Subaltern lives have been violently displaced from a large slum to make way for a central business district in Metro Manila in the Philippines and forcibly relocated to an overlooked peri-urban resettlement. Through this article, I offer a counter-overlooking, marking the centrality of subaltern disposability, depletions and resistances and of unliveable remote resettlements in the co-constitution of the gentrification of in-city and peri-urban spaces. This counter-overlooking is necessary to better understand the dynamics of elite accumulation in peripheries and subaltern homes. I gathered accounts of survival, difficulties and resistances from 18 evicted slum dwellers using storytelling and building on years of engaged ethnography. Gentrification displaces slum dwellers from high-value urban spaces, increases government revenues and decreases social service provision. The peri-urban spaces with mandated socialised housing absorb the displaced and subprime housing capital, fuelling urban expansion, but contend with urban ills, increasing unemployment and the need for social services. Remote resettlements extract subaltern lives and break up families and communities. The evictees’ capacity to survive, care for and from the family and community, and renew themselves is slowly depleted. This depletion is resisted through gendered community care work and ‘countermobility’, where evictees precariously return to the city to reunite family, habitation and livelihood. The very surplus subalterns that are disposed of from capital cities, thus, become one of the driving forces of city-making in overlooked peri-urban spaces.
AguileraA. (2017). Failed markets: The crisis in the private production of social housing in Mexico. Latin American Perspectives, 44(2), 38–51. https://doi.10.1177/0094582X16682782.
2.
ArcillaC. (2018). Producing empty socialized housing: Privatizing gains, socializing costs, and dispossessing the Filipino poor. Social Transformation: Journal of the Global South, 6(1),77–105.
3.
ArcillaC. (2019). Ethics and personal politics in engaged ethnography of urban subalternity. Aghamtao, 27(1), 57–87.
4.
ArcillaC. (2022). Disrupting gentrification: From barricades and housing occupations to an insurgent urban subaltern history in a southern city. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography, 55(5), 1321–1344. https://doi.1111/anti.12827
5.
ArcillaC. (2023). Ensuring the affordability of socialized housing: Towards livable and sustainable homes for the poor: Ensuring the affordability of socialized housing. In TademT. & AtienzaM. E. (Eds.), A better metro Manila? Towards responsible local governance, decentralization and equitable development (pp. 259–289). Palgrave McMillan. https://doi.10.1007/978-981-19-7804-3
6.
Ayala Land, Incorporated (ALI). (2009). Development and disposition of the 30-hectare north triangle property, Diliman, Quezon City: Financial proposal.
7.
BaetenG., WestinS., PullE., & MolinaI. (2017). Pressure and violence: Housing renovation and displacement in Sweden. Environment and Planning A, 49, 631–651.
8.
BallesterosM., & LlantoG. (2015). Social inclusion and housing: Evidence from the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. http://www.adb-asianthinktanks.org/sites/all/libraries/2015-researchpapers/PHI_PIDS_Marife%20Ballesteros_Social%20Inclusion%20and%20Housing.pdf
9.
BaroyN. G., & WuJ. (2023). Post-disaster recovery and bargaining with patriarchy: A case study from Macapaya, Philippines. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 94. https://doi.10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103833
10.
BhattacharyaT. (2015). How not to skip class: Social reproduction of labor and the global working class. Viewpoint Magazine 5. https://viewpointmag.com/2015/10/31/how-not-toskip-class-social-reproduction-of-labor-and-the-global-working-class/
CamusM. (2013). Ayala Land breaks ground in Quezon City project. Inquirer.Net. https://Inquirer.net/151165/ayala-land-breaks-ground-quezon-city-project
13.
ChoiN. (2014). Metro Manila through the gentrification lens: Disparities in urban planning and displacement risks. Urban Studies, 53(3), 577–592.
14.
CrawfordB., & SainsburyP. (2017). Opportunity or loss? Health impacts of estate renewal and the relocation of public housing residents. Urban Policy and Research, 35, 137–149.
15.
DesmondM. (2012). Eviction and the reproduction of urban poverty. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 88–133.
16.
DoveyK., & RecioR. (2024). Inventraset assemblages: The spatial logic of informal street vending, transport and settlement. Urban Studies, 61(12), 2265–2289. https://doi.10.1177/00420980231223060
17.
Elliot-CooperA., HubbardP., & LeesL. (2020). Moving beyond Marcuse: Gentrification, displacement and the violence of un-homing. Progress in Human Geography, 44(3), 492–509.
18.
FainsteinS. (2010). The just city. Cornell University Press.
19.
FedericiS. (2006). Precarious labor: A feminist viewpoint. https://inthemiddleofthewhildwind.wordpress.com/precarious-labora-feminist-viewpoint/
20.
FergusonS. (2020). Women and work: Feminism, labour and social reproduction. Pluto Press.
21.
GidwaniV., & KumarS. (2019). Time, space, and the subaltern: The matter of labor in Delhi’s grey economy. In JazeelT. & LeggS. (Eds.), Subaltern geographies (pp. 142–166). University of Georgia Press.
22.
HarveyD. (2004). The ‘new imperialism’: Accumulation by dispossession. Socialist Register, 40, 63–87.
23.
HelbrechtI. (2017). Gentrification and displacement. In HelbrechtI. (Ed.), Gentrification and resistance: Research displacement processes and adaption strategies (pp. 1–8). Springer.
24.
HochstenbachC., & MusterdS. (2018). Gentrification and the suburbanization of poverty: Changing urban geographies through boom and bust periods. Urban Geography, 39, 26–53.
25.
KadirN. (2016). The autonomous life? Paradoxes of hierarchy and authority in the squatters movement in Amsterdam. Manchester University Press.
26.
LeesL. (2012). The geography of gentrification: Thinking through comparative urbanism. Progress of Human Geography, 36, 155–171. https://doi.10.1068/a44349
27.
LombardM. (2013). Struggling, suffering, hoping, waiting: Perceptions of temporality in two informal neighbourhoods in Mexico. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31, 813–829.
28.
MathersA., & NovelliM. (2007). Researching resistance to neoliberal globalization: Engaged ethnography as solidarity and praxis. Globalizations, 4(2), 229–249.
29.
National Anti-Poverty Commission. (2018). Welfare and amenities in resettlement areas: A valuation of results from the data generation in 26 resettlement sites.
30.
NixonR. (2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press.
31.
NugrahaE., WeselyJ., RuszczykH., de VilliersI., & ZhaoY. (2023). Overlooked cities: Shifting the gaze in research and practice in global urban studies. Cities, 133(104044), 1–4. https://doi.10.1016.j.cities.2022.104044
32.
Office of the President. (2007). Executive Order No. 620-A: Expanding the composition of the Urban Triangle Development Commission and clarifying its structure and functions, thereby amending Executive Order No. 620, series of 2007. Malacañang.
33.
OrtegaA. (2016a). Manila’s metropolitan landscape of gentrification: Global urban development, accumulation by dispossession & neoliberal warfare against informality. Geoforum, 70, 35–50. https://doi.10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.02.002
34.
OrtegaA. (2016b). Neoliberalizing spaces in the Philippines: Suburbanization, transnational migration, and dispossession. Lexington Books.
35.
ParnellS., & RobinsonJ. (2012). (Re)Theorizing cities from the global South: Looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geography, 33(4), 593–617. https://doi.10.2747/0272-3638.33.4.593
36.
Philippine Statistics Authority. (2020). Highlights of the Philippine population 2020 census of population and housing. https://psa.gov.ph/content/highlights-philippine-population-2020-census-population-and-housing-2020-cph
37.
PiazzaG. (2018). Squatting social centres in a Sicilian City: Liberated spaces and urban protest actors. Antipode, 50(2), 498–522.
38.
PorteousD., & SmithS. (2001). Domicide: The global destruction of home. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
39.
Quetulio-NavarraM., NiehofA., van der VaartW., Van der HorstH., & SuliyantoS. (2012). The disruption and rebuilding of social capital in involuntary resettlement in the Philippines and Indonesia. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 4(3).
40.
Quezon City Government. (2010). Comprehensive land use plan of Quezon city, 2011–2030.
41.
Quezon City Government. (2011). Shelter plan. City Planning and Development Office.
42.
Rizal Provincial Government. (1993). Comprehensive land use plan of Rizal, 1993–2002.
43.
Rodriguez Municipal Government. (2011). Executive–Legislative agenda, 2011–2013.
44.
Rodriguez Municipal Government. (2012). Comprehensive land use plan of Rodriquez, 2012–2022.
45.
RoyA. (2005). Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147–158.
46.
RoyA. (2010). Poverty capital: Microfinance and the making of development. Routledge.
47.
RoyA. (2011). Slumdog cities: Rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35, 223–238.
48.
SassenS. (2014). Expulsions: Brutality and complexity in the global economy. Harvard University Press.
49.
SekiK. (2010). Governing through exclusion: The unmaking of ‘citizen’ and ‘community’ through neoliberal urban development in Metro Manila, Philippines. Japanese Review of Cultural Anthropology, 1(1), 67–101.
50.
SimoneA. (2010). City life from Dakar to Jakarta. Routledge.
51.
SlettoB., & NygrenA. (2016). Unsettling neoliberal rationalities: Engaged ethnography and the meanings of responsibility in the Dominican Republic and Mexico. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(5), 965–83.
52.
SmithN. (2002). New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode, 34, 427–450.
53.
SoederbergS. (2015). Subprime housing goes South: Constructing securitized mortgages for the poor in Mexico. Antipode, 47(2), 481–499.
54.
TanyagM. (2018). Resilience, female altruism, and bodily autonomy: Disaster-induced displacement in post-Haiyan Philippines. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 43(3).
55.
UN-HABITAT. (2011). Losing your home: Assessing the impacts of eviction. https://hrbaportal.org/wp-content/files/Losing-your-Home-Assessing-the-impact-of-eviction-UN-Habitat-OHCHR.pdf
56.
Urban Triangle Development Commission. (2010). Comprehensive master plan for the Quezon city central business district: Main report. Office of the President.
57.
VasudevanA. (2017). The autonomous city: A history of urban squatting. Verso.
58.
Wikimedia Commons. (n.d.) Map of Metro Manila showing the location of Quezon City. Retrieved from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ph_locator_ncr_quezoncity.png
59.
ZhangY. (2018). Domicide, social suffering and symbolic violence in contemporary Shanghai, China. Urban Geography, 39(2), 190–213.
