The test-score gap between black and white students should be seen as a crisis. We propose a testable model based on readily available data that will allow us to estimate the impact and interrelationships of a multitude of factors that may be partially responsible for the problem. The estimation of this model will require the joint efforts of experts in many areas of education as well as of experts in multilevel structural equation modeling.
BollenK.A.Structural equations with latent variables.New York: Wiley; 1989.
2.
PierreBourdieu. The forms of capital (Richard Nice, Trans.). In: Richardson JG, editor. Handbook for theory and research in the sociology of education.New York: Greenwood; 1986. p. 241-58.
3.
BraswellJ.S., DionG.S., DaaneM.C., JinY.The nation's report card: mathematics 2003.Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office; 2005 (NCES 2005–451).
4.
BraunH., JenkinsF., GriggW.Comparing private schools and public schools using hierarchical linear modeling.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences; 2006. NCES 2006–461.
5.
Darling-HammondL.Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence. Educ Pol Anal Arch.2000; 8(1). Retrieved from 0Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1.
6.
Darling-HammondL.Access to quality teaching: an analysis of inequality in California's public schools. Santa Clara Law Review.2002–2003; 43: 1045–1184. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7d20c58j.
7.
Darling-HammondL., HoltzmanD., GatlinS.J., HeiligV.Does Teacher Preparation Matter? Evidence about Teacher Certification, Teach for America, and Teacher Effectiveness. Educ Pol Anal Arch.2005; 13(42). Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7d20c58j.
8.
FergusonR.F.Can schools narrow the Black-White test score gap? In: JencksC., PhillipsM., editors. The Black-White test score gap.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 1998. p. 318–74.
9.
LeeV.E., BrykA.S.A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociol Educ.1989; 62: 172–92.
10.
LeeV.E., DedrickR.F., SmithJ.B.The effect of the social organization of schools on teachers' efficacy and satisfaction. Sociol Educ.1991; 64(3): 190–208.
11.
LubienskiS.T.Examining instruction, achievement, and equity with NAEP mathematics data. Educ Pol Anal Arch.2006; 14: 33. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/85.
12.
LubienskiC., LubienskiS.T.Charter, private, public schools and academic achievement: new evidence from NAEP mathematics data (Report).New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education; 2006.
13.
MunkT.Full-school engagement as a mediator of ethnic and economic composition effects on grade 8 mathematics test scores: a two-level structural equation model. PhD diss., The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 2007
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics.Reston: Author; 1989.
16.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Principles and standards for school mathematics.Reston: Author; 2000.
17.
OakesJ.The distribution of knowledge. keeping track: how schools structure inequality.Yale University Press. 1985
18.
OakesJ.Tracking in mathematics and science education: a structural contribution to unequal schooling. In: WeisL., editor. Class, race, and gender in American education.Albany: State University of New York; 1988. p. 106–25.
19.
OakesJ., JohnsonR., MuirK.Access and Achievement in Mathematics and Science: Inequalities that Endure and Change. In: BanksJ.A., BanksC.A.M., editors. Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education.San Francisco: Wiley; 2004. p. 69–90.
20.
PalardyG.J.Differential school effects among low, middle, and high social class composition schools: a multiple group, multilevel latent growth curve analysis. Sch Effectiveness Sch Improv.2008; 19: 21–49.
21.
RaudenbushS.W., WillmsJ.D.The estimation of school effects. J Educ Behav Stat.1995; 20: 307–35.
22.
RaudenbushS.W., FotiuR.P., CheongY.F.Inequality of access to educational resources: a national report card for eighth-grade math. Educ Eval Policy Anal.1998; 20: 253–67.
23.
RumbergerR.W., PalardyG.J.Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school. Teach Coll Rec.2005; 107: 1999–2045.
24.
SandersW.L., HornS.P.Research findings from the Tennessee value-added assessment system (TVAAS) database: implications for educational evaluation and research. J Pers Eval Educ.1998; 12: 247–56.
25.
WenglinskyH.Closing the racial achievement gap: the role of reforming instructional practices. Educ Pol Anal Arch.2004; 12: 22. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/219.
26.
WillmsJ.D.Learning divides: ten policy questions about the performance and equity of schools and schooling systems (Report No. UIS/WP/06-02). Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics; 2006.
