Electronic monitoring has become an integral part of the criminal justice process in England and Wales. Since the first trials in the 1980s the range of applications of electronic monitoring and the number of offenders subject to it have increased. Knowledge about the impact of electronic monitoring on offenders is limited and crucial questions about its effect on offending and desistance remain unanswered. This article addresses these questions by reviewing evidence from a study that interviewed offenders subject to electronically monitored curfew orders. It suggests that for some offenders curfew orders reduce offending and contribute to desistance by addressing levels of social capital in two ways. First, by decreasing levels of anti-social capital by reducing offenders' links with situations, people, places and networks correlated with their offending. Second, by improving levels of pro-social capital by encouraging offenders to connect or re-connect with influences linked with desistance such as family and employment. Curfew orders can also have negative impacts on pro-social capital particularly by disrupting employment and family ties and responsibilities. This article concludes that curfew orders have the potential to play a positive and distinctive role in supporting desistance and complement work undertaken as part of the new community order.
Barry, M. (2006) Youth Offending in Transition. London: Routledge.
2.
Bean, P. (2002) Drugs and Crime. Cullompton : Willan Publishing.
3.
Bottomley, A.K., A. Hucklesby and G. Mair (2004) `The New Uses of Electronic Monitoring: Findings for the Implementation Phase in Three Pilot Areas', Issues in Community and Criminal Justice Monograph5: 13—51.
4.
Bottoms, A., J. Shapland, A. Costello, D. Holmes and G. Muir (2004) `Towards Desistance: Theoretical Underpinnings for an Empirical Study', Howard Journal43(4): 368—89.
5.
Burnett, R. (2004) `To Reoffend or Not to Reoffend? The Ambivalence of Convicted Property Offenders', in S. Maruna and R. Immarigeon (eds) After Crime and Punishment: Ex-offender Reintegration and Desistance from Crime, pp. 152—80. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
6.
Cassidy, D., G. Harper and S. Brown (2005) Understanding Electronic Monitoring of Juveniles on Bail or Remand to Local Authority Accommodation. Home Office Online Report 21/05. London: Home Office.
7.
Coleman, J. (1988) `Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital ', American Journal of Sociology94S: S95—S120.
8.
Crawford, A. (2006) `Fixing Broken Promises?': Neighbourhood Wardens and Social Capital', UrbanStudies43(5/6): 957—76.
9.
Dingwall, G. (2005) Alcohol and Crime. Cullompton : Willan Publishing.
10.
Dodgson, K. (2001) Electronic Monitoring of Released Prisoners: An Evaluation of the Home Detention Curfew scheme. Home Office Research Study no. 222. London: Home Office.
11.
Elliott, R., J. Airs, C. Easton and R. Lewis (2000) Electronically Monitored Curfew for 10—15 Year Olds: Report of the Pilot. London: Home Office.
12.
Farrall, S. (2002) Rethinking What Works with Offenders. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
13.
Farrall, S. (2004) `Social Capital and Offender Re-integration: Making Probation Desistance Focused', in S. Maruna and R. Immarigeon (eds) After Crime and Punishment: Ex-offender Reintegration and Desistance from Crime, pp. 57—84. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
14.
Farrall, S. and A. Calverley (2006) Understanding Desistance from Crime. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
15.
Hagan, J. and B. McCarthy (1997) Mean Streets: Youth Crime and Homelessness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Haverkamp, R., M. Mayer and R. Levy (2004) `Electronic Monitoring in Europe', European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice12(1): 36—45.
17.
Holloway, K., T. Bennett and D. Farrington (2005) The Effectiveness of Criminal Justice and Treatment Programmes in Reducing Drug Related Crime: A Systematic Review. Home Office Online Report 26/05. London: Home Office.
18.
Home Office (2005) Sentencing Statistics 2004 England and Wales. Statistical Bulletin 15/05. London: Home Office.
19.
Home Office (2006a) Curfew Orders . www.cjsonline.gov.uk/offender/community-sentencing/curfew/index/html (accessed 8 June 2006).
20.
Home Office (2006b) Drug Interventions Programme. www.drugs.gov.uk/drugintervention-programme/ (accessed 8 June 2006).
21.
Hough, M. (1996) Problem Drug Use and Criminal Justice: A Review of the Literature. Drug Prevention Initiative Paper no. 15. London: Home Office.
22.
Hucklesby, A., C. Eastwood, A. Spriggs and T. Seddon (2005) The Evaluation of the Restriction on Bail Pilots: Implementation Lessons from the First Six Months. RDS Online Review 36/05 . London: Home Office.
23.
Laub, J.H. and R.J. Sampson (2003) Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
24.
Lobley, D. and D. Smith (2000) Evaluation of Electronically Monitored Restriction of Liberty Orders. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Research Unit.
25.
McNeill, F. (2003) `Desistance-Focused Probation Practice', in W.H. Chui and M. Nellis (eds) Moving Probation Forward, pp. 146—62. Harlow: Pearson Education.
26.
Mair, G. (2001) `Technology and the Future of Probation', in A.E. Bottoms, L. Gelsthorpe and S. Rex (eds) Community Penalties: Change and Challenges, pp. 168—82. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
27.
Mair, G. (2005) `Electronic Monitoring in England and Wales: Evidence-Based or Not?', Criminal Justice5(3): 257—78.
28.
Mair, G. and E. Mortimer (1996) Curfew Orders and Electronic Monitoring. Home Office Research Study no. 163. London : Home Office.
29.
Mair, G. and C. Nee (1990) Electronic Monitoring: The Trials and Their Results. Home Office Research Study no. 120. London: Home Office.
30.
Maruna, S. (2001) Making Good: How Ex-convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.
31.
Mortimer, E. (2001) Electronic Monitoring of Released Prisoners: An Evaluation of the Home Detention Curfew Scheme. Research Findings no. 139. London: Home Office.
32.
Mortimer, E. and C. May (1997) Electronic Monitoring in Practice: The Second Year of the Trials of Curfew Orders. Home Office Research Study no. 177. London: Home Office.
33.
Mortimer, E., E. Pareira and I. Walter (1999) Making the Tag Fit: Further Analysis from the First Two Years of the Trials of Curfew Orders. Research Findings no. 105. London: Home Office.
34.
Nellis, M. (1991) `The Electronic Monitoring of Offenders in England and Wales: Recent Developments and Future Prospects', British Journal of Criminology31(2): 165—85.
35.
Nellis, M. (2003a) `Electronic Monitoring and the Future of Probation ', in W.H. Chui and M. Nellis (eds) Moving Probation Forward, pp. 245—60. Harlow: Pearson Education.
36.
Nellis, M. (2003b) `“They Don't Even Know We're There”: The Electronic Monitoring of Offenders in England and Wales', in K. Ball and F. Webster (eds) The Intensification of Surveillance, pp. 62—89. London: Pluto Press.
37.
Nellis, M. (2004) `Electronic Monitoring and the Community Supervision of Offenders', in A. Bottoms, S. Rex and G. Robinson (eds) Alternatives to Prison, pp. 224—47. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
38.
Nellis, M. (2006) `The Limitations of Electronic Monitoring: Reflections on the Tagging of Peter Williams', Prison Service Journal March. Available at http://www.hmprisonservice.gov.uk/resourcecentre/prisonservicejournal/index.asp?id=5017,3124,11,3148,0,0
39.
Rex, S. (1999) `Desistance from Offending: Experiences of Probation ', Howard Journal38(4): 366—83.
40.
Sampson, R.J. and J.H. Laub (1993) Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
Smith, D. (2001) `Electronic Monitoring of Offenders: The Scottish Experience', Criminal Justice1(2): 201—14.
42.
South, N. (2002) `Drugs, Alcohol and Crime', in M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, pp. 914—44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
Sugg, D., L. Moore and P. Howard (2001) Electronic Monitoring and Offending Behaviour: Reconviction Results for the Second Year of Trials of Curfew Orders. Research Findings 141. London: Home Office .
44.
Turnball, P., T. McSweeney, R. Webster, M. Edmunds and M. Hough (2000) Drug Treatment and Testing Orders: Final Evaluation Report. London: Home Office.
45.
Walter, I. (2002) Evaluation of the National Roll-Out of Curfew Orders. Home Office online report 15/02. London: Home Office.
46.
Walter, I., D. Sugg and L. Moore (2001) A Year on the Tag: Interviews with Criminal Justice Practitioners and Electronic Monitoring Staff about Curfew Orders. Research Findings 140. London: Home Office .
47.
Whitfield, D. (1997) Tackling the Tag. Winchester : Waterside Press.
48.
Whitfield, D. (2001) The Magic Bracelet. Winchester : Waterside Press.
