Drawing on anthropological research conducted in public Swiss nursing homes, this paper explores how ethical subjects are constructed in interactions with people with dementia. The institutional ethical guidelines concerning resident autonomy are particularly challenging for nursing staff to follow when dealing with people with advanced dementia. For people with dementia to be able to participate in ethical life, nursing staff are called upon to account for residents on their behalf. This paper uses various observations to explore the construction of personhood in an institutional setting. In the paper, I distinguish between three frameworks of personhood: ‘momentary personhood’ grants autonomy, ‘social personhood’ demands accountability by the institution, and ‘biographical personhood’ presents coherence. Bringing together an anthropology of personhood, ethics and dementia, I argue that all the conditions of treating people with dementia as ethical subjects are met in this institutional setting. Personhood is actively (re-)constructed but remains fragmented and bound to the particular setting in which it is evoked. This paper contributes to questions of how people experience ethical lives and live under particular conditions of confinement and how formalised values of autonomy and care take on meaning in local settings.
CaduffC (2011) Anthropology’s ethics: Moral positionalism, cultural relativism, and critical analysis. Anthropological Theory11(4): 465–480.
2.
ChatterjiR (1998) An ethnography of dementia. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry22(3): 355–382.
3.
CohenL (1995) Toward an anthropology of senility: Anger, weakness, and Alzheimer’s in Banaras, India. Medical Anthropology Quarterly9(3): 314–334.
4.
CohenL (1998) No Aging in India: Alzheimer’s, the Bad Family, and Other Modern Things. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
EwingKP (1990) The illusion of wholeness: Culture, self, and the experience of inconsistency. Ethos18(3): 251–278.
6.
FazelSMcMillanJO’DonnellI (2002) Dementia in prison: Ethical and legal implications. Journal of Medical Ethics28(3): 156–159.
7.
FischR (1994–1995) Zärtlichkeit und Sexualität im Altersheim?Pro senectute akzent: Magazin für kultur und gesellschaft1994-1995(4), 1994:13.
8.
FoucaultM (1997) The ethics of the concern of the self as a practice of freedom. In: RabinowP (eds) Michel Foucault. Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth. The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1. New York: The New Press, 281–301.
9.
GabrielJ (2019) Wer Macht Denn Sowas?! Sexualbegleiterinnen Und Sexualbegleiter in Der Schweiz Und Ihre Unterstützung Durch Die Soziale Arbeit. Lucerne: Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts.
10.
GerstlauerV (2009) Die Churer Armenanstalt: Die Reform Des Armenwesens Im Geiste Der Aufklärung. Zürich: Rüegger Verlag.
11.
GoffmanE (1961) Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books.
12.
HayesSShackellPMottramP, et al. (2007) The prevalence of intellectual disability in a major UK prison. British Journal of Learning Disabilities35(3): 162–167.
13.
HöpflingerF (2007) Zur Geschichte des Alters in der Schweiz. Mathis Brauchbar. 2007.
14.
JeongJ-M (2021) Co-creative affordance: Rethinking “beyond loss” in dementia through co-dwelling. Medical Anthropology40(1): 35–49.
15.
KäppeliS (2008) Der mündige Patient in der Pflege – ein Widerspruch in sich selbst?5. Kongress für Gesundheitsökonomie und Gesundheitswissenschaften Bern.
16.
KatzSLeibingA (2023) ‘Lost in time like tears in rain’: Critical perspectives on personhood and dementia. In: Critical Dementia Studies. Routledge, 57–71.
17.
KeaneW (2014) Affordances and reflexivity in ethical life: An ethnographic stance. Anthropological Theory14(1): 3–26.
18.
KeaneW (2015) Ethical Life: Its Natural and Social Histories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
KontosPC (2006) Embodied selfhood: An ethnographic exploration of Alzheimer’s disease. In: LeibingACohenL (eds) Thinking About Dementia: Culture, Loss, and the Anthropology of Senility. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 195–217.
20.
LaidlawJ (2002) For an anthropology of ethics and freedom. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute8(2): 311–332.
21.
LaidlawJ (2018) Fault lines in the anthropology of ethics. In: MattinglyCDyringRLouwM (eds) Moral Engines: Exploring the Ethical Drives in Human Life. New York: Berghahn Books, 174–193.
MattinglyC (2012) Two virtue ethics and the anthropology of morality. Anthropological Theory12(2): 161–184.
24.
MattinglyC (2014) Moral Laboratories: Family Peril and the Struggle for a Good Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
MattinglyC (2018) Ethics, immanent transcendence and the experimental narrative self. In: DyringRLouwMWentzerTS (eds) Moral Engines: Exploring the Ethical Drives in Human Life. New York: Berghahn, 39–60.
26.
McintoshJ (2018) Personhood, self, and individual. In: The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1–9.
27.
McLeanAH (2006) Coherence without Facticity in Dementia: The Case of Mrs. Fine. In: LeibingACohenL (eds) Thinking About Dementia: Culture, Loss, and the Anthropology of Senility. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 157–179.
28.
NoonanPEMatovina SchlidtAReynoldsS (2006) The serial trial intervention: An innovative approach to meeting needs of individuals with dementia. Journal of Gerontological Nursing32(4): 18.
29.
O’MalleyP (2009) Responsibilization. In: The Sage Dictionary of Policing. Sage London, 277–279.
30.
O’SullivanEO’DonnellI (2007) Coercive confinement in the republic of Ireland: The waning of a culture of control. Punishment & Society9(1): 27–48.
31.
PyysiäinenJHalpinDGuilfoyleA (2017) Neoliberal governance and ‘responsibilization’ of agents: Reassessing the mechanisms of responsibilityshift in neoliberal discursive environments. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory18(2): 215–235. Taylor & Francis:.
32.
SassnickF (1989) Armenpolitik Zwischen Helfen Und Strafen: Das Problem Der Armut in Winterthur Vom Ancien Ŕegime Zum 19. Jahrhundert.Neujahrsblatt der Stadtbibliothek Winterthur. Winterthur: Stadtbibliothek Winterthur.
33.
Soom AmmannERauberGSalis GrossC (2019) ‘Doing death’the Mediterranean way: End-of-life in a segregated nursing home. Mortality24(3): 271–289.
34.
SpreatS (2020) Persons with intellectual disability in prison. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour11(4): 233–237.
35.
SteeleLPhillipsonLSwafferK, et al. (2023) Segregation and incarceration of people living with dementia in care homes: Critical disability and human rights approaches. In: Critical Dementia Studies. Routledge, 151–167.
36.
TaylorJS (2017) Engaging with dementia: Moral experiments in art and friendship. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry41(2): 284–303.
37.
UEK UEAV (2019) Organisierte Willkür: Administrative Versorgungen in Der Schweiz 1930-1981. Chronos Verlag.
38.
UssherJMPerzJPartonC (2015) Sex and the menopausal woman: A critical review and analysis. Feminism & Psychology25(4): 449–468.
39.
WardSRSandbergLJ (2023) Thinking back and looking ahead: Co-ordinates for critical methodologies in dementia studies. In: WardRSandbergLJ (eds) Critical Dementia Studies. Routledge, 263–278.
40.
WittgensteinL (2009) Philosophische Untersuchungen - Philosophical Investigations (trans. G Anscombe, P Hacker, and J Schulte). 4th ed.WileyBlackwell.
41.
WylerHVan WijnkoopMSmithA, et al. (2024) Lost diagnoses? A multi-year trajectory of patients with childhood ADHD in the criminal justice system in Switzerland. Frontiers in Psychiatry15: 1403618.
42.
ZigonJ (2007) Moral breakdown and the ethical demand: A theoretical framework for an anthropology of moralities. Anthropological Theory7(2): 131–150.
