Professional and survivor perspectives on a co-located early domestic abuse intervention in a police station: A qualitative study

Abstract

The quantity and complex nature of reported and recorded domestic abuse incidents has continued to grow, demanding more efficient and effective support for survivors to reduce harm and prevent escalation of risk. Early intervention could be supported through the co-location of domestic violence and abuse advisors in police stations. This study explored the benefits of a co-located domestic abuse intervention support hosted in a UK police station. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with survivors and professionals involved in the delivery of the intervention. Transcripts were analysed separately using reflexive thematic analysis before data from the two groups were triangulated. Seven survivors and twelve professionals took part. Two themes were generated: experiences and outcomes from cases reported, and types and forms of support offered to survivors. Professionals also commented on the benefits of having additional people reviewing cases. Findings demonstrated positive collaborative working in a co-located setup and perceived improvements in survivor experiences and outcomes.

Keywords

Co-location domestic violence and abuse early interventions evaluation qualitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bacchus

Bewley

Vitolas

, et al. (2010) Evaluation of a domestic violence intervention in the maternity and sexual health services of a UK hospital. Reprod Health Matters 18(36): 147–57.

Birdsall

Kirby

McManus

(2016) Police–victim engagement in building a victim empowerment approach to intimate partner violence cases. Police Practice and Research 18(1): 75–86.

Blamey

Mackenzie

(2007) Theories of change and realistic evaluation: Peas in a pod or apples and oranges? Evaluation 13(4): 439–455.

Braun

Clarke

(2019) Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11(4): 589–597.

College of Policing (2022) Domestic abuse risk assessment. Available at: https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2022-12/CoP-DomesticAbuseRiskAssessment.pdf (accessed 3 April 2025).

Coy

Kelly

(2011) Islands in the stream: An evaluation of four London independent domestic violence advocacy schemes. Available at: https://tfl.ams3.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/media/documents/IDVA-Main-Report.pdf (accessed 28 March 2025).

Davies

(2021) Practicing co-produced research: tackling domestic abuse through innovative multi-agency partnership working. Crime Prevention and Community Safety 23(3): 233–251.

Davies

Barlow

(2024) Policing domestic abuse: The onus on first responders. Policing and Society 34(7): 627–640.

Dheensa

Halliwell

Daw

, et al. (2020) ‘From taboo to routine’: A qualitative evaluation of a hospital-based advocacy intervention for domestic violence and abuse. BMC Health Services Research 20(1): 129.

10.

Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (2015) ESRC framework for research ethics updated January 2015. Available at: https://www.polis.cam.ac.uk/system/files/documents/esrc-framework-for-research-ethics.pdf (accessed 9 August 2024).

11.

Elvey

Mason

Whittaker

(2022) A hospital-based independent domestic violence advisor service: Demand and response during the Covid-19 pandemic. BMC Health Services Research 22(1): 865.

12.

Granville

Bridge

(2010) Pathway project: An independent domestic violence advisory service at St Mary’s maternity hospital. Available at: https://www.endthefear.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/PATHway-Project-Summary1.pdf (accessed 9 August 2024).

13.

Guillemin

Gillam

(2016) Ethics, reflexivity, and ‘ethically important moments’ in research. Qualitative Inquiry 10(2): 261–280.

14.

Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (2021) Review of Policing Domestic Abuse during the Pandemic. Available at: https://assets-hmicfrs.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/uploads/review-of-policing-domestic-abuse-during-the-pandemic-2021.pdf (accessed 27 March 2025).

15.

Kaushik

Walsh

(2019) Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research. Social Sciences 8: 255.

16.

Moree

(2018) Qualitative Approaches to Studying Marginalized Communities. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.

17.

Mundy

Seuffert

(2021) Integrated domestic violence services: A case study in police/NGO co-location. Alternative Law Journal 46(1): 27–33.

18.

Myhill

Hohl

Johnson

(2023) The ‘officer effect’ in risk assessment for domestic abuse: Findings from a mixed methods study in England and Wales. European Journal of Criminology 20(3): 856–877.

19.

Nungsari

(2023) Recruitment of participants from vulnerable groups for social research challenges and solutions. In: Uddin

Paul

(eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Social Fieldwork. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 405–415.

20.

Office for National Statistics (2024) How domestic abuse data are captured through the criminal justice system. Available at: https://backup.ons.gov.uk/2024/11/28/how-domestic-abuse-data-are-captured-through-the-criminal-justice-system-november-2024/ (accessed 26 June 2025).

21.

Part

(2006) A flexible response to domestic abuse: Findings from an evaluation. Practice 18(1): 47–58.

22.

Peckover

Golding

(2017) Domestic abuse and safeguarding children: Critical issues for multiagency work. Child Abuse Review 26(1): 40–50.

23.

Rodgers

Carrington

Ryan

, et al. (2024) Embedding a domestic violence specialist in a police station: Police perspectives and engagement. International Journal of Police Science & Management 26(2): 182–194.

24.

Taylor-Dunn

Erol

(2022) Improving the ‘victim journey’ when reporting domestic abuse cyberstalking to the police – A pilot project evaluation. Criminology & Criminal Justice 23(5): 694–715.

25.

Tong

Sainsbury

Craig

(2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19(6): 349–357.

26.

Women’s Aid (2020) Research integrity framework (RIF) for domestic violence and abuse (DVA). Available at: https://www.womensaid.org.uk/research-integrity-framework-for-domestic-violence/ (accessed 9 August 2024).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB