Extractive industries often cause serious environmental harm, and even social harm, to the local populations of the commodity regions, especially in the Global South. The increasing demand and extraction of raw materials needed for the production of new technologies in the Global North is a specific case of this, which emphasizes asymmetrical global economic conditions. This article describes these harmful commodity relationships and presents the meaning behind the increase in the demand for and production of raw materials. The case of lithium is offered as an example of this development. Further, in the article, it is suggested that the lack of regulation and control promotes a series of deviant and criminal practices which can be systematically organized for criminological analysis. The harm caused by this industry, by its part, is presented as well, as well as a first categorization of its impact on the local population even in terms of human rights violations. Instead of a conclusion, an invitation to the study of these renewed forms of exploitation and victimization is made to criminologists, and especially, to criminologists from the particular regions that benefit from the development of new, innovative “clean” technologies.
AgambenG. (2004). Ausnahmezustand [State of exception]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
2.
AlbrechtH.-J. (2007). Internationale Kriminalität, Gewaltökonomie und Menschenrechtsverbrechen: Antworten des Strafrechts. Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft, 2, 153–169.
3.
AltvaterE. (2011). Los límites del capitalismo. Acumulación, crecimiento y huella ecológica. Buenos Aires: Mardulce.
4.
Aniyar de CastroL. (2010). Criminología de los derechos humanos. Criminología axiológica como política criminal. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editores del Puerto.
5.
Arteaga BotelloN.Lara CarmonaV. L. (2004). Violencia y distancia social: Una revisión. Papeles de Población, 40, 169–191, CIEAP/UAEM.
6.
BaechlerG. (1999). Violence through environmental discrimination: Causes, Rwanda arena, and conflict model. In MichalosA. C. (Ed.), Social indicators research series (Vol. 2). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer-Science + Business Media, B.V.
7.
BarakG. (Ed.). (2015). The Routledge international handbook of the crimes of the powerful. Cornwall, England: Routledge.
8.
BarakG. (2017). Unchecked corporate power: Why the crimes of multinational corporations are routinized away and what we can do about it. London, England: Routledge.
9.
BardtH.HübnerC. (2017). Vom Öl zum Lithium. Perspektiven neuer Rohstoffkoooperationen. Lima, Peru: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
10.
Boekhout van SolingeT.KuijpersK. (2013). The Amazon rainforest: A green criminological perspective. In SouthN.BrismanA. (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of green criminology (pp. 199–213). London, England: Routledge.
11.
BöhmM. L. (2012). Empresas transnacionales y violación de derechos humanos en América Latina—Dificultades para su imputación y juzgamiento. Boletín Semestral GLIPGö, 4, 11–24.
12.
BöhmM. L. (2016). Transnational corporations, human rights violations and structural violence in Latin America: A criminological approach. Kriminologisches Journal: Sonderheft Lateinamerika, 4, 272–293.
13.
BöhmM. L. (2019a). The crime of maldevelopment: International deregulation and violence in the global south. London, England: Routledge.
14.
BöhmM. L. (Director). (Ed.). (2019b). Empresas transnacionales, recursos naturales y conflicto en América Latina. Para una visibilización de la violencia invisible. Proyecto DECyT 2016–2018 (DCT 1606. Final Report 2019). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Universidad de Buenos Aires.
15.
BrismanA.SouthN. (2015). State-corporate environmental harms and paradoxical interventions: Thoughts in honour of Stanley Cohen. In SollundR. A. (Ed.), Green harms and crimes: Critical criminology in a changing world (pp. 27–42). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
BrismanA.SouthN.WhiteR. (2015). Toward a criminology of environment- conflict relationships. In BrismanA.SouthN. (Eds.), Environmental crime and social conflict: Contemporary and emerging issues (pp. 1–38). Farnham, England: Ashgate.
CarrascoA.FernándezE. (2009). Estrategias de resistencia indígena frente al desarrollo minero. La comunidad de Likantatay ante un posible traslado forzoso. Estudios Atacameños, 38, 75–92.
CostanzoL.MannaráF.Álvarez IcazaR. J.AnativiaJ. (2018). Victimología. Herramientas conceptuales. Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminología, Año, VIII, 220–228.
23.
CuiR.GuoJ.YinL.HuyD.LiedtkeM. (2016). Supply and demand of lithium and gallium. Beijing, China: Information Center of Ministry of Land and Resources (ICMLR)/Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR).
24.
DornerU.LiedtkeM. (2016). Mineralische Rohstoffe für die Energiewende. Hannover: Deutsche Rohstoffagentur (DERA).
25.
EbusB.KuijpersK. (2016). The state-corporate tandem cycling towards collision: State-corporate harm and the resource frontiers of Brazil and Colombia. In BrismanA.SouthN.WhiteR. (Eds.), Environmental crime and social conflict: Contemporary and emerging issues (pp. 125–152). London, England: Routledge.
26.
Edeso NatalíasV. (2005). La distancia social y su importancia en la interacción: Propuesta para su estudio en clase de ELE. ASELE, Actas XVI, 2005, 247–257.
27.
FattahE. A. (2010). The evolution of a young, promising discipline: Sixty years of victimology, a retrospective and prospective look. In ShohamS. G.KnepperP.KettM. (Eds.), International handbook of victimology (pp. 43–94). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
28.
Fernández SteinkoA. (2008). Las pistas falsas del crimen organizado: Finanzas paralelas y orden internacional. Madrid, Spain: Catarata.
29.
FerrajoliL. (2014). Criminología, crímenes globales y derecho penal. El debate epistemológico en la criminología contemporánea. In Rivera BeirasI. (Ed.), Delitos de los estados, de los mercados y daño social (pp. 81–96). Barcelona, Spain: Anthropos.
30.
Fraunhofer Institut für System-und Innovationsforschung & Institut für Zukunftsstudien und Technologiebewertung IZT gGmbH. (2009). Rohstoffe für Zukunftstechnologien. Einfluss des Branchenspezifischen Rohstoffbedarfs in rohstoffintensiven Zukunftstechnologien auf die zukünftige Rohstoffnachfrage. Stuttgart, Germany: Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.
31.
Fraunhofer Institut für System-und Innovationsforschung. (2016). Rohstoffe für Zukunftstechnologien 2016. “Auftragsstudie.”Berlin, Germany: DERA.
32.
FriedrichsD. O. (2007). White-collar crime in a postmodern, globalized world. In PontellH. N.GeisG. (Eds.), International handbook of white-collar and corporate crime (pp. 163–176). New York, NY: Springer.
33.
FriedrichsD. O.RotheD. L. (2015). Crimes of globalization. London, England: Routledge.
34.
GaleanoE. (1984). Las venas abiertas de América Latina (39th ed.). Madrid: Siglo XXI.
35.
GaltungJ. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6, 167–191.
36.
GaltungJ. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilization. London, England: Sage.
37.
GaribayC.BoniA.PanicoF.UrquijoP. (2014). Corporación minera, colusión gubernamental y desposesión campesina. El caso de Goldcorp Inc. En Mazapil, Zacatecas. Desacatos, 44, 113–142.
38.
GorensteinS. (2016). Empresas transnacionales en la agricultura y la producción de alimentos en América Latina y el Caribe. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Nueva Sociedad/Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
39.
GorensteinS.OrtizR. (2016). La tierra en disputa. Agricultura, acumulación y territorio en la Argentina reciente. RELAER, 1, 1–26.
40.
GudynasE. (2015). Derechos de la Naturaleza, Ética biocéntrica y políticas ambientales. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Tinta Limón.
41.
GuhaA. (1987). Development alternative and social alternative. In VivekanandaF. (Ed.), Premises and process of maldevelopment (pp. 3–29). Stockholm, Sweden: Bethany Books.
42.
GuhaA.VivekanandaF. (1987). Structural theory of overdevelopment and underdevelopment. In VivekanandaF. (Ed.), Premises and process of maldevelopment (pp. 166–175). Stockholm, Sweden: Bethany Books.
43.
HallM. (2014). Victims of environmental crime: Routes for recognition, restitution and redress. In SpapensT.WhiteR.KluinM. (Eds.), Environmental crime and its victims: Perspectives within green criminology (pp. 103–118). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
44.
HerediaM. (2013). Ideas económicas y poder durante la dictadura. In VerbitskyH.BohoslavskyJ. P. (Eds.), Cuentas pendientes—Los cómplices económicos de la dictadura (pp. 47–63). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo XXI.
45.
HillyardP.TombsS. (2015). From ‘crime’ to social harm? In ChamblissW. J.MoloneyC. J. (Eds.), State crime: Critical concepts in criminology, Vol. 1: An introduction to the field of state crime research (pp. 229–247). London, England: Routledge.
46.
HuismanW. (2008). Corporations and international crimes. In SmeulersA.HavemanR. (Eds.), Supranational criminology: Towards a criminology of international crimes (p. 181). Antwerpen, Belgium: Intersentia.
47.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights. (2015a). Informe de la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos Sobre Pueblos Indígenas, Comunidades Afrodescendientes y Recursos Naturales (OEA/Ser.I./V/II. Doc. 47/15, 31/12/2015).
48.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights. (2015b). Informe de la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos Sobre Criminalización de Defensoras Y Defensores de Derechos Humanos (OEA/Ser.L./V/II. Doc. 49/15, 31/12/2015).
49.
Instituto de Derecho Ambiental de Honduras. (2012). La mina San Martín en el Valle de Siria. Exploración, explotación y cierre: impactos y consecuencas. San Ignacio, FM: IDAHO/OXFAM.
50.
IslamS. (1987). On the controversies of development and the conceptual evaluation of maldevelopment. In VivekanandaF. (Ed.), Premises and process of maldevelopment (pp. 71–103). Stockholm, Sweden: Bethany Books.
51.
JarrellM.OzymyJ. (2014). Communities as victims of environmental crime: lessons from the field. In SpapensT.WhiteR.KluinM. (Eds.), Environmental crime and its victims. Perspectives within green criminology (pp. 249–261). Alsderhot.
52.
JewkesY. (2015). Media and crime: Key approaches to criminology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
KhannaP. (2016). Connectography: Mapping the global network revolution. Croydon, England: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
54.
KramerR. C.MichalowskiR. J.KauzlarichD. (2002). The origins and development of the concept and theory of state-corporate crime. Crime & Delinquency, 48, 263–282.
55.
LeeC. (2005). (Latente) soziale Probleme und Massenmedien. Herbolzheim, Germany: Centaurus Verlag.
Martínez SarasolaC. (2013). Nuestros paisanos los indios. Vida, historia y destino de las comunidades indígenas en Argentina (1st ed.). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Del Nuevo Extremo.
MayoralP.OjedaA.DworeskyM. (2019). Medio ambiente. Herramientas conceptuales. Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminología (in edition).
60.
McGregorM. A. (2009). Ending corporate impunity: How to really curb the pillaging of natural resources. Case Western Reserve Journal International Law, 42, 469–497.
61.
MISEREOR (2018). Rohstoffe für die Energiewende. Menschenrechtliche und ökologische Verantwortung in einem Zukunftsmarkt. Aachen: MISEREOR.
62.
NataliL. (2016). A visual approach for green criminology: Exploring the social perception of environmental harm. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
63.
PaulsN.ZagorskiK.FergusonD. C. (2015). On harm and mediated space: The BP oil spill in the age of globalisation. In BrismanA.SouthN.WhiteR. (Eds.), Environmental crime and social conflict: Contemporary and emerging issues (pp. 265–283). Farnham, England: Ashgate.
64.
PearceF. (1976). Crimes of the powerful: Marxism, crime and deviance. London, England: Pluto Press.
65.
RachmanG. (2016). Easternisation: War and peace in the Asian century. London, England: Penguin.
66.
Rivera BeirasI. (2014). Retomando el concepto de violencia estructural. La memoria, el daño social y el derecho a la Resistencia como herramientas de trabajo. In Rivera BeirasI. (Ed.), Delitos de los estados, de los Mercados y daño social (pp. 253–279). Barcelona, Spain: Anthropos.
67.
RotheD. L.MullinsC. W.SandstromK. (2008). The Rwandan genocide: International finance policies and human rights. Social Justice, 35, 66–86.
68.
RuggieroV. (1997). Criminals and service providers: Cross-national dirty economies. Crime, Law & Social Change, 28, 27–38.
69.
RuggieroV. (2001). Crime and markets: Essays in anti-criminology. Oxford, England: OUP.
70.
RuggieroV. (2007). It’s the economy, stupid! Classifying power crime. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 24, 163–177.
71.
ScheererS. (1993). Kriminalität der Mächtigen. In KaiserG. et al. (Eds.), Kleines kriminologisches Wörterbuch (3rd ed., pp. 246–249). Heidelberg, Germany: C.F. Müller.
72.
Seaga ShawI. (2011). Human rights journalism: Advances in reporting distant humanitarian interventions. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
73.
Silveira GorskiH. (2014). Por un espacio público no estatal. Contra la hegemonía neoliberal y el declive de la democracia. In Rivera BeirasI. (Ed.), Delitos de los estados, de los mercados y daño social (pp. 99–112). Barcelona, Spain: Anthropos.
74.
SinghK. H. (1987). Galtung and Wallterstein on structural theory of imperialism: Roots of social and economic disequilibrium. In VivekanandaF. (Ed.), Premises and process of maldevelopment (pp. 61–70). Stockholm, Sweden: Bethany Books.
75.
SpapensT. (2014). Invisible victims: The problem of policing environmental crime. In SpapensT.WhiteR.KluinM. (Eds.), Environmental crime and its victims: Perspectives within green criminology (pp. 221–236). Farnham, England: Ashgate.
76.
SvampaM. (2017). Del cambio de época al fin de ciclo. Gobiernos progresistas, extractivismo y movimientos sociales en América Latina. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Edhasa.
77.
TaianaJ. E. (2013). La geopolítica internacional de los apoyos económicos. In VerbitskyH.BohoslavskyJ. P. (Eds.), Cuentas pendientes—Los cómplices económicos de la dictadura (pp. 65–77). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
U.S. Geological Survey, 2019, Mineral commodities summaries 2019: U.S. Geological Survey.
81.
VianoE. C. (1990). Victimology: A new focus of research and practice. In VianoE. (Ed.), The victimology handbook. Research findings, treatment, and public policy (pp. xi–xxiii). New York, NY: Garland.
82.
VidalO.GoffeB.ArndtN. (2013). Metals for a low-carbon society. Nature Geoscience, 6, 894–896.
83.
WaltersR. (2006). Crime, bio-agriculture and the exploitation of hunger. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 26–45.
YuralivkerD. (1992). América Latina: Nuevas perspectivas de desarrollo. In Asociación Latinoamericana de Organizaciones de Promoción (Ed.), América Latina: Opciones estratégicas de desarrollo (pp. 99–107). Caracas, Venezuela: Ed. Nueva Sociedad.
