Austerity measures have become a contentious topic, shaping the landscape of health care systems around the world. As governments grapple with economic challenges, the impact of austerity on health care has emerged as a critical concern. This study focuses on the consequences of austerity actions adopted by the Zimbabwean government under the Transitional Stabilization Program (TSP) from August 2018 to December 2025. This research examines the impact of austerity measures on Zimbabwe's health care sector, exploring its connections with health infrastructure and resources, accessibility and affordability of health care, health funding, health care inequalities, and the health care workforce. Using a quantitative approach and data from 970 participants, including the general populace, health care providers, and government officials, significant positive correlations between austerity measures and these health care variables were identified. The findings indicated a noteworthy positive correlation between the independent variable “austerity measures” and five dependent variables: health care accessibility and affordability, health care inequalities, infrastructure and resources, health care funding, and health care workforce. The t-statistics values exceeded the threshold of 1.96, with values of 5.085, 3.120, 6.459, 8.517, and 3.830, respectively. These findings highlight the importance of considering the effects of austerity on health care access, health funding, health care inequalities, health workforce, health infrastructure and resources development. Policymakers should prioritize equitable resource allocation and targeted investments to strengthen the resilience of the health care system during economic challenges. Understanding these associations is crucial for evidence-based policy decisions and fostering a more equitable and resilient health care system in Zimbabwe.
MhazoATMapongaCC. The political economy of health financing reforms in Zimbabwe: A scoping review. Int J Equity Health.2022;21(1):1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01646-z
2.
NhapiTG. Socioeconomic barriers to universal health coverage in Zimbabwe: Present issues and pathways toward progress. J Dev Soc.2019;35(1):153–174.
3.
BoboT. The Role of Shona Traditional Institutions in the Zimbabwean Health Sector. University of Pretoria; 2020.
4.
DoyleS. Health in African history. The History of African Development—An Online Textbook for a New Generation of African Students and Teachers.2022.
5.
ChipunzaTNhamoS. Health and healthcare delivery in Zimbabwe: past and present. In: Post-Independence Development in Africa: Decolonisation and Transformation Prospects. Springer; 2023:171–194.
6.
GageADGotsadzeTSeidEMutasaRFriedmanJ. The influence of continuous quality improvement on healthcare quality: A mixed-methods study from Zimbabwe. Soc Sci Med.2022;298:114831. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114831
7.
AtienoRMoyoTNyang'oroO. Service delivery in fragile states: The case of health sector in Zimbabwe. 2022.
8.
Banda ChitsamatangaBMalingaW. A tale of two paradoxes in response to COVID-19’: Public health system and socio-economic implications of the pandemic in South Africa and Zimbabwe. Cogent Soc Sci. 2021;7(1):1869368.
9.
ChinyakataRRomanNVMsizaFB. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the barriers to accessing health care services in rural settings: A human capabilities approach. Open Public Health J.2021;14(1):36–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.2174/1874944502114010336
10.
NhapiT. An exploration of the domains of the inequality trajectory in Zimbabwe. Contemp Soc Sci. 2022;17(2):84–98.
11.
KamvuraTTDambiJMChiriseriETurnerJVerheyRChibandaD. Barriers to the provision of non-communicable disease care in Zimbabwe: A qualitative study of primary health care nurses. BMC Nurs.2022;21(1):1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00841-1
12.
GwizaA. Public Expenditure Management Capacity Challenges in the Ministry of Health and Child Care in Zimbabwe. University of Johannesburg (South Africa); 2021.
13.
ChirisaIGumboTGundu-JakarasiVN, et al.Interrogating climate adaptation financing in Zimbabwe: Proposed direction. Sustainability. 2021;13(12):6517.
14.
MpofuFY. Taxing the digital economy through consumption taxes (VAT) in African countries: Possibilities, constraints and implications. Int J Financ Stud. 2022;10(3):65.
15.
LoewensonRMukumbaC. Recovering lost tax to meet the health financing gap for universal public sector health systems in East and Southern Africa. BMJ Global Health. 2023;8(Suppl 8):e011820.
16.
ModisakengCMatlalaMGodmanBMeyerJC. Medicine shortages and challenges with the procurement process among public sector hospitals in South Africa; findings and implications. BMC Health Serv Res.2020;20(1):1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05080-1
17.
McIntyreDObseAGBarasaEWAtagubaJE. Challenges in financing universal health coverage in sub-Saharan Africa. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance. Oxford Encycl Econ Financ; 2018:1–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190625979.013.28
18.
DzingiraiM. Health financing challenges towards accomplishment of sustainable development goals. In: Handbook of Research on Quality and Competitiveness in the Healthcare Services Sector. IGI Global; 2023:63–83.
19.
KavilaW. Understanding the Fiscal Deficit and Economic Performance in Zimbabwe. 2022.
20.
MacdonaldA. Drawing lessons for austerity policy initiatives in Africa. Int J Health Med Nurs Stud. 2022;1(1):12–41.
21.
EdsonBGideonZ. Exploring the genesis, nature, etymology and efficacy of austerity policies: Drawing lessons for austerity policy initiatives in Africa. Int J Sci Acad Res (IJSAR),eISSN: 2583-0279. 2021;1(1):1–17.
22.
KingmaM. Nurses on the Move: Migration and the Global Health Care Economy. Cornell University Press; 2018.
23.
MalikEShankarS. Empowering Nurses: Exploring Self-Managed Organizations in Indian Healthcare. 2023.
24.
RaftopoulosBKanyenzeGSitholeMN. Navigating turbulence in Zimbabwe. In: Cape Town: University of Cape Town. University of Cape Town repository; 2021:1–11.
25.
NyandoroMDubeTMakochekanwaA. Banking institutions’ survival strategies and financial policies in a challenging economy, 2007–2015. In: Zimbos Never Die?Brill; 2023:200–229.
26.
SimpsonMHawkinsTSimpsonMHawkinsT. Regime interests and the failure of economic reform in the 1990s. In: The Primacy of Regime Survival: State Fragility and Economic Destruction in Zimbabwe. Palgrave Macmillan; 2018:61–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72520-9_4
27.
MuvunziT. The Impact of Structural Adjustment Programmes on the Public Health Sector: The Case of Zimbabwe. Anchor Academic Publishing (aap_verlag); 2015.
28.
AzevedoMJAzevedoMJ. The state of health system (s) in Africa: challenges and opportunities. In: Historical Perspectives on the State of Health and Health Systems in Africa, Volume II: The Modern era. Palgrave Macmillan; 2017:1–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32564-4_1
29.
ChipikaJTMalabaJA. Towards a transformative democratic developmental state in Zimbabwe–the complex journey. In: Towards Democratic Developmental States in SouThern Africa. Weaver Press; 2017:200.
30.
GondoR. A Critical Analysis of Community Participation at the Primary Level of the Health System in Goromonzi District, Zimbabwe. Rhodes University; 2016.
31.
DzinesaGADzinesaGA. Zimbabwe: DDR by trial and error. Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration in Southern Africa: Swords into Ploughshares?. Vol 37. Palgrave Macmillan; 2017:33–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60549-4_3
32.
RushwayaTK. Advocating for Dissent: An Investigation into Why and How Sections of Civil Society Advocate for Dissent in Kenya from 2013–2019. UiT Norges arktiske universitet;2020.
33.
MuchenaRI. An Exploration of Corruption in the Health Sector: A Case of Zimbabwe. Stellenbosch University; 2019.
34.
MandaSChirumeAT. Financing the social sector in Zimbabwe’s post-mugabe era—obstacles and opportunities. In: Making Politics in Zimbabwe’s Second Republic: The Formative Project by Emmerson Mnangagwa. Palgrave Macmillan; 2023:223–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30129-2_12
35.
TzeniosN. The determinants of access to healthcare: A review of individual, structural, and systemic factors. J Humanit Appl Sci Res. 2019;2(1):1–14.
36.
OgbonnaCC. Targeted or restrictive: Impact of US and EU sanctions on education and healthcare of Zimbabweans. Afr Res Rev. 2017;11(3):31–41.
37.
BaruaS. Financing sustainable development goals: A review of challenges and mitigation strategies. Bus Strategy Dev. 2020;3(3):277–293.
38.
BarrN. Economics of the Welfare State. Oxford University Press; 2020.
39.
TalvingL. The electoral consequences of austerity: economic policy voting in Europe in times of crisis. In: Electoral Rules and Electoral Behaviour. Routledge; 2018:58–81.
40.
OrtizICumminsM. The austerity decade 2010-20. Soc Policy Soc.2021;20(1):142–157.
41.
WangCWangDAbbasJDuanKMubeenR. Global financial crisis, smart lockdown strategies, and the COVID-19 spillover impacts: A global perspective implications from Southeast Asia. Front Psychiatry.2021;12:643783. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.643783
42.
MichaelMChristofidesLN. The impact of austerity measures on the public-private sector wage gap in Europe. Labour Econ.2020;63:101796. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101796
43.
RickardSJCarawayTL. International demands for austerity: Examining the impact of the IMF on the public sector. Rev Int Org. 2019;14(1):35–57.
44.
WoolhandlerSHimmelsteinDUAhmedS, et al.Public policy and health in the Trump era. Lancet.2021;397(10275):705–753.
45.
DouglasMKatikireddiSVTaulbutMMcKeeMMcCartneyG. Mitigating the wider health effects of COVID-19 pandemic response. Br Med J.2020;369:8243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1557
46.
FernandesN. Economic effects of coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) on the world economy. 2020.
MalikALenzenMMcAlisterSMcGainF. The carbon footprint of Australian health care. Lancet Planet Health. 2018;2(1):e27–e35.
49.
SunSXieZYuKJiangBZhengSPanX. COVID-19 and healthcare system in China: Challenges and progression for a sustainable future. Global Health.2021;17(1):1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00665-9
50.
ShahenMAIslamMRAhmedR. Challenges for health care services in Bangladesh: An overview. IOSR J Nurs Health Sci. 2020;9:13–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.9790/1959-0901011324
51.
NarwalSJainS. Building resilient health systems: Patient safety during COVID-19 and lessons for the future. J Health Manag.2021;23(1):166–181.
52.
OrganizationWH. Bangladesh Health System Review. WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific; 2015.
53.
CabralEI. The Philippine health agenda for 2016 to 2022. Philipp J Intern Med.2016;54(2):1–11.
54.
MilcentC. Healthcare Reform in China: From Violence to Digital Healthcare. Springer; 2018.
55.
TshibandaGMPradhanA. Investigating the challenges of information technology on the supply chain of the pharmaceutical industry.
56.
de FranciscoNDonadelMJitMHutubessyR. A systematic review of the social and economic burden of influenza in low-and middle-income countries. Vaccine. 2015;33(48):6537–6544. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.10.066
57.
MassudaAHoneTLelesFAGDe CastroMCAtunR. The Brazilian health system at crossroads: Progress, crisis and resilience. BMJ Global Health. 2018;3(4):e000829.
58.
BloomGBerdouEStandingHGuoZLabriqueA. ICTs and the challenge of health system transition in low and middle-income countries. Global Health.2017;13(1):1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-017-0276-y
59.
RohwerderB. Secondary impacts of major disease outbreaks in low-and middle income countries. 2020.
60.
MolluraDJCulpMPPollackE, et al.Artificial intelligence in low-and middle-income countries: Innovating global health radiology. Radiology. 2020;297(3):513–520.
61.
AduheneDTOsei-AssibeyE. Socio-economic impact of COVID-19 on Ghana's economy: Challenges and prospects. Int J Soc Econ.2021;48(4):543–556.
62.
GereffiG. What does the COVID-19 pandemic teach us about global value chains? The case of medical supplies. J Int Bus Policy. 2020;3(3):287–301.
63.
ScalaBLindsayCF. Supply chain resilience during pandemic disruption: Evidence from healthcare. Supply Chain Manage: Int J. 2021;26(6):672–688.
64.
SchnellerEAbdulsalamYConwayKEcklerJ. Strategic Management of the Health Care Supply Chain. John Wiley & Sons; 2023.
65.
CrawfordASerhalE. Digital health equity and COVID-19: The innovation curve cannot reinforce the social gradient of health. J Med Internet Res.2020;22(6):e19361.
66.
van GaansDDentE. Issues of accessibility to health services by older Australians: A review. Public Health Rev.2018;39(1):1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-018-0097-4
67.
KonttilaJSiiraHKyngäsH, et al.Healthcare professionals’ competence in digitalisation: A systematic review. J Clin Nurs.2019;28(5-6):745–761.
68.
Legido-QuigleyHKaranikolosMHernandez-PlazaS, et al.Effects of the financial crisis and Troika austerity measures on health and health care access in Portugal. Health Policy. 2016;120(7):833–839.
69.
KwameAPetruckaPM. Communication in nurse-patient interaction in healthcare settings in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review. Int J Africa Nurs Sci.2020;12:100198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100198
70.
ManyisaZMvan AswegenEJ. Factors affecting working conditions in public hospitals: A literature review. Int J Africa Nurs Sci.2017;6:28–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2017.02.002
71.
NdebeleNC. Implications and possible responses to the effects of staffing moratoria on organisational performance at Ngwelezana tertiary hospital in KwaZulu-Natal2021.
72.
Al-SuraihiWASamikonSAIbrahimI. Employee turnover causes, importance and retention strategies. Eur J Bus Manage Res (EJBMR). 2021;6(3):1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.3.893
73.
StaempfliSLamarcheK. Top ten: A model of dominating factors influencing job satisfaction of emergency nurses. Int Emerg Nurs.2020;49:100814. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2019.100814
74.
IraborIEOkolieUC. A review of employees’ job satisfaction and its affect on their retention. Ann Spiru Haret Univ Econ Ser. 2019;19(2):93–114.
75.
ChananaNSangeeta. Employee engagement practices during COVID-19 lockdown. J Public Affairs. 2021;21(4):e2508.
EckelmanMJShermanJ. Environmental impacts of the US health care system and effects on public health. PloS one. 2016;11(6):e0157014.
78.
OziliP. COVID-19 in Africa: Socio-economic impact, policy response and opportunities. Int J Sociol Soc Policy. 2020;42(3/4):177–200.
79.
McKeeMStucklerD. If the world fails to protect the economy, COVID-19 will damage health not just now but also in the future. Nat Med.2020;26(5):640–642.
80.
LoayzaNPenningsSM. Macroeconomic policy in the time of COVID-19: A primer for developing countries. World Bank Res Policy Briefs. 2020;28(147291):1–9.
81.
BooneLHaughDPainNSalinsV. Tackling the fallout from COVID-19. Economics in the Time of COVID-19. CEPR Press; 2020:37–44. ISBN: 978-1-912179-28-2.
82.
CumminsI. The impact of austerity on mental health service provision: A UK perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health.2018;15(6):1145.
83.
NajafiFFallahi-KhoshknabMAhmadiFDalvandiARahgozarM. Antecedents and consequences of workplace violence against nurses: A qualitative study. J Clin Nurs.2018;27(1-2):e116–e128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13884
84.
JonesABlakeJAdamsMKellyDMannionRMabenJ. Interventions promoting employee “speaking-up” within healthcare workplaces: A systematic narrative review of the international literature. Health Policy. 2021;125(3):375–384.
UddinM. Addressing work-life balance challenges of working women during COVID-19 in Bangladesh. Int Soc Sci J.2021;71(239-240):7–20.
87.
RispelLCBlaauwDDitlopoPWhiteJ. Human resources for health and universal health coverage: Progress, complexities and contestations. South Afr Health Rev. 2018;2018(1):13–21.
88.
DebarreA. Hard to Reach: Providing Healthcare in Armed Conflict. International Peace Institute.; 2018.
89.
SenekMRobertsonSRyanT, et al.Determinants of nurse job dissatisfaction-findings from a cross-sectional survey analysis in the UK. BMC Nurs.2020;19(1):1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00481-3
90.
BodeCSinghJ. Taking a hit to save the world? Employee participation in a corporate social initiative. Strateg Manage J.2018;39(4):1003–1030.
91.
GovenderMBussinMH. Performance management and employee engagement: A South African perspective. SA J Hum Resour Manage. 2020;18(1):1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v18i0.1215
92.
ViveirosCJDarlingEK. Barriers and facilitators of accessing perinatal mental health services: The perspectives of women receiving continuity of care midwifery. Midwifery. 2018;65:8–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.06.018
93.
BurgerRChristianC. Access to health care in post-apartheid South Africa: Availability, affordability, acceptability. Health Econ Policy Law. 2020;15(1):43–55.
94.
Del PinoERamosJA. Is welfare retrenchment inevitable? Scope and drivers of healthcare reforms in five Spanish regions during the crisis. J Soc Policy.2018;47(4):701–720.
95.
RahmanRAlsharqiOZ. What drove the health system reforms in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia? An analysis. Int J Health Plann Manage.2019;34(1):100–110.
96.
SparrowRDartantoTHartwigR. Indonesia Under the new normal: Challenges and the way ahead. Bull Indones Econ Stud.2020;56(3):269–299.
97.
DoetschJNSchlösserCBarrosHShawDKrafftTPilotE. A scoping review on the impact of austerity on healthcare access in the European union: Rethinking austerity for the most vulnerable. Int J Equity Health.2023;22(1):3.
98.
FalcoRD. Access to healthcare and the global financial crisis in Italy: A human rights perspective. e-Cadernos CES. 2019;39(31):1003–1030. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2762
99.
PetmesidouMGuillénAMPavoliniE. Health care in post-crisis South Europe: Inequalities in access and reform trajectories. Soc Policy Adm.2020;54(5):666–683.
100.
DoblytėSGuillénAM. Access compromised? The impact of healthcare reforms under austerity in Lithuania and Spain. Soc Policy Soc.2020;19(4):521–537.
BrianZWeintraubJA. Peer reviewed: Oral health and COVID-19: Increasing the need for prevention and access. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020;17:200266e. doi:https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd17.200266e
103.
OrganizationWH. Delivering Quality Health Services: A Global Imperative. OECD Publishing; 2018.
104.
KerasidouA. Empathy and efficiency in healthcare at times of austerity. Health Care Anal.2019;27(3):171–184.
MaphumuloWTBhenguBR. Challenges of quality improvement in the healthcare of South Africa post-apartheid: A critical review. Curationis. 2019;42(1):1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v42i1.1901
108.
KellyGMrengqwaLGeffenL. They don’t care about us”: Older people’s experiences of primary healthcare in Cape Town, South Africa. BMC Geriatr.2019;19(1):1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1116-0
MbanyaVNTerragniLGeleAADiazEKumarBN. Access to Norwegian healthcare system–challenges for sub-Saharan African immigrants. Int J Equity Health.2019;18(125):1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1027-x
111.
YabroffKRBradleyCShihY-CT. Understanding financial hardship among cancer survivors in the United States: Strategies for prevention and mitigation. J Clin Oncol.2020;38(4):292–301.
112.
ZhengZHanXZhaoJ, et al.Financial hardship, healthcare utilization, and health among US cancer survivors. Am J Prev Med.2020;59(1):68–78.
113.
DashGPaulJ. CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technol Forecast Soc Change.2021;173:121092. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
KrejcieRVMorganDW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas.1970;30(3):607–610.
118.
RoufMAAkhtaruddinM. Factors affecting the voluntary disclosure: A study by using smart PLS-SEM approach. Int J Law Manage. 2018;60(6):1498–1508.
119.
PopovicAHueckerMR. Study bias. 2021.
120.
Al IssaH-EAbdelsalamMK. Antecedents to leadership: A CB-SEM and PLS-SEM validation. Int J Sustainable Dev Plann. 2021;16(8):1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160801
121.
FornellCLarckerDF. Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Sage Publications Sage CA; 1981.
122.
HairJFRisherJJSarstedtMRingleCM. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev.2019;31(1):2–24.
123.
HanafiahMH. Formative vs. reflective measurement model: Guidelines for structural equation modeling research. Int J Anal Appl. 2020;18(5):876–889.
124.
AfthanorhanAAwangZAimranN. An extensive comparison of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for reliability and validity. Int J Data Network Sci. 2020;4(4):357–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2020.9.003
125.
CheungGWCooper-ThomasHDLauRSWangLC. Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pac J Manage.2023;41:1–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y
126.
YusoffASMPengFSAbd RazakFZMustafaWA. Discriminant validity assessment of religious teacher acceptance: The use of HTMT criterion. Paper presented at: Journal of Physics: Conference Series2020.
127.
RousseletGPernetCWilcoxRR. An introduction to the bootstrap: A versatile method to make inferences by using data-driven simulations. 2019.
