This commentary reflects on the appearance of “crisis” in urban climate research. I find that it most often appears as a description of a new and singular context, as a historically specific event, and as an urgent injunction to act. I evaluate the pros and cons of such crisis framings, concluding that they tend to produce analytics oriented toward present uniqueness rather than durable patterns, on complexity rather than foundational causes, and political and policy action oriented toward speed rather than systemic change.
AngeloHGohKPaprockiK (2025) Climate change and urban-agrarian solidarities. City: 1–30. 10.1080/13604813.2025.2512623.
4.
BrubakerRCooperF (2000) Beyond “identity.”Theory and Society29: 1–47.
5.
CalhounC (2010) The idea of emergency: Humanitarian action and global (dis) order. In: FassinDPandolfiM (eds) Contemporary States of Emergency: The Politics of Military and Humanitarian Interventions. New York: Zone Books, 29–58.
6.
ChaJM (2024) A Just Transition for all: Workers and Communities for a Carbon-Free Future. Cambridge: MIT Press.
7.
ChoiF (2022) The World Keeps Ending, and the World Goes on. New York: Harper Collins.
8.
FedericiS (2004) Caliban and the Witch. New York: Autonomedia.
9.
FortunKAdamsJSchützT, et al. (2021) Knowledge infrastructure and research agendas for quotidian Anthropocenes: Critical localism with planetary scope. The Anthropocene Review8(2): 169–182.
10.
GalindezK (2023) Planetary urbanization and imperialism: A view from Guåhan/Guam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research47(1): 5–21.
11.
GhoshA (2016) The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
GorzA (1967) A Strategy for Labor: A Radical Proposal. Translated by M. A. Nicolaus and V. Ortiz. Boston: Beacon Press.
13.
GothamKFGreenbergM (2014) Crisis Cities: Disaster and Redevelopment in New York and New Orleans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
HarveyD (1982) The Limits to Capital. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
HenigDKnightDM (2023) Polycrisis: Prompts for an emerging worldview. Anthropology Today39(2): 3–6.
17.
HeynenNKaikaMSwyngedouwE (2006) In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
18.
JazeelT (2018) Urban theory with an outside. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space36(3): 405–419.
19.
KleinN (2014) This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. New York: Simon and Schuster.
20.
MooreJW (2015) Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. New York: Verso Books.
21.
RobinsonC (1983) Black Marxism.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
22.
SaitoK (2023) Marx in the Anthropocene: Towards the Idea of Degrowth Communism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
SchmittC (1996) The Concept of the Political.Translated by George Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
SmithN (2006) There’s no such thing as a natural disaster. Understanding Katrina: perspectives from the social sciences. June 11. Available at: https://items.ssrc.org/understanding-katrina/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-natural-disaster/
25.
ToozeA (2022) Welcome to the world of the polycrisis. Financial Times, 28 October. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/498398e7-11b1-494b-9cd3-6d669dc3de33