Modern technology requires producing of a sustainable product with a high surface accuracy. In applications where the surface quality is highly considerable in various internal cylindrical components requires technology to manufacture an ultrafine surface finish. There is, in general, a probability of inducing errors into products by the traditional finishing processes (such as grinding/honing), which lead to failure. Preferably with some evidence in the main text. Further, the advanced finishing processes are developed, where the finishing forces can be controlled by varying the power output. Instead of a solid abrasive tool, the smart polishing fluid is used, which gets activated under the magnetic fields. In this manuscript, the material removal under different internal surface finishing processes is elaborated, which helps in improving the surface quality of various industrial components. Also, the surface quality produced on various industrial components after traditional as well as advanced finishing processes are discussed.
JainVK.Magnetic field assisted abrasive based micro-/nano-finishing. J Mater Process Tech2009; 209: 6022–6038.
2.
BediTS, and SinghAK.Magnetorheological finishing of blind-hole type surface of moulding machine. Mater Manuf Process 2018; 33(11): 1169–1176.
3.
BediTS, and SinghAK.Development of magnetorheological fluid-based process for finishing of ferromagnetic cylindrical workpiece. Mach Sci Technol 2018; 22(1): 120–146.
4.
HoshinoT, KurataY, and TerasakiY, et al.Mechanism of polishing of SiO2 film by CeO2 particles. J Non-Cryst Solids2001; 283: 129–136.
5.
BediTS, and SinghAK.Parametric study of a newly developed magnetorheological honing process. Adv Untraditional Mach Compos2020; 31: 483–491.
6.
KansalH, SinghAK, and GroverV.Magnetorheological nano-finishing of diamagnetic materials using permanent magnets tool. Precis Eng2018; 51: 30–39.
7.
YadavRD, and SinghAK.A novel magnetorheological gear profile finishing with high surface accuracy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2019; 139: 75–92.
8.
NadolnyK.Micro-discontinuities of the grinding wheel and their effects on its durability during internal cylindrical grinding. Mach Sci Technol 2013; 17(1): 74–92.
9.
GroverV and SinghAK.Modelling of surface roughness in a new magnetorheological honing process for internal finishing of cylindrical workpiece. Int J Mech Sci2018; 144: 679–695.
10.
SinghM and SinghAK.Performance investigation of magnetoreological finishing of rolls surface in cold rolling process. J Manuf Process2019; 41: 315–329.
11.
OczosKE, and DziochTS.Internal spherical surface grinding. Wear 1989; 133(2): 281–294.
12.
KimES, KinSN, and LeeYZ.The effect of plateau honing on friction and wear of cylinder liner. Wear2018; 400: 207–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2017.09.028.
13.
GrabonW, PawlusP, and WosS, et al.Effect of honed cylinder liner surface texture on tribological properties of piston ring-liner assembly in short time tests. Tribol Int2017; 113: 137–148.
14.
GaoS, YangC, and XuJ, et al.Modelling and simulation of bore diameter evolution in finish honing. Procedia Manuf2018; 26: 462–468.
15.
DimkovskiZ, AnderbergC, and OhlssonR, et al.Characterisation of worn cylinder liner surface by segmentation of honing and wear scratches. Wear2011; 271: 548–552.
16.
LawrenceKD, and RamamoorthyB.An accurate and robust process for the honing angle evaluation of cylinder liner surface using machine vision. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2011; 55: 611–621.
17.
BediTS, and SinghAK.Magnetorheological processes for nanofinishing—a review. Part Sci Technol2016; 34: 412–422.
18.
YeZ, ZhangC, and WangY, et al.An experimental investigation of piston skirt scuffing: a piston scuffing apparatus, experiments, and scuffing mechanism analyses. Wear2004; 257: 8–31.
19.
GuptePS, WangY, and MillerW, et al.A study of torn and folded metal (TFM) on honed cylinder bore surfaces. Tribol Trans2008; 51: 784–789.
20.
El-HeliebySOA, and RoweGW.Grinding cracks and microstructural changes in ground steel surfaces. Metals Technol2013; 8: 58–66.
21.
DenkenaB, OrtmaierT, and AhrensM, et al.Monitoring of grinding wheel defects using recursive estimation. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2014; 75: 1005–1015.
22.
AlamZ and JhaS.Modeling of surface roughness in ball end magnetorheological finishing (BEMRF) process. Wear 2017; 374–375: 54–62.
23.
MaanSSinghG and SinghAK.Nano-surface-finishing of permanent mold punch using magnetorheological fluid-based finishing processes. Mater Manuf Process 2017; 32(9): 1004–1010.
24.
IqbalF and JhaS.Experimental investigation into transient roughness reduction in ball-end magneto-rheological finishing process. Mater Manuf Process2019; 34(2): 224–231.
25.
UhlmannEDoitsM and SchmiedelC.Development of a material model for visco-elastic abrasive medium in abrasive flow machining. Procedia CIRP2013; 8: 351–356.
26.
RhoadesLJ.Abrasive flow machining: A case study. J Mater Process Tech1991; 28: 107–116.
27.
GoranaVK, JainVK., and LalGK.Experimental investigation into cutting forces and active grain density during abrasive flow machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2004; 44: 201–211.
GoranaVK, JainVK, and LalGK.Forces prediction during material deformation in abrasive flow machining. Wear2006; 260: 128–139.
30.
KumarSS, and HiremathSS.A review on abrasive flow machining (AFM). Procedia Tech2016; 25: 1297–1304.
31.
SambhariaJK, MaliHS, and GargV.Experimental investigation on unidirectional abrasive flow machining of trim die workpiece. Mater Manuf Process 2018; 33(6): 651–660.
32.
RhoadesLJ and KohutTA.Reversible unidirectional AFM. Patent 5,070,652, US, 1991.
33.
GilmoreJR, and RhoadesLJ.Abrasive polishing process, apparatus and composition. Patent 6,273,787, 2001.
34.
WilliamsRE, FC89-806Rajurkar KP. Performance characteristics of abrasive flow machining. SME paper, DearbornMI, and 898–906USA1989.
35.
SankarMR, JainVK, and RamkumarJ.Abrasive flow machining (AFM): an overview. Indo–US Workshop on Smart Machine Tools, Intelligent Machining Systems and Multi-scale Manufacturing, 2008.
36.
LovelessTR, WilliamsRE, and RajurkarKP.A study of the effects of abrasive-flow finishing on various machined surfaces. J Mater Process Tech1994; 47: 133–151.
37.
JainVK, and AdsulSG.Experimental investigation into abrasive flow machining (AFM). Int J Mach Tools Manuf2000; 40: 1003–1021.
38.
WaliaRS, ShanHS, and KumarP.Morphology and integrity of surfaces finished by centrifugal force assisted abrasive flow machining. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2008; 39: 1171–1179.
39.
KendaJ, PusavecF, and KermoucheG, et al.Surface integrity in abrasive flow machining of hardened tool steel AISI D2. Procedia Eng2012; 19: 172–177.
40.
SankarMR, JainVK, and RamkumarJ.Rotational abrasive flow finishing (R-AFF) process and its effects on finished surface topography. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2010; 50: 637–650.
41.
SankarMR, JainVK, and RamkumarJ. (2016) Nano-finishing of cylindrical hard steel tubes using rotational abrasive flow finishing (R-AFF) process Int J Adv Manuf Tech2016; 85: 2179–2187.
42.
KimJD, and KimKD.Deburring of burrs in spring collets by abrasive flow machining. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 2004; 24(7–8): 469–473.
43.
AzamiA, AziziA and KhoshanjamA.Nanofinishing of stainless steel tubes using rotational abrasive finishing (RAF) process. J Manuf Process2018; 34: 281–291.
44.
WangAC, and WengSH.Developing the polymer abrasive gels in AFM processes. J Mater Process Tech2007; 192–193: 486–490.
ShinmuraT, TakazawaK, and HatanoE, et al.Study on magnetic abrasive process–process principle and finishing possibility. Bull Japan Soc Precis Eng1985; 19(1): 54–55.
47.
ShinmuraT, TakazawaK, and HatanoE, et al.Study on magnetic abrasive finishing. CIRP Ann1990; 39(1): 325–328.
48.
YamaguchiH, ShinmuraT and IkedaR.Study of internal finishing of austenite stainless steel capillary tubes by magnetic abrasive finishing. J Manuf Sci Eng2007; 129: 885–892.
49.
YamaguchiH, ShinmuraT and KobayashiA.Development of an internal magnetic abrasive finishing process for non-ferromagnetic complex shaped tubes. JSME Int J C, Mech Sys, Mech Elem Manuf2001; 44: 275–281.
50.
KangJ and YamaguchiH.Internal finishing of capillary tubes by magnetic abrasive finishing using a multiple pole-tip system. Precis Eng2012; 36: 510–516.
51.
YuZ, HanB, and ChenS, et al.Study on the inner surface finishing of irregular spatial elbow pipe by the centerline reconstruction. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2017; 93: 3085–3093.
52.
RabinowJ.The magnetic fluid clutch. Trans AIEE1948; 67(2):1308–1315.
53.
SinghG, SinghAK, and GargP.Development of magnetorheological finishing process for external cylindrical surfaces. Mater Manuf Process2017; 32(5): 581–588.
54.
KordonskiWI and JacobsS.Magnetorheological finishing. Int J Mod Phys B1996; 10(23–24): 2837–2848.
JacobsSD, KordonskiW, and ProkhorovIV, et al.Deterministic magnetorheological finishing. EP Patent 0,858,381, 2002.
57.
SinghAK, JhaS and PandeyPM.Mechanism of material removal in ball end magnetorheological finishing process. Wear2013; 302(1–2): 1180–1191.
58.
JhaS and JainVK.Rheological characterization of magnetorheological polishing fluid for MRAFF. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2009; 42(7–8): 656–668.
59.
SidparaA, DasM and JainVK.Rheological characterization of magnetorheological finishing fluid. Mater Manuf Process2009; 24(12): 1467–1478.
60.
SaraswathammaK, JhaS and RaoPV.Rheological characterization of MR polishing fluid used for silicon polishing in BEMRF process. Mater Manuf Process 2015; 30(5): 661–668.
61.
JhaS and JainVK.Design and development of magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2004; 44(10): 1019–1029.
62.
JhaS and JainVK.Parametric analysis of magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing process. J Manuf Technol Manag2008; 13: 308–323.
63.
JhaS and JainVK.Modeling and simulation of surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Wear2006; 261: 856–866.
64.
PaswanSK, BediTS, and SinghAK.Modeling and simulation of surface roughness in magnetorheological fluid based honing process. Wear2017; 376–377: 1207–1221.
65.
JhaS, JainVK, and KomanduriR.Effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2007; 33: 725–729.
66.
DasM, JainVK, and GhoshdastidarPS.The out-of-roundness of the internal surfaces of stainless steel tubes finished by the rotational–magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing process. Mater Manuf Process2011; 26(8): 1073–1084.
67.
DasM, JainVK, and GhoshdastidarPS.Nanofinishing of flat workpieces using rotational–magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (R-MRAFF) process. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2012; 62: 405–420.
68.
VermaGC, KalaP and PandeyPM.Experimental investigations into internal magnetic abrasive finishing of pipes. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2017; 88: 1657–1668.
69.
BediTS, and SinghAK.A new magnetorheological finishing process for ferromagnetic cylindrical honed surfaces. Mater Manuf Process2017; 33(11): 1141–1149.
70.
GroverV and SinghAK.A novel magnetorheological honing process for nano-finishing of variable cylindrical internal surfaces. Mater Manuf Process2017; 32(5): 573–580.
71.
GroverV and SinghAK.Analysis of particles in magnetorheological polishing fluid for finishing of ferromagnetic cylindrical workpiece. Part Sci Technol2018; 36(7): 799–807.
72.
GroverV and SinghAK.Improved magnetorheological honing process for nanofinishing of variable cylindrical internal surfaces. Mater Manuf Process2017; 33(11): 1177–1187.
73.
PaswanSK, and SinghAK.Analysis of surface finishing mechanism in a newly developed rotational magnetorheological honing process for its productivity improvement. Wear2019; 426–427: 68–82.
74.
BediTS, and SinghAK.Magnetorheological finishing on injection barrel type surface of moulding machine. In: 39th International MATADOR Conference, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom, 7–9 July 2017, paper no. 0021 (Accepted).
