Identification of Deregulated Signaling Pathways in Jurkat Cells in Response to a Novel Acylspermidine Analogue-N 4 -Erucoyl Spermidine

Abstract

Natural polyamines such as putrescine, spermidine, and spermine are crucial in the cell proliferation and maintenance in all the eukaryotes. However, the requirement of polyamines in tumor cells is stepped up to maintain tumorigenicity. Many synthetic polyamine analogues have been designed recently to target the polyamine metabolism in tumors to induce apoptosis. N⁴-Erucoyl spermidine (designed as N⁴-Eru), a novel acylspermidine derivative, has been shown to exert selective inhibitory effects on both hematological and solid tumors, but its mechanisms of action are unknown. In this study, RNA sequencing was performed to investigate the anticancer mechanisms of N⁴-Eru-treated T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell line (Jurkat cells), and gene expression was examined through different tools. We could show that many key oncogenes including NDRG1, CACNA1G, TGFBR2, NOTCH1,2,3, UHRF1, DNMT1,3, HDAC1,3, KDM3A, KDM4B, KDM4C, FOS, and SATB1 were downregulated, whereas several tumor suppressor genes such as CDKN2AIPNL, KISS1, DDIT3, TP53I13, PPARG, FOXP1 were upregulated. Data obtained through RNA-Seq further showed that N⁴-Eru inhibited the NOTCH/Wnt/JAK-STAT axis. This study also indicated that N⁴-Eru-induced apoptosis could involve several key signaling pathways in cancer. Altogether, our results suggest that N⁴-Eru is a promising drug to treat ALL.

Keywords

Acylspermidine polyamine anticancer RNA-Seq gene expression Jurkat ALL

Introduction

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), characterized by the production of immature lymphocytes, has been one of the major causes of deaths worldwide.¹ In 2015 alone, nearly 876 000 people were affected by ALL and resulted in 111 000 deaths around the globe.^2,3 Mostly, children between the ages 2 and 5 are likely to be affected and with the strides in the development of chemotherapy, the 5-year survival rates have increased from 10% in the 1960s to 90% in 2015.⁴ However, the adults affected with ALL have a lower survival rate with an aggregate of 35% in elderly patients.⁵ Despite the recent developments and novel approaches in designing treatment regimens, there is limited information regarding the targeted molecular pathways and mechanisms involved.⁶ The causative factors leading to the development of ALL may be prolonged exposure to environmental carcinogens, genetic mutations, genetic syndromes, and delayed infections.^4,7,8

Many previous studies have reported the use of diverse classes of drugs for the treatment of ALL such as thiopurines, glucocorticoids, vincristine, dexamethasone, hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, and methotrexate.^9–12 Specific antibodies in immunotherapy including blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin^13,14 that target CD19 and CD22 are underway. However, due to relapse in the treatment and the adverse effects due to high doses, there is a persistent need to develop novel drugs which can be incorporated in the current chemotherapeutic intervention.

The natural polyamines such as putrescine, spermine, and spermidine are found in all the eukaryotic cells at micromolar concentrations.¹⁵ These biogenic polyamines are crucial for the normal cell proliferation, differentiation, and nuclear stabilization.¹⁶ Nevertheless, in the cancerous state, the requirement for these polyamines rises manifold and the polyamine metabolism pathway can be targeted through the use of polyamines from the external source resulting in cell death.^17,18 During the recent few years, the development of polyamine analogues as chemotherapeutic agents against different cancers has fascinated many researchers.^18–22 Many polyamine analogues targeting epigenetic modifications of the chromatin were evaluated previously and have shown promising results. The effects of polyaminohydroxamic acid derivatives and polyaminobenzamides as histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors^23,24; (bis)guanidine or biguanide polyamine analogues as lysine-specific demethylase (LSD1) inhibitors in in vitro have been extensively studied.²⁵ T-cell ALL mainly involves dysregulation of the NOTCH1 signaling by constitutive activation of the pathway in nearly 50% to 60% cases.²⁶ The modulation of the other key genes such as UHRF1, DNMT1, HDAC1, JAK1, BCL3, IDH2 CDKN1A, and RPL5^27–30 have also been shown to be implicated in the development of T-cell ALL.

Recently, we demonstrated the proapoptotic effects of 4 novel acylspermidine analogues on Jurkat (JK) and MCF7 breast cancer cells; one of these analogue-N⁴-Erucoyl spermidine (N⁴-Eru) has shown selective inhibitory effects on both types of tumors.³¹ The aim of this study was to investigate and analyze the differential gene expression (DGE) of N⁴-Eru-treated JK cells through RNA-Seq and to reveal the signaling pathways which could be targeted to induce apoptosis in JK cells.

Material Methods

Cell culture and treatment

T-cell ALL JK cell line was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were maintained in a humidified incubator at a temperature of 37°C and 5% CO₂. RPMI1640 media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (catalog no. 16000-044; Lifetech, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin antibiotics (100 units/mL, catalog no. 15140-122; Lifetech, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to maintain cells.

RNA-Seq and differentially expressed genes analysis

To investigate the anticancer mechanisms of N⁴-Eru and gene expression, JK cells were treated at a concentration corresponding to its half-maximal activity (30 µM) for 24 hours in triplicates. Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy kit Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA, and the RNA concentration was quantified. RNA quality was assessed using Bioanalyzer (RNA integrity number score >7.0). Then, the sequencing libraries were generated (TruSeq Stranded mRNA Sample Preparation Kit; Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) from 2.5 μg of total RNA from each of the 3 biological replicates. The 50-bp (base pair) long single-end deep sequencing was performed using Illumina HiSeq 2000 system. The adaptor sequences were removed, and the low-quality base call was filtered by FASTX-Toolkit. The obtained filtered short sequencing reads were mapped to the human genome using TopHat2, and the subsequent gene expression values were quantified using Subreads package Feature Counts function. The differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis was further performed from the gene expression values after identifying the library size and appropriate data set dispersion.³² The DGE was tested using R/Bioconductor package edgeR. Differentially expressed genes are determined by log2 fold change (Log2FC) and false discovery rate (FDR; log fold change [LogFC] ⩾0.5 or ⩽−0.5; FDR ⩽ 0.05).

Bioinformatics analysis

Gene set functional analysis was performed using Gene Ontology (GO) search through Enrichr tool.^33,34 The gene IDs of interest were converted to EntrezID and loaded to DAVID bioinformatics tools³⁵ for pathway analysis. The GO analysis and Biocarta/KEGG pathway analysis were then performed by setting all the GO terms and Biocarta pathway genes as background genes.³⁶ Overrepresented GO terms or pathways were determined by enrichment score (EASE ⩽ 0.1, gene count ⩾2). The heat map of genes responsible for cell death regulation was plotted using the web tool ClustVis as per the mentioned algorithm.³⁷ In addition, gene interactions of the antiproliferative and apoptotic-inducing genes were represented by employing the tool GeneMania.³⁸

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis between the control and the treated samples (the Student “t” test and one-way analysis of variance) was performed using GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). Results are presented as mean ± SEM of triplicates in the same experiment or 3 independent experiments. The significant statistical differences have been designated as *P < .05, **P < .01, and ***P < .001.

Results

N⁴-Eru-modulated gene expression

Data obtained from JK cells treated with 30 µM of N⁴-Eru showed that the messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of 1683 genes was altered, with 1052 genes downregulated (LogFC < −1.0; P < .05) and 631 genes upregulated (LogFC > 1.0; P < .05). The number of transcripts altered has been classified based on the LogFC or the “P” value as described in Tables 1 and 2. Altogether, the number of transcripts downregulated exceeded the number of transcripts upregulated.

Table 1.

Total number of transcripts altered in N⁴-Eru-treated Jurkat cells.

Range of “P” value of genes in transcriptome	No. of transcripts upregulated	Range of upregulated LogFC	No of transcripts downregulated	Range of downregulated LogFC
⩽.05	631	+1 to +7	1052	−8.8 to −1
⩽.01	283	+1.2 to +7.3	483	−8 to −1.2
⩽.001	122	+1.4 to +4.3	223	−8 to −1.4

Classification based on “P” values.

Table 2.

Total number of transcripts altered in N⁴-Eru-treated Jurkat cells.

LogFC of the genes in the transcriptome	No. of transcripts upregulated	LogFC	No. of transcripts downregulated	Range of “P” value
+3 to +7.3	32	−8.8 to −3	206	⩽.05
+1.5 to +2.9	257	−2.9 to −1.5	497	⩽.05
+1 to +1.4	340	−1 to −1.4	346	⩽.05

Classification based on Log fold change (LogFC) values.

Gene enrichment analysis of transcripts

The gene enrichment analysis (P < .01) of GO terms showed that there was an overall decrease in the cell proliferation and negative regulation of the proapoptotic genes accompanied by an increase in the expression of tumor suppressor genes. The GO analysis summary of different biological processes, molecular functions, and cell components in downregulated and upregulated transcripts in N⁴-Eru-treated JK cells are described in Figures 1 and 2, respectively.

Figure 1.

Annotation statistics of downregulated GO terms of the N⁴-Eru-treated Jurkat cells. The length of the bar represents the significance of that specific gene set or term. In addition, the degree of the brightness of the color denotes the significance (P < .01) of the differentially expressed genes.

Figure 2.

Annotation statistics of upregulated GO terms of the N⁴-Eru-treated Jurkat cells. The length of the bar represents the significance of that specific gene set or term. In addition, the degree of the brightness of the color denotes the significance (P < .01) of the differentially expressed genes.

KEGG/Biocarta pathway analysis

The KEGG/Biocarta pathway analysis showed the possibility of the involvement of NOTCH, JAK-STAT, and Wnt signaling pathways (Figures 3 to 5). There was a significant decrease in the levels of STAT5 which overexpression is known to be involved in cell survival. The important epigenetic modulators such as HDACs 1 and 3, DNA methyltransferase (DNMT1), and lysine demethylases (KDM3A, 4B, 4C), which regulate gene expression, by modifying histone posttranslational marks, were significantly downregulated (LogFC < 1.3; P < .01; Table 3).

Figure 3.

KEGG pathway analysis of differentially regulated genes in Jurkat cells after treatment with N⁴-Eru, depicting the affected genes in Notch signaling pathway.

Figure 4.

Significant deregulated key signaling nodes of JAK-STAT signaling pathway are represented in Jurkat cells after treatment with N⁴-Eru. Biocarta pathway analysis of critical differentially expressed genes is depicted with an asterisk.

Figure 5.

Significant deregulated key signaling nodes of JAK-Wnt signaling axis are represented in Jurkat cells after treatment with N⁴-Eru. KEGG pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes is depicted with an asterisk.

Table 3.

Downregulated genes in N⁴-Eru-treated Jurkat cells as compared with untreated cells.

Gene function	Gene	Gene symbol	LogFC^a	P value
Gene expression and chromatin regulation	Histone deacetylase 1	HDAC1	−1.58261	.031748
	Histone deacetylase 3	HDAC3	−1.6162	.002189
	Lysine demethylase 3A	KDM3A	−2.33896	1.03E−05
	Lysine demethylase 4B	KDM4B	−2.57391	.000149
	Lysine demethylase 4C	KDM4C	−1.32668	.032928
	DNA methyltransferase 1	DNMT1	−1.65035	.013526
	Ubiquitin like with PHD and ring finger domains 1	UHRF1	−1.43405	.019492
Cell cycle	Rb transcriptional corepressor like 2	RBL2	−2.53669	2.31E−05
	Ring finger protein 8	RNF8	−2.2863	.001563
	Dual specificity phosphatase 1	DUSP1	−1.49171	.001764
	Dual specificity phosphatase 10	DUSP10	−4.76307	2.28E−06
	Egl-9 family hypoxia inducible factor 3	EGLN3	−4.77901	1.32E−10
	Casein kinase 1 alpha 1	CSNK1A1	−1.96648	.000342
	Cell division cycle associated 7 like	CDCA7L	−1.8491	.001622
	Kinesin family member 2a	KIF2A	−2.41298	.000247
	Potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 11	KCTD11	−2.92092	1.49E−06
DNA binding	Elk3, Ets transcription factor	ELK3	−2.27289	1.41E−05
	Fos proto-oncogene, Ap-1 transcription factor subunit	FOS	−1.99917	3.93E−05
	Fosb proto-oncogene, Ap-1 transcription factor subunit	FOSB	−1.57359	.001061
	Satb homeobox 1	SATB1	−3.01631	.000194
	Damage-specific DNA-binding protein 2	DDB2	−1.93582	.000743

Fold change treated vs control.

Moreover, NOTCH1, NOTCH2, and NOTCH3 were downregulated with the subsequent downregulation of notch-related genes inhibiting cell growth and survival (Table 4). Furthermore, several genes such as RBL2, RNF8, DUSP1, DUSP10, EGLN3, CSNK1A1, CDCA7L, KIF2A, and KCTD11 involved in cell cycling were significantly downregulated. In addition, FOS and FOSB transcription factors which are proto-oncogenes were downregulated indicating a possible event of inhibition of cell growth in response to N⁴-Eru treatment. The crucial gene NDRG1 is an important component of the Wnt/Hedgehog/Notch super pathway involved in apoptosis and regulation of TP53 activity. Our results showed that NDRG1 was downregulated in N⁴-Eru-treated cells suggesting that NDRG1 acts as an oncogene in acute leukemia. The tumor suppressor genes KISS1, FOXP1, PPARG, E2F1, TGFB2, and DDIT3 were upregulated (Table 5). The gene interactions of the different transcriptional regulators and tumor suppressors are shown in Figure 6. Figure 6 represents a brief overview of the different gene interactions indicated by different line colors. The coexpression of the genes was highest (50.73%), the physical interactions between the genes were found to be 24.25%, the predicted interactions were 11.20%, followed by genes involved in the pathway at 6.01% and shared protein domains at 4.17%, and co-localization of the genes was found to be 2.42%. The genetic interactions stood at mere 1.2%. The colors in the circle of the gene point resemble a pie chart distribution which helps to identify the role of that particular gene in the different biochemical reactions such as histone modification, chromatin binding, cell growth, and response to hypoxia in the JK cells treated with N⁴-Eru.

Table 4.

Downregulated transcriptional and nuclear oncogenic cofactors in N⁴-Eru-treated Jurkat cells as compared with untreated cells.

Gene function	Gene	Gene symbol	LogFC^a	P value
Regulation of carcinogenesis	Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5A	STAT5A	−6.50328	.038494
	Wnt family member 10B	WNT10B	−6.50328	.038494
	Catenin beta 1	CTNNB1	−1.42782	.002704
	Recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region	RBPJ	−2.15519	.00015
	Retinoic acid receptor beta	RARB	−2.47092	.000217
	Spalt like transcription factor	SALL2	−2.73732	.00044
	Notch 1	NOTCH1	−1.77342	.007024
	Notch 2	NOTCH2	−1.58063	.001115
	Notch 3	NOTCH3	−3.20939	.007458
	Amyloid beta precursor protein	APP	−1.08842	.020626
	Transforming growth factor beta receptor 2	TGFBR2	−2.06261	.001555
	Ras homolog family member F, filopodia associated	RHOF	−7.76955	.001103
	Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1	MAP2K1	−2.01639	.000364
	Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 pseudogene 1	MAP2K1P1	−6.57648	.038494
Nuclear factors	BCL2 interacting protein 3	BNIP3	−2.84695	7.44E–08
	N-Myc downstream regulated 1	NDRG1	−4.97461	1.93E–18
	RAB13, member RAS oncogene family	RAB13	−2.01249	.000689
	Calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha 1G	CACNA1G	−2.93233	.001917
	Heat shock protein family A	HSPA8	−2.09429	.007049
	Vascular endothelial growth factor A	VEGFA	−1.62758	.000701
	NFKB inhibitor zeta	NFKBIZ	−1.68418	.000995
	Bifunctional apoptosis regulator	BFAR	−2.13262	.000604
Hypoxia-related pathway	Egl-9 family hypoxia inducible factor 3	EGLN3	−4.77901	1.32E–10
	Hexokinase 2	HK2	−3.05422	9.31E–08
	Phosphoglycerate kinase 1	PGK1	−2.74733	2.89E–08
	Heme oxygenase 1	HMOX1	−2.58973	2.15E–07
	Enolase 2	ENO2	−2.14244	1.42E–05
	Solute carrier family 2 member 1	SLC2A1	−2.08122	2.44E–05
	Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1	MAP2K1	−2.01639	.000364
	Vascular endothelial growth factor A	VEGFA	−1.62758	.000701
	Lactate dehydrogenase A	LDHA	−1.55003	.00103

Fold change treated vs control.

Table 5.

Upregulated tumor suppressor genes in N⁴-Eru-treated Jurkat cells as compared with untreated cells.

Gene function	Gene	Gene symbol	LogFC^a	P value
Tumor suppressor genes	CDKN2A-interacting protein N-terminal like	CDKN2AIPNL	2.430152	.896175
	Forkhead box O4	FOXP1	1.309448	.007521
	Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma	PPARG	1.370683	.00463
	KiSS-1 metastasis-suppressor	KISS1	6.723255	.024579
	DNA damage inducible transcript 3	DDIT3	2.739687	1.04E−07
	Lysine methyltransferase 2D	KMT2D	1.352845	.005701
	Tumor protein P53 inducible protein 13	TP53I13	1.387457	.016757
	Transforming growth factor beta 2 (TGFB2)	TGFB2	1.553288	.002345

Fold change treated vs control.

Figure 6.

Different gene interactions of the most significantly deregulated differentially expressed genes are represented as strings depicting cell death and tumor suppressor genes in N⁴-Eru-treated Jurkat cells as compared with untreated cells.

The heat map presented in Figure 7 gives an overall overview of the modulated gene expression with respect to both LogFC and “P” value.

Figure 7.

The heat map of the significantly altered differentially expressed genes shows the change with the intensity of the color varying with the alteration of LogFC (fold change) from −6 to +6 in N⁴-Eru-treated Jurkat cells as compared with untreated cells.

Discussion

Most of the polyamine analogues carry an overall positive charge on the complex and hence increase the affinity towards the negatively charged DNA.^39,40 One of the most important roles of the biogenic polyamines is to maintain DNA stability for normal cell function by optimal gene expression.⁴¹ As a matter of fact, polyamine analogues are designed to correct abnormal gene expression occurring in different diseases such as cancer. Inactivation of TSGs is a common characteristic in human cancer cells and is caused by several mechanisms. Epigenetic silencing of TSGs is one of the chief mechanisms involved in the regulation of TSGs and is ensured through a coordinated dialogue between DNA methylation and histone posttranslational modifications such as acetylation and methylation.^42–44

In cancer cells, besides promoter hypermethylation, histone proteins are hypoacetylated by HDAC and either hypomethylated or hypermethylated at specific amino acids by histone demethylase (HDM) and histone methyltransferase enzymes, respectively, leading to reduced expression of TSGs.⁴⁵ Therefore, many new polyamine analogues have been developed recently which act as HDAC/demethylase inhibitors leading to the reexpression of TSGs.^46,47 The data obtained from RNA-sequencing in this study showed that treating JK cells with the polyamine analogue N⁴-Eru induced a significant increase in a panel of TSGs such as p16^INK4a, FOXP1, PPARG, and KISS1 (Table 5) and a significant decrease in the expression of DNMT1 and UHRF1, HDACs HDAC1 and HDAC3 and lysine demethylases 3A, 4B, and 4C (Table 3). These results are consistent with a regulatory positive role of UHRF1 on TSGs, p16^INK4A, PPARG, and KISS1.^29,48–50 This suggests that N⁴-Eru-induced upregulation of TSGs could be challenged by epigenetic mechanisms involving DNA hypomethylation or histone acetylation and methylation through downregulation of DNMTs, HDACs, and HDM enzymes, respectively.

The polyamine analogues play a potential role like demethylase inhibitors in the expression of the aberrantly silenced genes by chromatin remodeling. Interestingly, lysine demethylases such as KDM3A, KDM4B, and KDM4C were significantly downregulated in response to N⁴-Eru which is in agreement with previous studies on polyaminoguanidines and polyaminobiguanides as noncompetitive inhibitors of LSD1.²⁵ These findings are also in line with previous studies on polyamine analogues (trichostatin (TSA), SAHA (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid), MS-275 {N-(2-aminophenyl)-4-[N-(pyridine-3-methoxycarbonyl)-aminomethyl] benzamide} as HDAC inhibitors. There is a considerable evidence that HDAC inhibitors TSA, SAHA, and MS-275 are effective in chemotherapeutic regimens in many cancers; however, dose-limiting toxicity remains challenging.^23,24,51,52

The data obtained also showed that many oncogenes and genes responsible for cell proliferation and survival such as c-MYC were downregulated in JK cells in response to N⁴-Eru treatment. In addition, many transcription factors associated with the NOTCH/Wnt/JAK-STAT axis were also significantly downregulated. For instance, signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5) activity is induced by a plethora of cytokines and growth factors, resulting in transcriptional activation of specific target genes. STAT5 plays an important role in a variety of cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Aberrant regulation of STAT5 has been observed in solid tumors as well as in patients with either chronic or acute myeloid leukemia.⁵³ This study showed that the levels of STAT5 mRNA decreased to nearly 6-fold when compared with the control (Table 4) suggesting an important role of STAT5 in N⁴-Eru-induced apoptosis.

The Wnt signaling pathway has been reported to be hyperactive in leukemia by the constituent overexpression of an important regulator, β-catenin, a free monomeric protein which is well known for its transcriptional regulation in solid as well as hematopoietic tumors. Many previous studies have identified β-catenin as a substrate for apoptosis induced by proteolysis.^54–57 Interestingly, while normal resting hematopoietic cells do not express β-catenin protein,⁵⁵ leukemic cells abundantly express β-catenin.⁵⁸ This study showed that N⁴-Eru might cause the repression of Wnt signaling axis and induce apoptosis. In addition, several genes of Notch signaling pathway were also downregulated suggesting a repression of Notch pathway in N⁴-Eru-treated JK cells. Of note, hypoxia-related key genes such as EGLN3 and HMOX1 were also downregulated which could also contribute in inducing apoptosis.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the polyamine analogue-N⁴-Eru can target several key pathways in leukemia cells. Therefore, to get a deeper insight into the molecular mechanisms, the advanced fields such as metabolomics, microarray array, and proteomics could reveal the specific targets with the integration of efforts of biologists and chemists to reduce the off-target effects and overcome the problem of dose-limiting toxicities.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the technical support from Deanship of Scientific Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, and KFMRC for providing RNA-Seq facility. The data and material presented in this manuscript have neither been published before nor has been submitted for publication to another scientific journal or is being considered for publication elsewhere. All the co-authors have read this manuscript and approved it for submission.

Funding:

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was funded and supported by Deanship of scientific research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant no. 1-130-36-HiCi.

Declaration of conflicting interests:

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership, grants, or patents received or pending and royalties. No writing assistance was used in the production of this manuscript.

Author Contributions

TA, CB, MA, and KA designed the project. SR, HC, AH, CB, and MA performed research, analyzed data and wrote the paper. SM, MAH, MZ, and TK helped with experimental design, data interpretation, and drafting of the paper. MH and MAH generated and contributed the data. DH also performed quality control analysis.

References

PDQ Pediatric Treatment Editorial Board. Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment (PDQ®): patient version. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26389385. 2002. Accessed January 24, 2018.

Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet (London, England). 2016;388:1545–1602. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6.

Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet (London, England). 2016;388:1459–1544. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1.

Inaba

Greaves

Mullighan

CG.

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet (London, England). 2013;381:1943–1955. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62187-4.

Paul

Kantarjian

Jabbour

EJ.

Adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:1645–1666.

Alhosin

León-González

Dandache

et al . Bilberry extract (Antho 50) selectively induces redox-sensitive caspase 3-related apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells by targeting the Bcl-2/Bad pathway. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8996. doi:10.1038/srep08996.

Preston

Kusumi

Tomonaga

et al . Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part III. Leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma, 1950-1987. Radiat Res. 1994;137:S68–S97.

Pui

C-H

Relling

Campana

Evans

WE.

Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Rev Clin Exp Hematol. 2002;6:161–180. doi:10.1046/j.1468-0734.2002.00067.x.

Seca

Pinto

CD.

Plant secondary metabolites as anticancer agents: successes in clinical trials and therapeutic application. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:E263. doi:10.3390/ijms19010263.

10.

Lee

SHR

Yang

JJ.

Pharmacogenomics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2017;30:229–236.

11.

Groninger

Meeuwsen-De Boer

De Graaf

SSN

Kamps

De Bont

ESJM

. Vincristine induced apoptosis in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia cells: a mitochondrial controlled pathway regulated by reactive oxygen species? Int J Oncol. 2002;21:1339–1345.

12.

Trencsenyi

Bako

Nagy

Kertai

Banfalvi

Methotrexate induced apoptotic and necrotic chromatin changes in rat myeloid leukemia cells. Inflamm Res. 2015;64:193–203. doi:10.1007/s00011-015-0797-x.

13.

Kantarjian

DeAngelo

Stelljes

et al . Inotuzumab ozogamicin versus standard care for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:740–753. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1509277.

14.

Nagorsen

Kufer

Baeuerle

Bargou

Blinatumomab: a historical perspective. Pharmacol Ther. 2012;136:334–342. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.07.013.

15.

Thomas

TJ.

Polyamine metabolism and cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2003;7:113–126.

16.

Paz

Garcia-Huidobro

Ignatenko

NA.

Polyamines in cancer. Adv Clin Chem. 2011;54:45–70.

17.

Nilsson

Keller

Baudino

et al . Targeting ornithine decarboxylase in Myc-induced lymphomagenesis prevents tumor formation. Cancer Cell. 2005;7:433–444. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.036.

18.

Huang

Pledgie

Casero

Davidson

NE.

Molecular mechanisms of polyamine analogs in cancer cells. Anticancer Drugs. 2005;16:229–241. doi:10.1097/00001813-200503000-00002.

19.

Weeks

Vanderwerf

Carlson

et al . Novel lysine-spermine conjugate inhibits polyamine transport and inhibits cell growth when given with DFMO. Exp Cell Res. 2000;261:293–302. doi:10.1006/excr.2000.5033.

20.

Mandal

Johansson

Orjalo

Park

MH.

Depletion of cellular polyamines, spermidine and spermine, causes a total arrest in translation and growth in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:2169–2174. doi:10.1073/pnas.1219002110.

21.

Minarini

Zini

Milelli

et al . Synthetic polyamines activating autophagy: effects on cancer cell death. Eur J Med Chem. 2013;67:359–366. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.06.044.

22.

Zini

Passariello

Gottardi

et al . Cytotoxicity of methoctramine and methoctramine-related polyamines. Chem Biol Interact. 2009;181:409–416. doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2009.06.015.

23.

Varghese

Gupta

Baran

et al . Alkyl-substituted polyaminohydroxamic acids: a novel class of targeted histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2005;48:6350–6365. doi:10.1021/jm0505009.

24.

Varghese

Senanayake

Murray-Stewart

et al . Polyaminohydroxamic acids and polyaminobenzamides as isoform selective histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2008;51:2447–2456. doi:10.1021/jm701384x.

25.

Huang

Greene

Murray Stewart

et al . Inhibition of lysine-specific demethylase 1 by polyamine analogues results in reexpression of aberrantly silenced genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:8023–8028. doi:10.1073/pnas.0700720104.

26.

Zhang

Ding

Holmfeldt

et al . The genetic basis of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nature. 2012;481:157–163. doi:10.1038/nature10725.

27.

Arber

Orazi

Hasserjian

et al . The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391–2405. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544.

28.

Coustan-Smith

Mullighan

Onciu

et al . Early T-cell precursor leukaemia: a subtype of very high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:147–156. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70314-0.

29.

Alhosin

Omran

Zamzami

et al . Signalling pathways in UHRF1-dependent regulation of tumor suppressor genes in cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2016;35:174. doi:10.1186/s13046-016-0453-5.

30.

Alhosin

Abusnina

Achour

et al . Induction of apoptosis by thymoquinone in lymphoblastic leukemia Jurkat cells is mediated by a p73-dependent pathway which targets the epigenetic integrator UHRF1. Biochem Pharmacol. 2010;79:1251–1260. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2009.12.015.

31.

Razvi

Choudhry

Moselhy

et al . Synthesis, screening and pro-apoptotic activity of novel acyl spermidine derivatives on human cancer cell lines. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;93:190–201. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2017.06.019.

32.

Starkey

Lei

et al . Inhibition of Hedgehog-signaling driven genes in prostate cancer cells by Sutherlandia frutescens extract. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0145507. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145507.

33.

Kuleshov

Jones

Rouillard

et al . Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W90–W97. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw377.

34.

Chen

Tan

Kou

et al . Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:128. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-128.

35.

Huang

Sherman

Lempicki

RA.

Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:44–57. doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.211.

36.

Dennis

Sherman

Hosack

et al . DAVID: database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery. Genome Biol. 2003;4:R60. doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-9-r60.

37.

Metsalu

Vilo

ClustVis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using principal component analysis and heatmap. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:W566–W570. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv468.

38.

Warde-Farley

Donaldson

Comes

et al . The GeneMANIA prediction server: biological network integration for gene prioritization and predicting gene function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:W214–W220. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq537.

39.

Djouhri-Bouktab

Rolain

Brunel

JM.

Mini-review: polyamines metabolism, toxicity and potent therapeutical use. Anti-infect Agent. 2014;12:95–103. doi:10.2174/22113525113119990118.

40.

Gerner

Meyskens

FL.

Polyamines and cancer: old molecules, new understanding. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:781–792. doi:10.1038/nrc1454.

41.

Feuerstein

Williams

Basu

Marton

LJ.

Implications and concepts of polyamine-nucleic acid interactions. J Cell Biochem. 1991;46:37–47. doi:10.1002/jcb.240460107.

42.

Esteller

Cancer epigenomics: DNA methylomes and histone-modification maps. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8:286–298. doi:10.1038/nrg2005.

43.

Yang

C-S

Chuang

H-C

et al . FBW2 targets GCMa to the ubiquitin-proteasome degradation system. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:10083–10090. doi:10.1074/jbc.M413986200.

44.

Oberst

Rossi

Salomoni

et al . Regulation of the p73 protein stability and degradation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;331:707–712. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.158.

45.

Nowotarski

Woster

Casero

RA.

Polyamines and cancer: implications for chemotherapy and chemoprevention. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2013;15:e3. doi:10.1017/erm.2013.3.

46.

Johnstone

RW.

Histone-deacetylase inhibitors: novel drugs for the treatment of cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002;1:287–299. doi:10.1038/nrd772.

47.

Senanayake

MDT

Amunugama

Boncher

Casero

Woster

. Design of polyamine-based therapeutic agents: new targets and new directions. Essays Biochem. 2009;46:77–94. doi:10.1042/bse0460006.

48.

Sabatino

Fucci

Pancione

et al . UHRF1 coordinates peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARG) epigenetic silencing and mediates colorectal cancer progression. Oncogene. 2012;31:5061–5072. doi:10.1038/onc.2012.3.

49.

Zhang

Huang

Zhu

et al . Upregulated UHRF1 promotes bladder cancer cell invasion by epigenetic silencing of KiSS1. PL0S ONE. 2014;9:e104252. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104252.

50.

Ashraf

Ibrahim

Alhosin

et al . The epigenetic integrator UHRF1: on the road to become a universal biomarker for cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:51946–51962. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.17393.

51.

Ryan

Headlee

Acharya

et al . Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of MS-275, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with advanced and refractory solid tumors or lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3912–3922. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.02.188.

52.

Tabe

Jin

Contractor

et al . Novel role of HDAC inhibitors in AML1/ETO AML cells: activation of apoptosis and phagocytosis through induction of annexin A1. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:1443–1456. doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4402139.

53.

Buitenhuis

Coffer

Koenderman

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5). Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36:2120–2124. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2003.11.008.

54.

Fukuda

Apoptosis-associated cleavage of beta-catenin in human colon cancer and rat hepatoma cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1999;31:519–529. doi:10.1016/s1357-2725(98)00119-8.

55.

Tsutsui

Moriyama

Arima

Ohtsubo

Tanaka

Ozawa

Expression of cadherin-catenin complexes in human leukemia cell lines. J Biochem. 1996;120:1034–1039. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=8982873.

56.

Hwang

S-G

Lee

Trepel

Jeon

BH.

Anticancer drugs-induced apoptotic cell death in leukemia cells is associated with proteolysis of β-catenin. Leuk Res. 2002;26:863–871. https://www.nature.com/articles/leu2012221.

57.

Herren

Levkau

Raines

Ross

Cleavage of beta-catenin and plakoglobin and shedding of VE-cadherin during endothelial apoptosis: evidence for a role for caspases and metalloproteinases. Mol Biol Cell. 1998;9:1589–1601.

58.

Willert

Shibamoto

Nusse

Wnt-induced dephosphorylation of axin releases beta-catenin from the axin complex. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1768–1773.

Identification of Deregulated Signaling Pathways in Jurkat Cells in Response to a Novel Acylspermidine Analogue-N 4 -Erucoyl Spermidine

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Material Methods

Cell culture and treatment

RNA-Seq and differentially expressed genes analysis

Bioinformatics analysis

Statistical analysis

Results

N4-Eru-modulated gene expression

Gene enrichment analysis of transcripts

KEGG/Biocarta pathway analysis

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Funding:

Declaration of conflicting interests:

Author Contributions

References

N⁴-Eru-modulated gene expression