Switzerland’s reputation for order and cleanliness is deeply ingrained in both its national identity and international perception, underpinning a deep infrastructural commitment to seamless waste management. This is my starting point for reading the Giubiasco waste-to-energy plant as a spatial text of erasure, and for highlighting the communicative potential of built environments. Drawing on fieldwork observations, visual documentation, and interviews, this article examines how language, space, and materiality mediate the tension between the visibility and erasure of waste, and how semiotic and spatial-material resources are deployed within the architectural and communicative design of waste infrastructures. Directed toward discourse-oriented studies of semiotic erasure, my analysis identifies three multimodally realized tactics – aesthetic obfuscation, commodification, and sanitization – through which the plant enacts erasure through its exterior and interior design. These tactics extend to other infrastructural and semiotic landscapes, linking material practices to broader socio-political and environmental narratives. Ultimately, I propose that waste is thus never merely matter out of place, but negotiated within spatial, rhetorical, and aesthetic technologies of deflection.
AielloG (2011) From wound to enclave: the visual-material performance of urban renewal in bologna’s manifattura delle arti. Western Journal of Communication75(4): 341–366.
2.
AielloG (2020) Communicating the “world-class” city: a visual-material approach. Social Semiotics31(1): 136–154.
3.
AielloGDickinsonG (2014) Beyond authenticity: a visual-material analysis of locality in the global redesign of starbucks stores. Visual Communication13(3): 303–321.
4.
AlexanderC (2016) When waste disappears, or more waste please. In: MauchC (ed) Out of Sight, out of Mind: The Politics and Culture of Waste. Munich: RCC Perspectives Transformations in Environment and Society, 31–39.
5.
AlexanderCO’HareP (2020) Waste and its disguises: technologies of (un)knowing. Ethnos88(3): 419–443.
6.
AlexanderCRenoJO (eds) (2012) Economies of Recycling: The Global Transformation of Materials, Values and Social Relations. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
7.
BermanM (1983) All that Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. New York: Verso Books.
8.
BjörkvallAArcherA (2021) Semiotics of destruction: traces on the environment. Visual Communication21(2): 218–236.
9.
BowkerGCStarSL (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
10.
CameronDMarkusTA (2002) The Words Between the Spaces: Buildings and Language. London: Routledge.
11.
CavanaughJR (2017) How the sausage gets made: food safety and the mediality of talk, documents, and food practices. In: CavanaughJRShankarS (eds) Language and Materiality: Ethnographic and Theoretical Explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 105–124.
12.
CavanaughJR (2022) Trash talk: language as waste practice. Journal of SocioLinguistics26(3): 404–410.
13.
CorvellecH (ed) (2025) Waste as a Critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
DiamantopoulouSChristidouDBlundenJ (2024) Multimodality and museums: innovative research methods and interpretive frameworks. Multimodality & Society4(3): 249–258.
15.
DickinsonGAielloG (2016) Being through there matters: materiality, bodies, and movement in urban communication research. International Journal of Communication10: 1294–1308.
16.
DjonovEVan LeeuwenT (2011) The semiotics of texture: from tactile to visual. Visual Communication10(4): 541–564.
17.
EasterlingK (2014) Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. London: Verso Books.
18.
EisenmanP (1999) Diagram Diaries. New York: Universe.
19.
EricssonS (2023) Equality, marginalisation, and hegemonic negotiation: embodied understandings of the built and designed environment. Multimodality & Society3(4): 313–335.
20.
Eurostat (2024) Municipal waste by waste management operations. Eurostat. [dataset].
21.
FuASBalabanU (2024) Incineration, urbanization, and municipal solid waste in the world-system. Journal of World-Systems Research30(1): 276–301.
22.
GabrysJ (2009) Sink: the dirt of systems. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space27(4): 666–681.
23.
GendelmanIAielloG (2010) Faces of places: façades as global communication in post-eastern bloc urban renewal. In: JaworskiAThurlowC (eds) Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 256–273.
24.
GeorgouliasA (2017) The role of the architect. In: KaraHAsensio–VilloriaLGeorgouliasA (eds) Architecture and Waste: A (Re)Planned Obsolescence. Harvard: Harvard University Graduate School of Design, 130–144.
25.
GhosnRJazairyEH (2015) Geographies of Trash. New York: Actar Publishers.
26.
GilleZ (2007) From the Cult of Waste to the Trash Heap of History: The Politics of Waste in Socialist and Postsocialist Hungary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
27.
GilleZLepawskyJ (2021) The Routledge Handbook of Waste Studies. New York: Routledge.
28.
GregsonNCrangM (2010) Materiality and waste: inorganic vitality in a networked world. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space42(5): 1026–1032.
29.
HawkinsG (2006) The Ethics of Waste: How we Relate to Rubbish. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
30.
HawkinsG (2007) Waste in Sydney: unwelcome returns. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America122(1): 348–351.
31.
HolleranM (2024) Concrete monsters of the welfare state: discussions of brutalist architecture on social media. Space and Culture27(4): 442–458.
32.
IedemaR (2003) Multimodality, resemiotization: extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication2(1): 29–57.
33.
ImhoffL (2025) Signs of sustainability? The semiotic dimension of urban plants. In: KosaticaMSmithSP (eds) Framing Sustainability in Language and Communication. New York: Routledge, 124–142.
JohnstoneELiaoMHStraniK (2024) How does it feel? Space and text as affective affordances in the multimodal museum. Multimodality & Society4(3): 314–329.
KaikaM (2011) Autistic architecture: the fall of the icon and the rise of the serial object of architecture. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space29(6): 968–992.
38.
KaraH (2017) Industrial buildings don’t have to be ugly. In: KaraHAsensio–VilloriaLGeorgouliasA (eds) Architecture and Waste: A (Re)Planned Obsolescence. Harvard: Harvard University Graduate School of Design, 20–44.
39.
KaraHAsensio–VilloriaLGeorgouliasA (eds) (2017) Architecture and Waste: A (Re)Planned Obsolescence. Harvard: Harvard University Graduate School of Design.
KarlanderD (2019) A semiotics of nonexistence? Erasure and erased writing under anti-graffiti regimes. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal5(2): 198–216.
42.
KosaticaM (2022) The Burden of Traumascapes: Discourses of Remembering in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Beyond. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
43.
KosaticaMZieglerEBuchstallerI (2024) From winding tower to eiffel tower (of the ruhr area): the symbolic economy of industrial signs. Multimodality & Society4(4): 402–432.
44.
KressGVan LeeuwenT (2020) Reading Images the Grammar of Visual Design. 3rd edition. London: Routledge.
45.
LarkinB (2013) The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology42(1): 327–343.
46.
LedinPMachinD (2016) Strategic diagrams and the technologization of culture. Journal of Language and Politics15(3): 322–336.
47.
LefebvreH (1991) The Production of Space (Nicholson-Smith D Trans.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
48.
LiboironM (2015) Redefining pollution and action: the matter of plastics. Journal of Material Culture21(1): 87–110.
49.
LiboironMLepawskyJ (2022) Discard Studies: Wasting, Systems, and Power. Cambridge: MIT Press.
50.
McMurtrieRJ (2012) Feeling space dynamically: variable interpersonal meanings in high-rise apartment complexes. Visual Communication11(4): 511–534.
51.
McMurtrieRJ (2017) The Semiotics of Movement in Space. London: Routledge.
52.
Norberg-SchulzC (1980) Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York: Rizzoli International Publications.
53.
OECD (2024) Waste: Municipal Waste [Database]. OECD Environment Statistics. Available at: (accessed 10 April 2025).
54.
OsmondW (2024) Making pride (R)evolution: a reflection on exhibition design. Multimodality & Society4(3): 330–339.
55.
O’HareP (2022) Rubbish Belongs to the Poor: Hygienic Enclosure and the Waste Commons. London: Plutopress.
56.
PallasmaaJ (2012) The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
57.
PellandaA (2025) Garbage day as dispositive and semiotic landscape: a visual essay. Linguistic Landscape11(1): 32–46.
58.
RavelliLMcMurtrieRJ (2016) Multimodality in the Built Environment: Spatial Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
59.
RavelliLStenglinM (2008) 13. Feeling space: interpersonal communication and spatial semiotics. In: AntosGVentolaE (eds) Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter, 355–396.
60.
RavelliLWuX (2022) History, materiality and social practice: spatial discourse analysis of a contemporary art museum in China. Multimodality & Society2(4): 333–354.
TannenD (ed) (2007) Imagining worlds: imagery and detail in conversation and other genresTalking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 133–160.
69.
ThurlowC (2022) Rubbish? Envisioning a sociolinguistics of waste. Journal of SocioLinguistics26(3): 386–403.
70.
ThurlowCPellandaAWohlgemuthL (2022) The discursive chronotopes of waste: temporal laminations and linguistic hauntings. Language in Society51(5): 819–837.
71.
VacchiniE and Regional Waste Agency (2010) The architecture In: ICTR: Waste-To-Energy Plant. Mendrisio: Gabriele Capelli Editore, 74–91.
72.
VolvachN (2024) Shouting absences: disentangling the ghosts of Ukraine in occupied Crimea. Language in Society53(3): 523–548.
WinzelerRWickiABurckhardtC (2023) In: Rapporto Sull’Analisi Della Composizione Dei Rifiuti 2022. Switzerland: Report, Dipartimento federale dell’ambiente, dei trasporti, dell’energia e delle comunicazioni DATEC & Ufficio federale dell’ambiente UFAM Divisione Rifiuti e Materie Prime. Available at: https://www.bafu.admin.ch/bafu/en/home/topics/waste/state/data.html (accessed 25 May 2025).
