Residential income segregation is a spatial manifestation of social inequality and is an important factor that influences access to resources, services, and amenities. In general, past research analyzing income segregation has applied index-based methods to describe the separation of low-income households at one spatial scale; however, existing studies have not yet considered how income segregation varies across multiple income classes, spatial scales, and local contexts. This study applies a multilevel multigroup modeling approach to explore the global and local patterns of income segregation between dissemination areas (micro-scale), census tracts (meso-scale), and neighborhoods (macro-scale) in Toronto, Canada. A global model that estimates the overall multiscale segregation of five income classes finds that the most affluent families had the highest levels of segregation and that the segregation of all income classes was strongest at the macro- and micro-scales. A local model that allows the micro-scale segregation measures to vary geographically shows that higher-income families were less segregated in the city center than in the inner suburbs, that middle-income families were highly segregated in areas serviced by public transit, and that almost all income classes had high levels of segregation in disadvantaged neighborhoods prioritized for investment by local policymakers. The methodological and substantive contributions of this study for understanding the complex patterns of income segregation are discussed.
Acevedo-GarciaD (2001) Zip code-level risk factors for tuberculosis: Neighborhood environment and residential segregation in New Jersey, 1985-1992. American Journal of Public Health91(5): 734–741.
2.
AdesJApparicioPSeguinA-M (2012) Are new patterns of low-income distribution emerging in Canadian metropolitan areas. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien56(3): 339–361.
3.
AnselinL (1995) Local indicators of spatial association – LISA. Geographical Analysis27(2): 93–115.
4.
ArcayaMCSchwartzGSubramanianSV (2018) A multi-level modeling approach to understanding residential segregation in the United States. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science45(6): 1090–1105.
5.
BarrosJFeitosaFF (2018) Uneven geographies: Exploring the sensitivity of spatial indices of residential segregation. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science45(6): 1073–1089.
6.
BrooksSPGelmanA (1998) General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics7(4): 434–455.
7.
BrownLAChungS-Y (2006) Spatial segregation, segregation indices, and the geographical perspective. Population, Space and Place12: 235–243.
8.
BrowneWJSubramanianWVJonesK, et al. (2005) Variance portioning in multilevel logistic models that exhibit overdispersion. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society168(3): 588–613.
9.
Brunton-SmithIPina-SanchezJLiG (2020) Re-assessing the consistency of sentencing decisions in cases of assault: Allowing for within-court inconsistencies. The British Journal of Criminology. Epub ahead of print 23 May 2020. DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azaa030.
10.
CatneyG (2018) The complex geographies of ethnic residential segregation: Using spatial and local measures to explore scale-dependency and spatial relationships. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers43: 137–152.
DongGHarrisR (2015) Spatial autoregressive models for geographically hierarchical data structures. Geographical Analysis47(2): 173–191.
13.
DuncanODDuncanB (1955) A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. American Sociological Review20(2): 210–217.
14.
El-GeneidyAGrimsrudMWasfiR, et al. (2014) New evidence on walking distances to transit stops: Identifying redundancies and gaps using variable service areas. Transportation41(1): 193–210.
15.
FeitosaFFCamaraGMonteiroAMV, et al. (2007) Global and local spatial indices of urban segregation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science21(3): 299–323.
16.
FongEShibuyaK (2000) The spatial separation of the poor in Canadian cities. Demography37(4): 449–459.
17.
FowlerCS (2018) Key assumptions in multiscale segregation measures: How zoning and strength of spatial association condition outcomes. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science45(6): 1055–1072.
18.
GelmanA (2006) Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical. Bayesian Analysis1(3): 515–534.
19.
Goldstein H, Browne W and Rasbash J (2002) Partitioning variation in multilevel models. Understanding Statistics: Statistical Issues in Psychology, Education, and the Social Sciences 1(4): 223–231.
20.
GoldsteinHNodenP (2003) Modelling social segregation. Oxford Review of Education29(2): 225–237.
21.
Grube-CaversAPattersonZ (2015) Urban rapid rail transit and gentrification in Canadian urban centres: A survival analysis approach. Urban Studies52(1): 178–194.
22.
HarrisR (2017) Measuring the scales of segregation: Looking at the residential separation of white British and other schoolchildren in England using a multilevel index of dissimilarity. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers42: 432–444.
JargowskyPA (1996) Take the money and run: Economic segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas. American Sociological Review61(6): 948–998.
25.
JohnstonRForrestJJonesK, et al. (2016a) The scale of segregation: Ancestral groups in Sydney, 2011. Urban Geography37(7): 985–1008.
26.
JohnstonRJonesKManleyD, et al. (2016b) Macro-scale stability and micro-scale diversity: Modelling changing ethnic minority residential segregation - London 2011–2011. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers41: 389–402.
27.
JonesKJohnstonRManleyD, et al. (2015) Ethnic residential segregation: A multilevel, multigroup, multiscale approach exemplified by London in 2011. Demography52: 1995–2019.
28.
JonesKManleyDJohnstonR, et al. (2018) Modelling residential segregation as unevenness and clustering: A multilevel modelling approach including spatial dependence and tacking the MAUP. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science45(6): 1122–1141.
29.
LeckieGFrenchRCharltonC, et al. (2014) Modeling heterogeneous variance-covariance components in two-level models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics39(5): 307–332.
30.
LeckieGGoldsteinH (2015) A multilevel modelling approach to measuring changing patterns of ethnic composition and segregation among London secondary schools, 2001–2010. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)178(2): 405–424.
31.
LeckieGPillingerRJonesK, et al. (2012) Multilevel modeling of social segregation. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics37(1): 3–30.
32.
LeeYNelderJA (2006) Double hierarchical generalized linear models (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics)55(2): 139–185.
33.
LloydCDShuttleworthI (2012) Residential segregation in Northern Ireland: Assessing the value of exploring spatial variation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space44: 52–67.
34.
LunnDJacksonCBestN, et al. (2012) The BUGS Book: A Practical Introduction to Bayesian Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
35.
ManleyDJohnstonRJonesK, et al. (2015) Macro-, meso-, and microscale segregation: Modeling changing ethnic residential patterns in Auckland, New Zealand, 2001–2013. Annals of the Association of American Geographers105(5): 951–967.
36.
ManleyDJonesKJohnstonR (2019) Multiscale segregation: Multilevel modeling of dissimilarity – Challenging the stylized fact that segregation is greater the finer the spatial scale. The Professional Geographer71(3): 566–578.
37.
MasseyDSDentonNA (1988) The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces67(2): 281–315.
38.
MasseyDSEggersML (1990) The ecology of inequality: Minorities and the concentration of poverty, 1970-1980. American Journal of Sociology95(5): 1153–1188.
39.
MasseyDSEggersML (1993) The spatial concentration of affluence and poverty during the 1970s. Urban Affairs Quarterly29(2): 299–315.
40.
MasseyDSRothwellJDominaT (2009) The changing bases of segregation in the United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science626(1): 74–90.
O’SullivanDWongDWS (2007) A surface-based approach to measuring spatial segregation. Geographical Analysis39: 147–168.
43.
OwensA (2018) Income segregation between school districts and inequality in student’s achievement. Sociology of Education91(1): 1–27.
44.
PetrovicAvan HamMManleyD (2018) Multiscale measures of population: Within- and between-city variation in exposure to the sociospatial context. Annals of the American Association of Geographers108(4): 1057–1074.
45.
QuickMLuanH (2020) The spatial structure of socioeconomic disadvantage: A Bayesian multivariate spatial factor analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. Epub ahead of print 7 May 2020. DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2020.1759807.
46.
ReardonSF (2006) A conceptual framework for measuring segregation and its association with population outcomes. In: OakesJMKaufmanJS (eds) Methods in Social Epidemiology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp.169–192.
47.
ReardonSFBischoffK (2011) Income inequality and income segregation. American Journal of Sociology116(4): 1092–1153.
48.
ReardonSFMatthewsSAO’SullivanD, et al. (2008) The geographic scale of metropolitan racial segregation. Demography45(3): 489–514.
49.
ReardonSFO’SullivanD (2004) Measures of spatial segregation. Sociological Methodology34(1): 121–162.
50.
RieblerASorybyeSHSimpsonD, et al. (2016) An intuitive Bayesian spatial model for disease mapping that accounts for scaling. Statistical Methods in Medical Research25(4): 1145–1165.
51.
RobertoE (2018) The spatial proximity and connectivity method for measuring and analyzing residential segregation. Sociological Methodology48(1): 182–224.
52.
RosenGWalksA (2015) Castles in Toronto’s sky: Condo-ism as urban transformation. Journal of Urban Affairs37(3): 289–310.
53.
RossNAHouleCDunnJR, et al. (2004) Dimensions and dynamics of residential segregation by income in urban Canada, 1991–1996. The Canadian Geographer/ Le Géographe Canadien48(4): 433–445.
54.
RossNANobregaKDunnJ (2001) Income segregation, income inequality and mortality in North American metropolitan areas. GeoJournal53: 117–124.
55.
SakodaJM (1981) A generalized index of dissimilarity. Demography18: 245–250.
56.
SkaburskisANelsonK (2014) Filtering and gentrifying in Toronto: Neighbourhood transitions in and out from the lowest income decline between 1981 and 2006. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space46: 885–900.
57.
SlaterT (2013) Your life chances affect where you live: A critique of the ‘cottage industry’ of neighbourhood effects research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37(2): 367–387.
58.
Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, et al. (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 64(4): 583–639.
TownshendIJWalkerR (2002) The structure of income residential segregation in Canadian metropolitan areas. Canadian Journal of Regional Science Spring25(1): 25–52.
63.
WalksRAMaaranenR (2008) Gentrification, social mix, and social polarization: Testing the linkages in large Canadian cities. Urban Geography29(4): 293–326.
64.
WinshipC (1977) A revaluation of indexes of residential segregation. Social Forces55(4): 1058–1066.
65.
WongDS (2003) Spatial decomposition of segregation indices: A framework toward measuring segregation at multiple levels. Geographical Analysis35(3): 179–194.
66.
WongDWS (2002) Modeling local segregation: A spatial interaction approach. Geographical and Environmental Modelling6(1): 81–97.
67.
YaoJWongDWSBaileyN, et al. (2018) Spatial segregation measures: A methodological review. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie110(3): 235–250.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
