Urban streets provide environment for road running. The study proposes a non-parametric approach that uses machine learning models to predict road running intensity. The models were developed using route check-in data from Keep, a mobile exercise application, and street geographic information data in Beijing’s core district. The results show that blue space and trail continuity are the most important factors in improving road running intensity. There is an optimum design value for the sky openness and the street enclosure, which need to be balanced with shade while meeting the light of the road. And it is also important to provide appropriate visual permeability. Furthermore, unlike daily activities, it was found that higher function mixture and function density did not have significant positive effects on the road running intensity. This study provides empirical evidence on road running and highlights the key factors that planners, landscape architects, and city managers should consider when design running-friendly urban streets.
Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics (2021) Beijing Statistical Yearbook 2021 - 03 Population and Employment. Beijing: Report, China Statistics Press. (in Chinese).
2.
BirenboimAHelbichMKwanMP (2021) Advances in portable sensing for urban environments: understanding cities from a mobility perspective. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems88: 101650.
3.
BodinMHartigT (2003) Does the outdoor environment matter for psychological restoration gained through running?Psychology of Sport and Exercise4(2): 141–153.
4.
ChenJLongY (2021) Element identification, measurement, impact evaluation and spatial intervention of disordered urban public space. Time+Architrcture2021(01): 44–50. (in Chinese).
5.
ChenLZhangZLongY (2021) Association between leisure-time physical activity and the built environment in China: empirical evidence from an accelerometer and GPS-based fitness app. Plos One16(12): 0260570.
6.
CouttsC (2008) Greenway accessibility and physical-activity behavior. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design35(3): 552–563.
7.
EwingRHandyS (2009) Measuring the unmeasurable: urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Urban Design14(1): 65–84.
8.
FangXHanDChengQ, et al. (2018) Association of levels of physical activity with risk of parkinson disease. JAMA Network Open1(5): e182421.
9.
FriedmanJH (2001) Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics29(5): 1189–1232.
10.
HarveyCAultman-HallLTroyA, et al. (2017) Streetscape skeleton measurement and classification. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science44(4): 668–692.
11.
HoseinzadehNLiuYHanLD, et al. (2020) Quality of location-based crowdsourced speed data on surface streets: A case study of waze and bluetooth speed data in Sevierville, TN. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems83: 101518.
12.
HuangDJiangBYuanL (2022) Analyzing the effects of nature exposure on perceived satisfaction with running routes: an activity path-based measure approach. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening68: 127480.
13.
HuangDTianMYuanL (2023) Sustainable design of running friendly streets: Environmental exposures predict runnability by volunteered geographic information and multilevel model approaches. Sustainable Cities and Society89: 104336.
14.
HugSMHartigTHansmannR, et al. (2009) Restorative qualities of indoor and outdoor exercise settings as predictors of exercise frequency. Health and Place15(4): 971–980.
15.
HumpelNOwenNLeslieE, et al. (2004) Associations of location and perceived environmental attributes with walking in neighborhoods. American Journal of Health Promotion18(3): 239–242.
16.
JankowskaMMSchipperijnJKerrJ (2015) A framework for using GPS data in physical activity and sedentary behavior studies. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews43(1): 48–56.
17.
JanssenMWalravensRThibautE, et al. (2020) Understanding different types of recreational runners and how they use running-related technology. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17(7): 2276.
18.
JiangYHanYLiuM, et al. (2022) Street vitality and built environment features: a data-informed approach from fourteen Chinese cities. Sustainable Cities and Society79: 103724.
19.
KarusisiNBeanKOppertJM, et al. (2012) Multiple dimensions of residential environments, neighborhood experiences, and jogging behavior in the RECORD study. Preventive Medicine55(1): 50–55.
20.
KorpiloSVirtanenTLehvävirtaS (2017) Smartphone GPS tracking—inexpensive and efficient data collection on recreational movement. Landscape and Urban Planning157: 608–617.
LeeKKwanMP (2018) Physical activity classification in free-living conditions using smartphone accelerometer data and exploration of predicted results. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems67: 124–131.
23.
LiYPengLWuC, et al. (2022) Street view imagery (SVI) in the built environment: a theoretical and systematic review. Buildings12(8): 1167.
24.
LiuKSiuKWMGongXY, et al. (2016) Where do networks really work? The effects of the Shenzhen greenway network on supporting physical activities. Landscape and Urban Planning152: 49–58.
25.
LuY (2019) Using google street view to investigate the association between street greenery and physical activity. Landscape and Urban Planning191: 103435.
26.
LuYSarkarCXiaoY (2018) The effect of street-level greenery on walking behavior: evidence from Hong Kong. Social Science and Medicine208: 41–49.
27.
MajumdarBBSahuPKPatilM, et al. (2021) Pedestrian satisfaction-based methodology for prioritization of critical sidewalk and crosswalk attributes influencing walkability. Journal of Urban Planning and Development147(3): 04021032.
28.
GB50180:2018. (2018) Standard for urban residential area planning and design. (in Chinese).
29.
NagataSNakayaTHanibuchiT, et al. (2020) Objective scoring of streetscape walkability related to leisure walking: statistical modeling approach with semantic segmentation of google street view images. Health and Place66: 102428.
30.
NayorMChernofskyASpartanoN L, et al. (2021) Physical activity and fitness in the community: the Framingham heart study. European Heart Journal42(44): 4565–4575.
31.
OwenNHumpelNLeslieE, et al. (2004) Understanding environmental influences on walking: review and research agenda. American Journal of Preventive Medicine27(1): 67–76.
32.
PasanenTPWhiteMPWheelerBW, et al. (2019) Neighbourhood blue space, health and wellbeing: the mediating role of different types of physical activity. Environment International131: 105016.
33.
PedregosaFVaroquauxGGramfortA, et al. (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research12: 2825–2830.
34.
SchuurmanNRosenkrantzLLearSA (2021) Environmental preferences and concerns of recreational road runners. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18(12): 6268.
35.
SuMTanYLiuQ, et al. (2014) Association between perceived urban built environment attributes and leisure-time physical activity among adults in Hangzhou, China. Preventive Medicine66: 60–64.
36.
TanCLYChangCCNghiemLTP, et al. (2021) The right mix: Residential urban green-blue space combinations are correlated with physical exercise in a tropical city-state. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening57: 126947.
37.
TangJLongY (2017) Metropolitan street space quality evaluation: second and third ring of Beijing, inner ring of Shanghai. Planners33(02): 68–73. (in Chinese).
38.
VichGMarquetOMiralles-GuaschC (2019) Green exposure of walking routes and residential areas using smartphone tracking data and GIS in a Mediterranean city. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening40: 275–285.
39.
Walden-SchreinerCLeungYF (2013) Spatially characterizing visitor use and its association with informal trails in yosemite valley Meadows. Environmental Management52(1): 163–178.
40.
XuWZhangZLongY (2019) A preliminary study on housing choice behavior in urban residential space based on mobile phone data and multi-source data: taking communities within fifth ring road of Beijing as an example. Urban Development Studies26(10): 55–63. (in Chinese).
41.
YerramallaM SFayosseADugravotA, et al. (2020) Association of moderate and vigorous physical activity with incidence of type 2 diabetes and subsequent mortality: 27 year follow-up of the Whitehall II study. Diabetologia63(3): 537–548.
42.
YinLWangZ (2016) Measuring visual enclosure for street walkability: using machine learning algorithms and google street view imagery. Applied Geography76: 147–153.
43.
YingZNingL DXinL (2015) Relationship between built environment, physical activity, adiposity, and health in adults aged 46-80 in Shanghai, China. Journal of Physical Activity and Health12(4): 569–578.
44.
ZhangHChenBSunZ, et al. (2013) Landscape perception and recreation needs in urban green space in Fuyang, Hangzhou, China. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening12(1): 44–52.
45.
ZhouHHeSCaiY, et al. (2019) Social inequalities in neighborhood visual walkability: using street view imagery and deep learning technologies to facilitate healthy city planning. Sustainable Cities and Society50: 101605.
46.
ZhouYLongY (2017) Large-scale evaluation for street walkability: methodological improvements and the empirical application in Chengdu. Shanghai Urban Planning Review2017(01): 88–93. (in Chinese).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
