Achieving net zero emissions by 2050, as envisioned in the Paris Agreement, will require radical changes to urban form and function. Securing the necessary commitments and resources will be easier in the presence of a compelling economic case for mitigation. Focusing on Recife in Brazil, this article evaluates a wide range of low-carbon measures under different discount rates and energy prices. It finds that under less favourable conditions (high discount rates, constant energy prices), the city could reduce its emissions by 15 per cent, relative to business-as-usual (BAU) trends, through investment which would generate returns at market interest rates. Under more favourable conditions (low discount rates, increasing energy prices), the city could reduce emissions by 25 per cent with market-rate returns. That these opportunities have not been exploited indicates that barriers to low-carbon investment, including poor provision of information, transaction costs and capacity deficits may be of greater importance than the scale of direct incentives for raising climate investment. Decision makers therefore need to prioritise the dismantling of these obstacles to low-carbon investment and fostering of norms of environmental citizenship within cities.
AcutoM. (2013). City leadership in global governance. Global Governance, 19(3), 481–498.
2.
AldyJ. E. & StavinsR. N. (2012). Using the market to address climate change: Insights from theory and experience. Daedalus, 141(2), 45–60. doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00145
3.
AnguelovskiI. & CarminJ. A. (2011). Something borrowed, everything new: Innovation and institutionalization in urban climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3(3), 169–175.
4.
ArrowK. J.CropperM.GollierC.GroomB.HealG. M.NewellR. G., . (2013). How should benefits and costs be discounted in an intergenerational context? The views of an expert panel. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper No. 12–53. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2199511
5.
BajželjB.AllwoodJ. M. & CullenJ. M. (2013). Designing climate change mitigation plans that add up. Environmental Science and Technology, 47(14), 8062–8069.
6.
BassettE. & ShandasV. (2010). Innovation and climate action planning: Perspectives from municipal plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(4), 435–450.
7.
BerkhoutF. (2012). Adaptation to climate change by organizations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(1), 91–106. doi:10.1002/wcc.154
8.
BolderdijkJ. W.StegL.GellerE. S.LehmanP. K. & PostmesT. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature Climate Change, 3, 413–416. doi:10.1038/nclimate1767
9.
BossuytJ. (2013). Overview of the decentralisation process in Latin America: Main achievements, trends and future challenges. European Centre for Development Policy Management. Discussion Paper No. 148. Retrieved 26June2016, from http://ww.eulacfoundation.org/sites/eulacfoundation.org/files/pdf/OVERVIEW%20OF%20THE%20DECENTRALISATION%20PROCESS%20IN%20LA.pdf
10.
BulkeleyH. & BetsillM. M. (2013). Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 136–154.
11.
Castán BrotoV. & BulkeleyH. (2013). A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 92–102.
12.
CastletonH. F.StovinV.BeckS. B. M. & DavisonJ. B. (2010). Green roofs: Building energy savings and the potential for retrofit. Energy and Buildings, 42(10), 1582–1591. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.004
13.
ColenbranderS.GouldsonA.SudmantA.H. & PapargyropoulouE. (2015). The economic case for low-carbon development in rapidly growing developing world cities: A case study of Palembang, Indonesia. Energy Policy, 80, 24–35. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.020
14.
ColenbranderS.GouldsonA.SudmantA. H.PapargyropoulouE.ChauL. W. & HoC. S. (2015). Exploring the economic case for early investment in climate change mitigation in middle-income countries: A case study of Johor Bahru, Malaysia. Climate and Development, 1(14). doi:10.1080/17565529.2015.1040367
15.
ColenbranderS.GouldsonA.RoyJ.KerrmN.SarkarS.HallS., . (2016). Can low-carbon urban development be pro-poor? The case of Kolkata, India. Environment and Urbanization. doi:10.1177/0956247816677775
16.
CraggM. I.ZhouY.GurneyK. & KahnM. E. (2013). Carbon geography: The political economy of congressional support for legislation intended to mitigation greenhouse gas production. Economic Inquiry, 51(2), 1640–1650. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00462.x
17.
CreutzigF. & HeD. (2009). Climate change mitigation and co-benefits of feasible transport demand policies in Beijing. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14, 120–131. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2008.11.007
18.
DauvergneP. (2010). The problem of consumption. Global Environmental Politics, 10(2), 1–10.
19.
DavisS. J.CaldeiraK. & MatthewsH. D. (2010). Future CO2 emissions and climate change from existing energy infrastructure. Science, 329(5997), 1330–1333.
20.
den ElzenM.FeketeH.HöhneN.AdmiraalA.ForsellN.HofA. F., . (2016). Greenhouse gas emissions from current and enhanced policies of China until 2030: Can emissions peak before 2030?Energy Policy, 89, 224–236.
21.
DimitrovR. S. (2016). The Paris Agreement on climate change: Behind closed doors. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3), 1–11.
22.
EIA. (2014). Brazil. Energy Information Agency. Retrieved 18August2014, from http://www.eia.gov/countries/cab.cfm?fips=br
23.
EPE. (2009). Balanço Energético Nacional 2009. Empresa de Pesquisa Energética, Ministério de Minas e Energia. Retrieved 12August2014, from https://ben.epe.gov.br/downloads/Relatorio_Final_BEN_2009.pdf
24.
EPE. (2011). Anuário estatístico de energia elétrica 2011. Empresa de Pesquisa Energética, Ministério de Minas e Energia. Retrieved 12August2014, from http://www.epe.gov.br/AnuarioEstatisticodeEnergiaEletrica/20111213_1.pdf
25.
EPE. (2013a). Anuário estatístico de energia elétrica 2013. Empresa de Pesquisa Energética, Ministério de Minas e Energia. Retrieved 12August2014, from http://www.epe.gov.br/AnuarioEstatisticodeEnergiaEletrica/20130909_1.pdf
26.
EPE. (2013b). Balanço Energético Nacional 2013. Empresa de Pesquisa Energética, Ministério de Minas e Energia. Retrieved 12August2014, from https://ben.epe.gov.br/downloads/Relatorio_Final_BEN_2013.pdf
FünfgeldH. (2015). Facilitating local climate change adaptation through transnational municipal networks. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 12, 67–73. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2014.10.011
29.
FuzziS.BaltenspergerU.CarslawK.DecesariS.Denier, Van Der GonH., . (2015). Particulate matter, air quality and climate: Lessons learned and future needs. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15(14), 8217–8299.
GillinghamK.RapsonD. & WagnerG. (2016). The rebound effect and energy efficiency policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(1), 68–88. doi:10.1093/reep/rev017
32.
GoulderL. H. & ParyI. W. H. (2008). Instrument choice in environmental policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 152–174.
33.
GouldsonA.KerrN.Millward-HopkinsJ.FreemanM.TopiC. & SullivanR. (2015a). Innovative financing models for low carbon transitions: Exploring the case for revolving funds. Energy Policy, 86, 739–748. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.012
34.
GouldsonA.ColenbranderS.SudmantA.McAnullaF.KerrN.SakaiP., . (2015b). Exploring the economic case for climate action in cities. Global Environmental Change, 35, 93–105. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.009
35.
GrubbM. (2014). Planetary economics: Energy, climate change and the three domains of sustainable development. New York: Earthscan.
36.
GuanD.ShanY.LiuZ. & HeK. (2016). Performance assessment and outlook of China’s emission-trading scheme. Engineering, 2(4), 398–401.
37.
GuoJ.HepburnC. J.TolR. S. J. & AnthoffD. (2006). Discounting and the social cost of carbon: A closer look at uncertainty. Environmental Science and Policy, 9(3), 205–216.
38.
HarriesT. & Penning-RowsellE. (2011). Victim pressure, institutional inertia and climate change adaptation: The case of flood risk. Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 188–197. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.002
39.
HealG. M. & MillnerA. (2014). Agreeing to disagree on climate policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(10), 3695–3698. doi:10.1073/pnas.1315987111
40.
HeiskanenE.JohnsonM.RobinsonS.VadovicsE. & SaastamoinenM. (2010). Low-carbon communities as a context for individual behavioural change. Energy Policy (Carbon Reduction at Community Scale), 38(12), 7586–7595. doi:10.106/j.enpol.2009.07.002
41.
HoornwegD. & Bhada-TataP. (2012). What a waste: A global review of solid waste management. Washington DC, USA: The World Bank. Retrieved 19August2014, from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/17388
42.
HopeC. (2008). Discount rates, equity weights and the social cost of carbon. Energy Economics, 30(3), 1011–1019.
43.
HowarthR. B.GerstM. D. & BorsukM. E. (2014). Risk mitigation and the social cost of carbon. Global Environmental Change, 24, 123–131. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.012
44.
HusseinS.El-KhattamW. & Abdel-RahmanM. (2011). Investment requirements for Africa to lead in renewable energy production and distribution. In SimelaneT. & Abdel-RahmanM. (Eds), Energy transition in Africa (pp. 123–129). South Africa: Africa Institute of South Africa.
45.
IBGE. (2014). Estimativas da População Residente no Brazil e Unidades da Federação com Data de Referência em 1 de Julho de 2014. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Rio de Janeiro. Retrieved 5May2015, from ftp://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Estimativas_de_Populacao/Estimativas_2014/estimativa_dou_2014.pdf
46.
ICLEI. (2014). Cálculos demonstrativos parciais do Inventário Municipal de Emissões de Gases de Efeito Estufa do Recife. Recife, Brazil: Local Governments for Sustainability and Recife Prefeitura da Cidade.
47.
ICLEI. (2014). Inventário de Emissões de Gases de Efeito Estufa do Recife. Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI), Urban Low Emission Development Strategies (UrbanLEDS) and the City of Recife, Recife, Brazil.
48.
IEA. (2013). World Energy Outlook 2012. Paris: International Energy Agency.
49.
IEA. (2016). World Energy Outlook 2016. Paris: International Energy Agency.
50.
IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. In PachauriR.K. & MeyerL.A. (Eds), Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 151). Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
JenkinsJ. D. (2014). Political economy constraints on carbon pricing policies: What are the implications for economic efficiency, environmental efficacy, and climate policy design?Energy Policy, 69, 467–477. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.003
53.
JunghansL. & DorschL. (2016). Finding the finance: Financing climate compatible development in cities. Bonn: Germanwatch.
54.
KesickiF. & EkinsP. (2012). Marginal abatement cost curves: A call for caution. Climate Policy, 12(2), 219–236. doi:10.1080/14693062.2011.582347
55.
LeeT. & KoskiC. (2014). Mitigating global warming in global cities: Comparing participation and climate change policies of C40 Cities. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(5), 475–492. doi:10.1080/13876988.2014.910938
56.
LitmanT. (2014). A new transit safety narrative. Journal of Public Transportation, 17(4), 121–142.
57.
LudeñaC. & NettoM. (2011). Mitigation and adaptation to climate change: Theoretical framework for the elaboration of IDB’s strategy in Brazil. Inter-American Development Bank. Technical Note No. IDB-TN-622. Retrieved 11September2015, from http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=38565716
58.
MarkandyaA.ArmstrongB. G.HalesS.ChiabaiA.CriquiP.MimaS., . (2009). Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: Low-carbon electricity generation. The Lancet, 374(9706), 2006–2015.
59.
MeahK.UlaS. & BarrettS. (2008). Solar photovoltaic water pumping: Opportunities and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(4), 1162–1175. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.020
Millward-HopkinsJ.GouldsonA.ScottK.BarrettJ. & SudmantA. (2017). Uncovering blind spots in urban carbon management: The role of consumption-based carbon accounting in Bristol, UK. Regional Environmental Change, 1–12. doi:10.1007/s10113-017-1112-x
62.
MondalM. A. H.KampL. M. & PachovaN. I. (2010). Drivers, barriers, and strategies for implementation of renewable energy technologies in rural areas in Bangladesh—An innovation system analysis. Energy Policy, 38(8), 4626–4634. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.018
63.
MoxnesE. (2014). Discounting, climate and sustainability. Ecological Economics (Methodological and Ideological Options), 102, 158–166. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.003
NordhausW. D. (2007). A review of the stern review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature, 45(3), 686–702.
66.
OECD. (2015). OECD. Stat: Greenhouse gas emissions: Total GHG per capita. Retrieved 22October2015, from https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=AIR_GHG
67.
PizerW.AdlerM.AldyJ.AnthoffD.CropperM.GillinghamK., . (2014). Using and improving the social cost of carbon. Science, 346(6214), 1189–1190. doi: 10.1126/science.1259774
68.
RamseyF. P. (1928). A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal, 38(152), 543–559.
69.
Recife.com. (2015). Recife, Brazil: city info: geography. Retrieved 7May2015, from http://www.recife.com/v/geography/
70.
RickardsL.WisemanJ. & KashimaY. (2014). Barriers to effective climate change mitigation: The case of senior government and business decision makers. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(6), 753–773. doi:10.1002/wcc.305
71.
Romero-LankaoP. (2011). Governing carbon and climate in the cities: An overview of policy and planning challenges and options. European Planning Studies, 20(1), 7–26.
72.
SandelM. (2012). What money can’t buy: The moral limits of the market. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
73.
SarkarA. & SinghJ. (2010). Financing energy efficiency in developing countries—lessons learned and remaining challenges. Energy Policy (The socio-economic transition towards a hydrogen economy—findings from European research), 38(10), 5560–5571. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05/001
74.
SatterthwaiteD. (2008). Cities’ contribution to global warming: Notes on the allocation of greenhouse gas emissions. Environment and Urbanization, 20(2), 539–549. doi:10.1177/0956247808096127
75.
SchmidtT. S. (2014). Low-carbon investment risks and de-risking. Nature Climate Change, 4, 237–239. doi:10.1038/nclimate2112
76.
SemenzaJ. C.HallD. E.WilsonD. J.BontempoB. D.SailorD. J. & GeorgeL. A. (2008). Public perception of climate change: Voluntary mitigation and barriers to behavior change. American Journal of Preventative Medicine (Climate Change and the Health of the Public), 35(5), 479–487. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.020
77.
SetoK. C.DhakalS.BigioA.BlancoH.DelgadoG. C.DewarD., . (2014). Human settlements, infrastructure and spatial planning. In EdenhoferO.Pichs-MadrugaR.SokonaY.FarahaniE.KadnerS.SeybothK.. (Eds), Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 923–1000). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
78.
SimalengaT. (2011). Human capital requirements for sustainable renewable energy production. In SimelaneT. & Abdel-RahmanM. (Eds), Energy transition in Africa (pp. 101–122). South Africa: Africa Institute of South Africa.
79.
SternN. (2006). The economics of climate change: The stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80.
SwillingM.RobinsonB.MarvinS. & HodsonM. (2013). City-level decoupling: Urban resource flows and the governance of infrastructure transitions. A report of the working group on cities of the international resource panel. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme.
81.
Ürge-VorsatzD. & Tirado HerreroS. (2012). Building synergies between climate change mitigation and energy poverty alleviation. Energy Policy, 49, 83–90. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.093
82.
van den BerghJ. C. J. M. (2011). Energy conservation more effective with rebound policy. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48(1), 43–58.
83.
van den BerghJ. C. J. M. & BotzenW. J. W. (2015). Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey. Ecological Economics, 114, 33–46. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.015
84.
Vogt-SchilbA. & HallegatteS. (2014). Marginal abatement cost curves and the optimal timing of mitigation measures. Energy Policy, 66, 645–653. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.045
85.
WangQ. & LiR. (2015). Cheaper oil: A turning point in Paris climate talk?Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52(C), 1186–1192.
86.
World Bank. (2005). Nova Gerar Landfill Rio de Janeiro. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved 27November2014, from http://www.worldbank.org/projects/P079182/nova-gerar-landfill-rio-de-janeiro?lang=en
87.
World Bank. (2017a). Brazil. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Retrieved 12February2017, from http://data.worldbank.org/country/brazil
88.
World Bank. (2017b). Urban population (% of total). Retrieved 12February2017, from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS
89.
WRI, CAIT. (2014). Climate analysis indicators tool: WRI’s climate data explorer. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Retrieved from http://cait2.wri.org
90.
Yepez-GarcíaR.JohnsonM. T. & AndrésL. A. (2010). Meeting the electricity supply/demand balance in Latin America & the Caribbean. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
