Universal Design Principles for Multimodal Representation in Literacy Activities for Preschoolers

Abstract

The article demonstrates how to use the multimodal and multisensory representation principle of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to increase access to storybook reading for diverse groups of preschoolers with extensive support needs (ESN). Storybook reading is an essential part of instruction in early childhood education. Utilizing UDL-inspired book boxes, children of all ability levels can partake in the activity in a meaningful manner. Multimodal representation, such as use of tangible or abstract items (e.g.: photos, miniatures, real items) or sensory experiences (e.g.: essential oils, food items, braille, physical movement) allow children to engage with stories in an enhanced manner. Book boxes can assist in developing concepts related to social emotional growth, social skills, functional living skills, environmental concepts, and vocabulary presented in books.

Keywords

Universal Design for Learning (UDL)multiple disabilities extensive support needs early childhood literacy multimodal representation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allman

C. B.

Lewis

(2014). ECC essentials: Teaching the expanded core curriculum to students with visual impairments. AFB Press.

American Library Association. (2017). Multicultural Cinderella stories. https://www.ala.org/aboutala/offices/resources/multicultural

Artiles

A. J.

Ortiz

A. A.

(2002). English language learners with special education needs: Identification, assessment, and instruction. Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Publishing Company.

Baroody

A. J.

Clements

D. H.

Sarama

(2019). Teaching and learning mathematics in early childhood programs. In Brown

C. P.

McMullen

M. B.

File

(Eds.), Handbook of early childhood care and education (pp. 329–354). Wiley Blackwell.

Brillante

Nemeth

(2017). Universal design for learning in the early childhood classroom: Teaching children of all languages, cultures, and abilities, birth – 8 years (1st ed.). Routledge.

Browder

D. M.

Mims

P. J.

Spooner

Ahlgrim-Delzell

Lee

(2008). Teaching elementary students with multiple disabilities to participate in shared stories. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 33(1–2), 3–12.

Browder

D. M.

Wakeman

S. Y.

Spooner

Ahlgrim-Delzell

Algozzinexya

(2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72(4), 392–408. https://doi.org/gqx7

Brown

C. S.

(2014). Language and literacy development in the early years: Foundational skills that support emergent readers. Language and Literacy Spectrum, 24, 35–49. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1034914.pdf

CAST. (2018). UDL & the learning brain. http://www.cast.org/products-services/resources/2018/udl-learning-brain-neuroscience

10.

Chen

Dote-Kwan

(2021). Preschoolers with visual impairments and additional disabilities: Using universal design for learning and differentiation. Young Exceptional Children, 24(2), 70–81. https://doi.org/h3dk

11.

Clements

D. H.

Sarama

(2019). Learning trajectories/teaching strategies gold alignment. https://www.learningtrajectories.org/documents/1579301880799.pdf

12.

Coogle

C. G.

Storie

Rahn

N. L.

(2021). A framework for promoting access, increasing participation, and providing support in early childhood classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(5), 867–877. https://doi.org/gj62nf

13.

Cunconan-Lahr

R. L.

Stife

(2007). Universal Design for Learning (UDL) checklist for early childhood environments. Northampton Community College. https://www.northampton.edu/Documents/ECE/Checklist_and_Questions.pdf

14.

Dalton

E. M.

Brand

S. T.

(2012). The assessment of young children through the lens of Universal Design for Learning (UDL). Forum on Public Policy Online, 2012(1), 1–18. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ979436.pdf

15.

Dickinson

D. K.

McCabe

Essex

M. J.

(2007). A window of opportunity we must open to all: The case for preschool with high-quality support for language and literacy. In Dickinson

D. K.

Neuman

S. B.

(Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 11–28). Guilford Publications.

16.

Dixon

L. Q.

Zhao

Quiroz

B. G.

Shin

J.-Y.

(2012). Home and community factors influencing bilingual children’s ethnic language vocabulary development. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(4), 541–565. https://doi.org/gjg8p3

17.

Evmenova

(2018). Preparing teachers to use universal design for learning to support diverse learners. Journal of Online Learning Research, 4(2), 147–171. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/181969

18.

Gaudreau

King

Y. A.

Dore

R. A.

Puttre

Nichols

Hirsh-Pasek

Golinkoff

R. M.

(2020). Preschoolers benefit equally from video chat, pseudo-contingent video, and live book reading: Implications for storytime during the coronavirus pandemic and beyond. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 2158. https://doi.org/h3db

19.

Gauvreau

A. N.

Lohmann

M. J.

Hovey

K. A.

(2021). Circle is for everyone: Using UDL to promote inclusion during circle times. Young Exceptional Children. https://doi.org/h3dj

20.

Guān

C.-L. D.

Cheatham

G. A.

(2018). Bilingual vocabulary development for dual language learners with disabilities: Two research-based approaches. Young Exceptional Children, 21(3), 142–156. https://doi.org/gmdj39

21.

Gurganus

S. P.

(2017). Math instruction for students with learning problems (2nd ed.). Routledge.

22.

Head Start: Early Childhood Learning & Knowledge Center. (2019). Report to congress on dual language learners in Head Start and Early Head Start programs. Administration for Children and Families at U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/report/report-congress-dual-language-learners-head-start-and-early-head-start-programs

23.

Horn

Parks

(2019) Inclusive special education for yourng learners with severe and multiple disabilities. In Obiakor

Bakken

J. P.

(Eds.), Special Eductaion for Young Learners with Disabilities (Advances in Special Education, Vol. 34) (pp. 119–137). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org.jn6p

24.

Hudson

M. E.

Test

D. W.

(2011). Evaluating the evidence base of shared story reading to promote literacy for students with extensive support needs. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 36(1–2), 34–45. https://doi.org/bspf9n

25.

Kurth

J. A.

Ruppar

A. L.

Toews

S. G.

McCabe

K. M.

McQueston

J. A.

Johnston

(2019). Considerations in placement decisions for students with extensive support needs: An analysis of LRE statements. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 44(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/gjh4gw

26.

McLeod

R. H.

Kaiser

A. P.

Hardy

J. K.

(2019). The relation between teacher vocabulary use in play and child vocabulary outcomes. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 39(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/h3dc

27.

Miles

McLetchie

(2008). Developing concepts with children who are deaf-blind. The National Consortium on Deaf-Blindness. https://www.nationaldb.org/info-center/developing-concepts-factsheet/

28.

Nelson

P. M.

Klingbeil

D. A.

Parker

D. C.

(2020). An evaluation of the incremental impact of math intervention on early literacy performance. Psychology in the Schools, 58(3), 431–442. https://doi.org/h3dd

29.

Ortiz

A. A.

Fránquiz

M. E.

(2019). Co-editors’ introduction: Early childhood education programs for dual language learners: Opportunities and challenges. Bilingual Research Journal, 42(3), 269–274. https://doi.org/h3df

30.

Purpura

D. J.

Napoli

A. R.

Wehrspann

E. A.

Gold

Z. S.

(2017). Causal connections between mathematical language and mathematical knowledge: A dialogic reading intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/gprnmf

31.

Saeed

H. T.

Abdulaziz

AL-Daboon

S. J.

(2018). Prevalence and risk factors of primary speech and language delay in children less than seven years of age. Journal of Community Medicine & Health Education, 8(2), 608. https://doi.org/h3dg

32.

Shanahan

Lonigan

C. J.

(2010). The National Early Literacy Panel [NELP]: A summary of the process and the report. Educational Researcher, 39(4), 279–285. https://doi.org/bj4prg

33.

Spooner

Browder

D. M.

(2015). Raising the bar: Significant advances and future needs for promoting learning for students with severe disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 36(1), 28–32. https://doi.org/h3v

34.

Stockall

N. S.

Dennis

Miller

(2012). Right from the start. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/jcmq

35.

Toews

S. G.

McQueston

Kurth

J. A.

(2021). Evaluation of the evidence base for shared reading to support literacy skill development for students with extensive support needs. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 46(2), 77–93. https://doi.org/hqm2

36.

Towson

J. A.

Akemoglu

Watkins

Zeng

(2021). Shared interactive book reading interventions for young children with disabilities: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30(6), 2700–2715. https://doi.org/h3dh

37.

Towson

J. A.

Fettig

Fleury

V. P.

Abarca

D. L.

(2017). Dialogic reading in early childhood settings: A summary of the evidence base. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 37(3), 132–146. https://doi.org/gcgp9z

38.

van Kleeck

. (2008). Providing preschool foundations for later reading comprehension: The importance of and ideas for targeting inferencing in storybook-sharing interventions. Psychology in the Schools, 45(7), 627–643. https://doi.org/bmqtjh

39.

Zimmerman

S. S.

Rodriguez

M. C.

Rewey

K. L.

Heidemann

S. L.

(2008). The impact of an early literacy initiative on the long-term academic success of diverse students. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 13(4), 452–481. https://doi.org/bkb6tg