Corporate Accountability for Involvement in Gross Human Rights Violations During the Brazilian Civil-Military Dictatorship – The Role of the Truth Commissions and the Case of Volkswagen Do Brasil
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2023
Corporate Accountability for Involvement in Gross Human Rights Violations During the Brazilian Civil-Military Dictatorship – The Role of the Truth Commissions and the Case of Volkswagen Do Brasil
The article describes, analyzes, and evaluates transitional justice measures that were adopted in Brazil regarding corporate responsibility for complicity with the civil-military dictatorship in the practice of gross human rights violations. The main focus is on the performance of the National Truth Commission and the São Paulo State Truth Commission, as well as on the agreement reached between the Prosecution Service and Volkswagen do Brasil in the scope of the civil inquiry established to determine the company’s responsibility for complicity with the civil-military dictatorship. The measures are considered incipient and not problem free, though they represent a breakthrough in corporate responsibility related to transitional justice, encouraging further development and continuity through acknowledgment and the allocation of resources.
AbrahamsCharles P. (2013). Lessons from the South African experience. In MichalowskiSabine (Ed.), Corporate accountability in the context of transitional justice. Routledge. [Kindle Paperwhite version].
2.
AbrãoPauloGenroTarso. (2012). Os direitos da transição e a democracia no Brasil – estudos sobre justiça de transição e teoria da democracia [Transition rights and democracy in Brazil - studies on transitional justice and theory of democracy]. Editora Forum.
3.
AmbosKai. (2009). The legal framework of transitional justice. In AmbosKaiLargeJ.WierdaM. (Eds.), Building a future on peace and justice: Studies on transitional justice, conflict resolution and development (pp. 19–103). Springer.
4.
AmbosKai. (2019). Direito penal internacional econômico – fundamentos da responsabilidade penal internacional das empresas [International economic criminal law – fundamentals of international criminal accountability for companies]. Livraria do Advogado.
5.
ApoloAlejandraSilva FilhoJosé Carlos Moreira da. (2020). Memoria y justicia transicional para “tiempos democráticos” – análisis del caso de la comisión de la verdad de Ecuador desde una perspectiva crítica [Memory and transitional justice to “democratic times” – analysis of the case of the truth comission of Ecuador from a critical perspective]. Revista Direito e Práxis [Journal Law and Praxis]. Ahead of printhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/revistaceaju/article/view/54460
6.
ArthurPaige. (2011). How “transitions” Reshaped human rights: A conceptual history of Transitional Justice. In ReáteguiFélix (Ed.), Transitional justice – handbook for latin America (pp. 73–133). Brazilian Amnesty Commission; International Center for Transitional Justice.
7.
AubrySylvain (2013). A new avenue towards corporate accountability – the optional protocol to the covenant on economic, social and cultural rights. In MichalowskiSabine (Ed.), Corporate accountability in the context of transitional justice. Routledge. [Kindle paperwhite version].
8.
BasualdoEduardoBasualdoVictoria. (2021). Confronting labor power: Ford motor Argentina and the dictatorship (1976-1983). In BasualdoVictoriaBerghoffHartmutBucheliMarcelo (Eds.), Big business and dictatorships in latin America (pp. 215–236). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43925-5_8
9.
BasualdoVictoriaBerghoffHartmutBucheliMarcelo. (2021). Crime and (no) punishment: Business corporations and dictatorships. In BasualdoVictoriaBerghoffHartmutBucheliMarcelo (Eds.), Big business and dictatorships in latin America (pp. 1–33). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43925-5_1
10.
BellChristine. (2009). Transitional justice, interdisciplinarity and the state of the ‘field’ or ‘non-field. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 3(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijn044
11.
BohoslavskyJuan PabloTorellyMarcelo. (2014). Financial complicity: The Brazilian dictatorship under the “macroscope”. In SharpDustin N. (Ed.), Justice and economic violence in transition. Springer.
Brasil. (2014). Presidência da república secretaria especial de direitos humanos. relatório final da comissão nacional da verdade [National truth commission final report]. SEDH. http://cnv.memoriasreveladas.gov.br/
14.
Camilo SánchezNelson. (2013). Corporate accountability, reparations, and distributive justice in post-conflict societies. In MichalowskiSabine (ed.), Corporate accountability in the context of transitional justice. Routledge. [Kindle paperwhite version].
DreifussRené Armand. (1987). 1964: A conquista do estado - ação política, poder e golpe de classe [1964: The conquest of the state – political action, power and the class coup] (5th.ed.). Vozes.
17.
FerreiraLúcia de Fátima GuerraNunesPaulo Giovani Antonino. (2013). I finaziamenti privati internazionali alle dittadure militari in America Latina [International private funding to military dictatorships in latin America]. In MoninaGiancarlo (Ed.), Memorie di repressione, resistenza e solidarietà in Brasile e in America latina [Memories of repression, resistance and solidarity in Brazil and Latin America] (pp. 227–314). Ediesse.
18.
Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. (2014). What amounts to “a serious violation of international human rights law”? An analysis of practice and expert opinion for the purpose of the 2013 arms trade treaty. Geneva Academy.
19.
HaynerPriscilla B. (2011). Unspeakable truths - transitional justice and the challenge of truth commissions (2nd.ed.). Routledge.
20.
HazanPierre. (2017). Beyond borders: The new architecture of transitional justice?International Journal of Transitional Justice, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijw029
International Commission of Jurists( (2008). Corporate complicity & legal accountability – volume 2 criminal law and international crimes – report of the international commission of Jurists expert legal panel on corporate complicity in international crimes. ICJ.
24.
KopperChristopher. (2017). A VW do Brasil durante a ditadura militar brasileira 1964-1985: Uma abordagem histórica [VW do Brasil during the Brazilian military dictatorship 1964-1985: A historical approach]. Cível, Tutela Coletiva. Inquérito Civil Nº.
25.
KopperChristopher. (2021). Business as usual under a military regime? Volkswagen do Brazil and the military dictatorship in Brazil (1964-1980). In BasualdoVictoriaBerghoffHartmutBucheliMarcelo (Eds.), Big business and dicatatorships in Latin America (pp. 319–344). Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
KostovicovaDenisa. (2017). Seeking justice in a divided region: Text analysis of regional civil society deliberations in the balkans. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 11(1), 154–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijw023
27.
KritzNeil J (Ed.), (1995). Transitional justice: How emerging democracies reckon with former regimes (Vol.1). United States institute of Peace Press.
28.
LenguaParra AdriánOstolaza Seminario VictorEmilio. (2020). Enemistad aparente: La tensión entre el concepto de graves violaciones de derechos humanos de la Corte Interamericana com el derecho penal [Apparent enmity: the tension between the concept of serious human rights violations of the inter-American court with criminal law]. Derecho PUCP [Law. PUCP], 84(1), 223-356. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.008.
29.
MichalowskiSabine. (2015). Doing business with a bad actor: How to draw the line between legitimate comercial activities and those that trigger corporate complicity liability. Texas International Law Journal, 50(3), 403–464.
30.
MingardiGuaracySantosMartin Carone dos. (2017). A participação da indústria paulista na repressão política - o caso volkswagen - relatório Final [The participation of the São Paulo industry in political repression – the Volkswagen case – final report]. In Procuradoria da república (2020). Cível, Tutela Coletiva Inquérito Civil Nº.
31.
Organización de los Estados Americanos (2019). Comisión interamericana de derechos humanos. relatoría especial sobre derechos económicos sociales culturales y ambientales [Special report on economical social cultural and environmental rights] https://oas.org/es/cidh/informes/pdfs/EmpresasDDHH.pdf
32.
PayneLeigh A.PereiraGabrielBernal-BermúdezLaura (2020). Transitional justice and corporate accountability from below – deploying archimedes’ lever. Cambridge University Press.
QuinalhaHonório Renan. (2013). Justiça de transição - contornos do conceito [Transitional Justice – contours of the concept]. Outras Expressões; Dobra Editorial.
35.
Roth-ArriazaNaomiMariezcurrenaJavier. (2006). Transitional justice in the twenty-first century: Beyond truth versus justice. Cambridge University Press.
36.
Saad-DinizEduardo. (2020). Justiça de transição corporativa: A nova geração de estudos transicionais [Politics turns, corporations remain: The undone corporate transitional justice in Brazil]. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Criminais [Brazilian Journal of Criminal Sciences], 167(5), 71-128.
37.
SandovalClaraFilippiniLeonardoVidalRoberto (2013). Linking transitional justice and corporate accountability. In MichalowskiSabine (Ed.), Corporate accountability in the context of transitional justice. Routledge. [Kindle Paperwhite version].
38.
SandovalClaraSurfleetGill. (2013). Corporations and redress in transitional justice processes. In MichalowskiSabine (Ed.), Corporate accountability in the context of transitional justice. Routledge. [Kindle Paperwhite version].
39.
São Paulo (Estado). (2015). Assembleia legislativa do estado de São Paulo comissão da verdade do estado de São Paulo rubens paiva. Relatório Final. ALESP. http://comissaodaverdade.al.sp.gov.br/relatorio/
40.
SchinkeVanessaSilva FilhoJosé Carlos Moreira da. (2016). Poder Judiciário e regime autoritário: Democracia, história constitucional e permanências autoritárias [Judiciary and authoritarian regime: democracy, constitutional history and authoritarian permanences]. Journalof the Federal University of Paraná Law School, 61(2), 41–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v61i2.45091
41.
SharpDustin N. (2013). Interrogating the peripheries: the preoccupations of fourth generation transitional justice. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 26, 149-178.
42.
Silva FilhoJosé Carlos Moreira da. (2015a). Marcos teóricos da justiça de transição e os processos transicionais na América Latina [Theoretical frameworks of transitional justice and transitional processes in Latin America]. In Sousa JuniorJosé Geraldo deSilva FilhoJosé Carlos Moreira daRampinTalita Tatiana DiasFonsecaLívia Gimenes daPaixãoCristiano. Introdução crítica à justiça de transição na América Latina- o direito achado na rua (7, pp. 133–145). UnB.
43.
Silva FilhoJosé Carlos Moreira da. (2015b). Justiça de transição - da ditadura civil-militar justransicional - direito à memória e à verdade e os caminhos da reparação e da anistia no Brasil [Transitional justice – from the civil-military dictatorship to the transitional justice debate – the right to memory and truth and the pathways of reparation and amnesty in Brazil]. Livraria do Advogado.
44.
Silva FilhoJosé Carlos Moreira da. (2020). Mémoire et usages politiques des institutions au Brésil – En 2016, um coup d’État institutionnel? [Memory and political uses of institutions in Brazil - In 2016, um institutional coup?]. In GoirandCamilleMüllerAngélica (Eds), Documenter les violences – usages publics du passé dans la justice transitionnelle [Documenting violence - public uses of the past in transitional justice] (pp. 309–334). IHEAL.
45.
Silva Filho José Carlos Moreirada. (2018). Transnacionalidade e justiça de transição no âmbito do, MERCOSUL (2005-2016) - projetos, contexto e perspectiva comparada na atuação da reunião de altas autoridades em direitos humanos e chancelarias (RAADH) e do instituto de políticas públicas em direitos humanos (IPPDH) [Transnationality and transitional justice in the MERCOSUR scope (2005-2016) - projects, context and comparative perspective in the work of meeting of high authorities on human rights and Chancelleries (RAADH) and the institute of public policies on human rights (IPPDH)]. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais [Journal of the Law School of Federal University of Minas Gerais], 72(1), 329-355. https://doi.org/10.12818/P.0304-2340.2018v72p329.
46.
SionVitorAmorimFelipeDichtchekenianPatrícia. (2016). Os acionistas críticos de Volkswagen, Siemens e Mercedes-Benz [The critical shareholders of Volkswagen, Siemens and Mercedes-Benz].In MonteleoneJoanaCeravolo SerezaHaroldoVitorS (Eds), À espera da verdade – empresários, juristas e elite transnacional – histórias de civis que fizeram a ditadura militar [Waiting for the truth - businessmen, jurists and transnational elite - stories of civilians who did the military dictatorship] (pp. 189–196).
TeitelRuti. (2011). Transitional justice genealogy. In ReáteguiFélix (Ed.), Transitional justice – handbook for Latin America (pp. 125–158). Brazilian Amnesty Comission; International Center for Transitional Justice.
49.
TorellyMarcelo. (2012). D. Justiça de Transição e Estado Constitucional de Direito – Perspectiva teórico-comparativa e análise do caso brasileiro [Transitional justice and constitution state of law – theoretical-comparative perspective and analysis of the Brazilian case]. Fórum.
50.
TorellyMarcelo. (2015). Justiça de transição – origens e conceito [Transitional justice – origins and concept].In Sousa JuniorJosé Geraldo deSilva FilhoJosé Carlos Moreira daRampinTalita Tatiana DiasFonsecaLívia Gimenes daPaixãoCristiano (eds.), Introdução crítica à justiça de transição na América Latina- o direito achado na rua (Vol.7,.pp.146–152). UnB.
51.
TosiGiuseppeFerreiraLúcia de Fátima Guerra (Eds.). (2014). As multinacionais na América Latina – Tribunal Russell II [Multinationals in Latin America – The Russell Tribunal II]. UFPB.
United Nations General assembly. (2006). Basic principles and guidelines on the right to a remedy and reparation for victims of gross violations of international human rights law and serious violations of international humanitarian law. A/RES/60/147. https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/BASICP∼1.PDF
Van ZylPaul. (2011). Promoting transitional justice in post-conflict societies. In ReáteguiFélix (Ed.), Transitional Justice – handbook for Latin America (pp. 45–67). Brazilian Amnesty Comission; International Center for Transitional Justice.
56.
WinterStephen. (2013). Towards a unified theory of transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 7(2), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijt004
