Scholars studying China’s generations have shown keen interest in devising new generational labels to identify characteristics of particular age cohorts. This analysis, based on 41 interviews with Chinese participants, departs from this common research strategy, first, by positioning generational labels used by ordinary Chinese, rather than academic constructs developed in western democracies, at the centre of inquiry. Three successive forms of generational nomenclature are discussed in light of China’s socialist movement and modernization: generations as natural sites of continuity, generations of revolutionaries, and generations named after decades. Further, by treating generation as a fundamentally social construct, this analysis investigates how terms such as “my generation” are constantly reconstituted in contextually-specific discursive and conversational contexts. Often distinctively shaped by China’s unique path of modernization and uneasy relationship with the West, the generational discourses of everyday Chinese shed new light on what it could mean for generations scholarship to “think globally.”
BeckU.Beck-GernsheimE. (2009). Global generations and the trap of methodological nationalism for a cosmopolitan turn in the sociology of youth and generation. European Sociological Review, 25(1), 25–36.
2.
BergstromM. (2012). All eyes east: Lessons from the front lines of marketing to China’s youth. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
BischopingK. (2017). Generations and memory: A meeting of modern concepts and postmodern questions. Oral History Forum d’histoire orale, 37 (Special Issue on Generations and Memory: Continuity and Change).
4.
BischopingK.GazsoA. (2016). Analyzing talk in the social sciences: Narrative, conversation and discourse strategies. London, England: SAGE.
5.
BonninM. (2006). The “lost generation”: Its definition and its role in today’s Chinese elite politics. Social Research, 73(1), 245–274.
6.
ChanA.RosenS.UngerJ. (1980). Students and class warfare: The social roots of the Red Guard conflict in Guangzhou (Canton). The China Quarterly, 83, 397–446.
7.
ChenC. (2010). Poverty in hutong residential compounds – Case study of urban anthropology. Journal of Minzu University of China (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 3, 16–26.
8.
ChengY. (2009). Creating the new man: From Enlightenment ideals to socialist realities. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
9.
CherringtonR. (1997). Generational issues in China: A case study of the 1980s generation of young intellectuals. The British Journal of Sociology, 48(2), 302–320.
10.
DavisM. (1999). Gangland: Cultural elites and the new generationalism. St Leonard, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
11.
DeppermannA. (2007). Using the other for oneself: Conversational practices of representing out-group members among adolescents. In BambergM.De FinaA.SchiffrinD. (Eds.), Selves and identities in narrative and discourse (pp. 273–301). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
12.
DrewP.HoltE. (1988). Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems, 35(4), 398–417.
13.
EdmundsJ.TurnerB. S. (2005). Global generations: Social change in the twentieth century. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(4), 559–577.
14.
FosterK. R. (2013). Generation, discourse, and social change. New York: Routledge.
15.
FreiR. (2017). Talking about legacies and ruptures: Generational narratives in times of youth activism in Argentina and Chile. Oral History Forum d’histoire orale, 37 (Special Issue on Generations and Memory: Continuity and Change).
16.
GaoZ.BischopingK. (2015, 8). Identity, memory, and stigmatization of Chinese elders. Presented at the Annual Convention of American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.
HalaiN. (2007). Making use of bilingual interview data: Some experiences from the field. The Qualitative Report, 12(3), 344–355.
19.
HenselerC. (Ed.). (2012). Generation X goes global: Mapping a youth culture in motion. New York: Routledge.
20.
HungE. P. W.ChiuS. W. K. (2003). The lost generation: Life course dynamics and xiagang in China. Modern China, 29(2), 204–236.
21.
HungK. H.GuF. F.YimC. K. (Bennett). (2007). A social institutional approach to identifying generation cohorts in China with a comparison with American consumers. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5), 836–853.
22.
KanK. (2013). The new “Lost Generation”: Inequality and discontent among Chinese youth. China Perspectives, 2, 67–73.
23.
L. G. (1970). Observations. The Antioch Review, 30(1), 3–6, 144.
24.
LeeH. (2014). The stranger and the Chinese moral imagination. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
Lévi-StraussC. (1987). Introduction to the work of Marcel Mauss. (BakerF., Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1950)
26.
LinZ.PalmerJ. C. (2016). A critical review of sociological dialogue between China and the West. Chinese Sociological Dialogue, 1(1), 3–14.
27.
LiuF. (2011). Urban youth in China: Modernity, the internet and the self. New York: Routledge.
28.
LiuT. (1991). Be wary of the world war without smoke of gunpowder: Studies about anti-“peaceful evolution”. Tianjin, China: Tianjin Academy of Social Sciences Press.
29.
LiuX. (1989). Some sociological thoughts on the April Fifth generation and May Fourth generation. Dushu, 5, 35–43.
30.
MannheimK. (1952). The problem of generations. In KecskemetiP. (Ed.), Karl Mannheim: Essays (pp. 276–322). New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1927)
MaoZ. (1966). Quotations from Chairman Mao Zedong. (People’s Liberation Army General Political Department, Ed.). Beijing, China: People’s Liberation Army General Political Department.
33.
McDanielS. A. (2004). Generationing gender: Justice and the division of welfare. Journal of Aging Studies, 18(1), 27–44.
34.
MooreR. L. (2005). Generation Ku: individualism and China’s millennial youth. Ethnology, 44(4), 357–376.
35.
NunbergG. (1993). Indexicality and deixis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16(1), 1–43.
36.
OngR. (2007). “Peaceful evolution”, “regime change” and China’s political security. Journal of Contemporary China, 16(53), 717–727.
37.
OyewumiO. (1998). De-confounding gender: Feminist theorizing and western culture, a comment on Hawkesworth’s “Confounding gender”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 23(4), 1049–1062.
PotterJ. (2002). Two kinds of natural. Discourse Studies, 4(4), 539–542.
40.
ReuleckeJ. (2003) Einführung: Lebensgeschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts—im ‘Generationencontainer’? In ReuleckeJ.Müller-LucknerElisabeth (Eds.), Generationalität und Lebensgeschichter im 20. Jahrhundert (pp. vii-xv). Munich: Oldenbourg Verlag.
41.
ReuleckeJ. (2008). Generation/generationality, generativity, and memory. In ErllA.NünningA. (Eds.), Media and Cultural Memory/Medien und kulturelle Erinnerung (pp. 119–125). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
42.
RosenS. (2009). Contemporary Chinese youth and the state. The Journal of Asian Studies, 68(2), 359–369.
43.
SausmikatN. (2003). Generations, legitimacy, and political ideas in China: The end of polarization or the end of ideology?Asian Survey, 43(2), 352–384.
UspenskiiB. A. (1973). A poetics of composition. (ZavarinV.WittigS., Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
49.
XuL. (2010). From revolutionary rebels to a thinking generation: A reflection on China’s Red Guard movement of the mid-1960s. The Sixties, 3(2), 143–162.
50.
XuS. (2006). Dai. In Analytic dictionary of characters and words (pp. 650–651). Beijing, China: Jiuzhou Press.
51.
YangG. (2005). Days of old are not puffs of smoke: Three hypotheses on collective memories of the Cultural Revolution. China Review, 5(2), 13–41.
52.
YangJ.LiS. (2011). The impact of rustication on sent-down cohorts’ income. Frontiers of Economics in China, 6(2), 290–310.
53.
ZhangZ. (Ed.). (2012). Analytic dictionary of characters and words. Beijing, China: The Chinese Overseas Publishing House.
54.
ZhangZ. J. (1995). The semantic variance of zanmen. Biting Words and Chewing Characters, 8, 12.
55.
ZhaoB. (2013). The Little Emperors’ new toys: A critical inquiry into children and television in China. New York: Springer Science.
56.
ZhaoF. (2007). Youth studies: The evolution from “generations” to “post.”China Youth Studies, 12, 30–32.
