This article looks at high stakes standardized tests through the lens of critical race theory (CRT) tenet three (Capper, 2019), counter-storytelling and majoritarian narratives, and explores approaches to assessment that are culturally relevant and affirming. We discuss existing literature and research focused on the impact of high stakes testing, especially on marginalized communities, while also highlighting practices that honor the lived experiences and stories of these communities. We utilize a phenomenological methodology as we interview educators in a variety of positions within the same public school district in Texas in order to identify themes and trends in their perceptions of, and relationships to, high stakes standardized testing. The following three themes were identified: (a)majoritarian narratives, (b) perception of the assessment, and (c) change over time. We also identified examples and recommendations for culturally responsive and culturally affirming assessment practices and include specific examples and future implications and recommendations.
ArarKOrucuDWilkinsonJ, et al. (2021) Neoliberalism and Education Systems in Conflict Exploring Challenges across the Globe. London, UK: Routledge.
2.
AuW (2013) Hiding behind high-stakes testing: Meritocracy, objectivity and inequality in U.S. education. International Education Journal12(2): 7–20.
3.
BernalDD (2002) Critical race theory, Latino critical theory, and critical raced-gendered epistemologies: Recognizing students of color as holders and creators of knowledge. Quintessence International8(1): 105–126.
4.
BradburyA (2020) A critical race theory framework for education policy analysis: the case of bilingual learners and assessment policy in England. Race Ethnicity and Education23(2): 241–260. DOI: 10.1080/13613324.2019.1599338
5.
CapperCA (2019) Organizational Theory and Critical Epistemologies: Leading to Eliminate Inequities. Ch. 7. London, UK: Routledge.
6.
CarjuzaaJRuffWG (2010) When western epistemology and an indigenous worldview meet: Culturally responsive assessment in practice. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning10(1): 68–79.
7.
CammarotaJFineM (2008) Revolutionizing Education: Youth Participatory Action Research in Motion. London, UK: Routledge.
8.
Choices Program (2022) About the Choices Program. Choices Program Brown University. Available at: https://www.choices.edu
9.
ComberBSimpsonA (2001) Negotiating Critical Literacies in Classrooms. London, UK: Routledge.
10.
CooperL (1994) Critical storytelling in social work education. Australian Journal of Adult and Community Education34(2): 131–141.
11.
CreswellJW (2015) 30 Essential Skills for the Qualitative Researcher. First edition. SAGE Publications, Inc.
12.
CreswellJW (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 3rd ed (pp. xxix, 260). Sage Publications, Inc.
13.
CummingJJVan der KleijFM (2016) Effective enactment of assessment for learning and student diversity in Australia. In: LaveaultDAllalL (eds), Assessment for learning: meeting the challenge of implementation. Springer International Publishing, pp. 55–73.
14.
DeeTSJacobBA (2010) The Impact of No Child Left behind on Students, Teachers, and Schools. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Fall 2010.
15.
BernalD (1998) Using a chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review68(4): 555–583. DOI: 10.17763/haer.68.4.5wv1034973g22q48
EwellPT (2013) The Lumina Degree Qualifications Profile: Implications for Assessment. University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
FordDYKeaCT (2009) Creating culturally responsive instruction: For students’ and Teachers’ Sakes. Focus on Exceptional Children41: 1–16.
20.
GayG (2018) Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. In: Multicultural Education Series. Third Edition. New York, USA: Teachers College Press.
21.
GuajardoFGuajardoMOliverJ, et al. (2012) Framework for a new political praxis: Respeto, dignidad y conocimiento. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal6(1): 2012.
22.
HartRCasserlyMUzzellR, et al. (2015) Student Testing in America’s Great City Schools: An Inventory and Preliminary Analysis. Council of the Great City Schools.
23.
Hendrix-SotoA (2021) Activating Joy and Hope in Critical Literacies Instruction: Responding Pedagogically to Youth Skepticism in a YPAR Project. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice70(1): 349–368. DOI: 10.1177/2381337721103581
24.
HongSChoiW (2015). A longitudinal analysis of the effects of open enrollment on equity and academic achievement: Evidence from Minneapolis, Minnesota. Children and Youth Services Review49: 62–70.
25.
HorsfordSD (2010) Mixed Feelings about Mixed Schools: Superintendents on the Complex Legacy of School Desegregation. Educational Administration Quarterly46(3): 287–321.
26.
IkemotoL (1997) Furthering the inquiry: Race, class, and culture in the forced medical treatment of pregnant women. In: WingA (ed), Critical race feminism: A reader. New York University Press, pp. 136–143.
27.
KhalifaMAKhaliDHalloranC, et al. (2019) Toward an indigenous, decolonizing school leadership: A literature review. Educational Administration Quarterly55(4): 348.
KirovaAHennigK (2013) Culturally Responsive Assessment Practices: Examples from an Intercultural Multilingual Early Learning Program for Newcomer Children. Power and Education5(2): 106–119. DOI: 10.2304/power.2013.5.2.106
KvaleSBrinkmannS (2015) InterViews : Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Third edition. Sage Publications.
32.
Ladson-BillingsG (1998) Just what is critical race theory and what's it doing in a nice field like education?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education11(1): 7–24.
33.
MatsudaMJIiiCRLDelgadoR, et al. (1993) Words that Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment. 1st edition. London, UK: Routledge.
34.
MontenegroEJankowskiN (2017) Equity and Assessment: Moving towards Culturally Responsive Assessment (Occasional Paper No. 29). University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA).
35.
MorseCE (2020 December 11). Inside the Facebook Wars Dividing Thousands of AISD Parents Who Comes First in Austin Schools?The Austin Chronicle.
36.
MoschkovichJNelson-BarberS (2009) What Mathematics Teachers Need to Know about Culture and Language. Culturally Responsive Math Education. London, UK: Routledge.
NicholsSGlassGBerlinerD (2005) High-stakes testing and Student Achievement: Problems for the No Child Left Behind Act. Executive Summary. Education Policy Research Unit.
39.
NortvedtGAWieseEBrownM, et al. (2020) Aiding culturally responsive assessment in schools in a globalising world. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability32(1): 5–27. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-020-09316-w
40.
OakesJOrmsethTBellRM, et al. (1990) Multiplying Inequalities: The Effects Of Race, Social Class, and Tracking On Opportunities To Learn Mathematics And Science. RAND Corporation. Available at: https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3928.html
41.
OkunT (1999) Divorcing White Supremacy Culture: Coming Home to Who We Really Are. White Supremacy Culture. Available at: https://www.whitesupremacyculture.info/
42.
PattonMQ (2002) Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed.Sage.
Rivera-McCutchenRL (2021) Radical Care: Leading for Justice in Urban Schools. Teachers College Press.
45.
Singer-FreemanKBastoneLSkrivankJ (2016) Using ePortfolios to Assess Applied and Collaborative Learning and Academic Identity in a Summer Research Program for Community College Students. International Journal of ePortfolio6(1): 45–57.
46.
SolórzanoDGYossoTJ (2002) Critical Race Methodology: Counter-storytelling as an Analytical Framework for Education Research. Quintessence International8(1): 23–44. DOI: 10.1177/107780040200800103
47.
ŞimşekHYıldırımA (2013) Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (Hasan Şimşek-Ali Yıldırım) (9. Bs). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
48.
TeheraniAMartimianakisTStenfors-HayesT, et al. (2015) Choosing a Qualitative Research Approach. Journal of Graduate Medical Education7(4): 669–670. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00414.1
WilderFMojicaM (2022, March 17). Seven Texas Teachers on the State of Education: “I’m Tired of Getting Punched.” Texas Monthly.
52.
YinR (2014) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
53.
YossoTJ (2005) Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education8(1): 69–91.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
