Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The Communication and Optimal Resolution toolkit contains implementation guidance for communication and resolution programs that are comprehensive, principled, and systematic approaches to the prevention and response to patient harm that includes the open and honest communication of inappropriate care to patients and families that is coupled with financial compensation and the commitment to future prevention. The toolkit was released by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in May 2016. The authors describe their experiences with implementing communication and resolution programs with all of the components of Communication and Optimal Resolution and other communication and resolution program best practices in over 200 hospitals. Lessons learned include the ability to predict and discover actual barriers to full implementation and strategies for overcoming them are shared. Future considerations for further dissemination and spread are discussed.

Keywords

Clinical risk communicating risk dispute resolution healthcare law and ethics medicolegal issues safe practice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kraman

SS and

Hamm

Risk management: extreme honesty may be the best policy. Ann Intern Med 1999; 131: 963–967.

Kachalia

Kaufman

Boothman

et al . Liability claims and costs before and after implementation of a medical error disclosure program. Ann Intern Med 153: 213–221.

McDonald

Helmchen

Smith

et al . Responding to patient safety incidents: the “seven pillars.” Qual Saf Health Care 19: e11.

Lambert

Centomani

Smith

et al . The “seven pillars” response to patient safety incidents: effects on medical liability processes and outcomes. Health Serv Res 2016; 51: 2491–2515.

Mello

Kachalia

Roche

et al . Outcomes in two Massachusetts Hospital Systems give reason for optimism about communication-and-resolution programs. Health Aff 2017; 36: 1795–1803.

AHRQ, https://archive.ahrq.gov/news/newsroom/press-releases/2010/hhsliabaw.html (2010, accessed 1 February 2018).

AHRQ, https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/candor/introduction.html (accessed 1 February 2018).

Mazor

Simon

SR and

Gurwitz

JH.

Communicating with patients about medical errors: a review of the literature. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 1690–1697.

Gallagher

Waterman

Ebers

et al . Patients’ and physicians’ attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. JAMA 2003; 289: 1001–1007.

10.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services PfPC, https://partnershipforpatients.cms.gov/about-the-partnership/what-is-the-partnership-about/lpwhat-the-partnership-is-about.html (accessed 1 February 2018).

11.

Bodenheimer

T and

Sinsky

From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med 2014; 12: 573–576.

12.

AHRQ. CANDOR Toolkit, www.ahrq.gov/candor (accessed 12 February 2018).

13.

Marx

Patient safety and the “just culture”: a primer for health care executives. New York: Columbia University, 2001.

14.

National Quality Forum. Safe practices for better healthcare – 2009 update: a consensus report. Washington, DC: National Quality Forum, 2009.

15.

Gibson

R and

Singh

JP.

Wall of silence: the untold story of the medical mistakes that kill and injure millions of Americans. Washington, DC: Lifeline Press, 2003.

16.

Makary

MA.

Unaccountable: what hospitals won’t tell you and how transparency can revolutionize health care. New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2012.

17.

Kellogg

Hettinger

Shah

et al . Our current approach to root cause analysis: is it contributing to our failure to improve patient safety? BMJ Qual Saf 2017; 26: 381–387.

18.

AHRQ. Major insurance company offers discount to customers adopting AHRQ-styled product, https://www.ahrq.gov/news/newsroom/case-studies/201713.html (accessed 1 February 2018).

19.

MACRMI, http://www.macrmi.info/#sthash.RZjpLbYZ.dpbs (accessed 1 February 2018).

20.

Bell

Smulowitz

Woodward

et al . Disclosure, apology, and offer programs: stakeholders’ views of barriers to and strategies for broad implementation. Milbank Q 2012; 90: 682–705.

21.

Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 231, Sections 60L and 79K.

Implementing communication and resolution programs: Lessons learned from the first 200 hospitals

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References