A pertinent question that remains unaddressed in literature is that ‘what reflects socio-economic status (SES) and what determines it?’ This is because in some studies income, education, consumption expenditure, health status etc. have been used as proxy indicators of SES, whereas, there are some other studies which consider these as the determinants of SES. In this context, this article has attempted to make a clear distinction between the determinants and indicators of SES. As a determinant of SES, we have certain factors, extensively used in literature and as an indicator of SES, Sen (1999) idea of freedom has been used. Partial least square-structural equation modelling has been applied to estimate our model.
BentlerP. M., & BonettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
3.
BloomD., SchünemannJ., CanningD., PrettnerK., & KotschyR. (2018). Health and economic growth: Reconciling the micro and macro evidence(Discussion Paper No. 11940). IZA—Institute of Labor Economics. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3301689
4.
BoomsmaA., & HooglandJ. J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. In CudeckR., JoreskogK. G., SorbomD., and ToitS. D. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 139–168). Scientific Software International.
5.
BradleyR. H. (2016). Socioeconomic status. In FriedmanH. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mental health(2nd ed., pp. 196–210). Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397045-9.00223-8
6.
BushraA., & WajihaN. (2015). Assessing the socio-economic determinants of women empowerment in Pakistan. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.321
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.
8.
CortinaJ. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
9.
Darin-MattssonA., ForsS., & KåreholtI. (2017). Different indicators of socioeconomic status and their relative importance as determinants of health in old age. International Journal for Equity in Health, 16(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0670-3
10.
DawsonJ. W. (2003). Causality in the freedom–Growth relationship. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(03)00009-0
11.
DufloE. (2012). Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051–1079. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.4.1051
12.
FanY., ChenJ., ShirkeyG., JohnR., WuS. R., ParkH., & ShaoC. (2016). Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: An updated review. Ecological Processes, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-016-0063-3
13.
GaurK. L. (2013). Socio-economic status measurement scale: Thirst area with changing concept for socio-economic status. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 2(9), 139–145.
14.
HairJ. F., HultG. T. M., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2013). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (p. 165). SAGE Publication.
15.
HenselerJ., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
16.
MacCallumR. C., & AustinJ. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201
17.
MaityS., HaobijamV., & SenA. (2014). Socioeconomic status of Kuki tribal women: A case study Churachandpur District, Manipur. American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research, 9(5), 120–128. https://www.idosi.org/aejsr/9(5)14/2.pdf
18.
OakesJ. M., & RossiP. H. (2003). The measurement of SES in health research: Current practice and steps toward a new approach. Social Science and Medicine, 56(4), 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00073-4
19.
O’HearnD. (2009). Amartya Sen’s development as freedom: Ten years later (Issue 8). Policy & Practice—A Development Education Review. https://www.developmenteducationreview.com/issue/issue-8/amartya-sens-development-freedom-ten-years-later
20.
SedaiA. K., NepalR., & JamasbT. (2022). Electrification and socio-economic empowerment of women in India. The Energy Journal, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.43.2.ased
21.
SenA. (1999). Development as freedom (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
22.
StraussM. E., & SmithG. T. (2009). Construct validity: Advances in theory and methodology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153639
23.
TaylorS., & YuD. (2009). The importance of socio-economic status in determining educational achievement in South Africa (Working Paper 01). Stellenbosch University. https://ideas.repec.org/p/sza/wpaper/wpapers73.html
24.
TenenhausM., VinziV. E., ChatelinY. M., & LauroC. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
25.
ThomasS. (2013). The impact of economic freedom on women’ s socioeconomic Status[Honors theses]. Florida State University Libraries. http://fsu.digital.flvc.org/islandora/object/fsu:204653/datastream/PDF/view
26.
TodaroM. P., & SmithS. C. (2015). Economic development (12th ed.). Pearson.
27.
VyasS., & KumaranayakeL. (2006). Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal components analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 21(6), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czl029
28.
WestJ. (2018). Asian century… on a knife-edge: A 360 degree analysis of Asia’s recent economic development. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7182-9
