Implementation of Modified Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in a youth psychiatric partial hospital program

Abstract

Objective

Seclusion and restraint are procedures utilized in youth psychiatric settings. While a number of agencies have called for a reduction and ultimate elimination of the use of these practices, there has been limited research on behavioral programs to reduce seclusion/restraint. This is particularly true for research on behavioral programming in youth psychiatric partial hospital settings. As such, the current study sought to examine the effectiveness of a modified version of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (M-PBIS) implemented on a youth psychiatric partial hospital service to reduce seclusion/restraint.

Method

This naturalistic, prospective study covered a 26-month period and utilized a pre–post design. M-PBIS features include a defined set of positive behavioral expectations, a system to teach behavioral expectations, reinforcement of appropriate behaviors, data collection/evidence-based decision making, individual support for those not responding to the unit-wide system, active support by all stakeholders (including all staff members agreeing to the program), and positive recognition among staff.

Results

With a sample of 442 admissions, there were meaningful reductions in the percent of patients who were in seclusion/restraint (from 47.6 to 6.7%) as well as the overall seclusion/restraint rate (from 3.56 (SD = 1.94) to 0.48 (SD = 0.64)). Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in the use of Pro Re Nata (PRN) medication for agitation/aggression (percent of patient who received a PRN decreased from 33.3 to 12.9%).

Conclusions

This naturalistic study suggests that M-PBIS is a promising intervention for use in youth psychiatric partial hospital services to reduce seclusion/restraint and PRN medication for agitation/aggression. Reduction and ultimate elimination of seclusion/restraint is a critical objective in improving the quality and safety of acute mental health services for youth.

Keywords

Seclusion restraint youth psychiatric positive behavior

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Health Care Financing Administration. Hospital condition of participation. Federal Register Doc 99-16543. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1999.

LeBel

Stromberg

Duckworth

et al . Child and adolescent inpatient restraint reduction: a state initiative to promote strength-based care. JAm Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004; 43: 37–45.

Goren

Abraham

Doyle

Reducing violence in a child psychiatric hospital through planned organizational change. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs 1996; 9: 27–36.

Nunno

Holden

Tollar

Learning from tragedy: a survey of child and adolescent restraint fatalities. Child Abuse Neglect 2006; 30: 1333–1342.

Murray

Sefchik

Regulating behavior management practices in residential treatment facilities. Child Youth Serv Rev 1992; 14: 519–539.

Senator TH, Congressman GM, and Congressman GH. Keeping All Students Safe Act, sec. 2, S.2020, U.S. Senate, 16 December, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112s2020is/pdf/BILLS-112s2020is.pdf (2011, accessed 10 September 2014).

Duncan

Letter from Education Secretary Arne Duncan to Chairman Christopher J. Dodd, Chairman George Miller, and Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers, 8 December, http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/secletter/091211.html (2009, accessed 2 October 2014).

Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Comprehensive accreditation manual for hospitals: the official handbook. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission Resources, 2000.

American Psychiatric Nurses Association. APNA position on the use of seclusion and restraint, http://www.apna.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3728 (2014, accessed 8 July 2014).

10.

Curie

SAMHSA’s commitment to eliminating the use of seclusion and restraint. Psychiatr Serv 2005; 56: 1139–1140.

11.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Promoting alternatives to the use of seclusion and restraint – issue brief # 4: making the business case. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2010.

12.

Masters

Bellonci

C and

The Work Group on Quality Issues. Practice parameter for the prevention and management of aggressive behavior in child and adolescent psychiatric institutions, with special reference to seclusion and restraint. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002; 41: 4S–25S.

13.

Frueh

Knapp

Cusack

et al . Patients’ reports of traumatic or harmful experiences within the psychiatric setting. Psychiatr Serv 2005; 56: 1123–1133.

14.

Donovan

Plant

Peller

et al . Two-year trends in the use of seclusion and restraint among psychiatrically hospitalized youths. Psychiatr Serv 2003; 54: 987–993.

15.

Martin

Krieg

Esposito

et al . Reduction of restraint and seclusion through collaborative problem solving: a five-year prospective inpatient study. Psychiatr Serv 2008; 59: 1406–1412.

16.

Delaney

Fogg

Patient characteristics and setting variables related to restraint use on four inpatient psychiatric units. Psychiatr Serv 2005; 56: 186–192.

17.

Huckshorn

KA.

A snapshot of six core strategies for the reduction of seclusion and restraint, 2006. http://www.nasmhpd.org/docs/NCTIC/Consolidated_Six_Core_Strategies_Document.pdf (accessed 8 August 2014).

18.

Reynolds

Grados

Praglowski

et al . Use of Modified Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in a psychiatric inpatient unit for high-risk youths. Psychiatr Serv 2016; 67: 570–573.

19.

Bradshaw

Koth

Bevans

et al . The impact of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) on the Organizational Health of Elementary Schools. Sch Psychol Q 2008; 23: 462–473.

20.

LeBel

Regulatory change: a pathway to eliminating seclusion and restraint or “regulatory scotoma”?

Psychiatr Serv 2008; 59: 194–196.

21.

Antoinette

Iyengar

Puig-Antich

Is locked seclusion necessary for children under the age of 14?

Am J Psychiatry 1990; 147: 1283–1289.