The essay aims to exam corporate complicity with authoritarian regimes of the past and contemporary practices for the purposes of developing the body of corporate criminology. The opening of Brazilian criminological research to the role of companies during the military regime shines new lights on corporate accountability and may, when investigating the corporate complicity with authoritarian dynamics, also open new avenues for the transitional justice studies. Especially with regard to the idea of Corporate Transitional Justice, it assumes the need for broader debates about the historical continuum and different forms of business contributions and aspects of harming and victimizing in the corporate field.
ArthurP. (2009). How “transitions” reshaped human rights: A conceptual history of Transitional Justice. Human Rights Quarterly, 31(2), 321–367.
3.
AssisD. (2001). Propaganda e cinema a serviço do golpe (1962-1964) [Propaganda and cinema at the service of the coup (1962-1964)]. Mauad.
4.
BarakG. (2017). Unchecked corporate power: Why the crimes of multinational corporations are routinized away and what we can do about it. Routledge.
5.
BarbosaC. A. (2008). A FIESP e o Estado Novo: de escudeiros a opositores (uma breve história do empresariado industrial paulista e a crise do regime autoritário) [FIESP and the Estado Novo: from squires to opponents (a brief history of industrial entrepreneurs in São Paulo and the crisis of the authoritarian regime)]—1979 a 1985 [Dissertação US].
6.
BasualdoE. M.SantarcangeloJ. E.WainerA.RussoC.PerroneG. (2016). El Banco de la Nación Argentina y la Dictadura [The Banco de la Nación Argentina and the Dictatorship]. Siglo Veintiuno.
7.
BatesG. (2020). Accountability by numbers: A new global transitional justice dataset (1946-2016). Perspectives on Politics, 18, 161–184.
8.
BernazN. (2017). Business and human rights: History, law, and policy—Bridging the accountability gap. Routledge.
9.
BilskyL. (2017). The Holocaust, corporations, and the law: Unfinished business. Michigan Press.
10.
BohmM. L. (2019). The crime of maldevelopment: Economic deregulation and violence in the Global South. Routledge.
11.
BraithwaiteJ. (2018). Criminology, peacebuilding and transitional justice: Lessons from the Global South. In ScottJ.CarringtonK.SozzoM.HoggR.(org.) (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of criminology and the global south (pp. 971–990), Palgrave.
12.
BraithwaiteJ. (2020a). Many doors to international criminal justice. New Criminal Law Review, 23, 1–26.
13.
BraithwaiteJ. (2020b). Regulatory mix, collective efficacy, and crimes of the powerful. Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime, 1, 62–71.
14.
BurchardC. (2010). Ancillary and neutral business contributions to “corporate-political core crime.”Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8, 919–946.
15.
CamposP. H. P. (2017). Estranhas catedrais: As empreiteiras brasileiras e a ditadura civil-militar 1964-1988 [Estranhas catedrais: Brazilian contractors and the civil-military dictatorship 1964-1988]. Eduff.
16.
CapocciaGPop-ElechesG. (2019). Democracy and retribution: Transitional justice and regime support in postwar West Germany. Comparative Political Studies, 6, 399–433.
17.
CastroA.PhillipsN.AnsariS. (2020). Corporate corruption: A review and an agenda for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 14, 935–968.
18.
ChambersR. (2005). The Unocal settlement: Implications for the developing law on corporate complicity in Human Rights abuses. Human Rights Brief, 13, 14–17.
19.
ClaphamA. (2006). Human rights obligations of non-state actors. Oxford Press.
20.
ClarkJ. M. (1926). The social control of business. Chicago Press.
DevaS. (2017). Scope and proposed business and human rights treaty: Navigating through normativity, law and politics. In BilchitzD.DevaS.(org.) (Eds.), Building a treaty on business and human rights. Cambridge Press.
23.
ErpJ.HuismanWVande WalleG. (2015). The Routledge handbook of white-collar and corporate in Europe. Routledge.
24.
FernandesM. C. (2020). As empresas que colaboraram com a ditadura [Companies that collaborated with the dictatorship]. Valor Econômico.
25.
García MartínL. (2020). Transitional Justice, corporate accountability and socio-economic rights: Lessons from Argentina. Routledge.
26.
GaspariE. (2014). A ditadura envergonhada [The embarassed dictatorship]. Intrenseca.
27.
GreadyP.RobinsS. (2014). From transitional to transformative justice: A new agenda for practice. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 8, 339–361.
28.
HaganJ. (2010). Who are the criminals? The politics of crime policy from the age of Roosevelt to the age of Reagan. Princeton Press.
29.
KauzlarichD. (2003). A complicity continuum of state crime. Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice, 6, 241–254.
30.
KöpperC. (2017). A VW do Brasil durante a Ditadura Militar brasileira 1964-1985. Dieter Landerberger.
31.
KramerR. C.MichalowskiR. J.KauzlarichD. (2002). The origins and development of the concept and theory of state-corporate crime. Crime and Delinquency, 48, 263–282.
32.
KutzC. (2000). Complicity. Cambridge Press.
33.
LagunesPSvejnarJ. (2020). Corruption and the Lava Jato scandal in Latin America. Routledge.
34.
LaiD. (2020). Socioeconomic justice: International intervention and transition in post-War Bosnia and Herzegovina. Cambridge Press.
35.
LauferW. (2008). Corporate bodies and guilty minds (2nd ed.). Chicago Press.
36.
LauferW. (2017). The missing account of progressive corporate criminal law. New York University Journal of Law and Business, 14, 71–142.
37.
LauferW. (2018). A very special regulatory milestone. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, 37, 392.
38.
Maier-KatkinDMearsD. P.BernardT. J. (2009). Towards a criminology of crimes against humanity. Theoretical Criminology, 13, 227–255.
39.
McAuliffeP. (2013). The roots of transitional accountability: Interrogating the “justice cascade.”International Journal of Law in Context, 9, 106–123.
40.
MeirellesR. (2020). State violence, torture, and political prisoners: On the role played by amnesty international in Brazil during the dictatorship (1064-1985). Routledge.
41.
MillerZ. (2008). Effects of invisibility: In search of the “economic” in transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2, 266–291.
42.
MingardiG.SantosM. C. (2017). A participação da indústria paulista na repressão política: o Caso Volkswagen [The participation of the São Paulo industry in political repression: The Volkswagen Case]. Report to Public Authorities.
43.
MurphyC. (2017). The conceptual foundations of transitional justice. Cambridge Press.
44.
NicksonRBraithwaiteJ. (2013). Deeper, broader, longer transitional justice. European Journal of Criminology, 11, 445–463.
45.
PayneL. (1994). Brazilian industrialists and democratic change. Johns Hopkins Press.
46.
PayneL.PereiraG. (2016). Corporate complicity in international human rights violations. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 12, 63–84.
47.
PayneL.PereiraG.Bernal-BermúdezL. (2020). Transitional justice and corporate accountability from below. Cambridge Press.
48.
PiethM. (2018). Corporate compliance and human rights: Setting the scene. Criminal Law Forum, 29, 595–601.
49.
RamasastryA. (2004). Corporate complicity: From Nuremberg to Rangoon: An examination of force labor cases and their impact in the liability of multinational corporations. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 20, 91–159.
50.
Relatório Conjunto MPF/MPT/MPSP. (2021). Direitos humanos, empresas e Justiça de Transição: o papel da Volkswagen no Brasil na repressão política da Ditadura military [Human rights, business and Transitional Justice: Volkswagen's role in Brazil in the political repression of the military dictatorship. Joint Report]. Relatório Conjunto MPF/MPT/MPSP.
51.
Roht-ArriatzaN. (2014) Why was the economic dimension missing for so long in transitional justice? An exploratory essay. In BohoslavskyJ. P.VerbitskyH. (Eds.), The economic accomplices to the Argentine Dictatorship: Outstanding debts. Cambridge.
52.
Saad-DinizE. (2020). Justicia de transición corporativa [Corporate transitional justice]. La Ley, 6/2020, 1–11.
53.
Saad-DinizE.SponchiadoJ. (2017). La financiación corporativa de la Dictadura Militar en Brasil: en búsqueda de la reparación de las víctimas [Corporate financing of the Military Dictatorship in Brazil: Searching for the reparation of the victims]. In Vélez-RodríguezL. (Ed.), Sociedad y fuerza pública ante los retos de la paz (pp. 435–463). Ibañez.
54.
SharpD. (2013). Interrogating the peripheries: The preoccupations of fourth generation transitional justice. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 26, 149–178.
55.
SikkinkK. (2011). Justice Cascade: How human rights prosecutions are changing world politics. W. W. Norton.
56.
SimpsonS. (2002). Corporate crime, law and social control. Cambridge Press.
57.
SoaresI. V.BohoslavskyJ. P.TorellyM. (2016). Responsabilidade empresarial [Corporate responsibility]. Folha de São Paulo, June 3.
58.
StennerK. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge.
59.
StennerKHaidtJ. (2018). Authoritarianism is not a momentary madness, but and eternal dynamic within liberal democracies. In SunsteinC. (Ed.), Can it happen here? Authoritarianism in America. HarperCollins.
60.
SzablewskaNBachmannS.-D. (2015). Current issues in transitional justice: Towards a more holistic approach. Springer.
61.
TeitelR. (2003). Transitional justice genealogy. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 16, 69–94.
62.
TelesE.SafatleV. (2010). O que resta da ditadura [What’s left of the dictatorship]. Boitempo.
63.
VerbitskyH.BohoslavskyJ. (2016). The economic accomplices to the argentine dictatorship. Cambridge Press.
64.
WaldorfL. (2012). Anticipating the past: transitional justice and socio-economic wrongs. Socio and Legal Studies, 21, 171–186.
65.
WongM. T. (2019). Natural resources, extraction and indigenous rights in Latin America: Exploring the boundaries of environment and State-corporate crimes in Bolivia, Peru, and Mexico. Routledge.
66.
ZerkJ. (2013). Corporate liability for gross human rights abuses: Towards a fairer and more effective system of domestic law remedies. UN High Commissioner Report.
