Most studies of ethnic residential segregation recognise that occupational class is an important influence on the intensity of segregation of members of different ethnic groups, but are unable to explore variations in that intensity because of the lack of relevant data. Australian census data allow the class structure of different ancestry groups to be identified in small areas within cities. Such data for 17 ancestry groups in Sydney are used here to explore variations in segregation levels between classes within ancestry groups at three separate scales. To do this, a major extension to a recently-developed methodology for exploring multi-scale segregation patterns is introduced. The results show that for some groups class is more important than ancestry as an influence on segregation levels, whereas for others there is relatively little class segregation.
BrowneWJDraperD (2006) A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models. Bayesian Analysis1: 473–550.
3.
BrowneWJSubramaniamSVJonesKet al. (2005) Variance partitioning in multilevel logistic models that exhibit overdispersion. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)168: 99–113.
4.
ButlerTHamnettC (2011) Ethnicity, Class and Aspiration: Understanding London’s New East End. Bristol: Polity Press.
5.
DarrochAGMarstonWG (1971) The social class basis of ethnic residential segregation: The Canadian case. American Journal of Sociology77: 491–501.
6.
DraperD (2008) Bayesian multilevel analysis and MCMC. In: LeeuwJMeijerE (eds) Handbook of Multilevel Analysis. New York: Springer, pp. 77–139.
7.
DuncanCJonesK (2001) Using multilevel models to model heterogeneity: Potential and pitfalls. Geographical Analysis32: 279–305.
8.
HarrisRManleyDJohnstonRJ (2017) The changing interaction of ethnic and socio-economic segregation in England and Wales, 1991-2011. Ethnicities17: 320–349.
9.
IcelandJSharpeCSteinmetzE (2005) Class differences in African-American residential patterns in US metropolitan areas. Social Science Research34: 252–266.
10.
IcelandJWilkesR (2006) Does socioeconomic status matter? race, class and residential segregation. Social Problems53: 248–273.
11.
IntratorJTannenJMasseyDS (2016) Segregation by race and income in the United States 1970–2010. Social Science Research40: 45–60.
12.
JohnstonRJForrestJJonesKet al. (2016) The scale of segregation: Ancestral groups in Sydney, 2011. Urban Geography 37(7): 985–1008.
13.
JohnstonRJForrestJManleyDet al. (2017) The segregation of generations: Ancestral groups in Sydney 2011. Geographical Research 55: 249–268.
JonesKJohnstonRJManleyDet al. (2015) Ethnic residential segregation: A multi-level, multi-group, multi-scale approach – exemplified by London in 2011. Demography52: 1995–2019.
LeeDMintonJPryceG (2015) Bayesian inference for the Dissimilarity Index in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Spatial Statistics11: 81–95.
19.
McCullaghPNelderJA (1989) Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman & Hall.
20.
ManleyDJohnstonRJJonesKet al. (2015) Macro-, meso- and microscale segregation: Modelling changing ethnic residential patterns in Auckland, New Zealand, 2001–2013. Annals of the Association of American Geographers105: 951–967.
21.
MasseyDS (1981) Social class and ethnic segregation: A reconsideration of methods and conclusions. American Sociological Review46: 641–650.
22.
MasseyDSRothwellJDominaT (2009) The changing bases of segregation in the United States. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences626: 74–90.
23.
OwenDW (1995) The spatial and socio-economic patterns of minority ethnic groups in Great Britain. Scottish Geographical Magazine111: 27–35.
ReardonSFTownsendJFoxL (2017) A continuous measure of the joint distribution of race and income among neighbourhoods. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences3(2): 34–62.
26.
SpiegelhalterDJBestNGCarlinBPet al. (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B64: 583–640.
