Abstract
Introduction:
This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted specifically in participants with diabetes and painful peripheral neuropathy to assess the effectiveness and safety of medical cannabis, isolated cannabinoids, or nationally approved cannabis-based medicines as adjuvant treatment, compared with placebo or baseline.
Materials and Methods:
Controlled clinical studies and RCTs in adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy were eligible. Animal and in vitro studies were excluded. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Scopus and screened 15,377 records; 35 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 4 RCTs were included in the qualitative synthesis.
Results:
Three of four studies reported statistically significant reductions in neuropathic pain with cannabinoid-based interventions compared with placebo, whereas one trial did not demonstrate superiority. In two trials using vaporized or sublingual Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), doses in the range of approximately 16–18 mg were associated with clinically meaningful pain relief in participants. Adverse effects, including dizziness and cognitive symptoms, were common but generally mild-to-moderate, and discontinuations due to adverse effects varied across studies.
Discussion/Conclusion:
Evidence from four small, heterogeneous RCTs suggests that cannabinoid-based therapies may reduce pain in some patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy; however, the limited number of studies, variability in formulations and comparators, and risk of bias preclude firm conclusions regarding efficacy. Observed THC doses around 16–18 mg/day delivered via vaporized or sublingual routes should be viewed as preliminary, hypothesis-generating ranges rather than definitive recommendations. Larger, contemporary RCTs with rigorous risk-of-bias control, standardized outcomes, and detailed safety reporting are needed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.