Win-win and eco-efficiency approaches to environmental management that focus on cost
benefits from environmental improvement in business have been widely promoted in recent
years. However they have been criticized because they are of limited appeal to small and
medium sized enterprises (SMEs) and because they do not promote a broader programme of
learning and change. Based on qualitative interviews with SMEs in the UK that have
participated in a resource efficiency project, the paper aims to identify the conditions
under which management learning is occurring, that triggers a process of on—going
environmental improvement. The main indicators of management learning identified that lead
to a process of learning and change were: cognitive and behaviour change; an approach that
went beyond problem-solving; a culture of leadership and participation; a discontinuity
that made resource efficiency a priority; a networked, open-minded leader.
ArgyrisC.SchönD.
(1978). Organizational Learning. A Theory of Action
Perspective.Reading Mass:
Addison-Wesley.
2.
ArgyrisC.
(1999). On Organizational Learning.Oxford, UK and Malden, Mass.: Blackwell
Publishers Ltd.
3.
BatesonG.
(1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind.New York:
Ballantine.
4.
BoudreauJ.W.RamstadP.M.
(2005). Talentship, Talent Segmentation and Sustainability:
A New HR Decision Science Paradigm for a New Strategy Definition.
Human Resource Management, 44(2),
129–136.
5.
BourgoyneJ.G.HodgsonV.E.
(1983). Natural Learning and Managerial Action: A
Phenomenological Study in the Field Setting. Journal of
Management Studies, 20(3):
387–399.
6.
BrioJ.A.FernandezE.JunqueraB.
(2007). Management and Employee Involvement in Achieving and
Environmental Action-based Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study.
The International Journal of Human Resource Management,
18: 491–522.
7.
CopeJ.
(2003). Entrepreneurial Learning and Critical Reflection:
Discontinuous Events as Triggers for “Higher—level” Learning.
Management Learning, 34(4),
429–450.
8.
CyertR.M.MarchJ.G.
(1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:
Prentice-Hall.
9.
DeBruijnT.J.N.HofmanP.S.
(2000). Pollution Prevention and Industrial Transformation:
Evoking Structural Changes within Companies. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 8,
215–223.
DenzinK.N.LincolnY.S.
(1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks, London:
Sage.
13.
Envirowise (2001).
Engaging SMEs in Environmental Improvement: A Best Practice Guide for Business
Support Organizations. GG346,
Envirowise.
14.
FiolM.C.LylesM.A.
(1985). Organizational Learning.
Academy of Management Review, 10 (4),
803–813.
15.
GibbA.A.
(2000). SME Policy, Academic Research and the Growth of
Ignorance, Mythical Concepts, Myths, Assumptions, Rituals and
Confusions. International Small Business Journal,
15(3),
13–35.
16.
GranovetterM.
(1973). The Strength in Weak Ties.
American Journal of Sociology, 78(6),
1360–1380.
17.
HagenØ.LarssaetherS.
(2000). A Critical Look at Business's Response to the
Environmental Challenge: Is Eco-efficiency a Result of Single—loop Problem—solving?
Paper presented at theBusiness Strategy and the Environment Conference,
Leeds18–19 September.
18.
HalmeM.
(2001). Learning for Sustainable Development in Tourism
Networks. Business Strategy and the Environment,
10, 100–114.
19.
HansenO.E.SondergardB.MeredithS.
(2002). Environmental Innovations in Small and Medium Sized
Enterprises. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,
14(1), 37–56.
20.
HansenO.E.SondergardB.HolmJ.KerndrupS.
(2005). Creation and Communication of Environmental
Knowledge within and between Communities of Practice. In OehmeI.SeebacherU.
(Eds.), Corporate Sustainability: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical
Approaches.München, Wien:
Profil.
21.
HarrisL.C.CraneA.
(2002). The Greening of Organizational
Culture. Journal of Organizational Change Management,
15(3),
214–234.
22.
HartS.L.
(1995). A Natural—Resource—Based View of the
Firm. Academy of Management Review,
20(4),
986–1014.
23.
HawkenP.LovinsA.B.LovinsL.H.
(1999). Natural Capitalism: The Next Industrial
Revolution.London: Earthscan Publications
Ltd.
24.
HillaryR.
(2000). Small and Medium-sized Enterprises and the Environment:
Business Imperatives.Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing
Ltd.
25.
HollidayC.O.Jr.SchmidheinyS.WattsP.
(2002). Walking the Talk: The Business Case for Sustainable
Development.Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf
Publishing.
26.
HooperP.JukesS.StubbsM.
(2000). SME Environmental Performance and the Business
Support Network: Problem—solving not Panacea. Paper presented atThe Business Strategy and the Environment Conference,
Leeds, 18–19
September.
27.
JabbourC.J.C.SantosC.A.S.
(2008). The Central Role of Human Resource Management in the
Search for Sustainable Organizations. International Journal of
Human Resource Management, 19(12),
2133–2154.
28.
JabbourC.J.C.SantosF.C.A.NaganoM.S.
(2010). Contributions of HRM Throughout the Stages of
Environmental Management: Methodological Triangulation Applied to Companies in
Brazil. The International Journal of Human Resource
Management, 21(7),
1049–1089.
29.
KolkA.
(2000). Economics of Environmental Management.Harlow, UK: Pearson Education
Ltd.
MasurelE.
(2007). Why SMEs Invest in Environmental Measures:
Sustainability Evidence from Small and Medium—Sized Printing Firms.
Business Strategy and the Environment, 16,
190–201.
32.
MillardD.HooperP.StubbsM.TilleyF.
(2005). Inter—organizational Learning Networks, Waste
Minimization Projects and SMEs: Towards a Conceptual Framework. In
OehmeI.SeebacherU.
(Eds), Corporate Sustainability.München, Wien:
Profil.
33.
MillardD.
(2007). Environmental Learning and SMEs: The Role of Waste
Minimization Projects'. Unpublished PhD
thesis.
34.
PettsJ.
(2000). Smaller Enterprises and the Environment:
Organizational Learning Potential. In FinemanS.
(ed.), The Business of Greening.London, New York,
Routledge.
35.
PorterM.E.Van der
LindeC. (1995).
Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate.
Harvard Business Review, September-October.
36.
RaelinJ.
(2001). Public Reflection as the Basis of
Learning. Management Learning,
32(1),
11–30.
37.
RamusC.A.
(2002). Encouraging Innovative Environmental Actions: What
Companies and Managers Must Do. Journal of World
Business, 37,
151–164.
38.
RevellA.RutherfoordR.
(2003). UK Environmental Policy and the Small Firm:
Broadening the Focus. Business Strategy and the
Environment, (12),
26–35.
39.
RevellA.BlackburnR.
(2007). The Business Case for Sustainability? An Examination
of Small Firms in the UK's Construction and Restaurant Sectors.
Business Strategy and the Environment,
16(3),
404–420.
40.
RevellA.
(2010). Small Businesses and the Environment: Turning Over a
New Leaf. Business Strategy and the Environment,
19, 273–28.
41.
RoomeN.WijenF.
(2005). Stakeholder Power and Organizational
Learning. Corporate Environmental Management,
10, 69–76.
42.
RothenbergS.
(2003). Knowledge Content and Worker Participation in
Environmental Management at NUMMI. Journal of Management
Studies, 40(7),
1783–1802.
43.
SchaperM.
(2002). Small firms and environmental
management. International Small Business Journal,
20(3),
235–251.
44.
ScheinE.H.
(1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership.San Francisco: Jossey
Bass.
45.
Seiler-HausmannJ—D.LiedtkeC.von
WeizsäckerE.U.
(2004). Eco—efficiency and Beyond: Towards the Sustainable
Enterprise.Sheffield: Greenleaf
Publishing.
46.
SengeP.M.
(1990). The Fifth Discipline — The Art and Practice of the Learning
Organization, London, UK:
Doubleday.
47.
ShrivastavaP.
(1995). The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological
Sustainability. Academy of Management Review,
20(4),
936–960.
48.
SimpsonM.TaylorN.BarkerK.
(2004). Environmental Responsibility in SMEs: Does it
Deliver Competitive Advantage?Business Strategy and the Environment,
13(3),
156–171.
49.
SmithM.
(1998). Small Business and Environmental Issues in the UK and the
Netherlands: A Literature Review and Research Agenda.Birmingham: The Groundwork
Foundation.
50.
SpenceL.
(1999). Does Size Matter? The State of the Art in Small
Business Ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review,
8(3),
163–174.
51.
StoneL.
(2006a). Limitations of Cleaner Production Programmes as
Organizational Change Agents. I. Achieving Commitment and On—going
Improvement. Journal of Cleaner Production,
14, 1–14.
52.
StoneL.
(2006b). Limitations of Cleaner Production Programmes as
Organizational Change Agents. II. Leadership, Support, Communication, Involvement and
Programme Design. Journal of Cleaner Production,
14, 15–30.
53.
StraussA.CorbinJ.
(1994). Grounded Theory Methodology: An
Overview. In DenzinK.H.LincolnY.S.,
Handbook of Qualitative Research.London: Thousand Oaks.
54.
TilleyF.
(1999). The Gap between Environmental Attitudes and the
Environmental Behaviour of Small Firms. Business Strategy and
the Environment, 8,
238–248.
55.
TilleyF.HooperP.D.WalleyE.
(2003). Sustainability and Competitiveness: Are There Mutual
Advantages for SMEs. In JonesO.TilleyF.
(Eds.), Competitive Advantage in SMEs: Organising for Innovation and
Change.Chichester, UK:
Wiley.
56.
TomerJ.F.
(1999). The Human Firm: A Socio—economic Analysis of its Behaviour
and Potential in a New Economic Age.London and New York:
Routledge.
57.
VickersI.Cordey—HayesM.
(1999). Cleaner Production and Organizational
Learning. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management,
11(1),
75–94.
