein thrombosis. Thromb Res 2004; 114: 149–53. DOI 10.1016/j.thromres.2004.05.009

15.

Chong

Brighton

Baker

. Once-daily enoxaparin in the outpatient setting versus unfractionated heparin in hospital for the treatment of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2005; 19: 173–81. DOI 10.1007/s11239-005-1848-x

16.

Levine

Gent

Hirsh

. A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin administered primarily at home with unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital for proximal deep vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 677–81. DOI 10.1056/NEJM199603143341101

17.

Kagansky

Knobler

Rimon

. Safety of anticoagulation therapy in well-informed older patients. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 2044–50. DOI 10.1001/archinte.164.18.2044