A degree of task completeness—a consequence of the division of labor and job specialization—might play an important role in employees’ motivation to be creative/innovative. While there is no consensus on whether having well-rounded or task-specialized work is optimal for employees’ innovative work behavior (IWB), we entertain the possibility that the preferred amount of this job attribute may condition individual reactions to a particular task structure. Moving beyond a traditional fit/misfit perspective of perceiving individuals as passive respondents, we expect that task-identity discrepancy (actual vs desired) triggers an employee to respond proactively by exhibiting job crafting, resulting in more frequent IWB. We test our hypotheses with mediated polynomial regression analyses based on a multi-source time-lagged field study of 184 professionals in a European bank and an experimental study with 81 students at an EU-based university. The results indicate that task-identity incongruence indirectly drives IWBs more than congruence. Specifically, both task-identity overfit (actual > desired) and task-identity underfit (desired > actual) are positively predicting IWB through job crafting as a coping mechanism for employees to adjust their work and unleash the innovative power from the experienced incongruence.
AfsarBBadirYKhanMM (2015) Person–job fit, person–organization fit and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of innovation trust. The Journal of High Technology Management Research26: 105–116.
2.
AleksićDČerneMDysvikA, et al (2016) I want to be creative, but . . . preference for creativity, perceived clear outcome goals, work enjoyment, and creative performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology25: 363–383.
3.
AndersonBSSchuelerJBaumM, et al (2022) The chicken or the egg? Causal inference in entrepreneurial orientation–performance research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice46: 1569–1596.
4.
AxtellCMHolmanDJUnsworthKL, et al (2000) Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology73: 265–285.
5.
Biermeier-HansonBWynneKTThrasherG, et al (2021) Modeling the joint effect of leader and follower authenticity on work and non-work outcomes. The Journal of Psychology155: 140–164.
6.
BindlUKUnsworthKLGibsonCB, et al (2019) Job crafting revisited: Implications of an extended framework for active changes at work. Journal of Applied Psychology104: 605–628.
7.
BoehnleinPBaumM (2022) Does job crafting always lead to employee well-being and performance? Meta-analytical evidence on the moderating role of societal culture. The International Journal of Human Resource Management33: 647–685.
8.
BruningPFCampionMA (2018) A role–resource approach–avoidance model of job crafting: A multimethod integration and extension of job crafting theory. Academy of Management Journal61: 499–522.
9.
BunceDWestM (1994) Changing work environments: Innovative coping responses to occupational stress. Work and Stress8: 319–331.
10.
CableDMEdwardsJR (2004) Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology89: 822–834.
11.
CaiDCaiYSunY, et al (2021) Leader-follower congruence in need for achievement and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader-member exchange. Applied Psychology70: 1492–1511.
12.
CaniëlsMCJVeldM (2019) Employee ambidexterity, high performance work systems and innovative work behaviour: How much balance do we need?The International Journal of Human Resource Management30: 565–585.
13.
CoelhoFAugustoM (2010) Job characteristics and the creativity of frontline service employees. Journal of Service Research13: 426–438.
14.
DanielsKJongeJ (2010) Match making and match breaking: The nature of match within and around job design. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology83: 1–16.
15.
De CoomanRMolSTBillsberryJ, et al (2019) Epilogue: Frontiers in person–environment fit research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology28: 646–652.
16.
de JongJDen HartogD (2010) Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management19: 23–36.
17.
DevlooTAnseelFDe BeuckelaerA, et al (2015) Keep the fire burning: Reciprocal gains of basic need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation and innovative work behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology24: 491–504.
18.
DierdorffECMorgesonFP (2007) Consensus in work role requirements: The influence of discrete occupational context on role expectations. Journal of Applied Psychology92: 1228–1241.
19.
DöblerASEmmermacherARichter-KillenbergS, et al (2022) New insights into self-initiated work design: The role of job crafting, self-undermining and five types of job satisfaction for employee’s health and work ability. Journal of Human Resource Management36: 113–147.
20.
DubbeltLDemeroutiERispensS (2019) The value of job crafting for work engagement, task performance, and career satisfaction: Longitudinal and quasi-experimental evidence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology28: 300–314.
21.
DustSBTimsM (2020) Job crafting via decreasing hindrance demands: The motivating role of interdependence misfit and the facilitating role of autonomy. Applied Psychology69: 881–912.
22.
EdwardsJR (1996) An examination of competing versions of the person-environment fit approach to stress. Academy of Management Journal39: 292–339.
23.
EdwardsJRCableDMWilliamsonIO, et al (2006) The phenomenology of fit: Linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit. Journal of Applied Psychology91: 802–827.
24.
FollmerEHTalbotDLKristof-BrownAL, et al (2018) Resolution, relief, and resignation: A qualitative study of responses to misfit at work. Academy of Management Journal61: 440–465.
25.
HackerW (2003) Action regulation theory: A practical tool for the design of modern work processes?European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology12: 105–130.
26.
HackmanJROldhamGR (1975) Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology60: 159–170.
27.
HackmanJROldhamGR (1976) Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance16: 250–279.
28.
HammondMMNeffNLFarrJL, et al (2011) Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts5: 90–105.
29.
HayesAF (2022) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
30.
KanterRM (1988) When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior10: 169–211.
31.
KarasekRA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly24: 285–308.
32.
KimTSchuhSCCaiY (2020) Person or job? Change in person-job fit and its impact on employee work attitudes over time. Journal of Management57: 287–313.
33.
LazazzaraATimsMde GennaroD (2020) The process of reinventing a job: A meta–synthesis of qualitative job crafting research. Journal of Vocational Behavior116: 103267.
34.
LeanaCAppelbaumEShevchukI (2009) Work process and quality of care in early childhood education: The role of job crafting. Academy of Management Journal52: 1169–1192.
35.
LeeAErdoganBTianA, et al (2021) Perceived overqualification and task performance: Reconciling two opposing pathways. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology94: 80–106.
36.
LinBLawKSZhouJ (2017) Why is underemployment related to creativity and OCB? A task-crafting explanation of the curvilinear moderated relations. Academy of Management Journal60: 156–177.
37.
MainkaDSüßS (2022) A scenario-based quasi-experimental study of co-workers’ cognitive responses to an individual’s resource-focused job crafting. German Journal of Human Resource Management. Epub ahead of print 29 December 2022. DOI: 10.1177/23970022221145145
38.
MeijerinkJBos-NehlesAde LeedeJ (2020) How employees’ pro-activity translates high-commitment HRM systems into work engagement: The mediating role of job crafting. The International Journal of Human Resource Management31: 2893–2918.
39.
MorgesonFPHumphreySE (2006) The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology91: 1321–1339.
40.
NiessenCWeselerDKostovaP (2016) When and why do individuals craft their jobs? The role of individual motivation and work characteristics for job crafting. Human Relations 69: 1287–1313.
41.
OhISGuayRPKimK, et al (2014) Fit happens globally: A meta-analytic comparison of the relationships of person-environment fit dimensions with work attitudes and performance across East Asia, Europe, and North America. Personnel Psychology67: 99–152.
42.
ParkerSK (2014) Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annual Review of Psychology65: 661–691.
43.
RudolphCWKatzIMLavigneKN, et al (2017) Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior102: 112–138.
44.
ShanockLRBaranBEGentryWA, et al (2010) Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology25: 543–554.
45.
SlocumJW (1981) Job redesign: Improving the quality of work life. Journal of Experiential Learning and Simulation3: 17–36.
46.
SonnentagS (2017) A task-level perspective on work engagement: A new approach that helps to differentiate the concepts of engagement and burnout. Burnout Research5: 12–20.
47.
SusenoYStandingCGengatharenD, et al (2020) Innovative work behaviour in the public sector: The roles of task characteristics, social support, and proactivity. Australian Journal of Public Administration79: 41–59.
48.
TimsMBakkerAB (2010) Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. South Africa Journal of Industrial Psychology36: 1–9.
49.
TimsMBakkerABDerksD (2015) Job crafting and job performance: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology24: 914–928.
50.
TimsMDerksDBakkerAB (2016) Job crafting and its relationships with person–job fit and meaningfulness: A three-wave study. Journal of Vocational Behavior92: 44–53.
51.
TimsMTwemlowMFongCYM (2022) A state-of-the-art overview of job-crafting research: current trends and future research directions. Career Development International27: 54–78.
52.
VleugelsWTierensHBillsberryJ, et al (2019) Profiles of fit and misfit: A repeated weekly measures study of perceived value congruence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology28: 616–630.
53.
VoelpelSCLeiboldMTekieEB (2006) Managing purposeful organizational misfit: Exploring the nature of industry and organizational misfit to enable Strategic Change. Journal of Change Management6: 257–276.
54.
VogelRMRodellJBLynchJW (2016) Engaged and productive misfits: How job crafting and leisure activity mitigate the negative effects of value incongruence. Academy of Management Journal59: 1561–1584.
55.
WangHJDemeroutiEBlancPL, et al (2018) Crafting a job in ‘tough times’: When being proactive is positively related to work attachment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology91: 569–590.
56.
WarrPInceogluI (2015) Job features, job values, and affective strength. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology24: 101–112.
57.
WongSIŠkerlavajMČerneM (2017) Build coalitions to fit: Autonomy expectations, competence mobilization, and job crafting. Human Resource Management56: 785–801.
58.
WrzesniewskiA, Bartel CA and Wiesenfeld B (eds) (2013) Remoteness as a resource: The impact of virtual work on job crafting. In: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Orlando, FL.
59.
WrzesniewskiADuttonJE (2001) Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. The Academy of Management Review26: 179–201.
60.
WuCHTianAWLuksyteA, et al (2017) On the association between perceived overqualification and adaptive behavior. Personnel Review46: 339–354.
61.
YuanFWoodmanRW (2010) Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal53: 323–342.
62.
ZhangFParkerSK (2019) Reorienting job crafting research: A hierarchical structure of job crafting concepts and integrative review. Journal of Organizational Behavior40: 126–146.
63.
ZhouJGeorgeJM (2001) When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal44: 682–696.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
