Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026-1
Effect of Laser-Assisted Continuous Chelation Irrigation Protocols on Sealer Penetration and Bond Strength in Root Dentin: An Evaluation Using a Calcium-Specific Fluorophore and Push-Out Test
Laser-assisted irrigation may enhance chemomechanical debridement and improve the sealing of root canals during endodontic treatment.
Objective:
This study aimed to address the scientific deficit in understanding the laser-assisted sequential versus continuous chelation in root canal irrigation.
Methods:
One hundred and twenty single-rooted teeth were prepared using Reciproc R40 instruments and randomly divided into six groups (n = 20) based on the irrigation protocol. In the sequential chelation groups, canals were irrigated with NaOCl during instrumentation, followed by 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid using a needle, ultrasound, or erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser activation. In the continuous chelation groups, canals were irrigated with a mixture of 2% sodium hypochlorite and 9% hydroxyethylidene diphosphonic acid during and after instrumentation, followed by final activation using the same three techniques. Ten samples per group were used to evaluate sealer penetration with Fluo-3 dye, while the remaining samples underwent push-out bond strength testing. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Kruskal–Wallis and Friedman tests (p < 0.05).
Results:
No significant differences in sealer penetration were found between sequential and continuous protocols in the apical third when needle or ultrasonic activation was used. However, laser activation combined with continuous chelation resulted in significantly higher sealer penetration and bond strength (p < 0.001). Sealer penetration followed the trend: coronal > middle > apical (p < 0.05) with all irrigation techniques.
Conclusions:
Continuous chelation protocols, especially when combined with laser activation, were as effective or superior to conventional methods in improving sealer penetration and bond strength. Continuous chelation with laser-assisted irrigation may improve clinical efficiency and shorten treatment time in root canal procedures.
PlotinoG, PameijerCH, GrandeNM, et al.Ultrasonics in endodontics: A review of the literature. J Endod, 2007; 33(2):81–95; doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.008
2.
OzelB, AyhanT, KaptanF, et al.Dual- or single rinse? The tubular sealer penetration of endodontic chelating agents. PLoS One, 2024; 19(6):e0303377; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303377
3.
NasherR, HilgersRD, GutknechtN. Debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals using the dual wavelength Er,Cr:YSGG/Diode 940 nm laser and the XP-Endoshaper and finisher technique. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg, 2020; 38(3):174–180; doi: 10.1089/photob.2019.4693
TeixeiraCS, FelippeMC, FelippeWT. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: An SEM analysis. Int Endod J, 2005; 38(5):285–290; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00930.x
6.
CondeAJ, EstevezR, LoroñoG, et al.Effect of sonic and ultrasonic activation on organic tissue dissolution from simulated grooves in root canals using sodium hypochlorite and EDTA. Int Endod J, 2017; 50(10):976–982; doi: 10.1111/iej.12717
7.
Montero-MirallesP, Torres-LagaresD, Segura-EgeaJJ, et al.Comparative study of debris and smear layer removal with EDTA and Er,Cr:YSGG laser. J Clin Exp Dent, 2018; 10(6):e598–e602; doi: 10.4317/jced.54936
8.
BagoI, PlotinoG, KatićM, et al.Effect of a novel laser-initiated photoacoustic activation of a solvent or sodium hypochlorite in the removal of filling remnants after retreatment of curved root canals. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2021; 36:102535; doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102535
9.
RathPP, YiuCKY, MatinlinnaJP, et al.The effects of sequential and continuous chelation on dentin. Dent Mater, 2020; 36(12):1655–1665; doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.10.010
10.
AslantasEE, BuzogluHD, AltundasarE, et al.Effect of EDTA, sodium hypochlorite, and chlorhexidine gluconate with or without surface modifiers on dentin microhardness. J Endod, 2014; 40(6):876–879; doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.041
11.
BallalNV, RayAB, NarkedamalliR, et al.Effect of continuous vs sequential chelation on the mechanical properties of root dentin: An ex vivo study. J Dent, 2024; 148:105214; doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105214
12.
NeelakantanP, VarugheseAA, SharmaS, et al.Continuous chelation irrigation improves the adhesion of epoxy resin-based root canal sealer to root dentine. Int Endod J, 2012; 45(12):1097–1102; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02073.x
13.
MoragoA, Ordinola-ZapataR, Ferrer-LuqueCM, et al.Influence of smear layer on the antimicrobial activity of a sodium hypochlorite/etidronic acid irrigating solution in infected dentin. J Endod, 2016; 42(11):1647–1650; doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.023
14.
LottantiS, GautschiH, SenerB, et al.Effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic, etidronic and peracetic acid irrigation on human root dentine and the smear layer. Int Endod J, 2009; 42(4):335–343; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01514.x
15.
KottathilH, ZehnderM, GublerA, et al.Compatibility of dual rinse 1-Hydroxyethane-1,1-diphosphonic acid with sodium hypochlorite solutions containing proprietary additives. J Endod, 2024; 50(10):1472–1477; doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2024.07.007
16.
BallalNV, RoyA, ZehnderM. Effect of sodium hypochlorite concentration in continuous chelation on dislodgement resistance of an epoxy resin and hydraulic calcium silicate sealer. Polymers (Basel), 2021; 13(20):3482; doi: 10.3390/polym13203482
17.
HashmiA, ZhangX, KishenA. Impact of dentin substrate modification with chitosan-hydroxyapatite precursor nanocomplexes on sealer penetration and tensile strength. J Endod, 2019; 45(7):935–942; doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.021
18.
ElsayedMA, IslamMS, ElbeltagyK, et al.Effect of different chelating agents on the shear bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements to coronal dentin. Aust Endod J, 2023; 49(Suppl 1):426–432; doi: 10.1111/aej.12759
19.
EldeebIM, NawarNN, SaberSM, et al.Smear layer removal and sealer penetration with different tapers after using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming technique. Clin Oral Investig, 2021; 25(8):5025–5032; doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03813-y
20.
DeariS, MohnD, ZehnderM. Dentine decalcification and smear layer removal by different ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and 1-hydroxyethane-1,1-diphosphonic acid species. Int Endod J, 2019; 52(2):237–243; doi: 10.1111/iej.12987
21.
ForteaL, Sanz-SerranoD, LuzLB, et al.Update on chelating agents in endodontic treatment: A systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent, 2024; 16(4):e516–e538; doi: 10.4317/jced.60989
22.
EngelGT, GoodellGG, McClanahanSB. Sealer penetration and apical microleakage in smear-free dentin after a final rinse with either 70% isopropyl alcohol or Peridex. J Endod, 2005; 31(8):620–623; doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000152296.06840.14
23.
OliverCM, AbbottPV. An in vitro study of apical and coronal microleakage of laterally condensed gutta percha with Ketac-Endo and AH-26. Aust Dent J, 1998; 43(4):262–268; doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb00175.x
24.
ViolichDR, ChandlerNP. The smear layer in endodontics - a review. Int Endod J, 2010; 43(1):2–15; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01627.x
25.
TorabinejadM, HandysidesR, KhademiAA, et al.Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: A review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2002; 94(6):658–666; doi: 10.1067/moe.2002.128962
26.
Kara TuncerA, TuncerS. Effect of different final irrigation solutions on dentinal tubule penetration depth and percentage of root canal sealer. J Endod, 2012; 38(6):860–863; doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.008
ZhangSH, GaoZR, ZhouYH, et al.Comparison of easydo activator, ultrasonic and needle irrigation techniques on sealer penetration and smear layer removal in vitro. BMC Oral Health, 2024; 24(1):56; doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03833-y
29.
Miguéns-VilaR, Martín-BiedmaB, Aboy-PazosS, et al.Effectiveness of different irrigant activation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study. J Clin Med, 2022; 11(4):1003; doi: 10.3390/jcm11041003
NagahashiT, YahataY, HandaK, et al.Er:YAG laser-induced cavitation can activate irrigation for the removal of intraradicular biofilm. Sci Rep, 2022; 12(1):4897; doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08963-x
32.
AungNPS, WatanabeS, OkijiT. Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation in comparison with different irrigation systems for cleaning the apical root canal area beyond ledge. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg, 2021; 39(12):759–765; doi: 10.1089/photob.2021.0044
33.
UstaSN, ErdemBA, GündoğarM. Comparison of the removal of intracanal medicaments used in regenerative endodontics from root canal system using needle, ultrasonic, sonic, and laser-activated irrigation systems. Lasers Med Sci, 2024; 39(1):27; doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-03980-w
34.
KaplanF, ErdemirA. Evaluating the effect of different irrigation activation techniques on the dentin tubules penetration of two different root canal sealers by laser scanning confocal microscopy. Microsc Res Tech, 2023; 86(7):791–802; doi: 10.1002/jemt.24339
35.
KorukD, BasmacıF, KırmızıD, et al.The impact of laser-activated and conventional irrigation techniques on sealer penetration into dentinal tubules. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg, 2022; 40(8):565–572; doi: 10.1089/photob.2022.0017
36.
BallalNV, IvicaA, MenesesP, et al.Influence of 1-Hydroxyethylidene-1,1-Diphosphonic acid on the soft tissue-dissolving and gelatinolytic effect of ultrasonically activated sodium hypochlorite in simulated endodontic environments. Materials (Basel), 2021; 14(10):2531; doi: 10.3390/ma14102531
37.
BeruttiE, MariniR, AngerettiA. Penetration ability of different irrigants into dentinal tubules. J Endod, 1997; 23(12):725–727; doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(97)80342-1
38.
GiardinoL, Del FabbroM, MorraM, et al.Dual Rinse(®) HEDP increases the surface tension of NaOCl but may increase its dentin disinfection efficacy. Odontology, 2019; 107(4):521–529; doi: 10.1007/s10266-019-00436-4
39.
MeireM, van AelstB, SehovicA, et al.Solutes in water affect the primary cavitation bubble generated by a pulsed erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser. Lasers Med Sci, 2024; 39(1):298; doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04257-y
40.
VersianiMA, MartinsJ, Ordinola-ZapataR. Anatomical complexities affecting root canal preparation: A narrative review. Aust Dent J, 2023; 68(Suppl 1):S5–S23; doi: 10.1111/adj.12992
41.
HuthKC, WuerschingSN, BenzL, et al.In vitro microscopical and microbiological assessment of the sealing ability of calcium silicate-based root canal sealers. J Funct Biomater, 2024; 15(11):341; doi: 10.3390/jfb15110341
42.
HassanR, RoshdyNN. Effect of continuous chelation on the dentinal tubule penetration of a calcium silicate-based root canal sealer: A confocal laser microscopy study. BMC Oral Health, 2023; 23(1):377; doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02995-z
43.
PatelS, RicucciD, DurakC, et al.Internal root resorption: A review. J Endod, 2010; 36(7):1107–1121; doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.014
44.
PaquéF, LuderHU, SenerB, et al.Tubular sclerosis rather than the smear layer impedes dye penetration into the dentine of endodontically instrumented root canals. Int Endod J, 2006; 39(1):18–25; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01042.x
45.
HazarE, HazarA. Effects of phytic acid and etidronic acid using continuous and sequential chelation on the removal of smear layer, dentin microhardness, and push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based cement. BMC Oral Health, 2025; 25(1):633; doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06010-5
46.
Arılı ÖztürkE, ÇanakçiBC, Turan GökdumanC. Effect of various final irrigation solutions at different temperatures on dentin tubule penetration of bioceramic-based root canal sealer. BMC Oral Health, 2025; 25(1):352; doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05727-7
47.
KelesA, Askerbeyli OrsS, PuraliN, et al.Effect of different sealer activation techniques on dentinal tubule penetration. Aust Endod J, 2023; 49(3):470–475; doi: 10.1111/aej.12738
48.
GeneraliL, CavaniF, SerenaV, et al.Effect of different irrigation systems on sealer penetration into dentinal tubules. J Endod, 2017; 43(4):652–656; doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.004
49.
MachadoMEL, Veintimilla LozadaVN, Carrillo RengifoKJ, et al.Confocal laser scanning microscopic analysis of the penetration of an epoxy resin-based sealer into dentinal tubules after calcium hydroxide dressing. Aust Endod J, 2021; 47(3):480–486; doi: 10.1111/aej.12508
50.
JeongJW, DeGraft-JohnsonA, DornSO, et al.Dentinal tubule penetration of a calcium silicate-based root canal sealer with different obturation methods. J Endod, 2017; 43(4):633–637; doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.023
51.
DonnermeyerD, SchmidtS, RohrbachA, et al.Debunking the concept of dentinal tubule penetration of endodontic sealers: Sealer staining with rhodamine B fluorescent dye is an inadequate method. Materials (Basel), 2021; 14(12):3211; doi: 10.3390/ma14123211
52.
FurtadoTC, de BemIA, MachadoLS, et al.Intratubular penetration of endodontic sealers depends on the fluorophore used for CLSM assessment. Microsc Res Tech, 2021; 84(2):305–312; doi: 10.1002/jemt.23589
53.
AguiarBA, FrotaLMA, TaguatingaDT, et al.Influence of ultrasonic agitation on bond strength, marginal adaptation, and tooth discoloration provided by three coronary barrier endodontic materials. Clin Oral Investig, 2019; 23(11):4113–4122; doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02850-y
54.
XuH, YeZ, ZhangA, et al.Effects of concentration of sodium hypochlorite as an endodontic irrigant on the mechanical and structural properties of root dentine: A laboratory study. Int Endod J, 2022; 55(10):1091–1102; doi: 10.1111/iej.13800
55.
BoutsioukisC, Arias-MolizMT. Present status and future directions—irrigants and irrigation methods. Int Endod J, 2022; 55(Suppl 3):588–612; doi: 10.1111/iej.13739
56.
HamashaAA, HatiwshA. Quality of life and satisfaction of patients after nonsurgical primary root canal treatment provided by undergraduate students, graduate students and endodontic specialists. Int Endod J, 2013; 46(12):1131–1139; doi: 10.1111/iej.12106
57.
GawdatSI, BedierMM. Influence of dual rinse irrigation on dentinal penetration of a bioceramic root canal sealer: A Conofocal microscopic Analysis. Aust Endod J, 2022; 48(3):481–486; doi: 10.1111/aej.12599
58.
CardinaliF, CamilleriJ. A critical review of the material properties guiding the clinician’s choice of root canal sealers. Clin Oral Investig, 2023; 27(8):4147–4155; doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05140-w
59.
CarvalhoTS, LussiA. Age-related morphological, histological and functional changes in teeth. J Oral Rehabil, 2017; 44(4):291–298; doi: 10.1111/joor.12474
60.
IvicaA, DeariS, PatcasR, et al.Transforming growth factor beta 1 distribution and content in the root dentin of young mature and immature human premolars. J Endod, 2020; 46(5):641–647; doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.01.016
