Abstract
Splenic injury is an extremely rare complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). There are only 34 cases reported in the literature up to now. Based on a case of a 72-year-old man, who after ERCP due to choledocholithiasis developed a large perisplenic and subcapsular hematoma, we carried out an extensive review of all cases of ERCP-induced splenic injury found in the literature. We searched PubMed/Medline and Google Scholar till 15 April 2023, for published case reports and series using the following terms: splenic injury after ERCP, ERCP-induced splenic injury, and post-ERCP splenic trauma. The case reports included were in English, Spanish, and German literature. We attempt to discuss the possible clinical image, the available diagnostic methods, the potential treatment alternatives, and predisposing factors related to this entity. Furthermore, a theory of a possible mechanism of this injury is discussed and supported schematically. The ERCP-induced splenic injury is rare and a high index of suspicion is needed for diagnosis. Therefore, we present two diagnostic algorithms, which according to our opinion may assist the evaluation of this complication and lead to early accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Collectively, our findings support that although ERCP-induced splenic injury is an unexpected/unusual complication of ERCP, following the proper steps can be timely diagnosed and treated.
Keywords
Introduction
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a golden standard, renowned, world widely applied technique used for the diagnosis and treatment of a wide range of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders. Over the years, and despite the undoubtable benefits, ERCP as an interventional procedure has been reported to be associated with complications. Some of the reported complications are very common (acute pancreatitis, infection, hemorrhage, and duodenal perforation) 1 while others are more infrequent, such as cardiovascular or anesthesia-related effects/complications, 2 pneumothorax, hepatic hematoma, and air embolism. 3 Splenic injury is a rare complication that should be taken into consideration and included in differential diagnosis. Post-ERCP splenic injury was first reported by Trondsen et al. 4 in 1989 and only 34 cases have been reported since then. To the best of our knowledge, no one has tried to speculate a step-by-step approach to explain the mechanism of the injury.
Methods
We searched PubMed/Medline and Google Scholar till 15 April 2023, for published case reports and case series using the following terms: ‘splenic injury after ERCP’, ‘ERCP-induced splenic injury’, ‘post-ERCP splenic trauma’. The case reports included were in English, Spanish, and German literature. We further searched the bibliography of each published case to find relevant studies. The patient provided written informed consent for the anonymous publication of his medical data and images, so all personal patient details were de-identified. The reporting of this study conforms to the CARE statement. 46
Case
A 72-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with right upper quadrant pain and jaundice. His past medical history was unknown. Laboratory tests and imaging evaluation were consistent with acute cholecystitis due to choledocholithiasis accurately depicted with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (Figure 1). An ERCP was followed, with relative ease, and no difficulties and complications were noticed. ERCP confirmed the diagnosis and combined it with endoscopic retrograde stone removal and sphincterotomy. Immediately after the intervention, the patient complained of left upper quadrant pain. Furthermore, the patient became hypotensive, developed tachycardia, and a hemoglobin and hematocrit drop was noticed (from 10 to 8.1 mg/dL and from 29.5% to 24.5%, accordingly). Mild leukocytosis was present. Serum amylase was normal and total bilirubin had been decreasing. The following abdominal ultrasound scan revealed free peritoneal fluid perisplenic, subdiaphragmatic as well as subhepatic with some echogenic foci, especially in the splenonephric pouch (Figure 2). As stone removal and sphincterotomy were uneventful, all the above raised the suspicion of splenic laceration. A CT scan with intravenous contrast administration confirmed hemoperitoneum due to splenic rupture with subcapsular and perisplenic hematoma as well as active bleeding (Figure 3). No other visceral organ or other pathology was found. A splenectomy was performed and the patient was resuscitated with blood transfusion and blood products. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged 10 days after in good condition.

Dilated common bile duct and hepatic ducts in pre-operative evaluation with MRCP.

Ultrasound images: (a) perisplenic fluid with internal echoes (star), (b) subhepatic/perihepatic fluid with internal echoes (star), and (c) air-filled intrahepatic bile ducts (arrow).

Contrast-enhanced CT scan: (a) arterial phase and (b) venous phase.
Discussion
Splenic injury following ERCP is considered to be a rare complication. Up to now, a total number of 34 cases have been reported in the literature with female predominance (n: 21). The age of the patients differs from 29 to 86 years old (mean age: 58.8). We created two tables (Tables 1 and 2) based on CT versus non-CT first approach, where we refer information about each of these cases such as age, gender, type of intervention, time to symptoms onset, clinical presentation and blood test results, imaging findings, laparotomy and pathologic findings, type of treatment, risk factors and difficulties, and other noteworthy data.
Literature review of cases with post-ERCP splenic injury with CT used as the first approach.
Died on postoperative day 40 of multiple organ failure.
BP, blood pressure; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Hct, hematocrit, Hgb, hemoglobin; LUQ, left upper quadrant; CT, Computed Tomography; OGD, oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy.
Literature review of cases with post-ERCP splenic injury with a non-CT first approach.
Post-procedural CT of the abdomen and pelvis was conducted showing a large splenic hematoma.
BP, blood pressure; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Hct, hematocrit; Hgb, hemoglobin; LUQ, left upper quadrant.
The symptoms that are related to post-ERCP splenic injury include progressive left upper quadrant pain radiating to the back and/or left shoulder, peritoneal irritation, tachycardia, hypotension, marked abdominal distention, vague tenderness, paleness, nausea, vomiting, and shock. Weaver et al. 5 also describe numbness in the patient’s leg and absent Doppler signal probably due to hypotension induced by splenic injury and the patient’s severe arterial disease. Furman and Morgenstern 6 and Subramanian et al. 7 reported that the pain was confused with the pain of pancreatitis and thus high awareness is needed. Grammatopoulos et al. 8 mentioned that tachycardia was absent from their patient despite the patient’s intra-abdominal bleeding probably due to previous β-blockers treatment. Hemoglobin and hematocrit drop, rise in inflammatory markers and in some cases, mild leukocytosis were referred. The time interval between ERCP and the first symptom appearance is also worth mentioning. In most cases, symptoms appeared immediately after ERCP or a few hours postoperatively but in some cases, symptoms appeared 1, 2,9,10 4 days later, 11 or even 6 days later. 12 The later the symptoms appear, the higher the index of suspicion needed to achieve the correct diagnosis.
In the literature cases, after a physical examination and laboratory tests, 27/34 patients had an abdominal CT scan conducted. Only in 5/34 cases,9,13–16 instead of a CT scan, laparotomy was performed, with abdominal exploration leading to the diagnosis. Two patients revealed hemoperitoneum and splenic bleeding unexpectedly when they were prepared for laparoscopic surgery after ERCP.17,18 In four cases4,16,19,20 (as in our case), abdominal ultrasound was also used with good results. Based on our case, we might suggest the use of ultrasound especially in hemodynamically stable patients. Another potentially useful diagnostic tool that is increasingly used with great results in abdominal trauma is contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). 21 In CT scans, findings include free abdominal fluid, splenic rupture and/or laceration, subcapsular hematoma, and capsular avulsion. In two cases,7,22 CT scan was not diagnostic for splenic injury. In the first case, one more CT scan was needed 24 h after the first to reveal the free fluid and the splenic rupture and in the second case CT scan was suggestive of post-procedure pancreatitis. Even CT scan is considered the golden standard someone must keep in mind that sometimes it might not highlight the real cause of the symptoms. Laparotomy and pathological findings in the vast majority of cases came to confirm the CT findings.
In 24/34 cases, splenectomy was performed. In the rest6,7,10,12,23–25 (7/34), conservative management with frequent follow-ups (with CT while CEUS could be a promising alternative method) 21 was followed due to the patients’ hemodynamically stable condition. Recently, the evolvement of interventional radiology broadened the horizons of trauma management with selective splenic artery embolization in hemodynamically stable patients playing an important role in post-ERCP splenic injury. Selective splenic artery embolization was used in four cases (4/34).11,18,26,27 Montenovo et al. 26 used splenic artery embolization as a bridge therapy for splenectomy while Polman et al. 18 used it as final treatment.
The exact cause of splenic injury during ERCP remains unknown. A possible mechanism is the endoscope passing maneuvers (Figure 4), which transmit direct forces to the spleen through the gastrosplenic ligament as speculated by the majority of the authors.

Illustration of the process approaching the ampulla of Vater during ERCP. Step-by-step approach from the esophagus to the ampulla of Vater and endoscope’s maneuvers are recognized.
Forces during ERCP
In Figure 5(a) (scheme), the distal tip of the endoscope is facing the upper wall of the duodenum. After rotating the scope, the distal tip is now facing the second part of the duodenum, allowing us to locate the ampulla of Vater [Figure 5(b) scheme]. The scope’s rotation creates torque/rotational force which is perpendicular to the plane of FA. Torque/rotational force is defined as τ = FA * r, where FA is the force applied on the stomach wall by the scope and r is the radius of the insertion tube, since it is in direct contact with the stomach wall. With that rotation, the insertion tube of the endoscope which is already in contact with the greater curvature of the stomach in the ‘long scope’ position, applies FA on the stomach wall. This force is transmitted across the greater curvature of the stomach, to the gastrosplenic ligament. The total force transmitted to the gastrosplenic ligament by the stomach is
The forces that are applied to the spleen’s steady state are as follows: Fspl (spleen), Fcol (colon), Fdia (diaphragm), and Fren (renal). With this new transmitted force, the total force (Ftot) applied to the spleen by the gastrosplenic ligament is Ftot =

Illustration of the forces exerted before (a) and after (b) the rotation of the endoscope in ‘the long scope’ position
Predisposing factors
From all reviewed cases, many predisposing factors are referred to play an important role in post-ERCP splenic injury. These factors include altered anatomy from previous major surgeries such as left hepatectomy, 28 sleeve gastrectomy, 24 liver transplant, 26 Billroth I gastrectomy, 10 or other anatomic reasons such as cascade stomach 17 and small intra-abdominal cavity, 15 pancreatic head masses8,13 and duodenal masses narrowing the duodenum lumen, pyloric stenosis,8,22,29 and requirement of prolonged loop position to achieve cannulation. 25 The referred factors act by reducing the available space for endoscopic movements, increasing the duration of ERCP, multiplying the number of maneuvers needed for the proper cannulation, and increasing the direct forces transmitted to the surrounding tissues resulting in increased chances of a splenic injury. Moreover, the anticoagulation therapy9,23,27,30 (4/34) and stomach insufflation/overinflation during ERCP6,31 appear to escalate the danger of ERCP-induced splenic trauma. Pancreatitis,4,16 especially chronic pancreatitis,5,12,31–33 (7/34) is also referred to as a possible risk factor. Chronic pancreatitis is thought to cause fibrosis and calcification on the surrounding ligaments, becoming less flexible. Another risk factor could be the presence of adhesions due to previous abdominal surgeries. Adhesions6,9,10,15,19,20,23–26,28,34 (12/34) decrease the mobility of abdominal organs and ligaments, making them more vulnerable to trauma. Patients’ general condition appears also to play a significant role. Insufficient sedation22,28 could lead to the patient’s discomfort and abrupt moves against the endoscope. Caution is needed on obese patients’ manipulation on the operating table4,9,17 because obesity has been associated with the development of post-ERCP complications 35 and with prolonged sedation with standard agents. 36 Another possible factor contributing to the injury could be the type of the endoscope. 9 Deist and Freytag 19 also presented a very interesting theory about a possible correlation between the level of estrogens and splenic rupture induced by ERCP. High level of estrogens has been associated with ligament and tendon trauma (anterior cruciate ligament).37,38 Estrogen receptors (ER)-β can be prevalent in the tissue of tendons and ligaments. 37 These receptors are present also in many human organs as the spleen, ovaries, testicles, and thymus.37,39 However, it has not been scientifically proven yet that ER-β receptors can be found especially in splenic ligaments, and if so, how estrogen levels could affect them. Another possible predisposing factor could be age-related changes in the spleen’s ligamentic system. Ligaments consist mainly of Collagen Type I (80%). 40 These changes are related to altered collagen structure, increased stiffness, and decreased fibril diameter of the ligaments resulting in increased risk for trauma, as was described for the anterior cruciate ligament. 41 Further evaluation is needed to determine whether these age-related changes involve the splenic ligaments. Also, someone can speculate that chronic liver dysfunction (cirrhosis) could affect the ‘quality’ of the body ligaments making them more prone to trauma. Some possible mechanisms could be malnutrition, insufficient blood supply, hypoalbuminemia causing alteration in the ligament composition, and collagen fiber degeneration. A cohort study in Taiwan showed that incidence rates of internal derangement of knees were higher in patients with chronic liver disease. 42 However, additional research is needed on the effects of chronic liver disease on the visceral ligamental system.
Although many possible predisposing factors seem to contribute to post-ERCP splenic injury, some cases are more complicated with no difficulties or known predisposing factors.14,43–45 In our case, the endoscopist was skilled, and ERCP was performed without any difficulties. Furthermore, no risk factor was known. Thus, in such cases, the possible mechanism could be the forces transmitted by the endoscope in the long position or the direct trauma. Furman and Morgenstern 6 suggest that the highest of the short gastric vessels, which are very short, are the most vulnerable to injury as they are stretched and torn when entering the splenic capsule.
In this paper, we presented a rare case of a patient with post-ERCP splenic injury as well as an in-depth literature review. After having examined closely all previously published cases, we gathered and evaluated the most interesting – in our opinion – characteristics and predisposing factors. Furthermore, we presented a step-by-step approach to the mechanism of this complicated injury. As far as we are aware, nobody before tried to support his theory neither scientifically nor schematically. Due to the lack of a clear practical diagnostic approach available in the literature, we designed two diagnostic algorithms, the first one for the differential diagnosis of ERCP’s most common and uncommon complications and the second one for the diagnosis and management of the post-ERCP splenic injury. (Both algorithms are available and can be found as Supplemental Material.) Lastly, we first suggested the use of CEUS as a promising new alternative diagnostic tool in post-ERCP splenic injury.
Conclusion
Splenic injury is a very rare but possibly life-threatening complication that should always be on the expert’s mind and differential diagnosis to be managed appropriately and on time. Post-ERCP symptoms such as progressive left upper quadrant pain, tachycardia, and hypotension should additionally raise the suspicion of splenic rupture. The time interval between ERCP and clinical manifestations can vary from minutes to many days. By the time of potential symptoms manifestation, an abdominal ultrasound could be helpful. CT scan is the method of choice for the diagnosis in the vast majority of cases with CEUS being a promising and encouraging alternative. If not, laparotomy will solve the problem. A high index of suspicion and clinical awareness are required, to establish the proper diagnosis, especially when symptoms appear days later. Alertness is needed during the ERCP procedure on patients with suspicious and/or known predisposing factors.
Supplemental Material
sj-docx-1-cmg-10.1177_26317745231223312 – Supplemental material for Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography induced splenic injury: comprehensive analysis and new perspectives based on a case report
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-cmg-10.1177_26317745231223312 for Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography induced splenic injury: comprehensive analysis and new perspectives based on a case report by Dimitrios S. Kourdakis and Savvas P. Deftereos in Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Supplemental Material
sj-docx-2-cmg-10.1177_26317745231223312 – Supplemental material for Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography induced splenic injury: comprehensive analysis and new perspectives based on a case report
Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-cmg-10.1177_26317745231223312 for Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography induced splenic injury: comprehensive analysis and new perspectives based on a case report by Dimitrios S. Kourdakis and Savvas P. Deftereos in Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Supplemental Material
sj-jpg-3-cmg-10.1177_26317745231223312 – Supplemental material for Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography induced splenic injury: comprehensive analysis and new perspectives based on a case report
Supplemental material, sj-jpg-3-cmg-10.1177_26317745231223312 for Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography induced splenic injury: comprehensive analysis and new perspectives based on a case report by Dimitrios S. Kourdakis and Savvas P. Deftereos in Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Footnotes
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
