Abstract
Background:
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic periodontitis (CP) have a bidirectional association; scaling and root planing (SRP) alone has limited efficacy in their comorbidity, with controversial photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) adjunctive efficacy.
Objective:
To quantify PBMT + SRP’s effects on periodontal [probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL)], glycemic [fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)], and inflammatory [high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)] indices in patients with T2DM + CP and explore heterogeneity (PBMT parameters, study region) for clinical optimization.
Methods:
Following PRISMA 2020, we searched six databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, etc.) from inception to August 24, 2025, for PBMT-adjuvanted SRP randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Bias was assessed via RoB 2.0, meta-analysis via RevMan 5.4, with preset subgroup analyses.
Results:
Six RCTs (n = 319) were included. At 3 months of follow-up, PBMT + SRP significantly improved key periodontal indices (PD: MD = −0.87 mm, 95% CI: [−1.00, −0.74]; CAL: MD = −0.47 mm, 95% CI: [−0.65, −0.29]; both p < 0.00001), glycemic control (FPG: MD = −0.79 mmol/L, 95% CI: [−1.41, −0.17], p = 0.01), and systemic inflammation (hs-CRP: MD = −0.99 mg/L, 95% CI: [−1.12, −0.86]; TNF-α: MD = −2.78 pg/mL, 95% CI: [−3.17, −2.39]; both p < 0.00001) versus SRP alone. HbA1c showed borderline significant reduction (MD = −0.81%, 95% CI: = [−1.62, −0.01], p = 0.05). Subgroup analyses suggested 808/810 nm + 0.8–1.5 W as potentially optimal PBMT parameters, though high-power efficacy relied on one small-sample study (n = 40). Notable limitations included high inter-study heterogeneity (most I2 > 90%) and maximum 6-month follow-up.
Conclusions:
PBMT adjunctive to SRP significantly improves periodontal indices (PD, CAL), FPG, and hs-CRP in patients with T2DM and CP, with borderline HbA1c reduction and good safety. Subgroup analyses identify 808/810 nm + 0.8–1.5 W as potentially optimal PBMT parameters, though high-power efficacy relies on one small-sample study. Given high inter-study heterogeneity (most I2 > 90%) and short follow-up (maximum 6 months), conclusions require validation by standardized, large-sample, long-term, high-quality RCTs.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
