Participant experiences of a post-release electronic monitoring program for domestic violence in New South Wales,Australia

Abstract

Electronic monitoring has been increasingly used internationally with recent implementation in Australia for those convicted of domestic violence offenses. It is timely and important to gain a better understanding of the physical, psychological, social, and offending-related experiences and impacts of electronic monitoring on this group to inform further implementation. This study describes the experiences of individuals who were subject to a post-release electronic monitoring program for domestic violence in the state of New South Wales, Australia. Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with 16 men who had recently experienced electronic monitoring. Thematic analysis was used to investigate common themes across participants’ experiences. Demographic and basic quantitative health data were also collected. Five themes were identified: (a) confusion regarding program practices, (b) awareness and pressure of monitoring, (c) social exclusion effects, (d) felt and enacted stigmatization, and (e) “for them not for me.” The findings reveal participants were highly aware of their being monitored, with a mix of positive and negative responses to this cognizance. Being electronically monitored had several flow-on effects on participants’ lives, creating challenges in social spheres across work and personal life. Stigma, both felt and enacted, featured heavily in participants’ responses. Individual factors that may affect program adherence were also identified, including education level and intent to commit a crime. Further quantitative work will be useful for informing a more complete understanding of the relationship between program experiences and outcomes such as reoffending and post-release community integration.

Keywords

domestic violence qualitative research electronic monitoring community orders surveillance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Attride-Stirling

. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307

Australian Bureau of Statistics, & ABS, C. (2015). National Health Survey: first results 2014-15. ABS Canberra.

Bales

Mann

Blomberg

Gaes

Barrick

Dhungana

McManus

(2010). Quantitative and qualitative assessment of electronic monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm900298c

Bartels

Martinovic

. (2017). Electronic monitoring: The experience in Australia. European Journal of Probation, 9(1), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/2066220317697658

Belur

Thornton

Tompson

Manning

Sidebottom

Bowers

. (2020). A systematic review of the effectiveness of the electronic monitoring of offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 68(April), 101686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101686

Black, M., & Smith, R. G. (2003). Electoric monitoring in the criminal justice system. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, (254), https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi254

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Burrell

Gable

. (2008). From B. F. Skinner to Spiderman to Martha Stewart: The past, present and future of electronic monitoring of offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 46(3–4), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670802143342

Corbett

Marx

G. T

. (1991). Critique: No soul in the new machine: Technofallacies in the electronic monitoring movement. Justice Quarterly, 8(3), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829100091111

10.

Corrigan

P. W.

Watson

A. C.

Barr

. (2006). The self-stigma of mental illness: Implications for self-esteem and self-efficacy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(8), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2006.25.8.875

11.

Creswell

J. W.

(1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications.

12.

Devlin

N. J.

Shah

K. K.

Feng

Mulhern

van Hout

. (2018). Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Economics, 27(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3564

13.

Dias

Ware

R. S.

Kinner

S. A.

Lennox

N. G

. (2013). Co-occurring mental disorder and intellectual disability in a large sample of Australian prisoners. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 47(10), 938–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867413492220

14.

Erez

Ibarra

P. R.

Bales

W. D.

Gur

O. M.

(2012). GPS monitoring technologies and domestic violence: An evaluation study. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/238910.pdf

15.

Foucault

(1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. (Transl. Sheridan

). Vintage, 1–12.

16.

Gibbs

King

. (2003). The electronic ball and chain? The operation and impact of home detention with electronic monitoring in New Zealand. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 36(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.36.1.1

17.

Gilliom

(2001). Overseers of the poor: Surveillance, resistance and the limits of privacy. University of Chicago Press.

18.

Goffman

. (2009). On the run: Wanted men in a Philadelphia Ghetto. American Sociological Review, 74(3), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400301a

19.

Graham

McIvor

. (2017). Advancing electronic monitoring in Scotland: Understanding the influences of localism and professional ideologies. European Journal of Probation, 9(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/2066220317697659

20.

Haggerty

K. D.

Wilson

Smith

G. J. D

. (2011). Theorizing surveillance in crime control. Theoretical Criminology, 15(3), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480610396442

21.

Herdman

Gudex

Lloyd

Janssen

Kind

Parkin

Bonsel

Badia

. (2011). Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Quality of Life Research, 20(10), 1727–1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x

22.

Howard

F. F

. (2020). The experience of electronic monitoring and the implications for effective use. Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 59(1), 17–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12351

23.

Hucklesby

. (2009). Understanding offenders’ compliance: A case study of electronically monitored curfew orders. Journal of Law and Society, 36(2), 248–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2009.00465.x

24.

Kessler

R. C.

Andrews

Colpe

. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32(6), 959–956. http://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291702006074

25.

Killias

Gilliéron

Kissling

Villettaz

. (2010). Community service versus electronic monitoring—what works better?: Results of a randomized trial. British Journal of Criminology, 50(6), 1155–1170. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq050

26.

Laurie, E., & Maglione, G. (2020). The electronic monitoring of offenders in context: From policy to political logics. Critical Criminology, 28, 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09471-7

27.

LeBel

T. P

. (2012). Invisible stripes? Formerly incarcerated persons’ perceptions of stigma. Deviant Behavior, 33(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2010.538365

28.

Maidment

M. R

. (2002). Toward a “woman-centered” approach to community-based corrections. Women & Criminal Justice, 13(4), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1300/J012v13n04

29.

Marklund

Holmberg

. (2009). Effects of early release from prison using electronic tagging in Sweden. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-008-9064-2

30.

McCaffrey

Kaambwa

Currow

D. C.

Ratcliffe

. (2016). Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L: South Australian population norms. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0537-0

31.

Moore

K. E.

Milam

K. C.

Folk

J. B.

Tangney

J. P

. (2018). Self-stigma among criminal offenders: Risk and protective factors. Stigma Health, 3(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000092

32.

Nancarrow

Modini

(2018). Electronic monitoring in the context of domestic and family violence.

33.

Paterson

. (2015). From offender to victim-oriented monitoring: A comparative analysis of the emergence of electronic monitoring systems in Argentina and England and Wales. Brazilian Journal of Urban Management, 7(2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-3369.007.002.SE01

34.

Patton

(1990). Designing qualitative studies. In D. C. Laughton (Ed.), Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed., pp. 169–186). Sage Publications.

35.

QSR International Pty Ltd. (2012). NVivo qualitative data analysis software (No. 10). QSR International Pty Ltd.

36.

Rados

(2019). Keeping their distance: A comparison of 2009 and 2013 domestic violence cases in Seminole county that utilized GPS technology to determine effectiveness of program. 2016, 2004–2019.

37.

Raio

C. M.

Konova

A. B.

Otto

A. R

. (2020). Trait impulsivity and acute stress interact to influence choice and decision speed during multi-stage decision-making. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64540-0

38.

Renzema

Mayo-Wilson

. (2005). Can electronic monitoring reduce crime for moderate to high-risk offenders? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-1615-1

39.

Salekin

K. L.

Olley

J. G.

Hedge

K. A

. (2010). Offenders with intellectual disability: Characteristics, prevalence, and issues in forensic assessment. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 3(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315861003695769

40.

Simon

. (2005). The return of panopticism: Supervision, subjection and the new surveillance. Surveillance and Society, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v3i1.3317

41.

Staples

W. G.

Decker

S. K

. (2010). Between the “home” and “institutional” worlds: Tensions and contradictions in the practice of house arrest. Critical Criminology, 18(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-009-9089-5

42.

Teigan

K. H

. (1994). Yerkes-Dodson: A law for all seasons. Theory & Psychology, 4(4), 525–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354394044004

43.

Vanhaelemeesch

Vander Beken

. (2014). Between convict and ward: The experiences of people living with offenders subject to electronic monitoring. Crime, Law and Social Change, 62(4), 389–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-014-9535-5

44.

Vanhaelemeesch

Vander Beken

Vandevelde

. (2014). Punishment at home: Offenders’ experiences with electronic monitoring. European Journal of Criminology, 11(3), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370813493846

45.

Wang

J. J. J.

Poynton

. (2017). Intensive correction orders versus short prison sentence: A comparison of re-offending. Crime and Justice Bulletin, October(207). https://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Publications/CJB/2017-Report-Intensive-correction-orders-versus-short-prison-sentence-CJB207.pdf

46.

Watkins, I. (2011). Corrective services NSW the utility of level of service inventory – revised (LSI-R) assessments within NSW correctional environments. Research Bulletin, (29), https://correctiveservices.dcj.nsw.gov.au/content/dam/dcj/corrective-services-nsw/documents/research-and-statistics/rb29-utility-of-level-of-service-inventory-.pdf

47.

Wodahl

E. J.

Ogle

Kadleck

Gerow

. (2013). Offender perceptions of graduated sanctions. Crime and Delinquency, 59(8), 1185–1210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128709333725