Abstract
Systematic analysis of planning policies is essential for evaluating the coherence and effectiveness of local policy-making, providing critical support for addressing complex urban challenges. However, extracting policies from planning documents is a labor-intensive task, especially when applied at scale across numerous plans. This study develops a novel large language model-based policy extraction (LLM-PE) framework to automate policy extraction and applies it to extracting local heat policies from various planning documents in Miami and Chicago to evaluate its performance. We find that the LLM-PE framework effectively identifies most local heat policies, with an average recall of 79.5%. Additionally, using the newly introduced Human Review Reduction Rate (HRRR) metric, we demonstrate that the average human review workload is reduced by 96.1%. While precision is relatively low (49.5% overall), the results indicate that our framework effectively complements human expertise by pre-screening policies at scale. Technical caveats remain, including the model’s limited ability to detect highly implicit strategies, a challenge exacerbated by inconsistent policy definitions across jurisdictions and plans. We further present a hybrid human–AI workflow for urban policy extraction, enabling scalable policy analytics to support the planning for heat-resilient cities.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
