This paper proposes that Green HRM can meet its full potential only by considering
employees in their twofold role as producers and consumers. Employees learn different
kinds of behaviour not exclusively at the workplace, but also in private life. Since
reciprocal interactions between working life and private life occur, a “green work-life
balance concept” is suggested to facilitate environmentally friendly behaviour in both
life domains. The concept offers chances not only for the environment, but also for the
company and its employees by increasing, for example, work motivation and job retention.
However, challenges like employees' reactance to allow corporate influence on private life
need to be addressed.
AntoniC.BauerC.
(2005). Umweltmanagementsysteme und betriebliches
Umweltverhalten — mehr Schein als Sein?Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie,
49, 57–68.
2.
BarnettR. C.HydeJ. S.
(2001). Women, Men, Work, and Family. An Expansionist
Theory. American Psychologist,
56(10),
781–796.
3.
BergerI. E.KanetkarV.
(1995). Increasing Environmental Sensitivity via Workplace
Experiences. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing,
14(2),
205–215.
4.
BerroneP.Gomez-MejiaL.
(2009). Environmental Performance and Executive
Compensation: An Integrated Agency-institutional Perspective.
Academy of Management Journal, 52(1),
103–126.
5.
BianchiS.CasperL. M.KingBerkowitz
R. (Eds.) (2003). Work,
Family, Health, and Well-being. National Institute of Child
Health and Human Development. Mahawa, New
Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
6.
BirdA.
(1996). Training for Environmental
Improvement. In WehrmeyerW.,
Greening People. Human Resources and Environmental Management.Sheffield: Greenleaf
Publishing.
BrehmJ.W.SenseningJ.ShabanJ.
(1966). The Attractiveness of an Eliminated Choice
Alternative. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
2, 301–313.
9.
BrioJ.A.FernandezE.JunqueraB.
(2007). Management and Employee Involvement in Achieving an
Environmental Action-based Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study.
The International Journal of HRM,
18(4),
491–522.
10.
BroughP.HoltJ.BauldR.BiggsA.RyanC.
(2006). The Ability of Work Life Balance Policies to
Influence Key Social, Organizational Issues. Asia Pacific
Journal of Human Resources, 46(3),
261–274.
11.
BroughP.O'DriscollM. P.KalliathJ.
(2005). The Ability of ‘Family Friendly’ Organizational
Resources to Predict Work-family Conflict and Job and Family
Satisfaction. Stress and Health, 21,
223–234.
12.
CascioJ.WoodsideG.MitchellP.
(1996). ISO 14000 Guide: The New International Environmental
Management Standards.Columbus: McGraw-Hill
Professional.
13.
ChaoT. G.O'Leary-KellyA. M.WolfS.KleinH. J.GardnerP. D.
(1994). Organizational Socialization: Its Content and
Consequences. Journal of applied Psychology,
79(5),
730–743.
14.
ClarkS.
C. (2000). Work, Family
Border Theory: A New Theory of Work, Family Balance. Human
Relations, 53(6),
747–770.
15.
CraneA.
(1995). Rhetoric and Reality in the Greening of
Organizational Culture. Greener Management
International, 12,
49–62.
16.
DailyB.BishopJ. W.GovindarajuluN.
(2008). A Conceptual Model for Organizational Citizenship
Behavior. Directed toward the Environment. Business &
Society, 48(2),
243–256.
17.
DailyB. F.HuangS. C.
(2001). Achieving Sustainability through Attention to Human
Resource Factors in Environmental Management. International
Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21,
1539–1552.
18.
EdwardsJ.RothbardN.
(2000). Mechanisms Linking Work and Family: Clarifying the
Relationship between Work and Family Constructs. Academy of
Management Review, 25(1),
178–199.
19.
ElloyD. F.SmithC. R.
(2003). Patterns of Stress, Work-family Conflict, Role
Conflict, Role Ambiguity and Overload among Dual Career Couples: An Australian
Study. Cross Cultural Management,
10(1),
55–66.
European Environmental Agency
(2010). The European Environment. State and Outlook 2010.
Consumption and the Environment.Luxembourg: Publication Office of the
European Union.
22.
FernandezE.JunqueraB.OrdizM.
(2003). Organizational Culture and Human Resources in the
Environmental Issue: A Review of the Literature. The
International Journal of HRM, 14(4),
634–656.
23.
FleetwoodS.
(2007). Why Work-life Balance now?The International Journal of HRM, 18(3),
387–400.
24.
FombrunC. J.GardbergN. A.BarnettM. L.
(2000). Opportunity Platforms and Safety nets: Corporate
Citizenship and Reputational Risk. Business and Society
Review, 105(1),
85–106.
25.
FreimannJ.SchwedesR.
(2000). EMAS Experiences in German Companies: A Survey on
Empirical Studies. Eco-management and Auditing,
7, 99–105.
26.
FroneM. R.RussellM.CooperM. L.
(1992). Antecedents and Outcomes of Work-family Conflict:
Testing a model of the Work-family Interface. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 77,
65–78.
27.
GovindarajuluN.DailyB. F.
(2004). Motivating Employees for Environmental
Improvement. Industrial Management & Data Systems,
104(4),
364–372.
28.
GreenhausJ. H.BeuttellN. J.
(1985). Sources of Conflict between Work and Family
Roles. Academy of Management Review,
10, 76–88.
29.
GreenhausJ. H.PowellG.
(2006). When Work and Family are Allies: A Theory of Work
and Family Enrichment. Academy of Management Review,
31(1),
72–92.
30.
GuestD.
E. (2002). Perspectives
on the Study of Work-life Balance. Social Science
Information, 41(2),
255–279.
31.
HamschmidtJ.
(1998). Auswirkungen von Umweltmanagementsystemen nach EMAS
und ISO 14 001 in Unternehmen — eine Bestandsaufnahme empirischer
Studien. IWö-Diskussionsbeitrag Nr. 65,.
St Gallen:
IWö.
32.
HansenU.SchraderU.
(1997). A Modern Model of Consumption for a Sustainable
Society. Journal of Consumer Policy,
20 (4),
443–468.
33.
HarrisL.CraneA.
(2002). The Greening of Organizational Culture: Management
Views on the Depth, Degree and Diffusion of Change. Journal of
Organizational Change Management, 15(3),
214–234.
34.
HaydenA.
(1997). Sharing the Work, Sparing the Planet: Reduced Work
Time, Overconsumption and Ecological Sustainability. Master
thesis. Ontario, Canada: York
University.
35.
HeimerlA.
(2002). Strukturwandel der Arbeit und nachhaltiger Konsum.
In Umweltbundesamt, Sozialwissenschaftliche Analysen zu
Veränderungsmöglichkeiten nachhaltiger Konsummuster.Berlin: Unesco-Verbindungsstelle im
Umweltbundesamt.
36.
HildebrandtE.
(1999). Flexible Arbeit und nachhaltige Lebensführung.Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum
Berlin.
37.
JabbourC. J.SantosF. C. A.
(2008). The Central Role of HRM in the Search for
Sustainable Organizations. The International Journal of
HRM, 19(12),
2133–2154.
38.
JacksonS.
L. (1997). The ISO 14001
Implementation Guide: Creating an Integrated Management System.Hoboken: John Wiley &
Sons.
39.
KaiserS.RinglstetterM.ReindlC. U.StolzM. L.
(2010). Die Wirkung von Work-Life Balance Initiativen auf
das Mitarbeitercommitment: Eine empirische Untersuchung in der
Unternehmensberatungsbranche. Zeitschrift für
Personalforschung, 24(3),
231–265.
40.
KanterR.
M. (1977). Work and Family in
the United States: A Critical Review and Agenda for Research and Policy.New York: Russell Sage
Foundation.
41.
KonradA.MangelR.
(2000). The Impact of Work-life Programs on Firm
Productivity. Strategic Management Journal,
21, 1225–1237.
42.
KossekE.
E. (2003). Workplace
Policies and Practices to Support Work and Family. In BianchiS.CasperL.M.KingBerkowitz
R. (Eds.), Work, Family, Health, and
Well-being. National Institute of Child Health and Human
Development. Mahwah, New Jersey:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43.
KossekE. E.LambertS.
(2005). Work and Life Integration: Organizational, Cultural, and
Individual Perspectives.Mahawa, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
44.
LambertS.
J. (1990). Processes
Linking Work and Family: A Critical Review and Research Agenda.
Human Relations, 43,
239–257.
45.
LeaS. E. G.WebleyP.
(1997). Pride in Economic Psychology.
Journal of Economic Psychology,
18(2–3),
323–340.
46.
MadsenH.UlhoiJ. P.
(2001). Greening of Human Resources: Environmental Awareness
and Training Interests within the Workforce. Industrial
Management & Data Systems, 101(2),
57–63.
47.
MaignanI.FerrellO. C.HultG. T. M.
(1999). Corporate Citizenship: Cultural Antecedents and
Business Benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing
Science, 27(4),
455–469.
48.
MarksS. R.MacDermidS. M.
(1996). Multiple Roles and the Self: A Theory of Role
Balance. Journal of Marriage and the Family,
58, 417–432.
49.
MassoudJ. A.DailyB. F.BishopJ. W.
(2008). Reward for Environmental Performance: Using the
Scanlon Plan as Catalyst to Green Organisations. International
Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment,
4(1),
15–31.
50.
MoschisG. P.ChurchillG. A.
(1978). Consumer Socialization: A Theoretical and Empirical
Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research,
15, 599–609.
51.
MusterV.
(2011). Companies Promoting Sustainable Consumption of
Employees. Journal of Consumer Policy,
34(1),
161–174.
52.
NeyerA.-K.BullingerA.C.MösleinK.M.
(2009). Integrating Inside and Outside Innovators: A
Sociotechnical Systems Perspective. R&D Management,
39(4),
410–419.
53.
OECD (2002).
Towards Sustainable Household Consumption? Trends and Policies in OECD
Countries.Paris: OECD
Publication.
54.
PetersonD.K.
(2004). Benefits of Participation in Corporate Volunteer
Programs: Employees' Perceptions. Personnel Review,
33(6),
615–627.
55.
PillerF.T.WalcherD.
(2006). Toolkits for Idea Competitions: A Novel Method to
Integrate Users in New Product Development. R&D
Management, 36(3),
307–318.
56.
PiotrkowskiC.
S. (1979). Work and the Family
System.New York: Free
Press.
57.
Pitt-CatsouphesM.KossekE. E.SweetS. A.
(Eds.) (2006). The Work and Family Handbook. Multi-disciplinary
Perspectives and Approaches.Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
58.
RamusC.
A. (2001).
Organizational Support for Employees: Encouraging Creative Ideas for
Environmental Sustainability. California Management
Review, 43(3),
85–105.
59.
RamusC.
A. (2002). Encouraging
Innovative Environmental Actions: What Companies and Managers Must Do.
Journal of World Business, 37,
151–164.
60.
RashidN. R. N. A.WahidN. A.SaadN. M.
(2006). Employees Involvement in EMS, ISO 14001 and its
Spillover Effects in Consumer Environmentally Responsible Behaviour.
International Conference on Environment Proceedings (ICENV 2006), 13th-15th
November 2006. Penang,
Malaysia.
ReusswigF.
(1994). Lebensstile und Ökologie. Gesellschaftliche Pluralisierung
und alltagsökologische Entwicklung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des
Energiebereichs.Frankfurt a.M.:
IKO.
63.
RiechmannC.
(2000). Deklarierte und gelebte Ökologieorientierung in
Unternehmungen. Konzept, Fallstudien, Gestaltungshinweise.München, Mering: Rainer Hampp
Verlag.
64.
RinkD.
(2002). Lebensstile und Nachhaltigkeit. Konzepte, Befunde und
Potentiale.Opladen: Leske +
Budrich.
65.
RiordanC. M.GatewoodR. D.BarnesB.
(1997). Corporate Image: Employee Reactions and Implications
for Managing Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business
Ethics, 16(4),
401–412.
66.
RothbardN.
(2001). Enriching or Depleting? The Dynamics of Engagement
in Work and Family Roles -Statistical Data Included.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 46,
655–684.
67.
RothbardN.PhillipsK.DumasT.
(2005). Managing Multiple Roles: Work-family Policies and
Individuals' Desires for Segmentation. Organization
Science, 16(3),
243–258.
68.
RyanA. M.KossekE. E.
(2008). Work-life Policy Implementation: Breaking down or
Creating Barriers to Inclusiveness?Human Resource Management Journal, 47(2),
295–310.
69.
ScheinE.
H. (2004). Organizational
Culture and Leadership.3rd edition, San Francisco:
Jossey Bass Wiley.
70.
SchultzI.SeebacherU.
(2010). Sustainable Behaviour at Work and in Private Life.
Preconditions, Measures and Tools for Promoting a Spillover.
Conference Proceedings of the 14th European Roundtable on Sustainable
Consumption and Production (ERSCP), 25 – 29 October 2010, Delft,
Netherlands.
71.
SöderholmP.
(2010). Environmental Policy and Household Behaviour:
Sustainability and Everyday Life.London:
Earthscan.
72.
StegerU.
(2000). Environmental Management Systems: Empirical Evidence
and further Perspectives. European Management Journal,
1, 23–37.
73.
SternP. C.DietzT.RuttanV. W.SocolowR. H.SweeneyJ. L.
(1997). Environmentally Significant Consumption.Washington, DC: National Academy
Press.
74.
StringerL.
(2009). The Green Workplace. Sustainable Strategies that Benefit
Employees, the Environment, and the Bottom Line.New York: Palgrave
Macmillan.
75.
ThompsonC. A.BeauvaisL. L.AllenT. A.
(2006). Work and Family from an Industrial, Organizational
Psychology Perspective. In Pitt-CatsouphesM.KossekE.E.SweetS.A.
(Eds.), The Work and Family Handbook. Multi-disciplinary Perspectives and
Approaches (pp. 283–307). Mahwah,
New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, 283–307.
76.
ThompsonJ. A.BundersonJ. S.
(2001). Work-nonwork Conflict and the Phenomenology of Time.
Beyond the Balance Metaphor. Work and occupation,
28(1),
17–39.
77.
WeeY. S.QuaziH. A.
(2005). Development and Validation of Critical Factors of
Environmental Management. Industrial Management & Data
Systems, 105(1),
96–114.
78.
WehrmeyerW.
(1996). Greening People. Human Resources and Environmental
Management.Sheffield: Greenleaf
Publishing.
79.
WehrmeyerW.ParkerK. T.
(1996). Identification and Relevance of Environmental
Corporate Cultures as Part of a Coherent Environmental Policy. In
WehrmeyerW.,
Greening People. Human Resources and Environmental Management.Sheffield: Greenleaf
Publishing.
80.
WoodsideG.AurrichioP.YturriJ.
(1998). ISO 14001.New York:
McGraw-Hill.
81.
ZedeckS.
(Ed.) (1992). Work, Family and Organizations.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Publishers.
