Building Collaborative Teams to Include Students With Extensive Support Needs in General Education Contexts

Abstract

Including students with extensive support needs (ESN) in general education schools and classes across a district and school can be challenging. To be successful and sustainable, students with ESN need education teams with a wide range of expertise and, at minimum, a district-wide system of inclusion. This article demonstrates how one district and their school teams used a scaffolded tool (5-15-45 Tool) and a five-step implementation process to increase the inclusion of students with ESN at the school and district levels. The tool was designed to support collaborative teams to implement evidence-based practices in general education contexts. Using vignettes, completed examples from the 5-15-45 Tool, and an external link to a grade-level lesson, this article illustrates how education teams, schools, and districts can use the 5-15-45 Tool and five-step process to include students with ESN in general education contexts and to enhance inclusive education across a district.

Keywords

inclusive educational practices extensive and pervasive support needs Universal Design for Learning (UDL)collaborative team system change instruction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agran

Jackson

Kurth

J. A.

Ryndak

Burnette

Jameson

Zagona

Fitzpatrick

Wehmeyer

(2020). Why aren’t students with severe disabilities being placed in general education classrooms: Examining the relations among classroom placement, learner outcomes, and other factors. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919878134

Cameron

Cook

(2013). General education teachers’ goals and expectations for their included students with mild and severe disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(1), 18–30.

Carter

Prater

M. A.

Jackson

Marchant

(2009). Educators’ perceptions of collaborative planning processes for students with disabilities. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.54.1.60-70

Cook

S. C.

Collins

L. W.

Madigan

McDuffie Landrum

Cook

(2021). Coaching co-teachers: Increasing specialized instruction in inclusive settings. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 54(2), 134–145.

Gee

Gonzalez

Cooper

(2020). Outcomes of inclusive versus separate placements: A matched pairs comparison study. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(4), 223–240. http://doi.org/10.1177/1540796920943469

Hartmann

Clausen

(2021, March 8–13). What would you do with 5 more minutes? [Conference session]. Council for Exceptional Children (CEC-LIVE).

Jackson

Agran

Lansey

K. R.

Baker

Matthews

Fitzpatrick

Jameson

J. M.

Ryndak

Burnette

Taub

(2022). Examination of setting ecologies within and across different types of placement for elementary students with complex support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(4), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221132248

Jameson

J. M.

Hicks

Lansey

K. R.

Kurth

J. A.

Jackson

Zagona

A. L.

Burnette

Agran

Shogren

Pace

(2022). Predictions on the frequency and significance of social contacts across placements: A Bayesian multilevel model analysis. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(4), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221136538

Lazarus

S. S.

Ryndak

D. L.

Howley

C. B.

McDaid

Liu

K. K.

Taub

Howley

Cosier

Clifton

Telfer

Holden

Thurlow

M. L.

Vandercook

(2019). Using systems change efforts to implement and sustain inclusive education practices in general education settings for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities: A review of the literature (TIES Center Report 102). University of Minnesota, The TIES Center.

10.

Maeng

J. L.

Whitworth

B. A.

Bell

R. L.

Sterling

D. R.

(2020). The effect of professional development on elementary science teachers’ understanding, confidence, and classroom implementation of reform-based science instruction. Science Education, 104(2), 326–353.

11.

Metz

(2016). Practice profiles: A process for capturing evidence and operationalizing innovations. National Implementation Research Network.

12.

Pak

Desimone

L. M.

Parsons

(2020). An integrative approach to professional development to support college- and career- readiness standards. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28, Article 111. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.4970

13.

Ruppar

Kurth

Bubash

Lockman Turner

(2023). A framework for preparing to teach students with extensive support needs in the 21st century. Teacher Education and Special Education, 46(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064211059853

14.

Shurr

Bouck

E. C.

McCollow

(2022). Examining teacher and teacher educator perspectives of teacher leadership in extensive support needs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 45(2), 160–179.

15.

Solone

C. J.

Thornton

B. E.

Chiappe

J. C.

Perez

Rearick

M. K.

Falvey

M. A.

(2020). Creating collaborative schools in the United States: A review of best practices. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(3), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2020358222

16.

Taub

D. A.

Burnette

Baker

Turek

Ryndak

D. L.

(in press). Comparing outcomes for students with significant cognitive disabilities in schools at different implementation levels of inclusive system change.

17.

Taub

D. A.

McCord

J. A.

Ryndak

D. L.

(2017). Opportunities to learn for students with extensive support needs: A context of research-supported practices for all in general education classes. The Journal of Special Education, 51(3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917696263

18.

TIES Center. (2020). TIES lessons for all: The 5-15-45 Tool. https://publications.ici.umn.edu/ties/5-15-45/overview

19.

TIES Center. (2023, January 5).Inclusive science lesson—Newton’s Law [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIsSuKqSY5E

20.

Trapani

Annunziato

(2019). Crossing the bridge of change: Measuring instructional change using the concerns based adoption model. Journal for Leadership and Instruction, 18(1), 12–16.

21.

Walker

V. L.

Loman

S. L.

(2022). Strategies for including students with extensive support needs in SWPBIS. Inclusive Practices, 1(1), 23–32.