Equal share in governance of managing natural resources is one of the strategic aspects of neoliberal developmentalism. Additionally, this process of natural resource governance (NRG) considers communities as a homogeneous entity by ignoring the cultural politics of gender division to maintain the latency and equilibrium of the existing gendered order and regime. Watershed developmental project is no exceptional in this regard. The existing empirical literature shows that the gender governance (GG) issues in development projects such as watershed is disproportionate between men and women.
This article talks about GG by discussing the issues of equity, participation and ownership in NRG, and it argued that GG cannot be synonymous with gender mainstreaming. Watershed development in India has been taken to address the issues of conservation and production, but it doesn’t address the cultural politics of gendered division. Women are more inclined to be marginalized in the governance of watershed management due to the cultural politics of control and access over the ownership of the natural resource (land) which comes under the hegemonic control of their male counterparts. Women participation in watershed activities is merely for fulfilling the custom of the official quota. Considering the potential function of women participation in watershed activities, the present article seeks to explore the issues and approaches through which the participatory institutions must meet the emerging challenges. This study concludes that the role of women participation in NRG will help in the integration of various form of capital more effectively.
AdolphB., & TurtonC. (1998). Promoting equity: Communities, self-help groups and watersheds in Andhra Pradesh. Overseas Development Institute.
2.
AgarwalB. (2010). Gender and green governance: The political economy of women’s presence within and beyond community forestry. Oxford University Press.
3.
AgrawalA. (2003). Sustainable governance of common-pool resources: Context, methods, and politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 243–262.
4.
BeteilleA. (1999). Empowerment. Economic & Political Weekly, 34(10/11), 589–597.
5.
BhuktanJ. P., BielerP., GonsalvesJ., & GuenatD. (2002). People and Resource Dynamics in Mountain Watersheds of the Hindu Kush-Himalayas (PARDYP)-Phase II: external review; final report. International Centre for Mountain Development (ICIMOD).
6.
ChadhaD. K., & KapoorU. (2000). Women, water management & ethics. InWomen & water- Seminar (Vol. 1–8). Central Ground Water Board.
7.
DasP. K. (1999). Steps towards sustainable watershed development. In SrivastavaA. & ChundiJ. (Eds.), Watershed management: Key to sustainable development (pp. 38–49). Indian Social Institute.
8.
DashP. K., DashT., & KaraP. K. (2011) The role of local institutions in sustainable watershed management: lessons from India. Development in Practice, 21(2), 255–268. 10.1080/09614524.2011.543271
9.
Down to Earth. (2007, 31July. Policy Drift. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/coverage/policy-drift-6265
10.
Human Right Watch. (2001). Caste discrimination: A global concern. A report for the United Nations world conference against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, Durban, South Africa, September, 2001. Human Rights Watch, 13(3(G)).
11.
JoshiD. (2002). The rhetoric and reality of gender issues in the domestic water sector—A case study from India, [PhD thesis, University of Southampton, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science].
12.
JoshiP. K., PangareV., ShiferawB., WaniS. P., BoumaJ., & ScottC. (2004). Watershed development in India: Synthesis of past experiences and needs for future research. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59(3), 303–320.
13.
KabeerNaila (2005). gender equality and women’s empowerment: A critical analysis of the third millennium development goal. Gender and Development, 13(1), 13–24.
14.
KaleE. (2011). Social exclusion in watershed development: Evidence from the Indo-German watershed development project in Maharashtra. Law, Environment and Development Journal, 7(2), 95. http://www.lead-journal.org/content/11095.pdf
15.
KumarD., & KumarD. (2016). Dalit children dropout in schools: Need for inclusive curriculum. Contemporary Voice of Dalit, 8(2), 124–135. 10.1177/2455328X16631053
16.
LalR. (Ed.). (2000). Integrated watershed management in global ecosystem. CRC Press.
17.
FarringtonJ., & LoboC. (1997, February). Scaling up participatory watershed development in India: Lessons from the Indo-German watershed development programme (Natural Resource Perspectives Paper, No. 17). ODI.
18.
MathewH. (2007). Watershed management and women empowerment in Idukki district [PhD thesis, The Gandhigram Rural University, Tamil Nadu].
19.
MiesM., & ShivaV. (1993). Ecofeminism. Zed Books.
20.
MillerS. E., ShinnC. W., & BentleyW. R. (1995). Rural resource management-problem solving for the long term. Iowa State University Press.
21.
Ministry of Local Development. (2001). 15th Country Report submitted to UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination ( CERD), WCAR, Durban, South Africa.
22.
PadmajaR., KavithaK., PramanikS., DucheV. D., SinghY. U., WhitbreadA. M., . (2020). Gender transformative impacts from watershed interventions: Insights from a mixed-methods study in the Bundelkhand region of India. Transactions of the ASABE (TSI), 63(1), 153–163.
23.
Parthasarathy Committee. (2006). From Hariyali to Neeranchal: Report of the technical committee on watershed programmes in India. Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India.
24.
PangareV. L. (1998). Gender issues in watershed development and management in India. Agricultural Research & Extention Network, 88. DFID.
25.
PundarikanthanN. V., JayalakshmiD., & KarmegamM. (2000). Role of women in water resource management. InWomen & water–Seminar (Vol. 93–100). Central Ground Water Board.
26.
QuisumbingA. R., Meinzen-DickR., RaneyT. L., CroppenstedtA., BehrmanJ. A., & PetermanA. (2014). Gender in agriculture: Closing the knowledge gap. Springer.
27.
RajoraR. (2002). Integrated watershed management. A field manual for equitable, productive and sustainable development. Rawat Publications.
28.
RaoN. (2018). Good women do not inherit land: Politics of land and gender in India. Routledge.
29.
RaoN., & RajuS. (2020). Gendered time, seasonality, and nutrition: Insights from two Indian districts. Feminist Economics, 26(2), 95–125.
30.
RoyU. N., & IyerG. (2001). Status of Dalits in Shivalik region of Punjab: A case study of watershed development villages. Journal of Rural Development, 20(1), 99–112.
31.
RwelamiraJ. K. (1999). Effect of socio-economic and gender issues on sustainable resource management. In KaumbuthoP. G. & SimalengaT. E. (Eds), Conservation tillage with animal traction: A resourcebook of animal traction network for Eastern and Southern Africa. ATNESA Publication.
32.
SeeleyJ, BatraM. & SarinM. (2000). Women’s participation in watershed development in India [Gatekeeper Series No. 92). International Institute for Environment and Development.
33.
ShahA. C. (2002). Women, water, irrigation: Respecting women’s priorities,Economic & Political Weekly, 37(43), 4413–4420.
34.
TempletP. H. (1995). Equity and sustainability: An empirical analysis. Society and Natural Resources, 8, 509–523.
35.
TweneboahE. (2002). Women and coastal pollution in Ghana. Report presented to the African Gender Institute (AGI), University of Cape Town, South Africa
36.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1997). Human Development Report: South Asia (Chapter-IV). http://hdr.undp.org/reports/detail_reports.cfm?view=100
37.
WalkerB. (1993). Misunderstanding gender. Gender and Development Unit, Oxfam [Unpublished].
38.
WaniS. P., SreedeviT. K., RockströmJ., & RamakrishnaY. S. (2009). Rainfed agriculture-past trends and future prospects. In WaniS. P., RockstromJ. & OweisT.. (Eds), Rainfed agriculture: Unlocking the Potential (pp. 1–35). CAB International.
39.
WarrenK. J. (1999). Ecological feminism. Routledge.
40.
WattK. E. F., MolloyL. F., VarshneyC. K., WeeksD., & WirosardjonoS. (1977). The unsteady state: Environmental problems, growth, and culture. East-West Center, University Press of Hawaii.
41.
WhiteheadA. (2006). Some preliminary notes on the subordination of women. IDS Bulletin, 37(4), 24–27.
42.
World Bank. (1991). Women’s crucial role in managing the environment in SubSaharan Africa. Africa Technical Department, Women in Development Unit, Technical Note, IBRD, Washington
